One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: mightytiges on February 22, 2011, 02:41:22 PM

Title: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: mightytiges on February 22, 2011, 02:41:22 PM
It's SEN so I'll take it with a grain of salt but Hartford just said there's word going around that Jack may have injured himself (no details) at training this morning. The Club is saying they haven't heard anything. Hopefully just more crappy SEN speculation.
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2011, 03:12:33 PM
SEN sms said Jack landed awkwardly at training and hurt his knee. Club says he has only jarred the knee and there's no structural damage. Jack won't now play on Friday night in Alice Springs though.
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: wayne on February 22, 2011, 03:15:32 PM
Phew!
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: wayne on February 22, 2011, 05:04:38 PM
Riewoldt knee scare

(http://mm.afl.com.au/Portals/0/images/AFL/AFL%20P-T/RiewoldtTigers246a.jpg)

RICHMOND spearhead Jack Riewoldt has been cleared of any structural damage after jarring his knee at training on Tuesday.

Riewoldt, 22, landed awkwardly in a marking contest during a training session at Victoria Park sparking speculation on local radio that he had sustained a major injury.

While he did spend the rest of the session on the sidelines with the joint iced, club officials later confirmed no lasting damage had been suffered during the incident.

However, given Riewoldt's importance to the side, it was also confirmed he won't be joining his teammates in Alice Springs for Friday night's NAB Challenge match against Port Adelaide.

Riewoldt has played 68 games for the Tigers since being selected in the first round of the 2006 NAB AFL Draft and will be hoping to build on a stellar 2010 season that saw him take out the Coleman Medal with 78 goals and the Jack Dyer Medal as his club's best and fairest player.

http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default.aspx?newsid=108236
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Tigermad20011 on February 22, 2011, 05:47:36 PM
So it season over before it starts.
Title: Craig Cameron on 3aw talking about Jack
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2011, 06:54:30 PM
Craig Cameron was just on 3aw:

* Good news in the sense there's no structural damage.

* We expect Jack to play next week (NAB week 3). He won't play this Friday night.

* Scans have shown no structural damage. We will wait though for the knee to settle down before playing him.
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Francois Jackson on February 22, 2011, 07:04:20 PM
whats more important than jacks knee being right is the fact we need to find another forward and fast.

Jack might as well be called Richo until we find some new players who can kick goals
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: mightytiges on February 22, 2011, 07:26:28 PM
With a stronger midfield in this Friday night there shouldn't be any excuses about lack of delivery. A chance for Vickery and Post (if he plays forward) to put their hands up if they want to play alongside Jack in round 1. Miller as well but for the long-term we want our young talls to make a impression and step up.

As for Jack hopefully Dr Death is right about the scans showing no structural damage. It always feels like it is our best players that are the ones who cop the serious injuries  :-\.
Title: Riewoldt knee fine (RFC)
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2011, 09:53:55 PM
Riewoldt knee fine
richmondfc.com.au
By Jason Phelan
7:18 PM Tue 22 Feb, 2011


RICHMOND spearhead Jack Riewoldt underwent scans on Tuesday and has been cleared of any structural damage after jarring his knee at training.

Riewoldt, 22, landed awkwardly during a training session at Victoria Park sparking speculation on local radio that he had sustained a major injury, but Tigers' general manager of football operations Craig Cameron later confirmed no lasting damage had been suffered during the incident.

"It's good news that there's no structural damage or any long-term damage for Jack," Cameron told 3AW radio.

"The scans have shown no structural damage. We've just got to wait and see how it settles down, but … from being pretty nervous when the incident first happened we're all pretty comfortable that it's only a one-week issue.

"We expect that he'll play in our NAB Challenge game next week, but he won't play in Alice Springs."

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/108248/default.aspx
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: one-eyed on February 22, 2011, 09:55:18 PM
and from Jack himself on twitter...

"Knee all good, just landed awkwardly. Disappointed I can't play this weekend but I should be right by NAB 3!!"

http://twitter.com/JackRiewoldt08
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on February 22, 2011, 10:53:13 PM
It always feels like it is our best players that are the ones who cop the serious injuries  :-\.
Knowing our luck Cotchin will break an arm, Foley's foot will fall off and Martin will contract some obscure condition which is only known by the pygmies on Bora Bora.
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Rodgerramjet on February 23, 2011, 02:19:27 AM
So it season over before it starts.


This is a useless post when you know damn well that what you are communicating is completely false. If your sole intention is to create upset with the posters of this board then stuff off, go troll somewhere else and take your evil intentions with you.
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on February 23, 2011, 07:28:52 AM
So it season over before it starts.


This is a useless post when you know damn well that what you are communicating is completely false. If your sole intention is to create upset with the posters of this board then eff off, go troll somewhere else and take your evil intentions with you.

