One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Coach on July 23, 2012, 05:47:22 AM
-
You know the umpiring was ass when this bastard was the best of the lot. Thought he was good (not good, that is too kind ;D but not horrible)apart from a 50 against Dustin.
stuff.
-
Yes I reckon Steve McBunrey was strutting around like a highflyer when he heard he was umpiring with those 2 other peanuts :thumbsup
-
:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
-
Mollison at it again. :banghead
-
You know the umpiring was ass when this bastard was the best of the lot. Thought he was good (not good, that is too kind ;D but not horrible)apart from a 50 against Dustin.
stuff.
:lol true true he was the pick of the litter yesterday
-
one day someone will
jump the fence i swear to god. :thumbsup
-
one day someone will
jump the fence i swear to god. :thumbsup
grand final day a few years down the track. imagine the umpires. we will all jump the fence.
-
one day someone will
jump the fence i swear to god. :thumbsup
grand final day a few years down the track. imagine the umpires. we will all jump the fence.
Yes, yes indeed...
An all star cast- I see it now unfolding...
Mcburney, Stevic and jennings... Oh and mollison
Bring back Razor Ray I say!!
-
This what I call the McBurney as the umpires McBurneyed us a few times yesty.
Pay a freekick that isn't there to pee off the player who is penalised against as much as possible to make him lose the plot and swear.
Then pay a 50 metre penalty against him.
That is what I call the Mc Burney,/MCBurneyed Verb to be McBurneyed see McBurney.
Ringing up the Oxford to put that in their dictionaries.
-
I always tell my boy to play the whistle and don't worry about the umpires. They are just trying to do their best with the limited talents thy have - but mcbirney is a idiot - enough said
-
thats the bottom line isnt it papa bear?
as frustrating as it is, you will never ever change an umpires decision by arguing with him ( nor should you be able to).
players at all all levels need that drilled into them and just STFU. you can only make matters worse otherwise.
-
All good points but if I find out I got cancer, The fence will be jumped lol
-
thats the bottom line isnt it papa bear?
as frustrating as it is, you will never ever change an umpires decision by arguing with him ( nor should you be able to).
players at all all levels need that drilled into them and just STFU. you can only make matters worse otherwise.
The Kangaroos managed to get the umps to go to the replay to check the Edwards goal from the square........
-
you know they weren't going to anyway.......?
-
thats the bottom line isnt it papa bear?
as frustrating as it is, you will never ever change an umpires decision by arguing with him ( nor should you be able to).
players at all all levels need that drilled into them and just STFU. you can only make matters worse otherwise.
The Kangaroos managed to get the umps to go to the replay to check the Edwards goal from the square........
No they didn't
The goal umpire asked for it to be reveiwed. He said beleived it was a goal but asked for it to be checked
N0rt had nothing to do with it
Teams cannot ask for a review
-
im sure someone can organise a hit
on this bloke.
-
thats the bottom line isnt it papa bear?
as frustrating as it is, you will never ever change an umpires decision by arguing with him ( nor should you be able to).
players at all all levels need that drilled into them and just STFU. you can only make matters worse otherwise.
The Kangaroos managed to get the umps to go to the replay to check the Edwards goal from the square........
The goal umpire asked for it to be reveiwed. He said beleived it was a goal but asked for it to be checked
N0rt had nothing to do with it
Correct me if wrong, but wasnt the goal umpire was convinced enough with the decision to already signal a goal? And It wasn't until the north players got in his face (in a pack) claiming one of the injustices of the century that he then asked field umpire Mc.Ballsack for a review?
That being the case, the north players had plenty to do with it, if not, we're the reason why it was reviewed.
-
Correct me if wrong, but wasnt the goal umpire was convinced enough with the decision to already signal a goal? And It wasn't until the north players got in his face (in a pack) claiming one of the injustices of the century that he then asked field umpire Mc.Ballsack for a review?
That being the case, the north players had plenty to do with it, if not, we're the reason why it was reviewed.
Nope.
Just watched the replay ;D and goal ump says to Ump No24 "I am sure it's a goal, I'm sure it's a goal but please have it reveiwed"
Nuffer No24 then says "Goal umpire believes it's a goal but wants it reveiwed"
Players can do what they like but they cannot ask let alone demand for a review. Go back to our game against Melb and the White goal - there was no review there despite us claiming "injustices of the century" too ;D :thumbsup
It was the umps call and the umps call only. Notice a few times that they are getting things out of order though. I rekcon it is at least the 3rd time in the past fortnight the field nuffer has given the all clear, a goals been signalled and then a reviews been called for
-
Correct me if wrong, but wasnt the goal umpire was convinced enough with the decision to already signal a goal? And It wasn't until the north players got in his face (in a pack) claiming one of the injustices of the century that he then asked field umpire Mc.Ballsack for a review?
That being the case, the north players had plenty to do with it, if not, we're the reason why it was reviewed.
Nope.
Just watched the replay ;D and goal ump says to Ump No24 "I am sure it's a goal, I'm sure it's a goal but please have it reveiwed"
Nuffer No24 then says "Goal umpire believes it's a goal but wants it reveiwed"
Players can do what they like but they cannot ask let alone demand for a review. Go back to our game against Melb and the White goal - there was no review there despite us claiming "injustices of the century" too ;D :thumbsup
It was the umps call and the umps call only. Notice a few times that they are getting things out of order though. I rekcon it is at least the 3rd time in the past fortnight the field nuffer has given the all clear, a goals been signalled and then a reviews been called for
Why would the umpire want his decision to be reviewed if he's 'sure' it's a goal? Yes it's the umps call at the end of the day to ask for a review, but was it that the north players pressured the ump into making that call for a review even though he said he was 'sure'?
Under the specific circumstances its hard to believe there is no other reason why he would do that.
-
because he doesnt want the scrutiny of getting a decision wrong that could have been confirmed or otherwise by a video review.
you often hear test match umpires and rugby refs say the believe it is so and so, but i want it checked.
-
because he doesnt want the scrutiny of getting a decision wrong that could have been confirmed or otherwise by a video review.
you often hear test match umpires and rugby refs say the believe it is so and so, but i want it checked.
True al, they do it all the time in the NRL