One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Coach on February 17, 2012, 08:52:49 PM

Title: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Coach on February 17, 2012, 08:52:49 PM
Looks like he's gawn for the first few weeks of the season. Footage doesn't look good
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: yellowandback on February 17, 2012, 09:10:37 PM
It's inconclusive, he'd be unlucky imv
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Coach on February 17, 2012, 09:23:59 PM
It's conclusive. He stopped, looked at Nort bloke and then knocked him on his ass
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: WA Tiger on February 17, 2012, 09:25:02 PM
Not good enough if he goes, we can't have players like him doing poo behind the ball...if he goes he is a fool.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: wayne on February 17, 2012, 09:28:43 PM
It's inconclusive, he'd be unlucky imv

Footage doesn't mean bugger all nowadays. Remember King got stitched up by Cloke in a practice game with no footage at all.

Behind the play and the guy getting subbed out means he'll get weeks.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: yellowandback on February 17, 2012, 10:10:06 PM
It's inconclusive, he'd be unlucky imv

Footage doesn't mean bugger all nowadays. Remember King got stitched up by Cloke in a practice game with no footage at all.

Behind the play and the guy getting subbed out means he'll get weeks.

Just saw the behind goal footage, more conclusive, not good
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: bojangles17 on February 17, 2012, 10:10:21 PM
2 or 3 unfortunately..
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: tony_montana on February 17, 2012, 10:15:25 PM
spewin bc he looked good and took everything that was dished at him - nth were going for the square up for the rest of the game. Smart player, on field leader already and tough as nails
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Tigermad20011 on February 17, 2012, 10:17:14 PM
Stood his ground play on.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Penelope on February 17, 2012, 10:18:53 PM
when did this happen? i missed the first half and a bit of the first game.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: WA Tiger on February 17, 2012, 10:20:43 PM
spewin bc he looked good and took everything that was dished at him - nth were going for the square up for the rest of the game. Smart player, on field leader already and tough as nails

Stupid player if found guilty, just like Jackson.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Penelope on February 17, 2012, 10:23:42 PM
much smarter and better footballer than jackson. he is a red though so maybe he does have a fiery streak that needs to be curbed.
you really need to see the incident before you pass judgement though
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on February 17, 2012, 10:28:43 PM
Oh dear. That's worth 2  :(
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: TigerTimeII on February 17, 2012, 10:29:42 PM
he will go only cos he is a tiger, but he held his ground did nothing wrong
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on February 17, 2012, 10:37:13 PM
spewin bc he looked good and took everything that was dished at him - nth were going for the square up for the rest of the game. Smart player, on field leader already and tough as nails

Stupid player if found guilty, just like Jackson.

Dont do it WAT,
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: WA Tiger on February 17, 2012, 10:38:58 PM
much smarter and better footballer than jackson. he is a red though so maybe he does have a fiery streak that needs to be curbed.
you really need to see the incident before you pass judgement though

If al IF ..IF, thats what I said so not passing judgement yet mate. But really if found guilty, not a smart move, and a smart footballer wouldnt do that. Good player yes, smart, we will see.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Penelope on February 17, 2012, 10:45:05 PM
well, with out either of us seeing it, lets say ,hypothetically, it was plain stupid.

the real issue then is does he do it again?

does he learn from his eff up, or does he do it again, then probably again.........?
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: WA Tiger on February 17, 2012, 10:52:58 PM
well, with out either of us seeing it, lets say ,hypothetically, it was plain stupid.

the real issue then is does he do it again?

does he learn from his eff up, or does he do it again, then probably again.........?

Thats a fair enough comment al, I agree, but honestly, it's as stupid as King getting reported and suspended the last game of the season for the past 2-3 years.

Why (if proven guilty) would you do that in a NAB game ffs, if suspended we will be without King and Conca for round one and by all reports they went well tonight....if we have a couple of injuries (touch wood) all of a sudden we are down about 5 players going into to round one.....that just gets me.... :banghead
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: 10 FLAGS on February 17, 2012, 11:28:01 PM
didnt do anything bad but he'll get suspended anyway.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: dwaino on February 17, 2012, 11:56:36 PM
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/129123/default.aspx

The footage. The only thing that I reckon going against him is he paused. Other than that, Adams should harden the eff up.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: Penelope on February 18, 2012, 12:11:04 AM
i think the commentator is on the money. no intent but he'll get weeks because the other bloke got knocked out.
Title: Re: Conca
Post by: TigerLand on February 18, 2012, 12:34:39 AM
Unfortunatly he's gone.

With a clean record + early guilty plea, I hope he only gets 2 weeks.

AFL hate head injuries, especially ones from bumps, especially ones behind the play.

I fear he'll get 3-4, which is ridiculous but unfortunately the nature of the AFL nowadays..

Wasn't a big bump just caught Adams in sweet spot.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Smokey on February 18, 2012, 06:19:15 AM
Was a bump that normally would not be looked at but there was a clash of heads that did the damage to Adams.  Conca came off also with a cut lip.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: one-eyed on February 18, 2012, 07:03:39 AM
AFL site saying it could be a 5 week suspension  :P

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/129123/default.aspx

RICHMOND youngster Reece Conca may be facing a five week stint on the sidelines following a behind-the-play incident that left North Melbourne's Leigh Adams concussed.

In behind-the-goals footage of the incident, Conca could be seen bumping Adams in the first quarter of Richmond's round one NAB Cup game against North at Etihad Stadium on Friday night.

Conca's shoulder appeared to make contact with Adams' head, although the Tiger midfielder's elbow was not raised.

Conca's biggest problem is the fact the incident took place about 40 metres behind the play.

Under new tribunal guidelines introduced in December last year, any contact made behind the play will be deemed intentional in the absence of compelling evidence otherwise.

The change was implemented after the AFL signalled its frustration with the two-match penalty given to Gold Coast Sun Campbell Brown for his off-the-ball strike on then-Western Bulldog Callan Ward early last season.

If found guilty Conca could expect a penalty of up to five matches, although he may be able to reduce any penalty with an early plea.

