One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Ox on March 06, 2010, 05:38:57 PM
-
(http://photos-b.ak.stuff-ash1/hs490.ash1/26809_377995802315_701042315_4917637_7165780_n.jpg)
Tuck
-
Nah,its POLO
-
yeah im pretty sure tuck has bigger arms and legs than him
-
same person
-
New question -
Which current RFC players would you want to have a beer with.
Tucky one of the very few on that list.
-
Deledio so one could bitch slap him and say"Harden the stuff up ya li'l sissy!"
-
Deledio so one could bitch slap him and say"Harden the eff up ya li'l sissy!"
ditto Angus
-
No doubt Will thursfield and Daniel Jackson. :cheers
-
That's good to hear.
I would like to think they had a brain.
-
Deledio so one could bitch slap him and say"Harden the eff up ya li'l sissy!"
ditto Angus
Yeah, I'm sure you'd do that to Angus. ::)
-
Gonad,
realistically we wouldn't/couldn't do it.
it's the thought that counts here......
-
same person
lol. Nah pretty sure Dean Polo isn't Tucky. ;D
-
Deledio so one could bitch slap him and say"Harden the eff up ya li'l sissy!"
ditto Angus
Yeah, I'm sure you'd do that to Angus. ::)
Not too sure why anyone would be scared of Gus. Just ask him what ruckman are meant to do when they haven't got the footy in their hands, he'll be wondering what the stuff just hit him. "we're actually supposed to take marks and touch the ball during games??"
:shh :lol
-
That photo of POLO, just shows to mudlarks climbing prematurely all over him with no sign of the ball. Did he get a free?
-
That photo of POLO, just shows to mudlarks climbing prematurely all over him with no sign of the ball. Did he get a free?
Actually think the mudlark on the right took the mark.
-
Polo needs to learn how to reverse a bit so they face plant.
-
On Polo, I thought he played okay on Friday
-
agree and polo will have a good yr this yr
-
jackstar, who do you think will play in Round 1 out of these players?
Tuck, Polo, White, Collins, Rance, Polak, Gourdis, Taylor, Roberts and Connors?
-
jackstar, who do you think will play in Round 1 out of these players?
Tuck, Polo, White, Collins, Rance, Polak, Gourdis, Taylor, Roberts and Connors?
Tuck, Polo, Collins would be certain I would think.
Connors ?
Dont think they would play Taylor as he aint ready I wouldnt think.. He looks okay but he would get smashed
Would think Farmer and Martin would be the only 1st gamers . Like Farmer :thumbsup
If Browne plays okay next week, he could be a surprise as I think there is a plan to play a tall forward eg Vickery or Simmonds.
Therefore Polak wouldnt play.
Round 1 we will need to expose Carlton defence with height. , dont think Polak is the answer, rather play Vickery as a tall option with some rotation through Simmonds and Browne, although you cant play Browne down forward, he would need to be rotated through bench
Gus wouldnt play thats for certain, didnt touch the ball on Friday Night.
Rance NO
Gourdis, probably not as Thursfield ,Moore and McGaune would hold down back positions you would think
-
jackstar, who do you think will play in Round 1 out of these players?
Tuck, Polo, White, Collins, Rance, Polak, Gourdis, Taylor, Roberts and Connors?
Tuck, Polo, Collins would be certain I would think.
Connors ?
Dont think they would play Taylor as he aint ready I wouldnt think.. He looks okay but he would get smashed
Would think Farmer and Martin would be the only 1st gamers . Like Farmer :thumbsup
If Browne plays okay next week, he could be a surprise as I think there is a plan to play a tall forward eg Vickery or Simmonds.
Therefore Polak wouldnt play.
Round 1 we will need to expose Carlton defence with height. , dont think Polak is the answer, rather play Vickery as a tall option with some rotation through Simmonds and Browne, although you cant play Browne down forward, he would need to be rotated through bench
Gus wouldnt play thats for certain, didnt touch the ball on Friday Night.
Rance NO
Gourdis, probably not as Thursfield ,Moore and McGaune would hold down back positions you would think
cool.
i have read some of your previous post jackstar, and although some people on here think, this and that of you.
i actually agree with A LOT of things you say.
you claim to of been at Richmond. (not for three years now?)
and i am not sure whether you are allowed to say what you did at Richmond, but i am interested to know.
i can only take what people say on here what they claim to know or have heard.
so, it is kind of good that some people can share information like that, but understand the "keep quiet rule".
Simmonds said on SEN, that he has been training as a Ruck and not a forward.
even though, he could still play in the forward line, Simmonds thinks he will not.
just interesting to read what you think.
personally i think we are fudged with Polak at full foward, because i believe he has no idea.
i guess that is why i am hoping/praying Griffiths gets fit quickly!
but i do agree with rotating Simmonds, Vickery as that tall full forward option.
i would rather throw Astbury at full foward then have Polak there!
i think Richmond have shot themselves in the foot saying they are going to promote Polak before Round 1!
:)
-
Would agree with your post.
With Simmonds, it would be great if the club could spring a surprise and the opposition wouldnt have the match up worked out ;)
-
Would agree with your post.
With Simmonds, it would be great if the club could spring a surprise and the opposition wouldnt have the match up worked out ;)
once again, i agree about the Simmonds surprise.
