One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => View from the Outer => Topic started by: julzqld on March 25, 2005, 01:26:49 AM

Title: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: julzqld on March 25, 2005, 01:26:49 AM
I felt very sorry to see Nick Riewoldt so upset after his shoulder injury and my heart went out to him.  Always sad to see a champion down.  I didn't agree with Mal Michael and Chris Scott roughing him up just after injuring his shoulder.  I don't believe that they didn't know he was injured.  Not sportmen like behaviour.

However, Eddie McGuire just made my blood boil.  Apart from his commentating which is irritating at best, his bid to make the Riewoldt injury a lot worse was just sickening.  I don't know how many times he asked Doc Larkins how long he'd (Riewoldt) be out and trying to sensationalise the story even more so.  And then, and please correct me if I did happen to hear this wrong, he made disparaging remarks about the Mater Hospital that Riewoldt was going to in Brisbane for x-rays.  The Mater Hospital has a great reputation, especially in regards to children and women (not sure about footballers).  Where does this guy get off?  And yet again we hear all about the tv rights and Eddie smugly saying that the AFL will make it a one year contract etc etc

Commiserations to Nick Riewoldt and a speedy recovery.  Damnation to Eddie McGuire.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: mightytiges on March 25, 2005, 02:49:42 AM
Not coming from Brisbane Eddie didn't know of the hospital and I think he thought Doc Larkins said Martyr instead of Mater.

Yeah Julz the interview came across as Eddie trying to get Larkins to say it was possibly a season-threatening injury so he could get a big scoop. And what was with Eddie's "what a great report" line  ??? - the bloke had just busted his collarbone and done his AC   ::).

The match itself after half time was brutal and a great game to start off the year. When the Saints got that run the Lions just switched on the physical power and stopped them in their tracks. Makes you realise again that we've got a long way to go to get to the intimidating level that Brisbane and Port have.

Saints have got a few worries after tonight apart from Riewoldt. They don't look like they'll have a forward line for the next few weeks (we play them in round 5) with Hamill having to go for smacking Scott in the chops and Gehrig's back injury. Their backline looks wobbly and they have a number of  players who won't put their body on the line - Goddard and Fiora two that stand out. Fiora wasn't bad last night and was pretty good in the 3rd qtr with his runs forward but he pulled out of head-on contests a few times and let the Lions player win the ball. He'll be adequate for the Saints but I doubt he'll show much more than that. He's not going to be someone we'll regret letting go. Bonus is we got Simmonds.

Michael slamming into Riewoldt's injured shoulder was poor. Not sure for sure if the now toothless Scott knew as Riewoldt was between him and his mate Hamill when he was bumping into every Saint in his path. If someone comes into the game carrying an injury then they're fair game as once you cross the line you're saying you're 100%. But to target an injured opponent when he looks like he's done something fairly serious is a pretty cowardly act.   
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Rodgerramjet on March 25, 2005, 03:52:31 AM
I'm all for toughness in a game of footy, In fact I think the game these days is a little to sanitized, but what I saw of Micheal and Scott tonight is just not football, going in to belt a guy like that when they know he IS injured is just really bad for the image of the game. I hope they both get suspended.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: julzqld on March 25, 2005, 09:21:06 AM
Thanks for clearing that up MT - I can see where it could have be misinterpreted.

I agree - I'm all for toughness and the game has been sanitised, but what Mal Michael did, and Chris Scott to a lesser extent, wasn't good.  It brought back memories of hearing that Matthew Lloyd was deliberately going to target Richo after he came back from having a broken arm.

Going back to Eddie - the other thing that struck me was how much he waffled on at the end of the game and not just about the Riewoldt injury.  It was as if he was trying to milk every second for his own publicity, whereas the rest of us were just wishing he would say goodnight so we could all tune into the NRL Footy Show (Dare Devil Dudes is hysterical).  The sooner he's gone the better footy will be.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: mjs on March 25, 2005, 10:47:38 AM
Eddie couldn't resist having a dig at McGough - called him too slow when he got caught in possession and said he caused a turnover when his kick into the forward line wasn't marked - both unfair calls.