Adams lay on the ground for several minutes after the incident, in which time a stretcher was called onto the field. Although he was able to walk from the ground with assistance, North coach Brad Scott said after the game that Adams was "dazed and confused".
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: 10 FLAGS on February 18, 2012, 07:33:03 AM
Adams got concussed when his head hit the ground.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: mightytiges on February 18, 2012, 07:43:31 AM
Reece was clearly only wanting to body-bump Adams as has been going on in footy since the year dot but sadly and dreadingly I think the AFL will make an example of Reece to show off their new "intentional" rule because Adams ended up concussed no matter whether it was directly Reece's fault (from the bump) or not (an accidently clash of heads). The AFL will claim the onus of a duty of care is on the player doing the bumping so Reece will have no comeback. 
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Ruanaidh on February 18, 2012, 07:44:48 AM
With the changes to the rules the AFL will be 'itching' to set an early precedent. Unfortunately, Conca delivered himself up on a plate.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on February 18, 2012, 08:56:20 AM
I like witnessing Toughness associated with anything Richmond. Probably has something to do with the fact that we have had such pissweek pipsqueaks putting on the jumper for too many years.

When I see new players like conca flex some muscle or a player backing up a teammate when they're getting pushed around, it brings a smile to my face.... And it makes me think maybe things are changing @ tigerland.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Owl on February 18, 2012, 09:07:19 AM
Ironed him out like a shabby shirt but honestly that would of been a golf clap from opposition players as a fair bump once upon a time.  If Conca goes then Brent Harvey needs to go for a row as well for smacking him in the mouth when he came back on ffs.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Willy on February 18, 2012, 09:16:56 AM
Boomer is a little turd.
Concs is gonna be a good'n. His attack on the ball is first rate. Hope he doesnt get over two weeks. If Adams didnt go down like such a big panzy then he would be fine.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: gerkin greg on February 18, 2012, 09:30:39 AM
Hopefully 3 weeks pleaded down to two, served in the NAB, right for round 1

Where was Adams duty of care to watch where he was going?

Isnt he supposed to be a Norf hardman

"patch"

 :ROTFL
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on February 18, 2012, 09:40:25 AM
Adams was the eff who had Cotch suspended for 4 in 2010. Sure it was late but the way they went about it then was nothing short of what I think of that circus of a footy club.
FWIW at least LA said that he ran into Conca.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: MADTIGER2010 on February 18, 2012, 09:44:39 AM
Looked harmless. 2 weeks cos Adams was a soft prick
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on February 18, 2012, 01:06:49 PM
Adams was the eff who had Cotch suspended for 4 in 2010. Sure it was late but the way they went about it then was nothing short of what I think of that circus of a footy club.

This
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Owl on February 18, 2012, 01:13:00 PM
Adams should get suspended for cutting Concas lip and making him bleed his own blood the clumsy prick.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on February 18, 2012, 01:29:21 PM
As a club we need to never forget the stance Nought took in 2010 with Cotch and when the skataboners time comes for MRP we stick the boot and any other projectile we can find into every hovell of that sorry footy club.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on February 18, 2012, 01:35:27 PM
Also never forget that N0rt were the SINGLE AND ONLY club who not only didnt support our save our skins campaign, but felt a need to come out and make a public statement that 'weak teams like Richmond that can't survive do not deserve help to be retained in the competition'.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Willy on February 18, 2012, 01:53:08 PM
Well my hatred for that club has just gone from strength to strength now hasnt it?
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Mr Magic on February 18, 2012, 02:03:19 PM
Concs is gonna be a good'n. His attack on the ball is first rate. Hope he doesnt get over two weeks. If Adams didnt go down like such a big panzy then he would be fine.

I love his attack on the ball too. Belies his innocent look.

We have a ripper here.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: bojangles17 on February 18, 2012, 02:25:06 PM
Concs is gonna be a good'n. His attack on the ball is first rate. Hope he doesnt get over two weeks. If Adams didnt go down like such a big panzy then he would be fine.

I love his attack on the ball too. Belies his innocent look.

We have a ripper here.

yes that has gone unsaid, he was a standout in the middle in first game, loved the way he went about it, didnt waste a possie :shh
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: WA Tiger on February 18, 2012, 02:28:45 PM
Hopefully 3 weeks pleaded down to two, served in the NAB, right for round 1

Where was Adams duty of care to watch where he was going?

Isnt he supposed to be a Norf hardman

"patch"

 :ROTFL

The games he is suspended for can only be served in the season proper so if he gets 5 weeks he won't be playing until round 6.

Hence why King won't be playing round 1 however he is permitted to play in the NAB Cup.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Willy on February 18, 2012, 02:43:37 PM
Maric will take King's possie for round 1.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: dwaino on February 18, 2012, 03:44:53 PM
Well my hatred for that club has just gone from strength to strength now hasnt it?

Nought has been promoted above Collingwood to join the Dees on my hate list.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on February 18, 2012, 04:30:21 PM
With media Nought sympathisers effstix like Brayshaw and Damo around feeding bs dogma to the uneducated masses coupled with a little bit of skataboner spirit and a pinch of their inferiority complex and there you have it.
As a footy club we should
Ditch the Eureka game. Glad I buy a 16 game membership with my reserved seat and not give one cent of my hard earned to those gypsies should we play them away.
Give it to Nought at the tribunal with their stance with Cotch in 2010. Should Conca go Adams should be singled out for special attention. Their time will come on the ground and at the MRP.
Ensure that some of the hidings we have copped in the last 25 years at the hands of this club are remembered and returned back to the delight of all those associated with our footy club.
& lastly when the $10 they have in their bank account runs out and they will need another trough of gruel to feed themselves veto it or show our disaffection disgust and disatisfaction.
Nought is everything we don't want to be and secretly their hatred for us stems from the fact that they wish they had our Premierships History Glory Support Finances etc. Our gloomiest bank statement would make music at Arden Sht.
Before I end my rant I will say this just for the theme and sake of this conversation I would rather help financially the Pies and especially the Blues just in case in the future these clubs died and we never got the chance in my lifetime we play that Filth in the GF and we can pay back some of the ghosts of 1982 and before that whereas I wouldn't give that characterless footy club 1 cent.

Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on February 18, 2012, 06:33:37 PM
I hate Carlton the most, and the whole shifty culture thing. 

North and Melbourne I just can't respect. One is a hapless minnow, the other is full of toffs. Both are poot clubs.

Then there's the whole Essendon Supporter 'we deserve success' thing which I can't stand.

Collingwood I dislike. Saints are pathetic.

The rest I couldn't really care about.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: tigtuff12 on February 18, 2012, 09:02:41 PM
...in trouble but what i really liked was the way it didn't seem to distract him - massive effort for a second year bloke to have that happen (then the "rough up" by angry kanga teammates) & continue to go hard and put his head over the pill...reckon he looked more composed last night as well....def have a keeper in this kid & look forward to seein him develop through the midfield more..
Title: Reece Conca could face a month on the sidelines (Herald-Sun)
Post by: one-eyed on February 18, 2012, 11:49:45 PM
Reece Conca could face a month on the sidelines

    by: Glenn McFarlane
    From: Herald Sun
    February 19, 2012


RICHMOND midfielder Reece Conca faces the prospect of spending up to a month on the sidelines after his off-the-ball clash with North Melbourne's Leigh Adams on Friday night.

But the good news for Tiger fans is he could serve at least two of those suspended matches during the NAB Cup series.

That came after AFL football operations officials met yesterday to clarify the rules for suspended players under the new set fixture of the NAB Cup.

The AFL has deemed all matches leading up to the pre-season grand final as "live games", given prizemoney is paid to the clubs from first to eighth.

Conca came under fire on Friday night after he collided with Adams away from the ball, leaving the Kangaroos player "dazed and confused".

Under changes to the AFL match review rules announced last December, all off-the-ball incidents are automatically deemed as medium or high impact.

They cannot be classed as low impact.

And, if found to have involved an elbow or a forearm, they must now be considered intentional.

The ruling between medium and high impact could be the difference between Conca receiving a three or four-game penalty this week.

The 19-year-old will find out his fate tomorrow.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/reece-conca-could-face-a-month-on-the-sidelines/story-e6frf9jf-1226274664210
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: TigerTimeII on February 19, 2012, 12:32:31 AM
what a joke, he held is ground and is entitled to... footy is stuffed
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: WA Tiger on February 19, 2012, 02:00:53 AM
God I just can't keep track of these rules, honestly, now NAB games are treated as live......

Good for Conca but ffs leave the bloody rules alone. :banghead
Title: Tiger Conca faces ban (Age)
Post by: one-eyed on February 19, 2012, 03:54:57 AM
Tiger Conca faces ban
Sam Lienert
February 19, 2012


RICHMOND is likely to lose promising youngster Reece Conca for its round-one match against Carlton, over an off-the-ball incident on Friday night.

The 19-year-old flattened North Melbourne's Leigh Adams in the pre-season opener at Etihad Stadium.

Behind-the-goal television footage showed Conca pause in front of a running Adams and move his body to block the path of the seemingly unsuspecting Kangaroo.

The collision left Adams lying on the ground for several minutes, before he was subbed out. North coach Brad Scott later said Adams was dazed.

The incident is likely to be classed as intentional and is certain to be graded as high contact, regardless of whether Adams' head made contact with Conca or the ground.

The greatest area of uncertainty is the degree of impact. With a medium impact grading, a rough conduct charge would be worth a four-match ban, which could be reduced to three games with an early guilty plea.

With Conca expected to be able to serve two of those matches in the remainder of the pre-season competition, that would wipe him out for the home-and-away season-opener.

The Tigers are already certain to be missing lively small forward Jake King for that match, because of a rough conduct suspension carried over from last season.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/tiger-conca-faces-ban-20120218-1tg6z.html#ixzz1mklRbRHY
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Mr Magic on February 19, 2012, 06:57:33 AM
If Concs gets 4 matches for that I'll go hey!

Is Adams dead? WTF is this game coming to?
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Smokey on February 19, 2012, 07:57:32 AM
God I just can't keep track of these rules, honestly, now NAB games are treated as live......

Good for Conca but ffs leave the bloody rules alone. :banghead

I think the rule is a good and fair one WAT.  If you can be suspended playing in them, then it's only right that you should serve your time in them.

I think of much greater concern is the way that the whole football media world has weighed in and stamped him as guilty and heavily suspended before he has even had a chance to defend himself.  You would think the poor bugger smashed Adams face apart with a brick the way they have all become self-righteous experts.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: TigerTimeII on February 19, 2012, 08:24:08 AM
God I just can't keep track of these rules, honestly, now NAB games are treated as live......

Good for Conca but ffs leave the bloody rules alone. :banghead

I think the rule is a good and fair one WAT.  If you can be suspended playing in them, then it's only right that you should serve your time in them.

I think of much greater concern is the way that the whole football media world has weighed in and stamped him as guilty and heavily suspended before he has even had a chance to defend himself.  You would think the poor bugger smashed Adams face apart with a brick the way they have all become self-righteous experts.


he has been tried convicted and crucified by the media , they have stuffing blown all this up, facts are conca braced himself to protect himself, and in doing so that norffag crumbled, he should have chosen a young skinny kid to try and intimidate , not reece the conca-rer.... ffs this is a joke
i dont care if he gets done now, im just happy that we finally look lik e a team that has balls, hardness and toughness
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on February 19, 2012, 09:09:18 AM
Here's the footage and camera angle the match review panel will be relying on

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOOQplSJxz8&feature=youtube_gdata_player


Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Owl on February 19, 2012, 10:09:53 AM
It just looks like such a soft shoulder bump and no high contact except muppet neck flopped down onto the deck to play for a free and knocked himself out overplaying the role
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Jackstar is back again on February 19, 2012, 06:58:38 PM
just seen it again on Foxtel.
3-4 weeks.
Too far off the ball is a real worry,
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Owl on February 19, 2012, 07:03:26 PM
So what is happening about the blokes who attacked Concs afterwards, one of them coat hangared him, so thats high contact, deliberate etc, does he go for a row too? 
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: tony_montana on February 19, 2012, 07:10:53 PM
Astonishing he went down so heavily from an inocuous bump, its not as if he lined him up ala the way Kosi got done, he stepped in with a block, not a baseball bat to the head.