:)
-
would be almost certain that griffiths and astbury wont play rnd 1 because of injuries would like to see one in the team at all times rotating in and out.
this leaves just polak riewoldt and post to choose from. not one of them is a ff.post has been earmarked for the backline but circumstance may see him play fwd rnd 1.
to me i would be tempted to go with gourdis out of the square. i would be trying to clear it out a bit and give him the space to lead into no one is going to catch him on the lead and we dont have a leading type.
i would play post at chf and allow riewoldt to roam the forward line.
now bear with me i would play simmonds as first ruck only option really and MAYBE look to play polak in an around the ground rucking role. let simmonds take centre bounces etc. only trouble is carlton may go with 3 ruckmen. perhaps one of browne or vickery on the bench.
the good thing about this is the structure and flexability of the team. if the regular backs struggle moore mcguane thursfield one of the bigger sized boys in gourdis or post can go back. if need be polak can float back if or push forward.
one thing for sure carlton will field a tall side. bower jamison thornton possibly austin back. waite henderson possibly kruezer forward warnock and hampson in ruck it may be we will try and run em ragged but we need to cover for all contingencies.
-
jackstar, who do you think will play in Round 1 out of these players?
Tuck, Polo, White, Collins, Rance, Polak, Gourdis, Taylor, Roberts and Connors?
Tuck, Polo, Collins would be certain I would think.
Connors ?
Dont think they would play Taylor as he aint ready I wouldnt think.. He looks okay but he would get smashed
Would think Farmer and Martin would be the only 1st gamers . Like Farmer :thumbsup
If Browne plays okay next week, he could be a surprise as I think there is a plan to play a tall forward eg Vickery or Simmonds.
Therefore Polak wouldnt play.
Round 1 we will need to expose Carlton defence with height. , dont think Polak is the answer, rather play Vickery as a tall option with some rotation through Simmonds and Browne, although you cant play Browne down forward, he would need to be rotated through bench
Gus wouldnt play thats for certain, didnt touch the ball on Friday Night.
Rance NO
Gourdis, probably not as Thursfield ,Moore and McGaune would hold down back positions you would think
cool.
i have read some of your previous post jackstar, and although some people on here think, this and that of you.
i actually agree with A LOT of things you say.
you claim to of been at Richmond. (not for three years now?)
and i am not sure whether you are allowed to say what you did at Richmond, but i am interested to know.
i can only take what people say on here what they claim to know or have heard.
so, it is kind of good that some people can share information like that, but understand the "keep quiet rule".
Simmonds said on SEN, that he has been training as a Ruck and not a forward.
even though, he could still play in the forward line, Simmonds thinks he will not.
just interesting to read what you think.
personally i think we are fudged with Polak at full foward, because i believe he has no idea.
i guess that is why i am hoping/praying Griffiths gets fit quickly!
but i do agree with rotating Simmonds, Vickery as that tall full forward option.
i would rather throw Astbury at full foward then have Polak there!
i think Richmond have shot themselves in the foot saying they are going to promote Polak before Round 1!
:)
Jack was Terry's pimp, used to spot new talent (young boys mainly) for the tanned one.
:lol :thumbsup and a few ;) ;) ;) just to make sure everbody knows I'm not serious.
-
would be almost certain that griffiths and astbury wont play rnd 1 because of injuries would like to see one in the team at all times rotating in and out.
this leaves just polak riewoldt and post to choose from. not one of them is a ff.post has been earmarked for the backline but circumstance may see him play fwd rnd 1.
to me i would be tempted to go with gourdis out of the square. i would be trying to clear it out a bit and give him the space to lead into no one is going to catch him on the lead and we dont have a leading type.
i would play post at chf and allow riewoldt to roam the forward line.
now bear with me i would play simmonds as first ruck only option really and MAYBE look to play polak in an around the ground rucking role. let simmonds take centre bounces etc. only trouble is carlton may go with 3 ruckmen. perhaps one of browne or vickery on the bench.
the good thing about this is the structure and flexability of the team. if the regular backs struggle moore mcguane thursfield one of the bigger sized boys in gourdis or post can go back. if need be polak can float back if or push forward.
one thing for sure carlton will field a tall side. bower jamison thornton possibly austin back. waite henderson possibly kruezer forward warnock and hampson in ruck it may be we will try and run em ragged but we need to cover for all contingencies.
i think Polak is not agile enough for the ruck.
i think he should not be promoted nd play Round 1.
he has kicked 2 goals in 3 matches so fair at full forward.
i would have Post at CHF or even FF.
it is not hard kicking it long and high to Post, he is good enough to take contested marks!
i would give Gourdis (who is actually a forward) a shot at full back.
have Gourdis/Thursfield/Moore/McGuane as key FB/CHB.
Post/Riewoldt/Astbury (if fit) as key CHF/FF.
Astbury is a kid, but give him a shot!
:)
-
Polak should not play. Enough of the charity.
Gus should not play in rd 1 neither should Rance.
Until Rance works on his kicking and uses his feet to kick more often than not as a first option as he is playing football he must not be considered for selection.
-
collins was woeful v the pies, connors is ahead of him at this stage
-
Polak should not play. Enough of the charity.
Gus should not play in rd 1 neither should Rance.
Until Rance works on his kicking and uses his feet to kick more often than not as a first option as he is playing football he must not be considered for selection.
Totally agree :thumbsup
-
+1.
Polak's done a remarkable job to put himself in contention but IMO Gourdis looks to have more potential which is exactly what rookie placements should be used for. Time to look elsewhere apart from GP. Goo has done the apprenticeship, now let's see what he can do at the next level.
-
one thing for sure carlton will field a tall side. bower jamison thornton possibly austin back. waite henderson possibly kruezer forward warnock and hampson in ruck it may be we will try and run em ragged but we need to cover for all contingencies.
Perhaps this is one of the reasons Hawdwick wants Post in the backline.
In regards to our forward line I would be happy with either Vickery or Gourdis @ FF. Do not think we will beat Carlton if Polak lines up there.