I thought Goddard was very good - didn't notice him pulling out and some of his pick-ups in traffic were very skillful. I'd take him tomorrow and I get the impression he's not that rated by the coach - just a feeling from how often he's benched.

 
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 25, 2005, 01:21:55 PM
However, Eddie McGuire ....  And yet again we hear all about the tv rights and Eddie smugly saying that the AFL will make it a one year contract etc etc

I only saw about 10 minutes of the game - didn't interest me that much I did hear Tony Jones going on about how a trainer had 2 of Scotts teeth - gripping TV that. And the part of the game that MJS mentioned where McGough was tackled and the Eddie said he "was too slow" - yawn :sleep :sleep

Onto to the TV rights  -Last night while I was out driving down to Red Rooster to get the family raost  ;D TripleM had Andy D on. Brayshaw, Newman and Taylor were asking Andy D about the TV rights and he suggested the AFL could if they wanted too make the next contract for 1 year only and then open them up for bidding again because the "first and lasts rights options" is for this next agreement only. Andy D also pointed out that the AFL have 2 years to finalise them. Spuds contribution to this discussion came at the end when he said "Nice straight bat there by Andrew Demetriou about the TV rights" - at the end of the interview Messrs Brayshaw, Newman and Taylor seemed rather relieved

But Pluuzzee give me a break. A one year TV rights deal? What is going on between the AFL & Ch 9? It smells fishy ...  dare I think it let alone say it collusion anyone ;D

Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Ox on March 25, 2005, 01:49:41 PM
I'm all for toughness in a game of footy, In fact I think the game these days is a little to sanitized, but what I saw of Micheal and Scott tonight is just not football, going in to belt a guy like that when they know he IS injured is just really bad for the image of the game. I hope they both get suspended.

Did I feel sympathy toward Rieoldt as he cried in pain and dismay ?

Of course...somewhat.

Did i approve of Michaels and Scotts treatment of the injured kid ?

stuffen oath.

It's called instinct and when you play a mans game expect a lot of it.

What they did,imo,was within the rules and as such should remain an un-reportable incident(s)

Sportsmanlike -definitely not,but who's talking about sportsmanship anyway.

If we at the RFC had an ounce of this vulturesque instinct
 we would be a formidable force within the competition as opposed to the recent benchmark for femininity.

As nasty as it was it was beautiful.

Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: JohnF on March 25, 2005, 07:31:40 PM
Agree with the Eddie is a dikhead vibe that is permeating this thread.

As for the Reiwoldt -Michael/Scott incident, I thought it was poor form by those two Brisbane players but it shouldn't be reportable. I just hope the favour is returned to them.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: mightytiges on March 25, 2005, 07:53:17 PM
It's unlikely they'll get reported. It'd set a new precident if players were rubbed out for not playing in the spirit of the game. Where would you draw the line?! 

As for a 1 year TV deal. I wonder if a Mr Packer has had a quiet word to Andy D ?!
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: froars on March 25, 2005, 07:57:11 PM
I'm really sick of the meathead approach of the commentators when these things come up.  Dermott always reckons virtually anything is okay.  Now, i luv physical footy, won't deny it.  But targeting someone who is injured like that is a pretty cowardly act IMO.  Not a reportable incident, but doesn't reflect well on the ppl involved.  Good on Cometti for having the guts to say it was an ordinary act.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Ox on March 25, 2005, 08:32:51 PM
Bad luck for Reiwoldt.

If he had any brains he would have fended then off with his good arm at leats instead of retreating to the boundary and crying like  an under 10s player.

WTF was that ?

I just watched molly mildew try and publicise the fact that these 2 should be reported- what i'd expect from a directionless
poofter.

Welcome to the big league kiddo.

It makes for great footy.
(and no,i dont agree with Byron Picketts hit on the adelaide guy.)
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: cub on March 25, 2005, 10:52:56 PM
Riewoldt doesn't play for us so really don't give a rats.
Think the incident was/is blown out of proportion - he was over the white line and wasn't in any trainers arms at the time - I would expect no less from any one in my team if they saw something like that to test it out.