This trial by media is pathetic
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: The Big Richo on February 19, 2012, 07:11:46 PM
Stop whinging Hooter, he deserves to go. 80 metres off the ball is poor form.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Owl on February 19, 2012, 07:14:45 PM
Stop whinging Hooter, he deserves to go. 80 metres off the ball is poor form.
I thought it was 79metres which is marginally more acceptable
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: WA Tiger on February 19, 2012, 07:23:29 PM
God I just can't keep track of these rules, honestly, now NAB games are treated as live......

Good for Conca but ffs leave the bloody rules alone. :banghead

I think the rule is a good and fair one WAT.  If you can be suspended playing in them, then it's only right that you should serve your time in them.

I think of much greater concern is the way that the whole football media world has weighed in and stamped him as guilty and heavily suspended before he has even had a chance to defend himself.  You would think the poor bugger smashed Adams face apart with a brick the way they have all become self-righteous experts.

I am not talking about he rule Smokey, yeah it's great, pity it wasn't in last year or we would have King back but FFS when is our game going to be left alone?

The rules for behind the ball incidents has changed and we will be the first to cop the brunt of it thanks to the press. We were also the first club to cop the change in the draft rules when we didn't get the prioriy pick and we copped the rule when the draft rules changed again, we finished bottom and the team, I think the Dees got first pick.

Leave th game alone is all I am saying.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Owl on February 19, 2012, 07:26:04 PM
nah carlton pumped us
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: mightytiges on February 19, 2012, 07:54:59 PM
Unsocialable footy has come to Tigerland. Not necessarily a bad thing but the cubs just need to be smarter when to dish it out. As much as it shouldn't be a 4-5 week suspension and the length of the suspension will be part of the AFL continually trying to take the bump out of the game, Conca was dumb to do it so far off the ball knowing the new 'intentional when off the ball' interpretation and with fox footy showing off all its different camera angles on the first night of its new coverage. The AFL will make an example of him and we'll just have to cop it  :P.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: TigerLand on February 19, 2012, 08:06:45 PM
So if he gets 4 weeks do live NAB cup games count?
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: WilliamPowell on February 19, 2012, 08:17:04 PM
So if he gets 4 weeks do live NAB cup games count?

That will depend on the MRP and how it issues the penalty

Adams said there was nothing in it

But unfortunately, because of the footage available it looks terrible and with the change in the rule regaridng how "behind the play incidnets" are going to graded I reckon he is on trouble

4 weeks but with an early plea and good record he'll get 3 and thet should take it.

So much for Eddie's rantings about Fox camera's will pick up everything. Hmmm in this case I ask what were the other camera's doing  ;D
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: gerkin greg on February 19, 2012, 10:02:29 PM
God I just can't keep track of these rules, honestly, now NAB games are treated as live......

Good for Conca but ffs leave the bloody rules alone. :banghead

"yeah sorry gerks"  ::)
Title: Tiger becomes first to benefit from new suspension law (Australian)
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2012, 05:19:31 AM
Tiger becomes first to benefit from new suspension law

    by: Greg Denham
    From: The Australian
    February 20, 2012


RICHMOND defender Reece Conca will be the first beneficiary of a significant rule change set to reduce the suspension time of players during the AFL premiership season.

The league has altered its rules relating to when a player can serve his suspension. And for the first time, a suspension incurred in the pre-season competition can be served in pre-season matches.

Under previous rules, players suspended in the pre-season had to serve their time from the start of the premiership season. Last year North Melbourne's Drew Petrie, and Carlton's Michael Jamison (two games) and David Ellard all missed the start of the season proper after being suspended during the pre-season.

AFL general manager of football operations, Adrian Anderson, confirmed yesterday the rule change also applies for the eight practice games in the final weekend of the pre-season series, and the NAB Cup grand final.

"NAB Cup suspensions can be served in the NAB Cup, including the final round which determines placings and prizemoney," Anderson said.

The AFL pays prizemoney down to eighth. The winner of the NAB Cup grand final receives $198,000, while the runner-up collects $132,000. Third- and fourth-placed clubs receive $88,000, with fifth to eighth collecting $44,000.

Conca, 19, will today be cited by the match review panel after umpires lodged a notice of investigation following an incident involving North Melbourne's Leigh Adams in the first NAB Cup match of the year on Friday night at Etihad Stadium.

Adams was substituted off the field following a heavy collision off-the-ball with Conca, who appeared to contact the Kangaroos player with his shoulder.

Goal-to-goal television footage shows Conca pause in front of a running Adams before blocking the seemingly unsuspecting North Melbourne player, which left him staggering and dazed before he was attended to for several minutes while lying on the turf.

Whether the panel assess the incident as striking or rough conduct, the outcome for Conca is likely to be a three-game ban.

But with the Tigers to play a further three pre-season matches, their tough half-back could still be eligible to play against Carlton at the MCG in the opening round.

Under new tribunal guidelines introduced last year for the classification of a striking offence, striking behind the play or off the ball or during a break in play or with a raised forearm or elbow, is usually conclusive that the strike is intentional.

That change was implemented after the match review panel was deemed to have been too lenient with the two-match penalty given to the Gold Coast's Campbell Brown for his off-the-ball strike on then Western Bulldogs player Callan Ward in round three last season when his conduct was assessed as reckless.

Conca, who is ineligible for a good behaviour discount as he is entering only his second season, could attract an initial 425 demerit points if impact is assessed as high.

The Tigers are already without forward Jake King against the Blues following his two-game ban for rough conduct in round 23 last year.

Richmond coach Damien Hardwick rated Conca's performance on Friday night as one of his club's positives.

