One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: WilliamPowell on May 31, 2012, 06:23:44 PM
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea
-
Good to see Mimi Maric getting another week ;D
-
Good to see Mimi Maric getting another week ;D
Well suited to Etihad
-
Good to see Mimi Maric getting another week ;D
Well suited to Etihad
Agree would hope he gets a start rather than being the sub
-
Dea is a considerable out. Somewhat of a blow to our on field swagger and arrogance.
Whoa :shh
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.
-
poo....and Dea was just starting to acclimatise :banghead Oh well, Batch isn't a bad replacement ;)
-
What is EFA gerks? (inserts overhead emoticon)
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.
You disagree with dropping a guy with a leg injury instead of a fit player :huh
-
EFA = Edited for accuracy
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.
You disagree with dropping a guy with a leg injury instead of a fit player :huh
How bizarre?....Maybe he missed the edit :-\
-
Richmond
B: Steven Morris, Alex Rance, Chris Newman
HB: Bachar Houli, Ben Griffiths, Brandon Ellis
C: Shaun Grigg, Dustin Martin, Shane Edwards
HF: Brett Deledio, Tyrone Vickery, Nathan Foley
F: Reece Conca, Jack Riewoldt, Jake King
Foll: Ivan Maric, Trent Cotchin, Shane Tuck
I/C: Daniel Jackson, Robin Nahas, Jake Batchelor, Addam Maric
Emg: Matthew White, Daniel Connors, Brad Miller
In: Jake Batchelor
Out: Matt Dea (Leg)
St Kilda
B: Jason Gram, Sam Gilbert, Tom Simpkin
HB: Sean Dempster, James Gwilt, Brendon Goddard
C: Nick Dal Santo, Lenny Hayes, Farren Ray
HF: Jack Steven, Nick Riewoldt, Terry Milera
F: Stephen Milne, Justin Koschitzke, Leigh Montagna
Foll: Jason Blake, David Armitage, Clinton Jones
I/C: Jamie Cripps, Arryn Siposs, Ahmed Saad, Jack Newnes
Emg: Raphael Clarke, Adam Schneider, Beau Wilkes
In: Jack Newnes
Out: Jarryn Geary (Injured)
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/team%20announcement/tabid/16481/default.aspx
-
Dan Connors an EMG - I wasn't far off.
-
Dan Connors an EMG - I wasn't far off.
Good call.
Sure will be interesting to see what he does/doesn't do if and when he gets selected in the 22. A man, with a heap of footy talent, playing for his career.
-
whispers that connors may play
-
For who x?
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.
You disagree with dropping a guy with a leg injury instead of a fit player :huh
certainly not. no mention of a leg injury when i posted. when did this leg injury occur.
-
That Tram again?
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.
You disagree with dropping a guy with a leg injury instead of a fit player :huh
certainly not. no mention of a leg injury when i posted. when did this leg injury occur.
In the quote box that you used - see Gerks/WPs post.
Anyhoot, time to get arrogant people and bring home another 10 goal win. We will do it!
-
You disagree with dropping a guy with a leg injury instead of a fit player :huh
certainly not. no mention of a leg injury when i posted. when did this leg injury occur.
In the quote box that you used - see Gerks/WPs post.
O'h Dear :lol :lol
Edited to correct quote
-
certainly not. no mention of a leg injury when i posted. when did this leg injury occur.
When Ch 7 did the "In & Outs" on the scroll across the bottom of the screen it didn't say Dea was out injured
-
For who x?
Coburg
-
On the AFL website it says (leg)
-
For who x?
Coburg
Nope - Coburg not playing this week (again :banghead)
-
That Tram again?
Taking the pee out of Punt Rd me thinks ;)
-
Big loss. At one stage in the game dea deadset smashed into a contest.
I remember watching reply and being shocked how hard the rfc bloke went in. No7
-
For who x?
no idea source is reliable but all depends on a fitness test who i have no idea
see what happens
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.
