One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on May 16, 2011, 05:36:04 PM
-
Robin Nahas, Richmond, has been charged with a first offence for making negligent contact with an umpire (Michael Jennings) during the first quarter of the Round Eight match between Richmond and the Western Bulldogs, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday May 15, 2011.
In summary, he can accept a $900 sanction with an early plea.
A first offence for making negligent contact with an umpire is a $1200 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $900 sanction.
Jake King, Richmond, has been charged with a first offence for misconduct in that he made unnecessary contact with a trainer for the Western Bulldogs during the fourth quarter of the Round Eight match between Richmond and the Western Bulldogs, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday May 15, 2011.
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
A first offence for misconduct is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/114009/default.aspx
-
Somebody should fine the trainer for being in Jake's face.
-
Think what I just mentioned about taking this stuff off the field applies. WTF does fat does fat boy trainer think he is! See the look on the fat smatrses face, only when you can get away with it you would do it buddy, fn loser.
-
Somebody should fine the trainer for being in Jake's face.
Here,here.
Fat little tardo should just stfu and wear the saliva bra!
-
Kingy is off to the tribunal to fight the fine.
-
stuffing trainer doesn't get a fine.
Typical BS. :banghead
-
trainer doesn't get a fine.
Typical BS. :banghead
trainer doesn't get fined because he didn't make contact with (read he didn't push) Jake
Can't believe they are wasting thier time going othe tribunal
-
trainer doesn't get a fine.
Typical BS. :banghead
trainer doesn't get fined because he didn't make contact with (read he didn't push) Jake
Can't believe they are wasting thier time going othe tribunal
Agree it's what 1k?
Whats the point? Have a night off instead.
-
kingy dont take days off ;D
-
Agree it's what 1k?
Whats the point? Have a night off instead.
yep $1.2k
Pointless
He pushed him, cannot see him getting off
-
Kingy failed to get off but he did get the fine reduced to $800
King fails to beat charge
By AAP .
17 May 2011 07:25PM EST
RICHMOND forward Jake King has failed to beat a charge of making unnecessary contact with a trainer during Sunday's game at Etihad Stadium.
However the AFL Tribunal ruled the recommended $1600 fine should be reduced to $800.
King claimed the incident happened in a split second and when he first reacted to push the trainer, he wasn't looking at him and thought he was a Western Bulldogs player.
http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/articles/2011/05/17/king-fails-to-beat-charge/
-
However the AFL Tribunal ruled the recommended $1600 fine should be reduced to $800.
King claimed the incident happened in a split second and when he first reacted to push the trainer, he wasn't looking at him and thought he was a Western Bulldogs player.
http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/articles/2011/05/17/king-fails-to-beat-charge/
with an ealry plea it was going to be $1200, still cant see the point
And seriously who at the RFC comes up with defences "wasn't looking" :lol
-
The point is $400 still in kings pocket rather than the AFL's, I suppose