One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on August 30, 2009, 08:41:09 PM

Title: 2009 National Draft official selections
Post by: one-eyed on August 30, 2009, 08:41:09 PM
2009 AFL National Draft official selections

Richmond picks:  3 (Martin), 19 (Griffiths), 35 (Astbury), 44 (Dea), 51 (Taylor), 67 (Webberley), 71 (Nason), 78 (passed), 89* (Browne), 94* (Nahas)

* - picks for rookie elevations


Priority Pick

1. Tom Scully •••••••••••••••••• Melb

Round 1

2. Jack Trengove •••••••••••••• Melb
3. Dustin Martin ••••••••••••••• Rich
4. Anthony Morabito •••••••••Frem
5. Ben Cunnington ••••••••N Melb
6. Gary Rohan •••••••••••••••••••Syd
7. Bradley Sheppard •••W Coast
8. John Butcher ••••••••••••••••••Port
9. Andrew Moore •••••••••••••••Port
10. Jake Melksham ••••••••••••Ess
11. Jordan Gysberts •••••••••Melb
12. Kane Lucas ••••••••••••••••••Carl
13. Daniel Talia •••••••••••••••••Adel
14. Lewis Jetta •••••••••••••••••••Syd
15. Christian Howard ••••W. Bull
16. Jasper McMillan-Pittard •••Port
17. Daniel Menzel ••••••••••••••Geel

Round 2

18. Luke Tapscott ••••••••••••••Melb
19. Benjamin Griffiths ••••••••Rich
20. Nathan Fyfe ••••••••••••••••Frem
21. Ryan Bastinac ••••••••••N Melb
22. Gerrick Weedon ••••••W Coast
23. Koby Stevens •••••••••W Coast
24. Jake Carlisle ••••••••••••••••••Ess
25. Aaron Black •••••••••••••N Melb
26. Travis Colyer ••••••••••••••••••Ess
27. Callum Bartlett ••••••••••••••Bris
28. Mitchell Duncan •••••••••••Geel
29. Jack Gunston •••••••••••••••Adel
30. Luke Ball •••••••••••••••••••••••Coll
31. Jason Tutt •••••••••••••••••W. Bull
32. Nicholas Winmar ••••••••••St K
33. Anthony Long ••••••••••••••••Ess

Round 3

34. Max Gawn •••••••••••••••••••Melb
35. David Astbury •••••••••••••••Rich
36. Joel Houghton •••••••••••••Frem
37. Jamie MacMillan ••••••N Melb
38. Sam Reid ••••••••••••••••••••••Syd
39. Sam Grimley ••••••••••••••••Haw
40. Allen Christensen •••••••••Geel
41. Ayden Kennedy ••••••••N Melb
42. Nathan Vardy •••••••••••••••Geel
43. Marcus Davies •••••••••••••Carl
44. Matthew Dea ••••••••••••••••Rich
45. Sam Shaw •••••••••••••••••••Adel
46. Benjamin Stratton ••••••••Haw
47. Ryan Harwood •••••••••••••••Bris
48. Jesse Crichton •••••••••••••Frem
49. Dylan Robertson •••••••••Frem

Round 4

50. Jack Fitzpatrick ••••••••••••Melb
51. Troy Taylor •••••••••••••••••••••Rich
52. Justin Bollenhagen ••••••Frem
53. Brayden Norris •••••••••N Melb
54. Byron Sumner •••••••••••••••Syd
55. Trent Dennis-Lane •••••••••Syd
56. Josh Cowan ••••••••••••••••••Geel
57. Jordan Williams ••••••••••••Haw
58. Rhan Hooper ••••••••••••••••Haw
59. Rohan Kerr •••••••••••••••••••Carl
60. Jesse Smith ••••••••••••••••••St K
61. James Craig •••••••••••••••••Adel
62. Ben Sinclair ••••••••••••••••••Coll
63. Lukas Markovic •••••••••W Bull
64. Adam Pattison •••••••••••••St K
65*. Jeremy Laidler ••••••••••••••Geel

