One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on July 30, 2010, 05:53:27 AM

Title: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: one-eyed on July 30, 2010, 05:53:27 AM
According to BF,

"good to see young jake will be a tiger for next year with an option for 2012 well done jake keep it going"

http://bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=737473



 :o
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: richmondrules on July 30, 2010, 07:46:38 AM
Don't see why this would be a surprise. Has done everything asked of him, has made great strides in keeping a lid on it and behaving and is a regular in our best 22.

The thing that is impressing me (if this BF post is true) is that we don't appear to be handing out big contracts any more. 1 year with performance triggers for two for Tucky (don't believe this is confirmed) and 1 year for Jake with an option for 2 if we want him.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 30, 2010, 08:44:34 AM
To sign King and Tuck is a good thing IMO. It shows that Hardwicks message is clear and these players have improved out of sight.

I would say King may be in our top 10 B & F since that Stkilda game where he demolished NDS. His kicking has improved also.

Whilst im not a fan of the midgets i think he can be a cleaver tagger we have been waiting for not like Patty Payne Nahas who should be delisted.

Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on July 30, 2010, 10:46:41 AM
shocking decision
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: FNM on July 30, 2010, 11:35:57 AM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: TigerTimeII on July 30, 2010, 11:41:19 AM
we need hard players like jake
get rid of softies like nahas
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on July 30, 2010, 11:42:41 AM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Mr Magic on July 30, 2010, 01:56:08 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: TigerLand on July 30, 2010, 01:57:49 PM
I think you'll find Jake wont be in the best 22 next year, this isn't the reason why he should be let go. A mature gutsy footballer as depth isn't a bad idea. He isn't our future but he has worth on our list in the 2s to come in and play and fill a role and he has shown this year he can do that.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Danog on July 30, 2010, 02:14:46 PM
If it's similar to Tucks (1, with triggers for 2), then I'm all for it.  He's a great leader.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: torch on July 30, 2010, 02:33:23 PM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?

2nd dumb decision, 1st was Tuck! IMO.

Edwards, Polo, Nahas are in the gun IMO!

Two of them have to go!
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: taztiger4 on July 30, 2010, 02:56:55 PM
is this confirmed or are you all jumping at shadows !
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on July 30, 2010, 03:00:58 PM
If it's similar to Tucks (1, with triggers for 2), then I'm all for it.  He's a great leader.

whose a great leader?

Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: tiger101 on July 30, 2010, 03:37:20 PM
haha wouldnt rely on BF as a great source i'll just wait till its confirmed before saying anything.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: tiger till i die on July 30, 2010, 03:37:47 PM
like it or not kingy happens to be one of our not that big but big names.. Collingwood all know who is for sure ;) and he has improved heaps from last year and is doing all he is requierd to do and he has proven he can be a good tagger (how many big players has he injured? some of ours :P but for a small body he is worth an extra year ... he shows that he is a tiger beacue he is alwasy doing stuff for teh club and i am happy to have him again

you NOOO sayers sorry but you must be blind to not see the impacts he has on some games and his improvments  :)
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on July 30, 2010, 03:40:43 PM
like it or not kingy happens to be one of our not that big but big names.. Collingwood all know who is for sure ;) and he has improved heaps from last year and is doing all he is requierd to do and he has proven he can be a good tagger (how many big players has he injured? some of ours :P but for a small body he is worth an extra year ... he shows that he is a tiger beacue he is alwasy doing stuff for teh club and i am happy to have him again

you NOOO sayers sorry but you must be blind to not see the impacts he has on some games and his improvments  :)

lol ... clubs going nowhere if decisions like this are true. People seem to have forgotten.


WE ARE 15H ON THE LADDER!

WE HAVE A SHOCKING LIST!

WE NEED ANOTHER CLEAN OUT!

Kings played 50 games, he gave it his best shot. And he contributed- noone can deny that but the question is will he be in Richmonds next Premiership team. The answer is NO so that makes this potential decision a bad one.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: tiger till i die on July 30, 2010, 03:47:56 PM
like it or not kingy happens to be one of our not that big but big names.. Collingwood all know who is for sure ;) and he has improved heaps from last year and is doing all he is requierd to do and he has proven he can be a good tagger (how many big players has he injured? some of ours :P but for a small body he is worth an extra year ... he shows that he is a tiger beacue he is alwasy doing stuff for teh club and i am happy to have him again

you NOOO sayers sorry but you must be blind to not see the impacts he has on some games and his improvments  :)

do u belive he has improved ? and we aint gonna get any really good players for teh next couple of years so we have to use what we have.. is what im trying to say

lol ... clubs going nowhere if decisions like this are true. People seem to have forgotten.


