One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on May 22, 2010, 11:08:33 PM

Title: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on May 22, 2010, 11:08:33 PM
Fire away....
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: jackstar is back again on May 22, 2010, 11:39:37 PM
Out-Vickery
Ins Anyone of 6ft 5ins who isnt scared and has got some idea ::)
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: TigerTimeII on May 22, 2010, 11:50:07 PM
out  nahas king vickery

in tambling connors browne

is connors suspension up yet , if not bring in relton
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: TigerLand on May 23, 2010, 12:12:30 AM
Out - Vickory King
In Polak Tambling

Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Tigermonk on May 23, 2010, 12:15:45 AM
Out-Vickery
Ins Anyone of 6ft 5ins who isnt scared and has got some idea ::)

Oh  we seen that pull out but you forgot to add Edwards as well.
Both players pulled out of the contest.
Bring up Browne
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: tiger till i die on May 23, 2010, 12:17:42 AM
Out Tryon , King

in Browne, Morton
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Francois Jackson on May 23, 2010, 12:18:02 AM
Out:  Vickery, FARMER(never to play again), Nahas

IN:    Browne, Post, Morton,

very lucky Nason. We cant afford too many midgets in the one side. Between him and Nahas its stuffin embrassing at times
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Tigermonk on May 23, 2010, 12:21:10 AM
Out:  Vickery, FARMER(never to play again), Nahas

IN:    Browne, Post, Morton,

very lucky Nason. We cant afford too many midgets in the one side. Between him and Nahas its effin embrassing at times

Have to agree we are too many smalls, must add to our height & weight
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Francois Jackson on May 23, 2010, 12:27:54 AM
Out:  Vickery, FARMER(never to play again), Nahas

IN:    Browne, Post, Morton,

very lucky Nason. We cant afford too many midgets in the one side. Between him and Nahas its effin embrassing at times

Have to agree we are too many smalls, must add to our height & weight

if Dimma wants to be fair dinkum then he cant go on like this. Every stuffin week we play too small and bloody embrassing to be honest.

Im waiting for Nahas and Nason to one day yell out 'the plane the plane"

Seriously TM i looked up in the forward line at one stage and saw Farmer, Nahas, Jack, Nason and White. :banghead :banghead

Jack R must be thinking WTF am i doing at this club  surrounded by these dwarfs.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Ramps on May 23, 2010, 12:36:18 AM
Out:  Vickery, FARMER(never to play again), Nahas

IN:    Browne, Post, Morton,

very lucky Nason. We cant afford too many midgets in the one side. Between him and Nahas its effin embrassing at times

Have to agree we are too many smalls, must add to our height & weight

if Dimma wants to be fair dinkum then he cant go on like this. Every effin week we play too small and bloody embrassing to be honest.

Im waiting for Nahas and Nason to one day yell out 'the plane the plane"

Seriously TM i looked up in the forward line at one stage and saw Farmer, Nahas, Jack, Nason and White. :banghead :banghead

Jack R must be thinking WTF am i doing at this club  surrounded by these dwarfs.

Hardwick has got a poohouse list, theres nothing he can do for this season, next season when another 10 to 12 blokes have been given the arse and new draftees and recruits have come in we may see a bigger side. I agree we need to find bigger players.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Tigermonk on May 23, 2010, 12:48:47 AM
can tell you Richmond have been keeping close contact with Krak  :lol they are seriously thinking of getting him back  ;D stay tuned
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Francois Jackson on May 23, 2010, 12:51:06 AM
can tell you Richmond have been keeping close contact with Krak  :lol they are seriously thinking of getting him back  ;D stay tuned

if thats the case ill be convinced Hardwick will go down the same road as Leather face and Spud Frawley. That cant be true!!!!

Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Tigermonk on May 23, 2010, 12:59:15 AM
been on the cards before Hardwick arrived  :shh Good fella is Krak
hope his put some weight on  ;D
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: crannyvegas on May 23, 2010, 01:04:31 AM
Krak isn't an answer to any of our problems. Had enough spotlight on our club, let him be someone elses risk.