Can't be seven in a row Claw missed round 6 and 7.
-
Bad luck about Dea. As dea out believe they now won't put Ellis as the substitute
-
In: Batchelor
Out: Dea (injured - leg)
EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.
Can't be seven in a row Claw missed round 6 and 7.
he played 7 and all 7 hes been in the worst players quite easily. played 7 worst in 7 to me thats 7 in a row.
-
Vickery was good against West Coast. His teammates kicked the footy to him a few times.
-
Just finished watching the replay twice. Couple of our goals against the Hawks came from Vickery-contested centre bounces, tapped it straight down the throat of our midfielders on more than one occasion for a clean take away and goal. FACT.
-
The only Fact that is becoming clear out of all this is Claw has NFI :lol And his spelling and punctuation is worse than mine ;D
-
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.
The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either :banghead
-
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.
The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either :banghead
I'm sure claw couldn't give a stuff if you read his posts or not.
:lol
-
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.
The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either :banghead
I'm sure claw couldn't give a stuff if you read his posts or not.
:lol
Then why does he bother posting? I got te feeling all Claws posts are directed at Dooks :huh
-
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.
The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either :banghead
I'm sure claw couldn't give a stuff if you read his posts or not.
:lol
Then why does he bother posting? I got te feeling all Claws posts are directed at Dooks :huh
Same thing probably applies to you too.
:lol
-
Next stop Hollywood? :lol
-
Vickery was good against West Coast. His teammates kicked the footy to him a few times.
no he wasnt good against wce he was ordinary. at the least he got a few touches but some of his efforts were a disgrace. he was among our worst again in that game.
where the hell is the bar set with some. bloody low imo. he went from to deplorable to just plain poor and thats good enough.
his best effort in the ruck was this week against hawthorn with a whopping 11 hit outs. roughead their forward ruckman had 13 hitouts 17 possesions 3 tackles 2 goals and richmond people bagged that effort.
-
He kicked 2.2 and took a few brilliant marks. He was not among our worst, claw.
-
Snip :banghead :banghead :banghead
Stick to the topic, keep the personal sniping & insults off the forum
-
Thank you WP :pray
-
Mini Maric is our sub tonight.
On the bench are King, Houli and Ellis.
The sub for St Kilda is Siposs.
-
Vickery was good against West Coast. His teammates kicked the footy to him a few times.
no he wasnt good against wce he was ordinary. at the least he got a few touches but some of his efforts were a disgrace. he was among our worst again in that game.
where the hell is the bar set with some. bloody low imo. he went from to deplorable to just plain poor and thats good enough.
his best effort in the ruck was this week against hawthorn with a whopping 11 hit outs. roughead their forward ruckman had 13 hitouts 17 possesions 3 tackles 2 goals and richmond people bagged that effort.
Roughead had a much higher % of gametime in the ruck than Vickery did. We thrashed Hawthorn in clearances when Vickery was in the ruck against him. For what it's worth, I thought Roughead was by far their best player as well.
-
Vickery was good against West Coast. His teammates kicked the footy to him a few times.
no he wasnt good against wce he was ordinary. at the least he got a few touches but some of his efforts were a disgrace. he was among our worst again in that game.
where the hell is the bar set with some. bloody low imo. he went from to deplorable to just plain poor and thats good enough.
his best effort in the ruck was this week against hawthorn with a whopping 11 hit outs. roughead their forward ruckman had 13 hitouts 17 possesions 3 tackles 2 goals and richmond people bagged that effort.
Roughead had a much higher % of gametime in the ruck than Vickery did. We thrashed Hawthorn in clearances when Vickery was in the ruck against him. For what it's worth, I thought Roughead was by far their best player as well.
Considering junk time?
-
We've got to at least match them in the middle and Morris, Batch and Newy not let their small forwards get loose. No Geary means they lose a small defender so hopefully that makes it easier for Nahas and Kingy.