WE ARE 15H ON THE LADDER!

WE HAVE A SHOCKING LIST!

WE NEED ANOTHER CLEAN OUT!

Kings played 50 games, he gave it his best shot. And he contributed- noone can deny that but the question is will he be in Richmonds next Premiership team. The answer is NO so that makes this potential decision a bad one.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Danog on July 30, 2010, 04:46:02 PM
If it's similar to Tucks (1, with triggers for 2), then I'm all for it.  He's a great leader.

whose a great leader?
Who do you think?
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: mightytiges on July 30, 2010, 07:34:59 PM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?
Craig Cameron would make this decision wouldn't he? Not his first dumb list management decision that's for sure.

If this is true I'm absolutely stunned about the option of a 2nd year  :help. With another dip into the draft later this year, Kingy should be playing VFL next year if we are to move forward. Strange that we are so keen to sign him up in July when he is hardly a keeper ???.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on July 30, 2010, 07:43:59 PM
If it's similar to Tucks (1, with triggers for 2), then I'm all for it.  He's a great leader.

whose a great leader?
Who do you think?

Winston Churchill  ;D

By the way Dan if you think King or Tuck are great leaders than we are in some trouble at Punt Rd. Neither of them are leaders, neither of them are potential RFC Premiership players and any serious list manager would move them on.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Penelope on July 30, 2010, 07:57:57 PM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?
Craig Cameron would make this decision wouldn't he? Not his first dumb list management decision that's for sure.

If this is true I'm absolutely stunned about the option of a 2nd year  :help. With another dip into the draft later this year, Kingy should be playing VFL next year if we are to move forward. Strange that we are so keen to sign him up in July when he is hardly a keeper ???.

The option is exactly that, Mt, an option that no one is obliged to honur. All it is is a carrot, an incentive.
I'm far from King's greatest fan but I think he has earned another year on the list. He then has to earn the second year of the contract next year.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Gordon Bennett on July 30, 2010, 08:06:29 PM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?

2nd dumb decision, 1st was Tuck! IMO.

Edwards, Polo, Nahas are in the gun IMO!

Two of them have to go!
Edwards in the gun? That's so ridiculous I just can't believe you said it.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on July 30, 2010, 08:14:19 PM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?

2nd dumb decision, 1st was Tuck! IMO.

Edwards, Polo, Nahas are in the gun IMO!

Two of them have to go!
Edwards in the gun? That's so ridiculous I just can't believe you said it.

Edwards is an improved player and he shouldnt even be talked about. Hes had a very good 12 months IMHO.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on July 30, 2010, 08:21:49 PM
Edwards is a keeper! Why would we cut him now when we are finally seeing reward?
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 30, 2010, 10:26:08 PM
we need hard players like jake
get rid of softies like nahas


i have bagged King in the past but on this one i actually agree with you.

If given a choice between Patty Payne and Kingy im glad we chose King. He has flaws but he has improved this year since that Saints game.

ooh and i dont think we can be stupid to sign someone up before the end of the year. I think its all rubbish.

Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: mightytiges on July 31, 2010, 05:37:56 PM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?
Craig Cameron would make this decision wouldn't he? Not his first dumb list management decision that's for sure.

If this is true I'm absolutely stunned about the option of a 2nd year  :help. With another dip into the draft later this year, Kingy should be playing VFL next year if we are to move forward. Strange that we are so keen to sign him up in July when he is hardly a keeper ???.

The option is exactly that, Mt, an option that no one is obliged to honur. All it is is a carrot, an incentive.
I'm far from King's greatest fan but I think he has earned another year on the list. He then has to earn the second year of the contract next year.
True there are a number of others ahead of Kingy for the chop (which explains why we are a bottom club  :P ) and even before this news given Kingy is in our current 22 I thought deep down the Club may keep Kingy on for another year as cannonfodder while the cubs develop. However while the likes of King standard footballers are on our list we aren't going to climb up the ladder. The 2012 option may be incentive for Kingy but for the list's sake it should never be exercised. He's lucky he will still be on an AFL list in 2011.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Penelope on July 31, 2010, 05:55:40 PM
For sure King is probably not the sort of player to take us forward in the long term.
My take on how Hardwick is working is that he first is looking for a core of players who will play the game how he wants them to play.