"I thought Reece showed a fair bit, he took another step forward," Hardwick said, adding he was also pleased with former Adelaide ruckman Ivan Maric. "The depth of our list is certainly improving."

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/tiger-becomes-first-to-benefit-from-new-suspension-law/story-e6frg7mf-1226275200518
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Muscles on February 20, 2012, 08:02:51 AM
I went to watch the Giants v Skunks v Bullies on Saturday night.  What a clash of the Bogans that was.  I saw two similar incidents, same distance off the ball, only without the head clash.  Players getting into position for a switch from the wing, across the ground into the forward 50,  bumping their taggers and putting them on their backsides.  I had the pleasure of having to sit with a group of about 30 junior-ish umpires.  None of them commented when I pointed out the off-the-ball clashes.

 

Vale the bump!
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: dwaino on February 20, 2012, 10:22:53 AM
Mick Molloy to Eddie on MMM this morning: "you carried on about having all these cameras, but you had to get this footage from NASA."  :lol
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: tiga on February 20, 2012, 10:42:29 AM
Mick Molloy to Eddie on MMM this morning: "you carried on about having all these cameras, but you had to get this footage from NASA."  :lol

 :rollin The sad fact is though, Eddie would foot the bill no matter the cost if it meant sourcing evidence against any non Collingwood player.  :banghead
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Phil Mrakov on February 20, 2012, 10:54:02 AM
So if he goes for 1-3 he will be eligible for round 1 and if he goes for more than 3 he will miss out?

He will go for 4+ because its Richmond.
Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: dwaino on February 20, 2012, 12:54:03 PM
There is only two games left unless we make the Nob cup final isn't there? 3 games would mean missing the Blues?

Title: Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on February 20, 2012, 01:33:27 PM
Robbo and harf are just about to discuss this on SEN 1116
If someone wants to call out Robbo on his comments the other night, here's the chance..
Title: Conca gets 3 weeks
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2012, 03:03:14 PM
Just on SEN:

Conca has copped a 3 week suspension.
Title: Re: Conca gets 3 weeks
Post by: JVT on February 20, 2012, 03:06:05 PM
Just on SEN:

Conca has copped a 3 week suspension.
Is that 3 with an early guilty plea?  :banghead
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Phil Mrakov on February 20, 2012, 03:08:05 PM
Does this mean hes gone for round 1 or?
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2012, 03:09:09 PM
Yep JVT. That's 3 weeks with the early plea included. If Reece was to challenge this and lose then it would be 4 weeks.

Mrakov - yep will miss round 1 unless we were to make the NAB Cup Grand Final.


Conca offered three
By Matt Thompson
2:55 PM Mon 20 Feb, 2012



RICHMOND midfielder Reece Conca has been offered a three-match suspension for his off the ball bump on North Melbourne's Leigh Adams at Etihad Stadium on Friday night. 

If the 19-year-old fights the charge at the tribunal and loses he faces a stuff ban.

The match review panel assessed the incident as reckless conduct, high impact and high contact.

But it ruled the midfielder had intended to bump or block his opponent, not make high contact, and said his intent was reckless, not intentional, under revised guidelines form striking offences this season.

Conca collided with Adams about 40m off the ball in Friday night's NAB Cup opener.

The Kangaroos said Adams pulled up fine, and could have played the second game on Friday night.

As it stands Conca now appears likely to miss only round one of the home and away season.

The League's confirmed NAB Cup games count as 'live matches', meaning at least the first two games of Conca's ban will be served before the season proper.

The Tigers will have until Tuesday at 11am to decide whether to take the case to the tribunal or accept the suspension.

The panel also investigated why Conca left the field under the blood rule in the first half against North Melbourne, but found no reportable offence had occurred.

Conca played 17 games in 2011, earning a NAB AFL Rising Star nomination in what was his debut season.

In other cases reviewed by the match review panel North Melbourne's Lindsay Thomas was offered a reprimand with 60 carry-over points for striking Conca, and Fremantle's Josh Mellington and Essendon's Leroy Jetta have been been fined $900 for wrestling. They can fight it, but risk $1200 fines if they lose.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/129239/default.aspx
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Phil Mrakov on February 20, 2012, 03:14:28 PM
Lets make the granny then  :banghead
Title: Re: Conca gets 3 weeks
Post by: WilliamPowell on February 20, 2012, 03:15:03 PM
Just on SEN:

Conca has copped a 3 week suspension.
Is that 3 with an early guilty plea?  :banghead

Would think so and that's about right based on how they said they would grade behnd the play incidents.

Just take it tigers and move on - he will only miss round 1 of the H&A season so it's not a bad result  ;D

Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Phil Mrakov on February 20, 2012, 03:18:18 PM
Quote
AFL football operations manager Adrian Anderson confirmed yesterday the rule change also applies for the eight practice games in the final weekend of the pre-season series, and the NAB Cup final.

 :cheers
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: JVT on February 20, 2012, 03:22:58 PM
I hope Mrakov is correct, but somehow I doubt it. We need him in Round 1  :clapping
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Phil Mrakov on February 20, 2012, 04:16:32 PM
Quote
Under new rules that allow players to serve suspensions for incidents in the NAB Cup during the pre-season, Conca can serve all three weeks of his suspension then line up against Carlton in the first round of the home-and-away season.

After the rules were clarified by the AFL, the Tigers don't even have to make the NAB Cup final - a highly unlikely prospect after they lost to the Roos in their first game - to take advantage of the new loophole.

Conca will sit out Richmond's next to NAB Cup fixtures, against Fremantle and Geelong, and a yet-to-be scheduled practice match on the same weekend as the NAB Cup final.




Will play round 1.



http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/reece-conca-could-face-a-month-on-the-sidelines/story-e6frf9jf-1226275839968

Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: JVT on February 20, 2012, 04:19:37 PM
Accept the ban, brilliant stuff!  :shh :thumbsup
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: WilliamPowell on February 20, 2012, 04:32:33 PM
This "loophole" is an AAnderson rule (read: stuff up)

Don't be surprised if little AA comes out and says there has been a "mis-understanding and that's not what I meant" and changes it ....  ;D
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: tony_montana on February 20, 2012, 05:03:11 PM
lol
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: one-eyed on February 20, 2012, 05:12:55 PM
Mrakov is right according to the RFC site as well  :thumbsup.

