One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on June 04, 2012, 12:57:13 AM
-
Tiger King facing five-match ban
Jesse Hogan
The Age
June 4, 2012
(http://images.theage.com.au/2012/06/03/3346747/ipad-art-wide-jake-king-420x0.jpg)
THE wild enthusiasm about Richmond's improvement is set to be dented by more match review panel attention on firebrand Jake King.
Tigers forward King, who is saddled with 71.85 carry-over points and 50 per cent loading on any charge due to his poor disciplinary record, is likely to be suspended for tripping St Kilda's Stephen Milne with an outstretched leg. In isolation that should result in only a one-match ban, yet a negative view on an off-the-ball clash with Sean Dempster could sideline him for between three and five matches in total.
Dempster began to pursue a long kick into Richmond's forward line when King blocked his path and crunched the unsuspecting Saint with a hefty bump.
Even though there was seemingly no high contact to Dempster - a key factor in inflating penalties - the 50 per cent loading for King could increase his base penalty for rough conduct from 225 points to 337.5.
Should King be charged twice, it is likely his points would tally 529.35, or 397.01 after the guilty plea discount. If he fought both charges at the tribunal and lost he would not be available to return until the Tigers' round 17 clash with North Melbourne.
MATCH REVIEW PANEL RD 10 PREDICTIONS
Jake King (Rich) tripping Stephen Milne (StK)
Reckless, low impact, body contact.
80 points up, due to bad record to 120 and up, due to carry-over to 191.85 (1 match); 143.89 with guilty plea (1 match).
Jake King (Rich) rough conduct to Sean Dempster (StK)
Reckless, medium impact, body contact. 225 points up due to bad record to 337.5 (3 matches); 253.13 if guilty (2 matches). [King total: 529.35 points (5 matches); 397.01 with guilty plea (3 matches)]
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/tiger-king-facing-fivematch-ban-20120603-1zq6f.html#ixzz1wk5CSOgF
-
WHAT A JOKE
-
Been munching on Homer's rancid hoagie has Hogan....delusional.
-
I thought he put his foot out, out of instinct, but then realised what he was doing and pulled it back. Did he make contact?
-
Who does Jesse Hogan support in the AFL?
Found the answer.The Dees.
-
Agree about the trip (and yep froars he made slight contact) think he will go for that but the bump.....
Please give me a break..... something seriously worng if he goes for that
-
Got a week
-
Got a week
Just for the trip?
Good result
-
Yep
-
might as well contest it, has nothing to lose
-
MRP did not cite Jake for his contact on Dempster.
Common sense
-
more likely to be an oversight from those butt clowns
-
Glad only a week
-
King offered one week ban
richmondfc.com.au
5:12 PM Mon 04 Jun, 2012
Richmond forward Jake King has been offered a one-week suspension from the AFL Match Review Panel stemming from Friday night’s win over St Kilda.
King was charged with a Level One tripping offence against the Saints’ Stephen Milne during the first quarter of the match at Etihad Stadium.
Based on video evidence and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point).
This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 80 demerit points and a reprimand. Due to an existing bad record of five matches suspended within the last three years, the penalty was increased by 50 per cent to 120 demerit points and a one-match sanction.
He also has 71.85 points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 191.85 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduced the sanction by 25 per cent to 143.89 points and a one-match sanction.
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/137759/default.aspx
-
And on the other incident with Dempeter the MRP report says:
Contact between Richmond's Jake King and St Kilda's Sean Dempster from the second quarter of Friday's match was assessed. The ball was being kicked into the Richmond forward line to player Robbie Nahas when King blocked Dempster from going to the contest. It was the view of the panel that King's actions were not excessive or unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.
Full article see:
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/137750/default.aspx
-
:banghead any Saints players get cited.
Always suspending my man Kingy :banghead
well put the Kingy jumper in the closet for a week & out with the Tuck jumper :thumbsup ;D
-
Wear them both Monk, just put one on over the top of the other! :thumbsup
-
cant do that mate, it will make me look fat ;D
-
Journalist should be sacked
-
It was the view of the panel that King's actions were not excessive or unreasonable in the circumstances.
Have to save that one for posterity.
-
I wonder if the club, coaches, leadership group and the playing group in general ever get sick and tired of having to make excuses for Jake King's undisciplined acts against opposition players which is regularly resulting in suspensions - which disrupts team structure - and 50 metre penalties for umpire abuse, that stop our momentum in crucial moments in hard fought games.
We all love the romantic notions surrounding the aura of the PUSH UP KING, but is his attitude really what PROFESSIONAL football is really about?