Vickery out, averaging 9 hitouts this year and not really offering much else

Farmer, wow get your improve on champ!!

Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Infamy on May 23, 2010, 01:08:14 AM
Out: Vickery (rest), Farmer (susp), Nahas (poor game and selfish snap OOTF at the end when Astbury was wide open 20m directly in front)
In: Browne, Tambling if fit enough & ..... dunno, depends on matchups, Polo, Polak or Collins I guess
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on May 23, 2010, 09:30:08 AM
OUT:McGuane - The sooner we get rid of this hack the better. I don't care if Post isn't pulling up trees at Coburg. Bring him in.
OUT: Farmer - This season's Thomson and Hislop rolled into one, if you know what I mean. Bring back Dea.
OUT: King - Was he even out there last night? Or is he just so small and ineffectual you can't even see him?? Maybe Collins in.
OUT: Cousins - I hate to say this but he's DONE. Slower than a dry summer (hey, there's no such things as wet weeks anymore :lol), and can't kick over a witches hat. IN: Oh, just bite the bullet and bring Connors back. We need to be able to put Lids back into the midfield again!! 
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on May 23, 2010, 09:35:08 AM
Oh Yeah, one last thing I almost forgot:
We need to stuff Griffiths into the forward line ASAP.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: TigerTimeII on May 23, 2010, 09:45:24 AM
been on the cards before Hardwick arrived  :shh Good fella is Krak
hope his put some weight on  ;D

i heard krak is heading for gc17 but i hope we et him back, he is killing it in wa and is now fitter stronger and wiser and still has that class factor. he had the best touch and feel for the ball in our team, just never got near it enough.
would be a great story if we got him back and he kicked arse
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on May 23, 2010, 09:59:20 AM
been on the cards before Hardwick arrived  :shh Good fella is Krak
hope his put some weight on  ;D

i heard krak is heading for gc17 but i hope we et him back, he is killing it in wa and is now fitter stronger and wiser and still has that class factor. he had the best touch and feel for the ball in our team, just never got near it enough.
would be a great story if we got him back and he kicked behind

I was watching the Vics vs: Wa game on the ABC yesterday, and when asked to summarise Krakouer's game, the commentator said, "he had 21 touches, but I don't think he had any real impact on the game."
That pretty much summarises his time at Richmond too, except I don't recall him having 21 touches in too many games. He was another 100 game "cameo player" like somebody else who should be going to the Gold Coast at the end of the year too.       
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: mat073 on May 23, 2010, 10:08:19 AM
I would give Polak one last go in the forward line until young Griffiths is ready to go.

Million dollar question is what to do with Cousins.

Sad but I think he has to go back to Coburg and find some touch.

Cuz is reminding me of Cogs last year.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 23, 2010, 11:11:45 AM
OUT: Farmer - This season's Thomson and Hislop rolled into one, if you know what I mean. Bring back Dea.

Dea aint going to happen - out for another couple of weeks with the hot spot in his foot. Was only due to take the moon boot off last week


Anyway....


INS: BrownE, Polo, Hislop, Polak

OUTS: Vickery (deplorable last evening), Nahas (see Vickery), King, Farmer (susp)



Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: eliminator on May 23, 2010, 01:57:19 PM
In Polak. Out White
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 23, 2010, 02:04:13 PM
Polak should definentely be an in.

Farmer will be suspended.

One of King and Nahas should be omitted also. I am leaning towards Nahas was very unproductive and selfish last night. That out on the full in the last minute was diabolical. Would have been nice to get to 100 points.

Possibly Morton or Postie? :-\
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Penelope on May 23, 2010, 02:11:09 PM
should Nahas be tried down back on the opposition slippery pricks
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 23, 2010, 02:22:38 PM
should Nahas be tried down back on the opposition slippery pricks

No way not a defensive bone in his body will be murdered by the slippery eels like Milne and others of his ilk. Would make blokes like Leon Davis look good.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 23, 2010, 02:58:48 PM
OUT: Farmer - This season's Thomson and Hislop rolled into one, if you know what I mean. Bring back Dea.