Under new rules that enable players to serve suspensions for incidents in the NAB Cup during the pre-season, Conca would be able to serve all three matches of his suspension and then be available to play against Carlton in the opening round of the 2012 home-and-away season.

The Tigers have two more scheduled NAB Cup fixtures, against Fremantle and Geelong, and a practice match, yet to be determined, on the same weekend as the NAB Cup final, if they are not playing off for the pre-season premiership.  That game will count as part of the NAB Cup, given the fact it will affect placings on the NAB Cup ladder used to decide prize-money in the pre-season competition.  The AFL will pay prize-money down to eighth placing in the NAB Cup.

Given Richmond is on an AFL Community Camp in Mildura until late Tuesday, it has been granted an extension, until Wednesday morning, to decide whether to take the case to the tribunal or accept the suspension.


Read full explanation at: http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/129252/default.aspx
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Phil Mrakov on February 20, 2012, 05:19:56 PM
Quote
Mrakov is right according to the RFC site as well  :thumbsup.

I'm always right :gotigers
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: WA Tiger on February 20, 2012, 05:48:39 PM
Well if he does miss round one we can only hope the same happens with a Carlton player next week, even it up a bit.

Love to see him play round one though.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Loui Tufga on February 20, 2012, 06:31:31 PM
Well if he does miss round one we can only hope the same happens with a Carlton player next week, even it up a bit.

Love to see him play round one though.

???? What are you smoking WAT? If he accepts the 3 games he will be available for round 1.
He would be a fool to challange it ;)
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on February 20, 2012, 06:44:57 PM
Well if he does miss round one we can only hope the same happens with a Carlton player next week, even it up a bit.

Love to see him play round one though.

???? What are you smoking WAT? If he accepts the 3 games he will be available for round 1.
He would be a fool to challange it ;)

If this is the case, it would be pleasing news.
Let's hope it stays that way
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: yellowandback on February 20, 2012, 06:49:38 PM
RICHMOND midfielder Reece Conca is clear to play in Round 1 if he accepts a three-week ban for his high hit on Kangaroo Leigh Adams.

Under new rules that allow players to serve suspensions for incidents in the NAB Cup during the pre-season, Conca can serve all three weeks of his suspension then line up against Carlton in the first round of the home-and-away season.

After the rules were clarified by the AFL, the Tigers don't even have to make the NAB Cup final - a highly unlikely prospect after they lost to the Roos in their first game - to take advantage of the new loophole.

Conca will sit out Richmond's next to NAB Cup fixtures, against Fremantle and Geelong, and a yet-to-be scheduled practice match on the same weekend as the NAB Cup final.

The game will technically count as part of the NAB Cup - and Conca's ban - because it will affect placings on the NAB Cup ladder used to determine prizemoney in the pre-season competition.

The match review panel today assessed Conca's contact with Adams as reckless conduct, high impact and high contact.

But it ruled the midfielder had intended to bump or block his opponent, not make high contact, and said his intent was reckless, not intentional.

Adams was subbed out of the game but the Roos said he could have played against Hawthorn in their second game on Friday night.

Conca will risk a four-match ban if he challenges the MRP ruling.

Under previous rules, players suspended in the pre-season had to serve their time from the start of the premiership season. Last year North Melbourne's Drew Petrie, and Carlton's Michael Jamison (two games) and David Ellard all missed the start of the season proper after being suspended during the pre-season.

AFL football operations manager Adrian Anderson confirmed yesterday the rule change also applies for the eight practice games in the final weekend of the pre-season series, and the NAB Cup final.

"NAB Cup suspensions can be served in the NAB Cup, including the final round which determines placings and prizemoney," Anderson told The Australian.

The AFL pays prizemoney down to eighth. The winner of the NAB Cup final receives $198,000, while the runner-up collects $132,000. Third- and fourth-placed clubs receive $88,000, with fifth to eighth collecting $44,000.

In other match review panel verdicts, North Melbourne's Lindsay Thomas was offered a reprimand with 60 carry-over points for striking Conca, and Fremantle's Josh Mellington and Essendon's Leroy Jetta have been been fined $900 for wrestling.


In the hun
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Penelope on February 20, 2012, 07:03:02 PM
this is the brave new world of football. Intent has been replaced with duty of care.

a round arm, deliberate punch gets a reprimand because it didnt realy do any damage while conca gets 3 weeks for that. He may as well have raised the elbow, he wouldnt have got too much extra.

these buffoons need to go play a game of hockey against a yr7 PE class and learn about duty of care.

Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Tigermonk on February 20, 2012, 07:25:51 PM
because any tiger player fronting the tribunal will get the max because Geisheins revenge
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Jackstar is back again on February 20, 2012, 07:31:24 PM
because any tiger player fronting the tribunal will get the max because Geisheins revenge

Sorry Monk, Geisch is in charge of umpires, not the tribunal
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Tigermonk on February 20, 2012, 07:39:20 PM
because any tiger player fronting the tribunal will get the max because Geisheins revenge

Sorry Monk, Geisch is in charge of umpires, not the tribunal

l know but l have to blame someone  ;D emmett dunne
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Coach on February 20, 2012, 07:42:13 PM
Hey Monky, did you see the Aussies nearly won the darts world cup? ;D

Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Tigermonk on February 20, 2012, 07:45:57 PM
Hey Monky, did you see the Aussies nearly won the darts world cup? ;D

Yeah been watching, l been talking to Simon a bit lately. sharpen your spears cause Smithy and me are teaming up this year  ;D
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Coach on February 20, 2012, 07:48:07 PM
;D
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Tigermonk on February 20, 2012, 07:50:43 PM
what about Van Gerwen taking out Simon 6-0 in the Championships Round 2 SF, then smashing a 9 darter & 170 finish to win the final. that boy is awesome
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Coach on February 20, 2012, 08:38:16 PM
he's going to be a star. already is. Hope Adrian Lewis drops off a bit, fat prick ;D
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: gerkin greg on February 20, 2012, 09:36:31 PM
take ya darts and eff off ya pricks