The challenge is then up to the more skilled players on the list to take their spot, or more specifically to earn it. This is a pretty good culture to install in the club, even if initially it means that players not quite up to it are getting games.

While I would be concerned if King was still getting regular games this time next year, I hope that if he is, it's because he has improved more than most think he can, rather an indictment on those that should be challenging for his his position.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 01, 2010, 11:15:47 AM
Shouldn't believe rumours and jump at shadows  ;D

There's some signing announcements supposedly coming up shortly but who they are who knows

And at the minute to be honest I really don't care

Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: tiger till i die on August 01, 2010, 04:47:09 PM
great game from Kingy today if he plays like that more in the future i would love have him for another year  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: bojangles17 on August 01, 2010, 05:02:19 PM
after todays game ,how about we make it 3  :shh
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on August 01, 2010, 06:27:58 PM
after todays game ,how about we make it 3  :shh

the only question is - Will Jake King be in our next premiership side.

In my opinion he wont be so that means he should not be on our list going forward.
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Smokey on August 01, 2010, 06:34:52 PM

the only question is - Will Jake King be in our next premiership side.


What, he's not playing next season?   :P  ;D
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Penelope on August 01, 2010, 06:39:29 PM
 :lol @ smokey

Ramps, if he keeps improving the way he is, he could be.
Despite a couple of missed goals he had a good game today.
When is our next premiership, by the way  ;D
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Ramps on August 01, 2010, 06:45:28 PM
:lol @ smokey

Ramps, if he keeps improving the way he is, he could be.
Despite a couple of missed goals he had a good game today.
When is our next premiership, by the way  ;D

2013/2014
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: jackstar is back again on August 01, 2010, 06:45:52 PM
Jake King very very good today.'the hard running to get on the end of it was excellent. Well done Jake :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Tigermonk on August 01, 2010, 07:03:35 PM
Yeah played well, Go Kingy  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: cub on August 01, 2010, 07:43:34 PM
I may just say, I was the first to bag King and got shot down. Still very limited in footy ability but makes up for it in many other ways. Deserves every thing he is getting atm  :clapping
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Infamy on August 01, 2010, 09:02:26 PM
I must admit, I don't really get the whole "not a player in our next premiership" thing
If I was picking a side to play in a grand final, I reckon King would be one bloke I'd love to have in my side on the day
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: 1965 on August 01, 2010, 09:08:19 PM
I must admit, I don't really get the whole "not a player in our next premiership" thing
If I was picking a side to play in a grand final, I reckon King would be one bloke I'd love to have in my side on the day

Well stuff me, I actually agree with you (you are still a vindictive turd though)

 :lol
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Infamy on August 01, 2010, 09:20:27 PM
I must admit, I don't really get the whole "not a player in our next premiership" thing
If I was picking a side to play in a grand final, I reckon King would be one bloke I'd love to have in my side on the day

Well eff me, I actually agree with you (you are still a vindictive turd though)

 :lol
Ooh ooh personal attack, my feelings are hurt :(
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: 1965 on August 01, 2010, 09:22:00 PM
I must admit, I don't really get the whole "not a player in our next premiership" thing
If I was picking a side to play in a grand final, I reckon King would be one bloke I'd love to have in my side on the day

Well eff me, I actually agree with you (you are still a vindictive turd though)

 :lol
Ooh ooh personal attack, my feelings are hurt :(

and here I am thinking I've paid you a compliment.

 :lol
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Infamy on August 01, 2010, 09:27:30 PM
I must admit, I don't really get the whole "not a player in our next premiership" thing
If I was picking a side to play in a grand final, I reckon King would be one bloke I'd love to have in my side on the day

Well eff me, I actually agree with you (you are still a vindictive turd though)

 :lol
Ooh ooh personal attack, my feelings are hurt :(

and here I am thinking I've paid you a compliment.

 :lol
A backhanded compliment perhaps
Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: Francois Jackson on August 01, 2010, 10:36:15 PM
after todays game ,how about we make it 3  :shh

the only question is - Will Jake King be in our next premiership side.

In my opinion he wont be so that means he should not be on our list going forward.

i think there is room for him in our team if he plays like this Ramps. If i were betting on our B & F since the Stkilda game he would be in our top 10 no question.

There is no room for Patty Payne Nahas but we can have one small in our team and King may be it.

I rate King equal if not better than Farmer, Nahas and Nason on our list.

Title: Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
Post by: tony_montana on August 05, 2010, 01:23:09 PM
Contract offer is there but can only be signed at seasons end pending any brain snaps from young Jake  :lol