Dea aint going to happen - out for another couple of weeks with the hot spot in his foot. Was only due to take the moon boot off last week


Anyway....


INS: BrownE, Polo, Hislop, Polak

OUTS: Vickery (deplorable last evening), Nahas (see Vickery), King, Farmer (susp)





Why Polo WP.... :lol, really though I thought Thompson was better than him last week and has he done something lately to earn a spot.... just asking... don't shoot me..... ;)
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Ramps on May 23, 2010, 05:22:51 PM
can tell you Richmond have been keeping close contact with Krak  :lol they are seriously thinking of getting him back  ;D stay tuned

would be the most disgraceful decision possible. the equivalent of Wallaces Kent Kingsley move. Just disgraceful and not on! If Hardwick allows this to happen then that will have been his first major mistake, and the supporters will then have every right to go after him and his coaching job. Its not on!
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Francois Jackson on May 23, 2010, 06:51:30 PM
should Nahas be tried down back on the opposition slippery pricks

hahaha  ive heard it all now. Might as well try Nason in the ruck too & King at FF

you serious? surely not

Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Penelope on May 23, 2010, 07:05:42 PM
should Nahas be tried down back on the opposition slippery pricks

No way not a defensive bone in his body will be murdered by the slippery eels like Milne and others of his ilk. Would make blokes like Leon Davis look good.

Dunno about not having a defensive bone in his body Tucker. When his head is right he puts good defensive pressure on in the forward line.

To beat a small fast player, you need a small fast player. To me the question mark would be on his footy smarts.

should Nahas be tried down back on the opposition slippery pricks

hahaha  ive heard it all now. Might as well try Nason in the ruck too & King at FF

you serious? surely no



Ok I'll bite.

Not too sure how playing a <6ft player on the opposition <6ft player is the same as playing a <6ft player in the ruck or at full forward.  ???

whats the punchline?


Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 23, 2010, 07:21:12 PM
He is a selfish type of player and if it benefits him by kicking a goal or too he'll tackle and harass. He just does not show those characteristics outside of the forward 50. Case in point the bit of play in the last minute last night. Knew he had a horrid game and could have set up Astbury for a certain goal but sprayed it. It's okay to be selfish when you are a forward but when we are trying to develop a winning formula up forward and a team first attitude that helps us win games.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Stripes on May 23, 2010, 07:23:01 PM
King was deplorable. Left his player to run off frequently and was useless in any zone formation. Was the worst player on the field. Must be just warming the spot for Connors and/or Dea. Will be interesting to see if Hardwick moves Lids back into the middle when Connors returns or leaves him in the backline, along with Connors and Newman to give us better desposal/ability to move the ball by foot forward.

Vickery may need a few games in the reserves. In a team with better rucks, he would be given the licence to develop (especially in size) in the VFL. Given the state of our rucks we have been forced to try and fast track him in the big league. I would rather bring Browne in and see whether he steps ups and similtaneously allow the 19 year old time to regain his confidence playing against smaller/less capable rucks in the 2nds.

If Farmer is suspended we may need to bring Polo back in. There is no other choice to fufill the small defender role that I can think of.

Stripes
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Penelope on May 23, 2010, 07:33:14 PM
He is a selfish type of player and if it benefits him by kicking a goal or too he'll tackle and harass. He just does not show those characteristics outside of the forward 50. Case in point the bit of play in the last minute last night. Knew he had a horrid game and could have set up Astbury for a certain goal but sprayed it. It's okay to be selfish when you are a forward but when we are trying to develop a winning formula up forward and a team first attitude that helps us win games.

fair enough, hard to argue against that.
sometimes it can be good to put a player out their comfort zone and see how they respond.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 23, 2010, 08:01:24 PM
He is a selfish type of player and if it benefits him by kicking a goal or too he'll tackle and harass. He just does not show those characteristics outside of the forward 50. Case in point the bit of play in the last minute last night. Knew he had a horrid game and could have set up Astbury for a certain goal but sprayed it. It's okay to be selfish when you are a forward but when we are trying to develop a winning formula up forward and a team first attitude that helps us win games.

fair enough, hard to argue against that.
sometimes it can be good to put a player out their comfort zone and see how they respond.

