One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: the claw on July 15, 2011, 05:13:10 PM

Title: players we have gifted 50 games plus.
Post by: the claw on July 15, 2011, 05:13:10 PM

what  duds only at richmond would  players like these get gifted so many games after so many sub standard performanceswith no real long term improvement and with the howlers and comedy capers a regular feature. yet after so many games supporters can see no wrong only at richmond do supporters tolerate  defend  and praise them.

anyway heres players who have got to 50 plus games and have hardly improved from day dot. the real concern is hardwick is backing these chumps in. one real concern is the coach stated at one stage poor kicks or poor decision makers should not be getting games.

edwards 82 games.
grigg  58. only been with us a yr but sheesh he has some things to work on.
jackson 97.
king 69.
mcguane 81
nahas 48 close enough.
miller 135
thursfield 70
tuck 134.
white 79
moore 84 a proviso has played a couple of good seasons but injury and poor form make up for the rest.
morton 65

after all the games  these blokes have played, all the time in the system  we still debate their worth their consistency weather they have greatly improved. the scary thing is theres others who have not got to 50 games who have spent significant time in the system.
if people are wondering why we are a bottom dweller heres your answer while they remain we are likely to remain a bottom dweller. the bar has to be raised and its mainly the seniors who are the problem.
Title: Re: players we have gifted 50 games plus.
Post by: Ekto on July 15, 2011, 05:30:45 PM

so many sub standard performanceswith no real long term improvement and with the howlers and comedy capers a regular feature

Spot on Claw. You have posted 667 too many posts.

Title: Re: players we have gifted 50 games plus.
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 15, 2011, 07:24:33 PM
I would argue that Kong has earned it
Nahas has played some good games
Moore also

You are spot on with the rest. In any other team most of those names wouldn't have made it past 10.

Very average list there
Title: Re: players we have gifted 50 games plus.
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on July 15, 2011, 07:32:27 PM

so many sub standard performanceswith no real long term improvement and with the howlers and comedy capers a regular feature

Spot on Claw. You have posted 667 too many posts.



That's abit harsh.

I thought some assessments are pretty spot on. Unfortunantely sometimes the lady known as Ms Reality is a real b1atch.
Title: Re: players we have gifted 50 games plus.
Post by: mightytiges on July 16, 2011, 05:10:32 AM

what  duds only at richmond would  players like these get gifted so many games after so many sub standard performanceswith no real long term improvement and with the howlers and comedy capers a regular feature. yet after so many games supporters can see no wrong only at richmond do supporters tolerate  defend  and praise them.

anyway heres players who have got to 50 plus games and have hardly improved from day dot. the real concern is hardwick is backing these chumps in. one real concern is the coach stated at one stage poor kicks or poor decision makers should not be getting games.

edwards 82 games.
grigg  58. only been with us a yr but sheesh he has some things to work on.
jackson 97.
king 69.
mcguane 81
nahas 48 close enough.
miller 135
thursfield 70
tuck 134.
white 79
moore 84 a proviso has played a couple of good seasons but injury and poor form make up for the rest.
morton 65

after all the games  these blokes have played, all the time in the system  we still debate their worth their consistency weather they have greatly improved. the scary thing is theres others who have not got to 50 games who have spent significant time in the system.
if people are wondering why we are a bottom dweller heres your answer while they remain we are likely to remain a bottom dweller. the bar has to be raised and its mainly the seniors who are the problem.
The test for Dimma as well as Craig Cameron will be at the end of season. They need keep turning over the list. How many get cut depends on how many decent picks we'll have.