One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on June 19, 2010, 10:55:52 PM

Title: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 19, 2010, 10:55:52 PM
Once forced change for McGuane presumably. Any others?
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Infamy on June 19, 2010, 11:16:17 PM
Out: McGuane (ankle)
In: Gourdis

Has to happen
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on June 20, 2010, 12:09:58 AM
Out  McGuane inj  Tambling

Ins Gourdis Moore
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on June 20, 2010, 12:17:48 AM
OUT: McGuane(inj) Tambling (useless)
IN: Gourdis Foley
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: eliminator on June 20, 2010, 10:52:52 AM
Bring in Foley and Moore if okay
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Chuck17 on June 20, 2010, 10:57:36 AM
Tambling (useless)

It would certainly appear that way.

I would be interested to get inside the coaching staffs head and see if he is meeting the goals they are setting him.

As I think Smokey said we have to get used to him not as a running midfielder but as a flanker.
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Smokey on June 20, 2010, 11:12:18 AM
Very interesting comment re: Foley from Danny Daly at the QRS pre-match function yesterday.  Basically they have written him off as a 'force' this season and they are treating the rest of this season as his pre-season for 2011.  Also mentioned that he may need some further surgery to 'tidy up' the ankle (I read this to mean remove some floating bone fragments) before next season.  I wouldn't have any expectations of either a timeframe or impact of Foley's return this season after hearing that.
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Smokey on June 20, 2010, 11:23:56 AM
And while on the subject of Danny Daly's talk, he had a few things to say about the kids on our list.  Given the vagaries and euphoria of our win and subsequent celebrations, there will be much I can't remember however a couple of points worth noting:

He believes Hicks will be a very good player for us, talked him up a fair bit.  Said you can't take very much notice of the fitness level of 1st year rookies because they don't get a chance for any pre-season work given that the draft isn't until December.  Reckons Hicks has got what it takes.

Said that Contin is still learning what senior football is about - where to run to, what is required etc.  Didn't talk him up in the same terms as Hicks.

Laughed as he told of Griffiths being our 'lucky charm' but said that he is likely to play all season in the seniors for the purpose of getting games into him.  Reckons he will be a very good player.

Said Post spent a lot of pre-season in the gym and was now working on his running fitness and game awareness.  Together with Gourdis, they are both very close to senior selection after some good recent Coburg efforts.

Reckons that Taylor has had a fair bit to deal with in his first season and was working through it all well.  Rates him as a player.

Dea has stress fractures and will miss about another 5 weeks.

McGuane almost didn't play, had to pass a last minute fitness test.  And they didn't expect Merrett to play, believed the rumours that he was injured again.

There was some other stuff that I can't recall but if someone else was there maybe they could elaborate?
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Tigermonk on June 20, 2010, 12:15:24 PM
OUT: McGuane(inj) Tambling (useless)
IN: Gourdis Foley

  ::) Tambling was ok l thought last night ?

Out, McGuane
In, Gourdis.
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: WA Tiger on June 20, 2010, 12:20:56 PM
Out: McGuane (inj), Tambling (inj)

In: Gourdis, Moore
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 20, 2010, 12:22:40 PM
Will worry about it next week

Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on June 20, 2010, 06:53:11 PM
Tambling (useless)

It would certainly appear that way.

I would be interested to get inside the coaching staffs head and see if he is meeting the goals they are setting him.

As I think Smokey said we have to get used to him not as a running midfielder but as a flanker.
I'd be happy wherever he played if he'd just stop coughing up the ball, and continually bringing our momentum to a screeching halt.....
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Gigantor on June 20, 2010, 06:56:59 PM
after watching ritchie last night i can say that i'm more than happy with his tackling,spoiling etc..However he just seems to dither when he has the ball,and that really costs us
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Gordon Bennett on June 20, 2010, 07:02:43 PM
I'd be happy wherever he played if he'd just stop coughing up the ball, and continually bringing our momentum to a screeching halt.....

pure fiction. He probably coughed up the ball one or two times, and he aided our momentum many times last night.
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on June 20, 2010, 07:09:10 PM
Out: McGuane (inj), Tambling (inj)

In: Gourdis, Moore
Thanks WAT, it's plainly obvious Ritchie is injured. Ostitis Pubis?
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: WA Tiger on June 20, 2010, 07:13:29 PM
Out: McGuane (inj), Tambling (inj)

In: Gourdis, Moore
Thanks WAT, it's plainly obvious Ritchie is injured. Ostitis Pubis?


Yeah not sure GR12, I think he is going well but could be going better, something is bothering him, he has something wrong. I am not sure if it is OP but if it is, get him out and bring him back next season!!
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Mopsy on June 20, 2010, 08:32:02 PM
And while on the subject of Danny Daly's talk, he had a few things to say about the kids on our list.  Given the vagaries and euphoria of our win and subsequent celebrations, there will be much I can't remember however a couple of points worth noting:

He believes Hicks will be a very good player for us, talked him up a fair bit.  Said you can't take very much notice of the fitness level of 1st year rookies because they don't get a chance for any pre-season work given that the draft isn't until December.  Reckons Hicks has got what it takes.

Said that Contin is still learning what senior football is about - where to run to, what is required etc.  Didn't talk him up in the same terms as Hicks.