Concs  :thumbsup

i hope no-one is thinking of going over to the norf board on BF and trolling the povs
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: dwaino on February 20, 2012, 09:37:29 PM
take ya darts and eff off ya pricks

Concs  :thumbsup

i hope no-one is thinking of going over to the norf board on BF and trolling the povs

Already been doing it on Youtube and stuff  ;D
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Coach on February 20, 2012, 09:37:58 PM
take ya darts and eff off ya pricks

Concs  :thumbsup

i hope no-one is thinking of going over to the norf board on BF and trolling the povs

I started the thread and can do what I want with it, guy. Trolling is boring. Would never do it
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: gerkin greg on February 20, 2012, 09:43:24 PM
darts is just too phaggy for richmond hard man reece conca's thread

and good work dwaino  :cheers
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: WA Tiger on February 20, 2012, 09:47:45 PM
Good result this, very good, great to see he will be in round one, need him in with King out.

Finally something from the turds at the AFL goes our way.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Mr Magic on February 20, 2012, 09:52:32 PM
Robbo on 360. :wallywink
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: dwaino on February 20, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
Robbo on 360. :wallywink

"I don't like it"  :lol
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: WilliamPowell on February 20, 2012, 10:02:22 PM
Robbo on 360. :wallywink

"I don't like it"  :lol

Even dopey David King got stuck into Robbo  ;D

And please "what if it had of been say Chris Judd he had of taken out it would have been a bigger story" Only too you you  :wallywink
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Smokey on February 20, 2012, 10:05:35 PM
Robbo on 360. :wallywink

"I don't like it"  :lol

Even dopey David King got stuck into Robbo  ;D

And please "what if it had of been say Chris Judd he had of taken out it would have been a bigger story" Only too you you  :wallywink

What if Chris Judd had done it?  I wonder if the fat grub would have been so vehement in his desire for the perpetrator being banished forever.  He is fast approaching Barrett in his stupidity and bias.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Mr Magic on February 20, 2012, 10:11:36 PM
Robbo just trying to shift focus from his Bumblers.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: afightingfurydotcom on February 20, 2012, 10:16:17 PM
His bump looked far worse so 3 weeks is fine, a bit of a rest for a bifg year for the Conc!
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on February 20, 2012, 10:29:53 PM
Robbo is a wombats cawk
Title: Just a slap on the wrist and a few weeks off (Herald-Sun)
Post by: one-eyed on February 21, 2012, 12:31:08 AM
Just a slap on the wrist and a few weeks off

    by: Mark Stevens
    From: Herald Sun
    February 21, 2012


WELCOME to Free Hit February.

If you are going to strike, bump, scratch or even stomp on somebody, make sure it is in the first round of the NAB Cup.

You can cop three matches - a hefty suspension under a match review panel formula laden with discounts - and still play in the opening round of the home-and-away season.

For the first time, under an extended NAB Cup competition, a player can serve his suspension in all pre-season games.

Under previous rules, players suspended in the pre-season had to serve their time from the start of the premiership season - unless their team continued in a knockout NAB Cup.

North Melbourne's Drew Petrie and Carlton's Michael Jamison missed the start of the real thing last season after being nailed by the panel in pre-season games.

Yet Reece Conca, who was dealt three matches yesterday for a bump on North Melbourne's Leigh Adams, is free to play against Carlton in Round 1 as the Tigers' next three pre-season matches will count as penance.

That is two NAB Cup games, and even the final round of glorified experimental practice games.

The AFL's theory is simple: The games are more meaningful than in the past because final NAB Cup placings and prizemoney are on the line. A club could move from eighth to sixth on the summer ladder and pick up a few thousand extra.

You can understand the league's take, but it is a massive stretch.

Missing pre-season games of any kind is not a sufficient deterrent. In fact, it would be a positive for some.

Players like to preserve themselves. It's nice to have a run or two, but missing three "practice" matches is hardly a brutal blow.

Collingwood star Dane Swan was that relaxed for Saturday night's NAB Cup openers, he didn't even know for sure if the Pies had won when he was interviewed at Blacktown post-match.

It's hardly a big deal missing a match of that status.

This column should not be seen as a slap to Conca, who was stiff to cop three. Yes, it was off the ball but it was hardly a hanging offence.

But he is extremely fortunate to create history by missing three summer matches and freshening up for Round 1 against the Blues.

And Petrie and Jamison, who suffered the pain of missing Round 1 last year, should be peeved.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/just-a-slap-on-the-wrist-and-a-few-weeks-off/story-e6frf9jf-1226276385465
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: WA Tiger on February 21, 2012, 01:14:28 AM
Blow it out your ass Stevens, bout time we had some bloody luck!!!
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Mr Magic on February 21, 2012, 05:18:12 AM
Robbo brown noser.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: dwaino on February 21, 2012, 10:12:53 AM
This morning on MMM we had Eddie and Darcy on our side at least  ;D. Darcy reckons Conca will be a better player than Heppell and Wayne Carey reckons we're further ahead than Nothing Melbourne. Not much... But at least a few aren't so openly against us lol
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: one-eyed on February 21, 2012, 11:18:39 AM
Richmond has accepted the three-match suspension handed down to young midfielder Reece Conca by the AFL’s match review panel ...

Read full article here: http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/129277/default.aspx
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: wayne on February 21, 2012, 12:38:36 PM
This morning on MMM we had Eddie and Darcy on our side at least  ;D. Darcy reckons Conca will be a better player than Heppell and Wayne Carey reckons we're further ahead than Nothing Melbourne. Not much... But at least a few aren't so openly against us lol

Darcy also reckons Cordy, Roughead and *snicker* Minson could be the most fearsome ruck combination in the history of football.

I hope he's right about Conca though. I am certainly happy with him.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: smasha on February 21, 2012, 12:47:00 PM
Blow it out your ass Stevens, bout time we had some bloody luck!!!

