One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: WA Tiger on July 29, 2012, 06:14:18 AM
-
Well folks IMO I think we are 3 more experienced players away from making it or continuing on the way we are for many years yet, "rebuilding".
IMO we need 2 more very good players and one excellent player (Cloke).
We need to get busy during free agency and the trade period. We need to off load the ok players and replace them with very good players.
We need to attack and attract players like the Swans have done for years and we need to do it at the end of the year. We need more Maric type of deals.
if we can get 3 more in, I think next year will take us over that fine line we have been treading!!!
Wake up March, continue to build tallent within.....mate, what tallent in the Coburg team are developing into very good players for next year....um....none!!
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
lol at calling someone deluded and then saying we have 6 decent players. Top stuff. Keep it up. :thumbsup :lol
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
McGuane (apparently)
But you also said Maric was no better than Graham earlier in the year so you still only have five.....
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
lol at calling someone deluded and then saying we have 6 decent players. Top stuff. Keep it up. :thumbsup :lol
well we have, you obviously didnt watch last night
Cant beleive Ellis.s kicking last night
-
I know how we can get more experienced players. Give more games to all our young kids
-
hehe true that
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
McGuane (apparently)
But you also said Maric was no better than Graham earlier in the year so you still only have five.....
No he didnt
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
lol at calling someone deluded and then saying we have 6 decent players. Top stuff. Keep it up. :thumbsup :lol
well we have, you obviously didnt watch last night
Cant beleive Ellis.s kicking last night
Ellis is not a very smart footballer & made some very critical errors
-
lol after another loss we now hang draw and quarter 1st yr players. it gets funnier and funnier.geez some people must have had delusions of grandeur to be so bitter about a loss.
we are where we should be with the list we have.
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
lol you acknowledge in the above post that we have just 6 decent players. then rant and rave on most threads that hardwick should be sacked because we are losing games we should win. you should not expect to win any games at all with just 6 decent players.
so let me get this straight. you expect to win with just 6 good players and its hardwicks fault that we lose. not the simple fact we have just 6 good players that is mindboggling.
with just 6 good players id say hes done well to win 7 games and get so close in so many others.
i suppose you think malthouse would win a gf with just 6 good players lol.
you should hear yourself jack the contradictions are many and varied.
yes you are right about one thing we dont have the cattle most deep down know this. what i dont get is in knowing this the expectations are so high . are we really that deluded.
-
Rationaility isnt his strong point
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
When will you stop coming on he and trolling Jack.
Everyone knows we aren't even worth being called a team without blokes of the ilk of
McGuane, Jako, Graham, Mini Maric, Derickx, Post, White, Edwards.
The blokes who the history books will show they have played 7 seasons of AFL and have the worth of a chewed up twistie.
This above are the blokes who are regulars or come into the side when injuries start to decimate our club.
We cringe when one came in and most or all are in on the same day then of course we are a buckley's chance.
Pee them off now. Would rather lose with kids than lose with these duds.
-
your kidding, are you deluded?
We have 6 players at beat
Lids, Cochtin, Tuck, Maric Martin.
Someone tell who the 6th is as I have forgotten
If that was even remotely true we wouldnt even get close to team, letalone beat 1st and sexond on the ladder, sorry to let facts get in way of a good story :lol
-
Ok jackstar, put Foley back in, Grimes back in, Griff back in, put the best we have available back in then do the math.....we are 3 experieced players off it, combined with the draft.... :thumbsup
-
Ok jackstar, put Foley back in, Grimes back in, Griff back in, put the best we have available back in then do the math.....we are 3 experieced players off it, combined with the draft.... :thumbsup
even with those three we struggled to win. 3 experienced players and one draft wont fix the list. keep on saying it next yr we are more likely to miss finals than make them even if we get 3 mature players and draft well in the nd.
experience, games played overall quality and depth says so.
look at the list the players and where each player is at. be honest and expectations will drop. 25 30 are not currently up to afl standard a lot of them have been there for yrs and will never get there. some have potential and may get there astbury arnot helbig etc but atm they are not up to the standard and may not be next yr you have to develop them first. brandon ellis has played every game his performances have barely been up to standard but he shows enough to suggest with further deveolpment he will be a good pick up.
the thing is there are a fair share of other sides in the same boat as us.
