One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on June 26, 2016, 12:45:24 AM

Title: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 26, 2016, 12:45:24 AM
Hampson needing scans on his knee?

Rioli possibly back?


Fire away your changes ....
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on June 26, 2016, 06:27:09 AM
Get rid of hunt.

Vickery can p o as well
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Jackstar 1960 on June 26, 2016, 08:03:50 AM
Hunt stays
Watching the game yesterday , it was obvious they look for Hunt as the release player out of D50 with run and carry
Teammates aren't scared to give the ball to him either
Vickery has to go
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: The Machine on June 26, 2016, 09:12:13 AM
Hunt played a great game yesterday. He covered when required and ran hard all day. Cant be dropped on that performance.
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 26, 2016, 09:17:29 AM
Hunt played a great game yesterday. He covered when required and ran hard all day. Cant be dropped on that performance.

Agree thought he was in pur best half dozen becuae he gave us 4 good quarters unlike some of his more big-name teammates

Reckon Hampson will miss
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Yeahright on June 26, 2016, 10:55:24 AM
Hunt should have his papers stamped after the worst game from an AFL player ever. Bring C.Ellis back in for him
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: mat073 on June 26, 2016, 10:59:55 AM
No way Hunt will get dropped.  Was ok yesterday.

They should drop Vickery but won't.

Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on June 26, 2016, 11:16:32 AM
Mixed good with bad. Pooed his pants on 3 to 4 occasions instead of keeping his eyes on the ball and making the play....
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on June 26, 2016, 11:28:17 AM
Hunt panics and poos himself. Also pulls out of contests when he hears footsteps. Some laughable mistakes.

 He looked ok on the outside at times yesterday but thats because there was ZERO pressure from Brisbane at those times (i.e. no Brisbane players nearby). Easy ball. Even i would have looked good.

Any other team who makes him accountable and he crumbles.

Watch the replay.

Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Raoul Duke on June 26, 2016, 11:44:18 AM
Wouldn't even play him in the 2's, he's a cancer and should be cut from the list.
Players that panic and poo themselves when ever the slightest pressure is around should not be selected its that simple.

You cant ask certain players to GO when its their turn and then have spud's like him squib it.

Worst player on our list easily.
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Andyy on June 26, 2016, 12:19:39 PM
Vickery should be shot.

Honestly we should all conspire together. Nothing lethal, maybe just a toe or something so he can never play again.


Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on June 26, 2016, 12:27:33 PM
Vickery should be shot.

Honestly we should all conspire together. Nothing lethal, maybe just a toe or something so he can never play again.


Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Hes playing like he knows hes going to be moved to another club.

More bronx cheers yesterday and that look at the crowd when he kicked the goal was like 'eff you lot'
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: tony_montana on June 26, 2016, 12:45:27 PM
Vickery should be shot.

Honestly we should all conspire together. Nothing lethal, maybe just a toe or something so he can never play again.


Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Hes playing like he knows hes going to be moved to another club.

More bronx cheers yesterday and that look at the crowd when he kicked the goal was like 'eff you lot'

or it could be a look "eff you lot dimma is giving me another contract haha sucked in"
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Yeahright on June 26, 2016, 01:39:23 PM

Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Why would he play like that then? Not doing himself any favours. Plus surely Dimma wouldn't play him if he's turning that poo in just in spite
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Stalin on June 26, 2016, 01:51:46 PM

Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Why would he play like that then? Not doing himself any favours. Plus surely Dimma wouldn't play him if he's turning that poo in just in spite

Of course he would play him

Dimma take the one week at a time mantra too literally.
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: mat073 on June 26, 2016, 01:57:43 PM
Vickery should be shot.



Honestly we should all conspire together. Nothing lethal, maybe just a toe or something so he can never play again.


Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Hes playing like he knows hes going to be moved to another club.

More bronx cheers yesterday and that look at the crowd when he kicked the goal was like 'eff you lot'

If the kind of "comments " coming over the fence - from Richmond supporters are reflective of the post Andyy just put up...can you blame him .
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on June 26, 2016, 02:09:22 PM
Vickery should be shot.



Honestly we should all conspire together. Nothing lethal, maybe just a toe or something so he can never play again.


Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Hes playing like he knows hes going to be moved to another club.

More bronx cheers yesterday and that look at the crowd when he kicked the goal was like 'eff you lot'

If the kind of "comments " coming over the fence - from Richmond supporters are reflective of the post Andyy just put up...can you blame him .

I have no position other than hes supposed to be a professional athlete, hes a poo player, and the sooner hes gone the better.

Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: TigerMonk on June 26, 2016, 03:27:49 PM
Hunt is a chicken footballer. Vickery should dominate against opposition like Brisbane. Its time to get rid of Vickery in the trade. Trade Astbury also as  he has NFI & is another Hunt. Bellis  = one of the worst AFL players l have ever seen. reminds me of a lazy Chris Tarrant who got a wake up call when he thought he was untouchable from selectors.