Round 5

66. pass •••••••••••••••••••••••••••Melb
67. Jeromey Webberley •••••••Rich
68. pass •••••••••••••••••••••••••••Frem
69. Taylor Duryea••••••••••••••••Haw
70*. Matthew Suckling •••••••••Haw
71. Ben Nason •••••••••••••••••••Rich
72*. Sam Jacobs •••••••••••••••••Carl
73. Jesse O'Brien ••••••••••••••••Bris
74*. Brodie Martin •••••••••••••••Adel
75. Josh Thomas •••••••••••••••••Coll
76. Shane Thorne ••••••••••••W Bull
77. Will Johnson •••••••••••••••••St K

Round 6

78. pass•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••Rich
79*. Greg Broughton •••••••••••Frem
80*. Cruize Garlett •••••••••••N Melb
81. pass •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••Syd
82*. Daniel Stewart •••••••••••••Port
83*. Aaron Joseph •••••••••••••••Carl
84. Bryce Retzlaff ••••••••••••••••Bris
85. Simon Buckley ••••••••••••••Coll
86*. Liam Picken•••••••••••••••W Bull
87*. Zac Dawson •••••••••••••••••St K
88*. Wade Thompson ••••••••••Port

Round 7

89*. Robin Nahas ••••••••••••••••Rich
90*. Kristin Thornton •••••••••••••Syd
91. Matt Maguire ••••••••••••••••Bris
92*. James Mulligan •••••••••W Bull
93*. Luke Miles ••••••••••••••••••••St K

Round 8

94*. Andrew Browne ••••••••••••Rich
95*. Pearce Hanley •••••••••••••••Bris
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: one-eyed on October 09, 2009, 03:49:40 PM
Updated Club-by-Club picks:

Adelaide:     13, 29, 45, 61, 77, 93

Brisbane:     27, 47, 76, 92

Carlton:       12, 43, 59, 75, 91

Collingwood: 30, 62, 78, 94

Essendon:    10, 24, 26, 33, 74, 90

Fremantle:    4, 20, 36, 48, 49, 52, 68, 84

Geelong:      17, 28, 40, 42, 56, 65, 81, 97

Hawthorn:    39, 46, 57, 58, 69, 70, 73, 89

Melbourne:   1, 2, 11, 18, 34, 50, 66, 82

North Melb:  5, 21, 25, 37, 41, 53, 85

Port Adel:     8, 9, 16, 88

Richmond:    3, 19, 35, 44, 51, 67, 72, 83

St Kilda:      32, 60, 64, 80, 96

Sydney:        6, 14, 38, 54, 55, 86 

West Coast:  7, 22, 23, 71, 87

W.Bulldogs:  15, 31, 63, 79, 95
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: WA Tiger on October 12, 2009, 12:32:27 AM
Melbourne have some great picks don't they.. :scream
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: one-eyed on October 16, 2009, 06:23:09 PM
Current Number of Draft Picks per club 16/10/09 - (will change with more delistings)

Adelaide                   4
Brisbane                  4
Carlton                     3
Coll'wood                 3           
Essendon                4           
Fremantle                6             
Geelong                   3                 
Hawthorn                 4       
Melbourne               4     
North Melbourne      4                       
Port Adelaide          3
Richmond               4 (Benny Gale said it'll most likely be 7 picks)
St Kilda                  1       
Sydney                   4
West Coast             3
W.Bulldogs              3


Using the above our later picks would move up the draft quite a bit ----- 3, 19, 34, 42, 47, 58, 59
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: one-eyed on October 31, 2009, 05:05:55 PM
Updated Club-by-Club picks: 

