One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: taztiger4 on November 10, 2011, 12:54:34 PM

Title: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: taztiger4 on November 10, 2011, 12:54:34 PM

article on RFC site saying Tucky & Jacko have re-signed

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Tiger Woods on November 10, 2011, 12:57:30 PM

"Richmond has re-signed two of its most experienced players - midfielders Shane Tuck and Daniel Jackson."

You may now commence rants of rage

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Tiger Woods on November 10, 2011, 01:00:27 PM

More from the news story http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/125983/default.aspx

"Jackson played 21 games with Richmond in the 2011 season and, although not quite as prominent as in the previous two years, he was still a valuable contributor, averaging just over 17 disposals per match and adding his trademark grunt to the team’s midfield."

When did we start calling turnovers "grunts" ??

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: one-eyed on November 10, 2011, 01:01:19 PM

Richmond has re-signed two of its most experienced players - midfielders Shane Tuck and Daniel Jackson.

“In a week where we’ve announced the re-signings of several of our promising young players, it’s also pleasing to confirm that Shane and Daniel - two of only six players at the Club with more than 100 games’ experience - have also re-committed to the Tigers,” said Richmond’s General Manager of Football, Craig Cameron.

“The value they provide such a young playing list through their experience at the game’s highest level, their strong bodies around the contest, and capacity to win their own ball, is something we certainly appreciate.”

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/125983/default.aspx

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Willy on November 10, 2011, 01:04:56 PM

 :outtahere

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Sabretooth on November 10, 2011, 01:07:15 PM

Anger management clinics are anticipating a surge in clientele!  :cheers

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: mightytiges on November 10, 2011, 01:14:27 PM

Opposition midfielders are shaking in their boots :nope

So does anyone know how long each new contract is for? Presumably Tucky got one year and I'm guessing Jacko got two. Surely he didn't get three  :help.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: WilliamPowell on November 10, 2011, 01:17:14 PM

Quote from: one-eyed on November 10, 2011, 01:01:19 PM

“The value they provide such a young playing list through their experience at the game’s highest level, their strong bodies around the contest, and capacity to win their own ball, is something we certainly appreciate.”

Now that's a funny quote if I apply it to one of the re-signings  ;D

If I don't do this  :rollin :lol :rollin :lol

I'll just end up doing this  :'( :'( between the odd one of these  :banghead

 ;D

Quote from: mightytiges on November 10, 2011, 01:14:27 PM

So does anyone know how long each new contract is for? Presumably Tucky got one year and I'm guessing Jacko got two. Surely he didn't get three  :help.

I think you'll find Tuck's would be one year

Lot of Clubs doing that this year only giving out 1 year deals with FA coming in next season

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Loui Tufga on November 10, 2011, 01:17:35 PM

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: JVT on November 10, 2011, 01:47:48 PM

Quote from: Tiger-from-Tas on November 10, 2011, 01:17:35 PM

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead

This.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: mightytiges on November 10, 2011, 01:50:39 PM

Quote from: WilliamPowell on November 10, 2011, 01:17:14 PM

Quote from: one-eyed on November 10, 2011, 01:01:19 PM

“The value they provide such a young playing list through their experience at the game’s highest level, their strong bodies around the contest, and capacity to win their own ball, is something we certainly appreciate.”

Now that's a funny quote if I apply it to one of the re-signings  ;D

If I don't do this  :rollin :lol :rollin :lol

I'll just end up doing this  :'( :'( between the odd one of these  :banghead

 ;D

It's a lesson to our young players in not what to do - ignoring first options, blind mongrel kicks that go straight to the opposition, and killing team momentum by holding onto the ball until all of your teammates are manned up and the opposition get numbers back :yep ;D

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on November 10, 2011, 01:54:13 PM

eff me, please let it be no more than 1 year.....  :banghead

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: mightytiges on November 10, 2011, 01:58:20 PM

Quote from: Sabretooth on November 10, 2011, 01:07:15 PM

Anger management clinics are anticipating a surge in clientele!  :cheers

;D

Cameron joins witness protection program :outtahere

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Coach on November 10, 2011, 01:59:12 PM

This just reeks of Craig Cameron.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: eliminator on November 10, 2011, 02:05:02 PM

I don't mind Tuck being signed up for another year. I believe the Club should have got rid of Jackson but given that the club did not get rid of Jackson he should only been given a year extension. Jackson should consider himself very fortunate

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: 10 FLAGS on November 10, 2011, 02:06:47 PM

Rumour is Jackson got a 2 year deal.