Out; Astbury, Vickery, Hunt, Bellis Hampson

In; Rioli, Griffiths, Maric, C. Ellis. Butler
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on June 26, 2016, 03:35:29 PM
Outs: Martin too much fancy kicks
         Cotchin cannot kick a goal with a set shot
         Rance, Stefan Martin owned him in the last
         Jack kicked 4.4 and just doesn't do enough with his opportunities.
         Hampson if injured

Ins:   Moore can replace Martin against his old side
         Batchelor is a clear like for like with Cotch
         Chappy for Rance is the obvious choice
         Griff for Jack
         Ivan for Hammer


 
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on June 26, 2016, 03:37:22 PM
Hunt is a chicken footballer. Vickery should dominate against opposition like Brisbane. Its time to get rid of Vickery in the trade. Trade Astbury also as  he has NFI & is another Hunt. Bellis  = one of the worst AFL players l have ever seen. reminds me of a lazy Chris Tarrant who got a wake up call when he thought he was untouchable from selectors.

Out; Astbury, Vickery, Hunt, Bellis Hampson

In; Rioli, Griffiths, Maric, C. Ellis. Butler

Jack has 8 shots at goal and kicks 4.4 wtf.
Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.
Jack should be traded for a mars bar and a small egg flip Big M.
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Yeahright on June 26, 2016, 06:54:55 PM

Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.

I know you are trolling but this is actually completely incorrect :lol
Title: Maric in line to replace injured Tiger Hampson (afl site)
Post by: one-eyed on June 27, 2016, 02:15:53 PM
Maric in line to replace injured Tiger Hampson

Nathan Schmook and Nat Edwards 
AFL.com.au
June 27, 2016



OUT-OF-FAVOUR ruckman Ivan Maric looms as a likely replacement for Richmond big man Shaun Hampson in Friday night's clash against Port Adelaide after being withdrawn from the VFL on Sunday.

Hampson suffered a right knee injury in Saturday's clash against the Brisbane Lions, limping from the field in the final three minutes after landing awkwardly on his knee in a ruck contest.

Given the Tigers' six-day break – and a five-day break for players pushing their case in the VFL – Maric was withdrawn on Sunday and could be called on to play his first AFL game in two months.

Maric, the Tigers' joint vice-captain, has been overtaken by Hampson this season after a back injury held him back in the early rounds.

He is yet to find his best form in the VFL and has not played at any level in two weeks given the Tigers' VFL bye in round 13.

Despite the short turnaround, Hampson was confident he would be fit to face the Power on Friday night.

He told AFL.com.au on Sunday morning he was unlikely to need a scan on his knee, and was optimistic about his chances of playing the Power in six days' time.

"It's not too bad," Hampson said.

"I just stirred up an existing injury, so it won't be an issue, I don't think.

"I just landed a bit awkwardly and stirred the medial up. The short break doesn’t help, but I think I'll be good."

The former Blue has been in career-best form, cementing himself as Richmond's No.1 ruckman over the past two months.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-06-27/shaun-hampson-confident-of-being-fit-to-face-port-adelaide
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: tony_montana on June 27, 2016, 02:34:35 PM

Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.

I know you are trolling but this is actually completely incorrect :lol

yep he was trying to pass it - woah, even when he's not having a ping he nails them  :snidegrin
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 27, 2016, 02:40:33 PM
The Barometer - Round 15

Herald-Sun
27 June 2016


RICHMOND

ON THE BLOCK: Shaun Hampson limped off in the closing minutes with a sore right knee, but Damien Hardwick was confident he would be fine. Hardwick also defended Ty Vickery, who while creating chances for others, failed to cash in on his side’s dominance up the ground and was again quiet. Nathan Broad and Jacob Townsend came were late inclusions, with the former on debut the more impressive.

ON THE CUSP: Ben Griffiths pulled out of the side on Friday night with a virus before Jake Batchelor did the same on the morning of the match. Both will be fit to take on Port Adelaide on Friday night.

SAM EDMUND’S VERDICT: If a win has told us any less about a side we would be amazed. Distinctly average against an abysmal Brisbane Lions outfit, but average was enough to secure the win. Speaking of wins, that’s five of the last six and Tigers fans will be starting to believe all over again. But Port Adelaide is up next across the border, which promises to provide a far more accurate gauge of exactly where this side is at. Is it just a mid-table battler or are we witnessing another late-season surge?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/footy-form/the-barometer-how-do-your-clubs-playing-stocks-look-after-round-14/news-story/bbc7f42442f66f19e94818a33e1691c2
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 28, 2016, 03:58:51 AM
Hampson is just 50/50 to play according to Mark Stevens on Ch 7 last night.
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: wayne on June 28, 2016, 09:36:21 AM
Hunt is a chicken footballer. Vickery should dominate against opposition like Brisbane. Its time to get rid of Vickery in the trade. Trade Astbury also as  he has NFI & is another Hunt. Bellis  = one of the worst AFL players l have ever seen. reminds me of a lazy Chris Tarrant who got a wake up call when he thought he was untouchable from selectors.