-
Ok, so with 2 very good players, 1 star, trade period for more experience and the draft we are still stuffed next year????
If thats the case...... :help
-
Please join this with the thread of Dooks 3-4 more... :snidegrin
4 years old this thread and we are still in the same position....
-
IMO we need 2 more very good players and one excellent player (Cloke).
:lol :lol :lol :lol CLOKE :lol :lol :lol
-
IMO we need 2 more very good players and one excellent player (Cloke).
:lol :lol :lol :lol CLOKE :lol :lol :lol
Where was he 3 years ago fool????
-
Cloke :banghead :facepalm :banghead :facepalm
-
Oh goody, its the 3rd twisted sister :clapping Took longer than I thought.
-
Thats funny Chuck and Yeahright. Laughing at us not getting Cloke while we kept Vickery all those years. Lets not even mention Griffiths and the other duds we also kept.
Cloke
2015 Marks 112
2014 Marks 137
2013 Marks 190
Vickery
2015 Marks 73
2014 Marks 46
2013 Marks 116
Geniuses.
-
:clapping :clapping :clapping :birthday
Don't worry unplugged, to those rabble of posters stats mean nothing...it's all about just being out their doing your job....whatever job that is..
-
Two brain halves got together and managed the job of a whole one - well done.... :clapping
-
Thats funny Chuck and Yeahright. Laughing at us not getting Cloke while we kept Vickery all those years. Lets not even mention Griffiths and the other duds we also kept.
Cloke
2015 Marks 112
2014 Marks 137
2013 Marks 190
Vickery
2015 Marks 73
2014 Marks 46
2013 Marks 116
Geniuses.
Is it Cotchins fault we didn't get Cloke
I think it is
You know it is
-
Thats funny Chuck and Yeahright. Laughing at us not getting Cloke while we kept Vickery all those years. Lets not even mention Griffiths and the other duds we also kept.
Cloke
2015 Marks 112
2014 Marks 137
2013 Marks 190
Vickery
2015 Marks 73
2014 Marks 46
2013 Marks 116
Geniuses.
Are you even serious?
We were NEVER a chance to get Cloke.
And I know that for a fact.
So now what is your point?
-
Thats funny Chuck and Yeahright. Laughing at us not getting Cloke while we kept Vickery all those years. Lets not even mention Griffiths and the other duds we also kept.
Cloke
2015 Marks 112
2014 Marks 137
2013 Marks 190
Vickery
2015 Marks 73
2014 Marks 46
2013 Marks 116
Geniuses.
Are you even serious?
We were NEVER a chance to get Cloke.
And I know that for a fact.
So now what is your point?
That's easy
It is all Cotchins fault
-
Thats funny Chuck and Yeahright. Laughing at us not getting Cloke while we kept Vickery all those years. Lets not even mention Griffiths and the other duds we also kept.
Cloke
2015 Marks 112
2014 Marks 137
2013 Marks 190
Vickery
2015 Marks 73
2014 Marks 46
2013 Marks 116
Geniuses.
Not sure how not wanting Cloke equates to us wanting Vickery? Keep drawing that bow.
If you want to talk stats, guess who is averaging more goals, marks inside 50, contested marks and even stuffing tackles this year :shh. In fact Vickery averaged more goals per game than Cloke last year and essentially the same the year before (1.9 v 2.0 in 2014 when Vickery played half the amount of games due to injury). But good for you, using totals when you know they'd be skewed because Cloke played more games than Vickery every year (especially 2014).
But stats mean nothing, ey WAT? FFS everyone can see the moneyball poo didn't work yet for some reason you guys still want to go down that path :banghead