One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Judge Roughneck on November 19, 2010, 10:36:09 AM

Title: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Judge Roughneck on November 19, 2010, 10:36:09 AM
 :cheers

1. Martin
2. Griffiths
3. Astbury
4. Dea
5. Taylor

6. Webberly
7. Nason
8. Nahas
9. Browne
10. Grimes

11. Hicks
12. Contin
13. (Roberts)
14. (Polak)
15. OReilly

16. Conca
17. Batchelor
18. Helbig
19. MacDonald
20. Derickx

21. Gourdis
22. Houli
23. Jakobi
24. Miller
25. Hislop
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Infamy on November 19, 2010, 10:54:29 AM
B. Grimes. Gourdis. ORielly
HB. Batchelor. Astbury. Dea.
C.  Helbig. Martin. Webberly.
HF. Taylor. Griffiths. Nason.
F. MacDonald. Westhoff. Hicks.
OB. Derickx. Conca. Contin.
I. Houli. Nahas. Browne.
Grigg?
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Judge Roughneck on November 19, 2010, 12:21:53 PM
Brad miller fits in there too
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Con65 on November 19, 2010, 05:07:31 PM
B-e

You may need a new full back.  Gourdis was recruited under the TW regime in the PSD back at the end of '07. Then delisted and picked up as a rookie for 2 years...and now back on the senior list.
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Judge Roughneck on November 22, 2010, 07:25:43 AM
I include Gourdis, browne, nahas, as they were all picked up again under hardwick in last two drafts 
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Stripes on November 22, 2010, 05:09:18 PM
If nothing else it shows the sheer quanity of players brought into the club over the past two years and the length of the journey ahead. While many of those players may become champions, it is the players we got before Hardwick came that need to be developed and relied upon if we see any success over the next couple of years.

Stripes
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Judge Roughneck on November 22, 2010, 05:33:49 PM
If nothing else it shows the sheer quanity of players brought into the club over the past two years and the length of the journey ahead. While many of those players may become champions, it is the players we got before Hardwick came that need to be developed and relied upon if we see any success over the next couple of years.

Stripes

intersting that many of the new players are mature types and not just 18 year olds gourdis, farmer, oreilly, webberly, miller, grigg, houli, nason, derickx to give the Wallace era players a boost before having to wait for the first and 2nd year players to come good.

It also means dea or conca can play at coburg and prove there worth before being given games for Richmond. In positions that hardwick wants them to learn
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 07, 2010, 11:31:09 PM
OReilly. Grimes. Gourdis
Dea. Astbury. Batchelor
Webberly. Martin. Conca. 
Helbig. Griffiths. Houli. 
Nason. Miller. Taylor.
Derickx. Contin. Grigg.

I: Browne. Hicks. MacDonald. Jacobi

EM:  Nahas. Hislop. Westhoff.   
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 09, 2010, 07:28:44 PM
26. Grigg
27. Farmer

: :cheerscheers

1. Martin
2. Griffiths
3. Astbury
4. Dea
5. Taylor

6. Webberly
7. Nason
8. Nahas
9. Browne
10. Grimes

11. Hicks
12. Contin
13. (Roberts)
14. (Polak)
15. OReilly

16. Conca
17. Batchelor
18. Helbig
19. MacDonald
20. Derickx

21. Gourdis
22. Houli
23. Jakobi
24. Miller
25. Hislop
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: the claw on December 10, 2010, 10:01:58 PM
sheesh take a few out and it looks ordinary. where is the quality apart from those few.
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Rodgerramjet on December 11, 2010, 05:45:05 AM
sheesh take a few out and it looks ordinary. where is the quality apart from those few.

Hopefully building, this comming year should tell its own little story, must see improvement both individually and generally. Nice side benefit could be some good trade bait taking shape, just in time for free agency.
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Smokey on December 11, 2010, 08:49:47 AM
sheesh take a few out and it looks ordinary. where is the quality apart from those few.

Why is it ordinary?  Two thirds of that list have either none or only one year in the game at the top level.  At least give them a crack at the title before chucking them on the scrap heap.  Sheesh.
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Willy on December 11, 2010, 01:54:49 PM
sheesh take a few out and it looks ordinary. where is the quality apart from those few.

 and to think he's been here all of one season!
Title: Re: Hardwicks Richmond
Post by: Loui Tufga on December 11, 2010, 06:13:23 PM
sheesh take a few out and it looks ordinary. where is the quality apart from those few.

I wouldn't say ordinary??? It looks like a very young side that will take a little more time but when the time comes look out :gotigers :gotigers