Out; Astbury, Vickery, Hunt, Bellis Hampson

In; Rioli, Griffiths, Maric, C. Ellis. Butler

Jack has 8 shots at goal and kicks 4.4 wtf.
Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.
Jack should be traded for a mars bar and a small egg flip Big M.

 :lol
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Chuck17 on June 28, 2016, 11:11:03 AM
Hampson is just 50/50 to play according to Mark Stevens on Ch 7 last night.

Normally plays at 25/75 so thats a bonus
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Stalin on June 28, 2016, 11:17:45 AM
Hampson is just 50/50 to play according to Mark Stevens on Ch 7 last night.

75/25 to fake injury when he is gettin beaten
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: torch on June 28, 2016, 04:08:38 PM
25% fit Hampson is better than a 100% Maric.
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: torch on June 28, 2016, 04:41:03 PM
IN:

McBean, Griffiths, Rioli, C.Ellis

OUT:

Townsend, Vickery, Broad, Lambert

Team v Port Adelaide

B: Hunt, Rance, Grimes

HB: Vlastuin, Astbury, Short

C: C.Ellis, Martin, B.Ellis

HF: Deledio, Griffiths, Edwards

F: Rioli, Riewoldt, McBean

R: Hampson, Cotchin, Miles

I: Grigg, Lloyd, Menadue, Conca
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on June 28, 2016, 08:40:20 PM
IN:

McBean, Griffiths, Rioli, C.Ellis

OUT:

Townsend, Vickery, Broad, Lambert

Team v Port Adelaide

B: Hunt, Rance, Grimes

HB: Vlastuin, Astbury, Short

C: C.Ellis, Martin, B.Ellis

HF: Deledio, Griffiths, Edwards

F: Rioli, Riewoldt, McBean

R: Hampson, Cotchin, Miles

I: Grigg, Lloyd, Menadue, Conca
Nice but won't happen... :banghead
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 28, 2016, 09:54:11 PM
In the mix: round 15

AFL.com.au
28 June 2016


RICHMOND

Ruckman Ivan Maric is waiting in the wings if big man Shaun Hampson doesn't recover from a knee injury this week. The Tigers say Hampson is a 50/50 proposition to face the Power after he stirred up a medial ligament injury. Maric was pulled out of the VFL on Sunday to keep him available for Friday night's clash against Port Adelaide and would be playing his first game since round six if selected.

Key forward Ben Griffiths (illness) and defender Jake Batchelor (hamstring soreness) are both expected to be available this week after being withdrawn late against the Brisbane Lions.

Rookie Adam Marcon has been banging the door down in the VFL and racked up another 27 possessions and two goals at the weekend. The Tigers have room to elevate the midfielder, but a five-day break after the VFL clash against Collingwood will conspire against Marcon.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-06-28/in-the-mix-round-15
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 28, 2016, 09:57:00 PM
Ruckman Shaun Hampson ran laps at training on Tuesday, after hurting his right knee in the dying minutes of the clash against the Brisbane Lions last Saturday.

His chances of playing received a boost when he trained on Tuesday, with Ellis confident the athletic big man would make the trip.

Jake Batchelor (hamstring tightness) and Ben Griffiths (illness) were late withdrawals from the team who defeated Brisbane last weekend and would also be in selection calculations.

Veteran ruckman Ivan Maric, who has managed just two games this season, was held out of the VFL last weekend as cover for Hampson if he wasn't passed fit.

"They had a fierce pre-season (battle) and Hammer's just come out on top and taken his spot," Ellis said of the internal ruck competition.

"But (Maric) was never going to give up.

"He has that never-say-die attitude ... it's always good to have that competition."

https://au.sports.yahoo.com/afl/a/31938302/hampson-on-the-improve-for-tigers-in-afl/#page1
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 30, 2016, 05:57:24 AM
The Footy Show last night had Castagna, Maric, Griffiths and C.Moore coming into the side (on the extended bench).
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on June 30, 2016, 08:53:59 AM
The Footy Show last night had Castagna, Maric, Griffiths and C.Moore coming into the side (on the extended bench).
Has C Moore been elevated?
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: taztiger4 on June 30, 2016, 09:39:56 AM
The Footy Show last night had Castagna, Maric, Griffiths and C.Moore coming into the side (on the extended bench).
Has C Moore been elevated?

No, It was on the Footy show , not much fact or thought process in anything there
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Jackstar 1960 on June 30, 2016, 01:51:49 PM
Ivan is in
Hammer out
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Stalin on June 30, 2016, 01:55:07 PM
You'd be shattered no?
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Jackstar 1960 on June 30, 2016, 02:29:57 PM
You'd be shattered no?

Just driving to the nearest bridge now 😂😂😂
Title: Re: Changes for the Port game?
Post by: Chuck17 on June 30, 2016, 07:16:53 PM
Great it's back to being 18 on 18 again