One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: tiger till i die on April 03, 2010, 08:05:03 PM

Title: Paterson
Post by: tiger till i die on April 03, 2010, 08:05:03 PM
Paterson ... why did we get rid of him again?
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: Tigermonk on April 03, 2010, 08:08:31 PM
It will be one of Richmond's biggest mistakes  :banghead
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 03, 2010, 09:36:16 PM
Yep, why did we get rid of him ::)
There 15 goals up and Patto has 25 dreamteam points half way through the last quarter .
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: 3121 on April 03, 2010, 09:37:45 PM
It will be one of Richmond's biggest mistakes  :banghead


Maybe you can tell us his strengths and also tell us what position he owned?
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 03, 2010, 09:40:15 PM
Belongs at Coburg Reserves.
Strengths, the players say he is a joke star ::)
Worst player to play AFL for a long time.
Some people think that if your 6ft 5ins , your a walk up start,
ABILITY HELPS
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on April 03, 2010, 10:03:27 PM
St Kilda could afford to play him tonight.

King and Gardiner are two ruckmen who have an excellent ability to tap down to their mids get to alot of contests are very physical and have on field prescence and in Gardiners cas can rest in the fwd line and he can kick 2 or 3 goals in a match.

Even McEvoy should be in front of Patto. Another St Kilda top up player. From an era where Thomas didn't believe in a ruckman Lyon has more than his fair share of them even though Patto it must be said is no ruckman even though he may have been named as ruckman on the team sheet.
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: Ramps on April 03, 2010, 10:07:32 PM
AVERAGE PLAYER IN A VERY VERY GOOD TEAM!
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: TigerTimeII on April 04, 2010, 12:20:21 AM
ross lyon loves him, he will come good wait and see


way better than simmonds too!
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: Harro80 on April 04, 2010, 12:35:05 AM
I never liked his stupid tounge action before he kicked the ball. LOL.
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: Danog on April 04, 2010, 02:02:02 AM
Would have kept him over Graham.
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: yellowandback on April 04, 2010, 07:34:18 AM
Belongs at Coburg Reserves.
Strengths, the players say he is a joke star ::)
Worst player to play AFL for a long time.
Some people think that if your 6ft 5ins , your a walk up start,
ABILITY HELPS

this is not a Troy Simmonds thread, although you are spot on. ;D
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: jackstar is back again on April 04, 2010, 07:37:19 AM
Would have kept him over Graham.

Both have little ability
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: RollsRoyce on April 04, 2010, 08:26:01 AM
Paterson ... why did we get rid of him again?

It's "Pattison" by the way. And I don't reckon he'll be any great loss.
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: Chuck17 on April 04, 2010, 08:30:51 AM
He is an ordinary player at best
Title: Re: Paterson
Post by: Stripes on April 04, 2010, 08:42:45 AM
He stood out like dogs balls last night. As he always has, seemed in slow motion. He missed an easy goal, couldn't make tackles stick, fumbled the ball and was embarrassing. Was reasonable in the center bounces which he always was for us but probably the only talent he showed all night was to encourage his team-mates after they kicked a goal. Always seemed a nice bloke but despite our current dearth of ruck talent, he was never going to be our answer in the ruck let alone up forward.

Nice guy but will never be more than a backup ruckman in a reasonable side at best.

Stripes