Adelaide (4):     13, 29, 45, 58

Brisbane (5):     27, 47, 64, 67, 68

Carlton (2):       12, 43

Collingwood (3): 30, 59, 65

Essendon (4):    10, 24, 26, 33

Fremantle (6):    4, 20, 36, 48, 49, 51

Geelong (5):      17, 28, 40, 42, 54

Hawthorn (5):    39, 46, 55, 56, 62

Melbourne (5):   1, 2, 11, 18, 34

North Melb (6):  5, 21, 25, 37, 41, 52

Port Adel (3):     8, 9, 16

Richmond (8 ):   3, 19, 35, 44, 50, 61, 63, 66

St Kilda (2):      32, 57

Sydney (4):        6, 14, 38, 53

West Coast (3):  7, 22, 23

W.Bulldogs (3):  15, 31, 60


nb. Based on senior list spots free after the first list lodgements
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/86555/default.aspx
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: torch on October 31, 2009, 08:44:55 PM
i thought Clubs must have a minimum of three picks?

 :)
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: wayne on October 31, 2009, 09:00:03 PM
i thought Clubs must have a minimum of three picks?

 :)

An elevated rookie counts as a pick this year I think??
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: Infamy on November 01, 2009, 02:23:14 AM
i thought Clubs must have a minimum of three picks?

 :)

An elevated rookie counts as a pick this year I think??
Correct, only need to make two picks in the national draft this year and the next few years with GC17 & GWS raiding the drafts
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: one-eyed on November 01, 2009, 04:40:22 AM
Just a minor correction ...... our picks are now 3, 19, 35, 44, 50, 61, 63 and 66.

Some clubs will pass on their last selection to keep one spot on their list open in the PSD. For example if Melbourne doesn't delist anymore players then they'll have to pass at pick 34 so they can get Luke Ball with first pick in the PSD. Likewise Sydney will have to pass at pick 53 so they can grab Bradshaw in the PSD. All up this means there'll probably be only 60 kids selected in total in the National draft this year.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: mightytiges on November 01, 2009, 09:15:24 PM
We'll pass on pick 66 to save a spot for the PSD but it looks like we'll have our first 7 picks inside the top 60 with some clubs pass on their last pick. If some of the top clubs also top up with recycled players in the ND then all the better for us.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: Tigerman on November 05, 2009, 06:30:54 PM
Just a minor correction ...... our picks are now 3, 19, 35, 50, 61, 63 and 66.

Some clubs will pass on their last selection to keep one spot on their list open in the PSD. For example if Melbourne doesn't delist anymore players then they'll have to pass at pick 34 so they can get Luke Ball with first pick in the PSD. Likewise Sydney will have to pass at pick 53 so they can grab Bradshaw in the PSD. All up this means there'll probably be only 60 kids selected in total in the National draft this year.
What happened to pick 44?
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: one-eyed on November 06, 2009, 04:23:48 PM
Just a minor correction ...... our picks are now 3, 19, 35, 50, 61, 63 and 66.

Some clubs will pass on their last selection to keep one spot on their list open in the PSD. For example if Melbourne doesn't delist anymore players then they'll have to pass at pick 34 so they can get Luke Ball with first pick in the PSD. Likewise Sydney will have to pass at pick 53 so they can grab Bradshaw in the PSD. All up this means there'll probably be only 60 kids selected in total in the National draft this year.
What happened to pick 44?
My bad! It's still there. I've edited my post.

So it's picks 3, 19, 35, 44, 50, 61, 63 and 66 although we'll most likely pass at our last pick 66 and keep one spot open for the PSD in which we have pick 2.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: Tigerman on November 06, 2009, 06:05:46 PM
Just a minor correction ...... our picks are now 3, 19, 35, 50, 61, 63 and 66.

Some clubs will pass on their last selection to keep one spot on their list open in the PSD. For example if Melbourne doesn't delist anymore players then they'll have to pass at pick 34 so they can get Luke Ball with first pick in the PSD. Likewise Sydney will have to pass at pick 53 so they can grab Bradshaw in the PSD. All up this means there'll probably be only 60 kids selected in total in the National draft this year.
What happened to pick 44?
My bad! It's still there. I've edited my post.