And the sooky la la is starting to get on my nerves as well - fair enough the palyers put thier heart and soul into training and playing week in week out - But get a reality grip guys it is just a game after all it is not the end of the world and the money and lifestyle surely makes up for a few weeks out FFS (Then again the way I carry on at the footy). That's another story  :lol

Wouldn't of seen it in the old days - what would people like Jack Dyer say - he would be rolling in his grave i'd dare say.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: JohnF on March 25, 2005, 11:26:36 PM
I'm really sick of the meathead approach of the commentators when these things come up.  Dermott always reckons virtually anything is okay.

I guess once you've stepped on a guy's head, everything is permitted.

This incident has been blown out of proportion no doubt because Reiwoldt is the AFL's golden boy, but it was still a low act by the Brisbane boys, anyway you look at it.

As for Reiwoldt himself, was a little melodramatic to turn on the waterworks, but I'll go easy on him. He is defnitely a brave player and commits his body to punishment, as was shown by that mark he took last year running backwards into an approaching pack. He ain't no soft cok.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Ox on March 26, 2005, 12:52:03 AM
He aint no softcok JohnF and will one day be one of the greats
but for now has to earn his stripes among older,meaner lions.

What we saw last night was a good old fashioned welcoming to the Big Time.

It may be wrong but poo like that inspires me to the max.

Nick will now re-assess an come back meaner.

I phukken love it and wish there were more of it.

Pressure makes diamonds.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: JohnF on March 26, 2005, 03:07:58 AM
Yeah there's truth to what you say mate.

lmfaoo@ barring up over Reiwoldt's initiation.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Ox on March 26, 2005, 01:23:01 PM
LMAOOOO@Watching the incident over and over on VHS while I beat the bishop into submission
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Fishfinger on March 26, 2005, 02:20:19 PM
I hope he recovers and is up for his Sunday service. 8) The bishop, that is.
I'm hoping I'm up for a Sunday service myself. :thumbsup (No, I'm not religious)
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: julzqld on March 28, 2005, 08:41:54 PM
I hear that the AFL aren't going to take any action against Michael and Scott.  Leigh Matthews, however, had strong words to say against Eddie McGuire for talking up the incident (very true).  Eddie, being his smug self, opted for sarcasm and said he cause Riewoldt's injury (funny, I could believe that).
Title: Re: Eddie McGuire
Post by: mightytiges on April 03, 2005, 04:12:17 AM
Eddie's already trying to trivialise the Yarra City council are seriously considering sueing the Pies for $10 million worth of damages over the state of Vic Park. Bet it won't even get a mention on the footy show.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Roar on April 03, 2005, 10:48:01 AM
Cough up Eddie you pulled Vic Park apart and sold it off piece by piece when you didn't even own the land selling the turf which belonged to the coucil it's about time you were brought to account $ 10 mill you moron and fencing stolen goods.

If you think anyone gives a crap what happens to you and your club anymore your in dreamland after your monologue on the Footy Show on Thursday which I believed conviced The TAC to pull the plug on Richmond have no doudt we will rejoice on anything that brings you down you hypocritical prick.

And hear this, at the end of tis season TAC will pull the plug on you as well.
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: Ox on April 03, 2005, 05:52:31 PM
 ;D

Eddie will eat himself.
Title: Re: Eddie McGuire
Post by: WilliamPowell on April 04, 2005, 12:59:44 PM
Eddie's already trying to trivialise the Yarra City council are seriously considering sueing the Pies for $10 million worth of damages over the state of Vic Park. Bet it won't even get a mention on the footy show.

they showed the "state" of Victoria Park on Friday night "Today Tonight" on Ch 7 - what a disgrace.

Holes in walls, brown tiolet bowls, holes in floors where the carpets have been ripped up....

I wouldn't be making light of it - will cost a lot to clean it up
Title: Re: Nick Riewoldt/Eddie McGuire
Post by: mightytiges on April 06, 2005, 09:10:07 AM
;D

Eddie will eat himself.

Seems everyone else is enjoying the feast - Matthews, Lions, Ch 7, Ch 10, ....  ;D

I would be worrying more about those dud pies of yours Eddie. Wooden spoon favourites  :thumbsup.