Just for the record Al I agree with the principle with where we are at to experiment and put a player out of their comfort zone to see if they can play in a different situation but to me Nahas is not one to go back and his small stature will result in Jake King type mismatches also IMO.  Furthermore he has been lost at sea also in the midfield when put there this season. Robin is a specialist if I can use that term fwd 50 type player only. As is Steven Milne at St Kilda.

Edwards was a smallish forward who looks okay in the backline atm. That experiment has worked somewhat and Shane is our most improved players so far this year.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 23, 2010, 09:43:42 PM
Why Polo WP.... :lol, really though I thought Thompson was better than him last week and has he done something lately to earn a spot.... just asking... don't shoot me..... ;)

Well one would hope that Thomson was better than Polo last week as Thomson played and Polo didn't - he was out suspended  ;D

Just think we need some experience down back and he has had some good results against Ebert and K Cornes  :thumbsup

Also with no Jackson we need a run with tagger and Polo plays that role very well
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: torch on May 23, 2010, 09:48:44 PM
Out:

Cousins - Waste Of Time!
Edwards - small, weak, W.O.T!
Farmer - what is he meant to be Hardwick? forward, back? can't kick!
Rance - see Farmer.
King - why bother? however his long kicking was very good!

In:

Griffiths, Morton, Tambling, Polo, Collins

Team:

Newman, Thursfield, Moore
Webberley, McGuane, Polo
White, Deledio, Collins
Morton, Astbury, Tambling
Riewoldt, Griffiths, Nahas
Graham, Martin, Cotchin
Tuck, Foley, Vickery, Nason

 :)
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 23, 2010, 09:50:17 PM
Why Polo WP.... :lol, really though I thought Thompson was better than him last week and has he done something lately to earn a spot.... just asking... don't shoot me..... ;)

Well one would hope that Thomson was better than Polo last week as Thomson played and Polo didn't - he was out suspended  ;D

Just think we need some experience down back and he has had some good results against Ebert and K Cornes  :thumbsup

Also with no Jackson we need a run with tagger and Polo plays that role very well

Oh thats right, sorry, forgot he was suspended. He will probably replace Farmer then, lets just hope he can get it together.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 23, 2010, 09:55:48 PM
Out:

Cousins - Waste Of Time!
Edwards - small, weak, W.O.T!
Farmer - what is he meant to be Hardwick? forward, back? can't kick!
Rance - see Farmer.
King - why bother? however his long kicking was very good!

In:

Griffiths, Morton, Tambling, Polo, Collins

Team:

Newman, Thursfield, Moore
Webberley, McGuane, Polo
White, Deledio, Collins
Morton, Astbury, Tambling
Riewoldt, Griffiths, Nahas
Graham, Martin, Cotchin
Tuck, Foley, Vickery, Nason

 :)

Torch, what is going on mate, Edwards was my whipping boy until he proved me wrong and he has done that now for the last 5-6 weeks so I can't agree with your comments regarding him.

Why would you also bring in and injured player, Griffiths?????

Morton and Collins have done nothing with Coburg to warrent a re-call either. Cousins will get going once the players around him improve and work harder and he has some game time.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: tigersalive on May 23, 2010, 10:10:04 PM
OUT:
Edwards - small, weak, W.O.T!


WTF were you watching?

Shut Stanton out of the game pretty well and was pretty handy offensively himself.

He's going no where.  One of the "midgets" who belongs in the team :thumbsup

If you want to drop another midget there is a bloke called Nahas who was hopeless.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on May 23, 2010, 10:35:53 PM
Out:  Vickery, FARMER(never to play again), Nahas

IN:    Browne, Post, Morton,

very lucky Nason. We cant afford too many midgets in the one side. Between him and Nahas its effin embrassing at times

Have to agree we are too many smalls, must add to our height & weight

if Dimma wants to be fair dinkum then he cant go on like this. Every effin week we play too small and bloody embrassing to be honest.