-
I wonder if the club, coaches, leadership group and the playing group in general ever get sick and tired of having to make excuses for Jake King's undisciplined acts against opposition players which is regularly resulting in suspensions - which disrupts team structure - and 50 metre penalties for umpire abuse, that stop our momentum in crucial moments in hard fought games.
We all love the romantic notions surrounding the aura of the PUSH UP KING, but is his attitude really what PROFESSIONAL football is really about?
When did he get a 50 against him? I seemed to have missed it
-
Can believe Kelly got off at Geelong and Jake gets a week
-
I wonder if the club, coaches, leadership group and the playing group in general ever get sick and tired of having to make excuses for Jake King's undisciplined acts against opposition players which is regularly resulting in suspensions - which disrupts team structure - and 50 metre penalties for umpire abuse, that stop our momentum in crucial moments in hard fought games.
We all love the romantic notions surrounding the aura of the PUSH UP KING, but is his attitude really what PROFESSIONAL football is really about?
When did he get a 50 against him? I seemed to have missed it
I think Ekto is referring to the other week. Certainly didn't give away a 50 this week, bit his tongue this week ;D
-
I think you are referring to the other weekS Bill. WIth emphasis on the plural part of the S.
-
Richmond forward Jake King has been offered a one-week suspension from the AFL Match Review Panel stemming from Friday night’s win over St Kilda.
King was charged with a Level One tripping offence against the Saints’ Stephen Milne during the first quarter of the match at Etihad Stadium.
Based on video evidence and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point).
This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 80 demerit points and a reprimand. Due to an existing bad record of five matches suspended within the last three years, the penalty was increased by 50 per cent to 120 demerit points and a one-match sanction.
He also has 71.85 points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 191.85 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduced the sanction by 25 per cent to 143.89 points and a one-match sanction.
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/137759/default.aspx
So when Kingy comes back it'll be six matches suspended within the last three years and a loading penalty of 60 percent? So pretty much anything Kingy does that the MRP doesn't like will see him automatically suspended rather than reprimanded due to this loading.
-
I think you are referring to the other weekS Bill. WIth emphasis on the plural part of the S.
;D ;D
I said week because I couldn't remember if he gave up one against the Hawks and one against the Swans ;D
-
how does a low impact hit to the face eg selwood on raines get off
yet a slight tippy toe trip as king was actually trying to get his foot out the way get one week
glass gets greene flush in the face yet no case, lewis did less and got 2 weeks
afl if just like greece
-
Medical report? For a trip? On Milne ::)
-
While fuckheads like this douche get nothing:
(http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w434/macopowa/8e6758ac.jpg)
-
I hope Jackson smashes that prick when we play the War Machine again
-
THE TRIBUNAL will not sit on Monday with Hawthorn midfielder Jordan Lewis headlining a list of five players who have accepted bans from the Match Review Panel.
Lewis will miss the next two matches after accepting a two-match ban for rough conduct.
Eagle Beau Waters, Tiger Jake King, Crow Bernie Vince and Swan Ben McGlynn have all accepted one-match bans.
From: http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/137797/default.aspx
-
Jesse Hogans Twitter is gold.
Someone calling him a prick HAHA.
-
Lol just heard a snippet on the radio of Lids saying he is surprised King has legs long enough to trip anyone.
-
Lol just heard a snippet on the radio of Lids saying he is surprised King has legs long enough to trip anyone.
That photo didn't prove anything.
His leg was out but didn't go near the Tiprats shins.
It is a Richmond player and we know now the normal set of rulebooks don't get used.
They bring out a big book with empty pages and make it up.
-
It might be a blessing in disguise for kingy. If he tangled with ballantyne this week he may have ended up with half a dozen.
-
The txt book running back spoil on the wing
Poor king was shafted
-
Jesse Hogans Twitter is gold.
Someone calling him a prick HAHA.
The 'stufffing dog' comment is gold :lol
-
King offered one week ban
richmondfc.com.au
5:12 PM Mon 04 Jun, 2012
Richmond forward Jake King has been offered a one-week suspension from the AFL Match Review Panel stemming from Friday night’s win over St Kilda.
King was charged with a Level One tripping offence against the Saints’ Stephen Milne during the first quarter of the match at Etihad Stadium.
Based on video evidence and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point).
This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 80 demerit points and a reprimand. Due to an existing bad record of five matches suspended within the last three years, the penalty was increased by 50 per cent to 120 demerit points and a one-match sanction.
He also has 71.85 points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 191.85 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduced the sanction by 25 per cent to 143.89 points and a one-match sanction.
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/137759/default.aspx
Gee reading this lot you'd think he was a mass murderer, what a load of xxxx.