Well the RFC management can pay for it. Coz I'm not giving them 1 cent of my money next year on a matter of priciple. Ive been a member for years but stuff it, if the club wants to waste the members money, they can waste someone elses or preferably their own. They can get stuffed for mine. Sick of Richmond supporters being treated like idiots by the administration.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: wayne on November 10, 2011, 02:17:39 PM

Take that GWS!

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Tiger Woods on November 10, 2011, 02:30:50 PM

Oh I get it now. They're pretending to be insane in order to lull the other clubs into a false sense of security. Well played RFC, well played :thumbsup

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Willy on November 10, 2011, 02:35:16 PM

Im disappointed, but not at all surprised. Was pretty obvious that Jacko wasnt going to be axed. The fact is that we dont really have an inside mid to replace him with at the moment. What we need now, is for someone to take his spot and force him to become a depth player at Coburg for two years. This is why it is imperative that we get quality inside mids to the club.

Im glad Tucky got another year.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: one-eyed on November 10, 2011, 03:14:38 PM

Herald-Sun alluding to Tucky getting one year...

RICHMOND has given Shane Tuck at least one more year at the top level, signing the veteran to a new contract.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/shane-tuck-wins-new-tiger-contract/story-fn69a32t-1226191253926

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: WilliamPowell on November 10, 2011, 03:18:53 PM

Quote from: mightytiges on November 10, 2011, 01:50:39 PM

It's a lesson to our young players in not what to do - ignoring first options, blind mongrel kicks that go straight to the opposition, and killing team momentum by holding onto the ball until all of your teammates are manned up and the opposition get numbers back :yep ;D

You forgot brain fades leading to multiple suspensions  ;D

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: one-eyed on November 10, 2011, 04:22:18 PM

Going by what Jacko said on SEN he's been offered two years.

Tucky will be SEN also with Schwarz and Leech in the next hour or so.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: tony_montana on November 10, 2011, 05:17:55 PM

Quote from: Davey on November 10, 2011, 01:59:12 PM

This just reeks of Craig Cameron.

yes bc Cameron is the sole decision maker at punt road


sorry al had to chime in before you  :thumbsup

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Coach on November 10, 2011, 05:22:10 PM

(http://laterallineco.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fishing_shirt_fly_fishing_shirt_Jay-Fleming_7_24_10.jpg)

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: tony_montana on November 10, 2011, 05:27:27 PM

Quote from: Davey on November 10, 2011, 05:22:10 PM

(http://laterallineco.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fishing_shirt_fly_fishing_shirt_Jay-Fleming_7_24_10.jpg)

duh..
 just for your enlightenment davey i have grave reservations about CC, reckon hes a poor operator, just having fun with al who is always playing devils advocate everytime CC's name is dragged through the mud.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Coach on November 10, 2011, 05:28:33 PM

Al just reeks of Craig Cameron.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: 10 FLAGS on November 10, 2011, 06:17:28 PM

rubbish DECISION  :banghead

They tried to keep it quiet coz they know the supporters are disgusted with these types of decisions. Unfortunately the attitudes of the people at the club mean people like me on principle will not buy memberships next year.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Penelope on November 10, 2011, 06:53:59 PM

Quote from: Davey on November 10, 2011, 05:28:33 PM

Al just reeks of Craig Cameron.

thats because we are one ;)

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: The Big Richo on November 10, 2011, 07:50:05 PM

Nice to see I forced the club to come clean on this one.

I agree with all negative sentiment expressed re Jackson, happy for Tuck who has shown he has great character.

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: taztiger4 on November 10, 2011, 07:59:23 PM

Quote from: 10 FLAGS on November 10, 2011, 06:17:28 PM

rubbish DECISION  :banghead

They tried to keep it quiet coz they know the supporters are disgusted with these types of decisions. Unfortunately the attitudes of the people at the club mean people like me on principle will not buy memberships next year.

what !!!

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on November 10, 2011, 08:19:30 PM

Quote from: al on November 10, 2011, 06:53:59 PM

Quote from: Davey on November 10, 2011, 05:28:33 PM

Al just reeks of Craig Cameron.

thats because we are one ;)

CC couldn't sack the water boy at Tigerland, let alone a crap player

Title: Re: Jackson and Tuck re-sign [merged]
Post by: Chuck17 on November 10, 2011, 09:38:42 PM

hopefully Miller can take Jacko out in pre-season which will mean we got use out of one of these two