One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on March 30, 2012, 07:48:30 PM

Title: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: one-eyed on March 30, 2012, 07:48:30 PM
Not blaming the umps for the loss as we were outplayed over the whole 4 quarters, but the AFL website and Ch 7 news tonight both showed vision of Yarran's freak goal where as he was avoiding Morris the ball looked as though it was fully over the boundary line.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/131843/default.aspx

It also reminded me of the decision in the second quarter when Vickery's goal was disallowed for running too far (?) when the replay showed he kicked the goal on his 15th step which is legal. It just wasn't our night  :P.   
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Ox on March 30, 2012, 07:51:25 PM
professional game is our Aussie rules :lol
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Coach on March 30, 2012, 07:52:32 PM
Vicks goals was against Nahas. illegal hold
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Penelope on March 30, 2012, 07:54:43 PM
the yarran one was definitely out.
Vickery's disallowed goal was for holding by nahas when he shepherded, and was probably a correct call
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Captain__Blood on March 30, 2012, 07:54:53 PM
i thought we got screwed by '12 points plays', where we have a chance of scoring a goal ourself, and it went down the other end and some inbred looking carlton flog would kick a goal, at least two-three times.
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on March 30, 2012, 08:13:56 PM
Probably. No point worrying now. Should have punched out a Carlton mum at the ground and be done with it
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Loui Tufga on March 30, 2012, 08:57:55 PM
Yarran will win the Wayne Harmes Medal for that goal ;D
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Penelope on March 30, 2012, 09:15:34 PM
 :lol :thumbsup
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: The Big Richo on March 30, 2012, 09:37:26 PM
Why didn't the video get used on the Yarran one?
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: TigerTimeII on March 30, 2012, 10:09:31 PM
umpires always have and always will screw us
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on March 30, 2012, 10:13:18 PM
Gieschen did say there was no problem with that decision. ::)
Clearly the AFL umpires boss is as blind as the umpires. ::)
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Willy on March 30, 2012, 10:24:38 PM
blind leading the...
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Owl on March 30, 2012, 10:34:25 PM
No what they said was that the umpires call was fair because it was too hard to tell  or some bs like that, the video clearly shows his foot is out of the boundary line and the ball is well and truly over and stuff me if the umpire wasn't standing there watching, the commentators on the television picked it up immediately and showed it on replay, Giesch thinks he is a stuffing Jedi Knight or something...look into my eyes, he did not step out of bounds....321 your back in the room.
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Yeahright on March 30, 2012, 11:25:23 PM
Could argue that the way he was leaning inbound allowed the ball to stay in, would be on the line at best
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 31, 2012, 02:20:16 AM
The ball was further out than he was. Lulz at Gieschen. Read what he said and not suprised just have to laugh.
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: one-eyed on March 31, 2012, 05:00:45 AM
Quote from: Coach Davey on March 30, 2012, 07:52:32 PM
Vicks goals was against Nahas. illegal hold
Quote from: al on March 30, 2012, 07:54:43 PM
Vickery's disallowed goal was for holding by nahas when he shepherded, and was probably a correct call
Cheers Coach and al. I wasn't sure what the free was for as the scoreboard at the ground made an effort to replay how many steps Vickery took.
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: yellowandback on March 31, 2012, 07:07:00 AM
Quote from: The Big Richo on March 30, 2012, 09:37:26 PM
Why didn't the video get used on the Yarran one?

Always thinking TBR, good call  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Ox on March 31, 2012, 02:02:47 PM
Quote from: Tuckerbag on March 30, 2012, 10:13:18 PM
Gieschen did say there was no problem with that decision. ::)
Clearly the AFL umpires boss is as blind as the umpires. ::)

seriously,we should all put in and have this cockroach bashed to within an inch of his life-for football fans everywhere
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Coach on March 31, 2012, 04:59:51 PM
Quote from: Username: on March 30, 2012, 10:09:31 PM
umpires always have and always will screw us


Enough with the excuses, guy.
Title: Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on March 31, 2012, 07:15:50 PM
Quote from: Coach Davey on March 31, 2012, 04:59:51 PM
Quote from: Username: on March 30, 2012, 10:09:31 PM
umpires always have and always will screw us


Enough with the excuses, guy.

Hey guy, who are you calling guy, guy? You got that, guy?