So it's picks 3, 19, 35, 44, 50, 61, 63 and 66 although we'll most likely pass at our last pick 66 and keep one spot open for the PSD in which we have pick 2.
Goodoh mate, you had me worried there, I was trying to think whether we'd traded it.
Going by that some of our picks will drop down a bit then. Be interesting to see how many other clubs stop early.
Title: Rookie upgrades set for National Draft (afl)
Post by: one-eyed on November 14, 2009, 07:06:17 AM
Rookie elevations this year are actually going to associated with actual draft picks in the National draft. This will stretch out the draft to 95 picks all up with the last 17 picks used for selecting promoted rookies. It's being done to keep in step with the old rule requiring all clubs to have a minimum 3 National draft picks.

Upgraded rookies in 2010:

Adelaide: Brodie Martin
Brisbane Lions: Pearce Hanley
Carlton: Sam Jacobs, Aaron Joseph
Collingwood: Nil
Essendon: Nil
Fremantle: Greg Broughton
Geelong: Jeremy Laidler
Hawthorn: Matthew Suckling
Melbourne: Nil
North Melbourne: Cruize Garlett
Port Adelaide: Daniel Stewart, Wade Thompson
Richmond: Andrew Browne, Robin Nahas
St Kilda: Zac Dawson, Luke Miles
Sydney Swans: Kristin Thornton
West Coast: Nil
Western Bulldogs: James Mulligan, Liam Picken

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/87140/default.aspx


So we'll now have 10 picks all up in the National Draft but our last two picks will be used on Nahas and Browne.

Picks:  3, 19, 35, 44, 51, 67, 71, 78, 89* (Browne), 94* (Nahas)

We'll most likely 'Pass' on another pick to keep a spot free for the PSD.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: one-eyed on November 14, 2009, 07:10:04 AM
2009 NAB AFL Draft order - Club by Club - after 2nd list lodgement

* - rookie elevations

ADELAIDE
No. of selections: five
Selections: 13, 29, 45, 61, 74*

BRISBANE LIONS
No. of selections: six
Selections: 27, 47, 73, 84, 91, 95*

CARLTON
No. of selections: five
Selections: 12, 43, 59, 72*, 83*

COLLINGWOOD
No. of selections: four
Selections: 30, 62, 75, 85

ESSENDON
No. of selections: four
Selections: 10, 24, 26, 33

FREMANTLE
No. of selections: eight
Selections: 4, 20, 36, 48, 49, 52, 68, 79*

GEELONG CATS
No. of selections: six
Selections: 17, 28, 40, 42, 56, 65*

HAWTHORN
No. of selections: six
Selections: 39, 46, 57, 58, 69, 70*

MELBOURNE
No. of selections: seven
Selections: 1, 2, 11, 18, 34, 50, 66

NORTH MELBOURNE
No. of selections: seven
Selections: 5, 21, 25, 37, 41, 53, 80*

PORT ADELAIDE
No. of selections: five
Selections: 8, 9, 16, 82*, 88*

RICHMOND
No. of selections: 10
Selections: 3, 19, 35, 44, 51, 67, 71, 78, 89* (Browne), 94* (Nahas)

ST KILDA
No. of selections: six
Selections: 32, 60, 64, 77, 87*, 93*

SYDNEY SWANS
No. of selections: seven
Selections: 6, 14, 38, 54, 55, 81, 90*

WEST COAST
No. of selections: three
Selections: 7, 22, 23

WESTERN BULLDOGS
No. of selections: six
Selections: 15, 31, 63, 76, 86*, 92*

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/87139/default.aspx
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: Tigerman on November 14, 2009, 08:10:05 PM
RICHMOND
No. of selections: 10
Selections: 3, 19, 35, 44, 51, 67, 71, 78, 89* (Browne), 94* (Nahas)

So perhaps 7 x ND selections and 1 x PSD selection. (plus 2xRookie upgrades)
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: mightytiges on November 15, 2009, 05:01:06 PM
RICHMOND
No. of selections: 10
Selections: 3, 19, 35, 44, 51, 67, 71, 78, 89* (Browne), 94* (Nahas)

So perhaps 7 x ND selections and 1 x PSD selection. (plus 2xRookie upgrades)
That looks the way we are going.