Laughed as he told of Griffiths being our 'lucky charm' but said that he is likely to play all season in the seniors for the purpose of getting games into him.  Reckons he will be a very good player.

Said Post spent a lot of pre-season in the gym and was now working on his running fitness and game awareness.  Together with Gourdis, they are both very close to senior selection after some good recent Coburg efforts.

Reckons that Taylor has had a fair bit to deal with in his first season and was working through it all well.  Rates him as a player.

Dea has stress fractures and will miss about another 5 weeks.

McGuane almost didn't play, had to pass a last minute fitness test.  And they didn't expect Merrett to play, believed the rumours that he was injured again.

There was some other stuff that I can't recall but if someone else was there maybe they could elaborate?

I think that is pretty much an assessment of what was said Smokey  :thumbsup on Hicks he did not appear to think his lack of height was any problem to his advancement
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 20, 2010, 09:15:14 PM
Thanks WAT, it's plainly obvious Ritchie is injured. Ostitis Pubis?


Not OP

I know there are some that don't want to acknowledge it but I think you will find the recovery from the compartment syndrome has a alot to do with it. No proper endurance running training during the pre-season (meaning not enough miles in the leg) has caused IMHO a problem with his general speed and speed off the mark.. Hopefully the break is what he needs
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: WA Tiger on June 20, 2010, 09:20:06 PM
Thanks WAT, it's plainly obvious Ritchie is injured. Ostitis Pubis?


Not OP

I know there are some that don't want to acknowledge it but I think you will find the recovery from the compartment syndrome has a alot to do with it. No proper endurance running training during the pre-season (meaning not enough miles in the leg) has caused IMHO a problem with his general speed and speed off the mark.. Hopefully the break is what he needs

Lets hope so WP, I really think Tambling can be our X factor, once his body is right... same with Cotch. I reckon Cotch is travelling at about 75% at the moment and look how good he is going.
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on June 21, 2010, 08:41:20 AM
I'd be happy wherever he played if he'd just stop coughing up the ball, and continually bringing our momentum to a screeching halt.....

pure fiction. He probably coughed up the ball one or two times, and he aided our momentum many times last night.

Pure FACT. And I'm not just talking about last night, when his dithering and indeciseveness drove every Tiger fan in my lounge room right up the wall. There are many instances in games this season when he's handballed to flat-footed players deep in defence, or run alongside crucial contests that he's needed to get involved, plus a host of other football sins that are too numerous to mention. Watch the tapes. Honestly, the sooner the footy dept. just swallows their pride and admits they got this one wrong and trades him, instead of waiting for him to blossom into the player he will NEVER be, the better. 
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 29, 2010, 05:47:15 PM
RICHMOND - In the Mix

Tough to change a winning side, but the most likely inclusion is key defender Kelvin Moore, who faces a fitness test for a leg injury this week, which he is expected to pass that with flying colours. Pushing hard from Coburg are ruckman Andrew Browne, key defender David Gourdis and small forward Robin Nahas, but they are unlikely to crack a spot in the side to take on Sydney Swans.

SYDNEY SWANS
Strong reserves games from Trent Dennis-Lane (seven goals) and Henry Playfair (five) have put the pair in contention to face Richmond after Paul Roos signalled his intention to field a new-look forward line. Jesse White is set to be dropped after a lean run, while Daniel Bradshaw (knee) and Tadhg Kennelly (knee) will be tested this week. Jarred Moore (ankle) played a full game in the reserves' 132-point win against Queanbeyan while Pat Veszpremi and Brett Meredith also impressed.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/97141/default.aspx
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: one-eyed on June 30, 2010, 11:16:31 PM
According to the Footy show added to our squad are Morton, Webberley, Gourdis, Nahas, Polo


Bradshaw, Kennelly and Veszpremi in for the Swans.
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Ox on July 01, 2010, 12:56:40 AM
Polio ?  :chuck
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 01, 2010, 06:48:53 AM
According to the Footy show added to our squad are Morton, Webberley, Gourdis, Nahas, Polo


Bradshaw, Kennelly and Veszpremi in for the Swans.


But not Moore in the "squad"?

I reckon the Footy show wouldn't have a clue  ;D

Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on July 01, 2010, 07:59:59 AM
I'd rather have Gourdis in than Moore, or McGuane. After 3 years, it's time the club just rolled the dice on this bloke.
Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: Ekto on July 01, 2010, 08:11:17 AM
I'd rather have Gourdis in than Moore, or McGuane. After 3 years, it's time the club just rolled the dice on this bloke.
Put your prejudice away RR and have faith in the people that are employed to make selection decisions and are developing the team nicely.

Title: Re: Changes for the Swans game?
Post by: RollsRoyce on July 01, 2010, 08:23:27 AM
I'd rather have Gourdis in than Moore, or McGuane. After 3 years, it's time the club just rolled the dice on this bloke.
Put your prejudice away RR and have faith in the people that are employed to make selection decisions and are developing the team nicely.



I do have faith in the people who are developing our team. If you'd read some of my posts responding to the people who want us to keep losing, to stock up on higher draft picks you would know that. My only prejudice is that I don't want us to keep playing undersized players in our key defensive posts.