Hear hear.

First time we get something go our way and the football world is up in arms.

Next headline will be "AFL gone corrupt-Richmond getting as many free kicks as the other clubs!"
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: dwaino on February 21, 2012, 12:57:58 PM
This morning on MMM we had Eddie and Darcy on our side at least  ;D. Darcy reckons Conca will be a better player than Heppell and Wayne Carey reckons we're further ahead than Nothing Melbourne. Not much... But at least a few aren't so openly against us lol

Darcy also reckons Cordy, Roughead and *snicker* Minson could be the most fearsome ruck combination in the history of football.

I hope he's right about Conca though. I am certainly happy with him.

Shh you  :laugh: I was enjoying having blokes on our side for once!!   :lol
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: tiga on February 21, 2012, 01:29:11 PM

After the rules were clarified by the AFL, the Tigers don't even have to make the NAB Cup final - a highly unlikely prospect after they lost to the Roos in their first game - to take advantage of the new loophole.


Who writes this crap?? This sentence completely contradicts itself. How can you have a clarification of a ratified rule change which was designed to prevent players infringing preseason from being punished in the season proper classified as a loophole?  :banghead

Definition : A loophole is an ambiguity in a system, such as a law or security, which can be used to circumvent or otherwise avoid the intent, implied or explicitly stated, of the system.

There is nothing ambiguous about this rule change at all. I wonder if this journo would have called it a "Loophole" if it was a non Richmond player! They just love kicking us don't they!  >:(
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Stripes on February 21, 2012, 02:35:17 PM
Am happy with this. I would have been happier if he got off but under the rules he did well not to miss the first week of the real stuff. Seemed to have stepped up from last year so we will welcome the midfield depth he provides come round one.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: WilliamPowell on February 21, 2012, 02:42:38 PM
Tigers accept the penalty

 :gobdrop :gobdrop

No brainer I would have thought
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Mr Magic on February 21, 2012, 09:50:48 PM
Knew Reece was hard at the ball. Nice to know he's hard at the man also.. :)
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Mr Magic on February 22, 2012, 09:16:49 PM
Media starting to realise not only who this guy is but that he can play. The week's events have lifted the young man's profile somewhat..
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: cub on February 22, 2012, 10:33:24 PM
Yep reckon Concs is a beauty, happy he is playing round1.
On the suspension spose it's a fair deal in the environment we are operating, all the same turds (and that's all they are) wanting him drawn and quartered need a good look at themselves.
There was no malice in the event just a really nice block a bit far off the ball, even Concs could of got hurt the way it panned and what that says is he has a knack of protecting himself and getting in the right position.

Oh yeah and (http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSnnPG6vaAqrsBo03Yy0rY8ZIxb4RRwEbXlTq8XVdoZU2X9Mo-P) Norf, they liked to bully us and when the table is turned whine like the little biatches they are.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Yeahright on September 10, 2012, 08:17:56 PM
What happened to bumping off the ball being intentional? Maxwell got nothing
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: tony_montana on September 10, 2012, 10:37:08 PM
Didn't he cop 2?
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Loui Tufga on September 10, 2012, 11:04:20 PM
Didn't he cop 2?

Yep maxwell got 2 Harvey got 4 :lol will miss the first month of next season :lol
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: tigs2011 on September 11, 2012, 12:51:49 AM
Didn't he cop 2?

Yep maxwell got 2 Harvey got 4 :lol will miss the first month of next season :lol

 :lol Maxy out round 1 next year only. Thank god I'd rather he played against us.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: tigs2011 on September 11, 2012, 12:55:29 AM
Norf fans think he will serve it in NAB Cup ala Conca. Can't wait till they realise this isn't the case. Gunna sit back with a few tinnies and enjoy the lulz.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Yeahright on September 11, 2012, 10:13:01 AM
Didn't he cop 2?

Poor wording. I didn't mean it specifically my bad. But I thought off the ball was automatically intentional and he only got reckless?
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Smokey on September 11, 2012, 10:18:12 PM
Norf fans think he will serve it in NAB Cup ala Conca. Can't wait till they realise this isn't the case. Gunna sit back with a few tinnies and enjoy the lulz.

He's gunna be serving a lot more than the NAB Cup regardless - 6 weeks!!!    :lol
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: WilliamPowell on September 12, 2012, 07:59:12 AM
Norf fans think he will serve it in NAB Cup ala Conca. Can't wait till they realise this isn't the case. Gunna sit back with a few tinnies and enjoy the lulz.

He's gunna be serving a lot more than the NAB Cup regardless - 6 weeks!!!    :lol

It's called Karma

Should never have challenged; was never going to get that snipe reduced

Well done tribunal; tremendous job  :clapping :bow :clapping
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: wayne on September 12, 2012, 08:57:30 AM
Norf fans think he will serve it in NAB Cup ala Conca. Can't wait till they realise this isn't the case. Gunna sit back with a few tinnies and enjoy the lulz.

He's gunna be serving a lot more than the NAB Cup regardless - 6 weeks!!!    :lol

 :lol
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Coach on September 12, 2012, 01:28:47 PM
Sucked in Boomer.
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Francois Jackson on September 12, 2012, 01:29:41 PM
His fighting the 6 match.

Il watch with interest



Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Loui Tufga on September 12, 2012, 04:18:05 PM
His fighting the 6 match.

Il watch with interest

Hes only fighting the extra 2 he got for trying to fight it in the first place :wallywink (The Putz is at Harvey not you Dan). Has will sit out 4 for certain........
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: dwaino on September 12, 2012, 06:01:04 PM
But anything off the ball is automatically intentional  :banghead
Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on September 12, 2012, 07:42:36 PM
Please 8 weeks :lol :rollin :lol

He can return back for the game in Hobart against GWS or their Round 9 annual crowdpuller at Etihad against Port.  :lol :rollin :lol

Title: Re: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on September 12, 2012, 07:46:04 PM
His fighting the 6 match.

Il watch with interest

I've got popcorn can we get a live telecast
?
If he want weeks off he should get his Missus to threaten a strip tease to the tribunal