Interesting there were that many further delistings for the 2nd list lodgement giving clubs more picks. Richo was the only forced one out due to injury and retirement  :(. Normally there are hardly any delistings after the end of October. Maybe a number of clubs think there is more value in this draft than first realised.

The idea of reading out promoted rookies late in the National draft seems a waste of time btw. They are already on clubs' senior lists.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: Beren on November 18, 2009, 01:35:34 PM
What's the Pre season draft order? According to a story about McPhee in today's Age Freo have pick 2, I thought we had pick 2.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: mightytiges on November 18, 2009, 04:18:30 PM
What's the Pre season draft order? According to a story about McPhee in today's Age Freo have pick 2, I thought we had pick 2.
That's a mistake in the paper. We have pick 2 and Freo have pick 3. The PSD order is just the reverse order of the ladder for all clubs that have a senior list spot still free on their list. If a club has its full quota (38 players) on its senior list then it can't participate in the PSD.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: Beren on November 18, 2009, 07:08:05 PM
Thnaks MT! :cheers
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: torch on November 24, 2009, 12:05:09 AM
why are the rookie elevations using draft picks?

i thought when you elevate a rookie, that is it, you just elevate them without using a draft pick?

 :)
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: mightytiges on November 24, 2009, 01:23:25 AM
why are the rookie elevations using draft picks?

i thought when you elevate a rookie, that is it, you just elevate them without using a draft pick?

 :)
As far as I know it's to remain consistent with the old rule of all clubs using a minimum of 3 National draft picks.

The new rule just brought in this year is you can count one or more of your promoted rookies as one of those 3 minimum picks. Given it's a compromised and therefore a shallower draft pool for the next 3 years with the new teams coming in, existing AFL clubs may not see the need or want to use as many as 3 National draft picks especially if you're a top side and your 3rd pick is late in the draft where the kids have a low chance of making it. It'll happen more and more when GC17 and GWS hog the first rounds of the draft between 2010-12. An existing club may find it more beneficial for the quality of their playing list to only use their 1st and 2nd picks say and then promote a rookie from within their own playing stocks and have that counted as their "3rd pick".
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: torch on November 24, 2009, 10:37:04 AM
why are the rookie elevations using draft picks?

i thought when you elevate a rookie, that is it, you just elevate them without using a draft pick?

 :)
As far as I know it's to remain consistent with the old rule of all clubs using a minimum of 3 National draft picks.

The new rule just brought in this year is you can count one or more of your promoted rookies as one of those 3 minimum picks. Given it's a compromised and therefore a shallower draft pool for the next 3 years with the new teams coming in, existing AFL clubs may not see the need or want to use as many as 3 National draft picks especially if you're a top side and your 3rd pick is late in the draft where the kids have a low chance of making it. It'll happen more and more when GC17 and GWS hog the first rounds of the draft between 2010-12. An existing club may find it more beneficial for the quality of their playing list to only use their 1st and 2nd picks say and then promote a rookie from within their own playing stocks and have that counted as their "3rd pick".

thank you MT.

will this rule that has been introduced this year continue after 2012?

 :)
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft order
Post by: mightytiges on November 24, 2009, 03:59:24 PM
will this rule that has been introduced this year continue after 2012?

 :)
Not sure torch. With 18 teams accessing the draft pool instead of 16 there'll be an argument to keep it.
Title: Re: 2009 National Draft official selections
Post by: one-eyed on November 27, 2009, 06:44:29 AM
Added the official draft selections in the first post of this thread for easy reference.