Im waiting for Nahas and Nason to one day yell out 'the plane the plane"

Seriously TM i looked up in the forward line at one stage and saw Farmer, Nahas, Jack, Nason and White. :banghead :banghead

Jack R must be thinking WTF am i doing at this club  surrounded by these dwarfs.
:ROTFL :ROTFL
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: the claw on May 23, 2010, 11:59:00 PM
at this stage of the week i reckon we need to focus on the obvious.
its obvious to me we cannot go into games and expect to be at least competetive with so many runts in the team.  runts in the main who lack the required polish so to speak. the small players we went with this week include. nason, webberley, white, king, nahas, farmer, cousins,edwards, and foley.  to me king white nahas  have to go. farmer will be suspended. cuz is really struggling but may be better for the run.
get the structure and size balance right and play as many skillful good kicks as possible with this in mind.

also we need to look at our rotation process concerning kids. we have a few who have had good blocks of games and are now struggling. time to send em back to coburg for confidence. in particular the one this applies to is vickery. drop him back and just add a like player in browne who can do with some exposure for a short stint or block of games.

atm i would be looking at something like this.

b; newman- thursfield - moore.
hb; deledio - mcguane - webberley.
c; cotchin - martin - edwards.
hf; nason - riewoldt - collins.
f;  astbury - polak -
r;  graham - tuck - foley
int; browne, polo, cuz, and either thomson a mid or a tall in post/rance.

outs would be. king, white, vickery farmer nahas.
ins would be browne, polak, polo, collins  thomson.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: one-eyed on May 25, 2010, 04:36:07 PM
RICHMOND - In the Mix

The Tigers took an unchanged lineup into the game against Essendon, but don't expect that this time around. Ty Vickery could do with a run in the VFL to stop his developing body being smashed in the ruck and he could be replaced by either Andrew Browne or Troy Simmonds. Graham Polak hasn't kicked a goal in either of his two matches, but the lack of a VFL match makes it hard for the likes of Ben Griffiths to push their case.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/94998/default.aspx
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 25, 2010, 09:22:47 PM
Well this shouold help us out.... Motlop suspended.. ;D, he usually tears us another one.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/port-adelaide-suspends-daniel-motlop-stuff/story-e6frf9jf-1225871259850
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Smokey on May 25, 2010, 09:39:57 PM
Well this shouold help us out.... Motlop suspended.. ;D, he usually tears us another one.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/port-adelaide-suspends-daniel-motlop-stuff/story-e6frf9jf-1225871259850

We might have been better off with him playing.  From what I saw in the replay he was terrible and looked very disinterested and distracted.  Would have left them carrying a passenger with his current attitude.   :-\
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 25, 2010, 09:44:07 PM
Well this shouold help us out.... Motlop suspended.. ;D, he usually tears us another one.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/port-adelaide-suspends-daniel-motlop-stuff/story-e6frf9jf-1225871259850

We might have been better off with him playing.  From what I saw in the replay he was terrible and looked very disinterested and distracted.  Would have left them carrying a passenger with his current attitude.   :-\

Yeah either that or we could have played him into form like we have been doing a bit lately with teams and players from oppositions. Look at the Hawks.. :-\
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: Mr Magic on May 25, 2010, 09:53:50 PM
Out: Farmer, King, Cousins (done)
In: Polo, Morton, Browne
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 25, 2010, 09:59:07 PM
Out: Farmer, King, Cousins (done)
In: Polo, Morton, Browne

Browne I agree with, but have Morton and Polo really done enough, I would play Polak and Thompson instead. But I think you may be more on the money.
Title: Re: Changes next week for the Port game?
Post by: eliminator on May 26, 2010, 08:05:53 AM
Glad Motlop out. Agree has been a thorn in our side in the past