Not completely sure Roger but i think Tigermad was talking tongue in cheek! Maybe TM2011 needed to add a :whistle or a :rollin or even a  :lol
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Rodgerramjet on February 23, 2011, 07:49:39 AM
So it season over before it starts.


This is a useless post when you know damn well that what you are communicating is completely false. If your sole intention is to create upset with the posters of this board then eff off, go troll somewhere else and take your evil intentions with you.

Not completely sure Roger but i think Tigermad was talking tongue in cheek! Maybe TM2011 needed to add a :whistle or a :rollin or even a  :lol

No he wasn't i'm afraid.
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Francois Jackson on February 23, 2011, 08:55:44 AM
So it season over before it starts.


This is a useless post when you know damn well that what you are communicating is completely false. If your sole intention is to create upset with the posters of this board then eff off, go troll somewhere else and take your evil intentions with you.

Not completely sure Roger but i think Tigermad was talking tongue in cheek! Maybe TM2011 needed to add a :whistle or a :rollin or even a  :lol

No he wasn't i'm afraid.

explain please

is it serious or not

Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Smokey on February 23, 2011, 09:17:34 AM
So it season over before it starts.


This is a useless post when you know damn well that what you are communicating is completely false. If your sole intention is to create upset with the posters of this board then eff off, go troll somewhere else and take your evil intentions with you.

Not completely sure Roger but i think Tigermad was talking tongue in cheek! Maybe TM2011 needed to add a :whistle or a :rollin or even a  :lol

No he wasn't i'm afraid.

explain please

is it serious or not



Jack's knee is fine, just jarred it - that came from both the club and Jack himself (Twitter).  Miss this week and should play in NAB 3.  RRJ was just having a crack at TM20011 doing his best Chicken Little impersonation - TM's glass wasn't even half empty, it was overturned!
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Penelope on February 23, 2011, 09:24:58 AM
 :lol
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: tiga on February 23, 2011, 01:18:41 PM
Well if Jack has a slow start to the year, at least now he can blame it on a interrupted preseason!  :lol

And after the initial report was revealed, I heard that Miller had reacted prematurely and went out and made a bulk purchase of boot polish for this season. So if you are now after some boot polish going cheap, Brad's your Man!  ;D
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: mat073 on February 23, 2011, 01:38:15 PM
So it season over before it starts.


This is a useless post when you know damn well that what you are communicating is completely false. If your sole intention is to create upset with the posters of this board then eff off, go troll somewhere else and take your evil intentions with you.

Not completely sure Roger but i think Tigermad was talking tongue in cheek! Maybe TM2011 needed to add a :whistle or a :rollin or even a  :lol

No he wasn't i'm afraid.

explain please

is it serious or not



Jack's knee is fine, just jarred it - that came from both the club and Jack himself (Twitter).  Miss this week and should play in NAB 3.  RRJ was just having a crack at TM20011 doing his best Chicken Little impersonation - TM's glass wasn't even half empty, it was overturned!

Its all over...Jumpin Jack is the new Coughlan
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Muscles on March 01, 2011, 07:54:09 AM
First it was a jarred knee, then it was a hyper-extension, now it's bone bruising.

I wonder what the description of Jack's minor knee hiccup will be next week?

Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: 1965 on March 01, 2011, 08:27:37 AM
So it season over before it starts.


This is a useless post when you know damn well that what you are communicating is completely false. If your sole intention is to create upset with the posters of this board then eff off, go troll somewhere else and take your evil intentions with you.

Not completely sure Roger but i think Tigermad was talking tongue in cheek! Maybe TM2011 needed to add a :whistle or a :rollin or even a  :lol

No he wasn't i'm afraid.

explain please

is it serious or not



Jack's knee is fine, just jarred it - that came from both the club and Jack himself (Twitter).  Miss this week and should play in NAB 3.  RRJ was just having a crack at TM20011 doing his best Chicken Little impersonation - TM's glass wasn't even half empty, it was overturned!

Its all over...Jumpin Jack is the new Coughlan

Just as well we got Miller then eh?

 :lol
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: wayne on March 01, 2011, 09:02:45 AM
First it was a jarred knee, then it was a hyper-extension, now it's bone bruising.

I wonder what the description of Jack's minor knee hiccup will be next week?



Benny Nason got bone bruising in the NAB cup game against the Dawks last year, he wasn't out for long.
Title: Re: Jack Riewoldt injured or not?
Post by: Penelope on March 01, 2011, 09:10:11 AM
First it was a jarred knee, then it was a hyper-extension, now it's bone bruising.

I wonder what the description of Jack's minor knee hiccup will be next week?



A jarred knee and hyper-extension are very similar injuries and both will cause bruising in the joint.