One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on August 23, 2012, 06:22:40 PM
-
In: Astbury, Batchelor, Dea
Out: King (inj.), Griffiths (inj.), Ellis (omitted)
-
Ellis ommitted
Only 10 weeks to late
-
Ellis ommitted
Only 10 weeks to late
Oh yeah, he s been woeful ::)
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
-
Ellis needed a rest. Next week he'll be back when Dea plays a shocker :P
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Much like your posting ;D
I will cut you some slack this week, it's always a tough week for you when the two sides that sacked your arse go up against each other ;D
-
:lol
-
Play Astbury forward! The number 12 doesn't belong in the backline.!
-
Richmond
B: Steven Morris, Alex Rance, Jayden Post
HB: Jake Batchelor, Chris Newman, Bachar Houli
C: Shaun Grigg, Trent Cotchin, Brett Deledio
HF: Matthew White, Shane Edwards, Daniel Jackson
F: Luke McGuane, Jack Riewoldt, Robin Nahas
Foll: Ivan Maric, Dustin Martin, Shane Tuck
I/C: David Astbury, Matt Dea, Bradley Helbig, Brett O'Hanlon
Emg: Tom Derickx, Brandon Ellis, Addam Maric
In: David Astbury, Matt Dea, Jake Batchelor
Out: Jake King (Foot), Ben Griffiths (Concussion), Brandon Ellis
Essendon
B: Mark Baguley, Cale Hooker, Courtenay Dempsey
HB: Nathan Lovett-Murray, Kyle Hardingham, Tayte Pears
C: Brent Stanton, Jobe Watson, Leroy Jetta
HF: David Zaharakis, Michael Hurley, Scott Gumbleton
F: Nicholas O'Brien, Stewart Crameri, Dyson Heppell
Foll: Tom Bellchambers, Alex Browne, Alwyn Davey
I/C: Heath Hocking, Angus Monfries, Jake Melksham, Michael Hibberd
Emg: Sam Lonergan, Travis Colyer, Elliott Kavanagh
In: Nathan Lovett-Murray, Scott Gumbleton, Tayte Pears, Nicholas O'Brien, Mark Baguley
Out: Dustin Fletcher (Hip), Sam Lonergan, Patrick Ryder (Knee), Jake Carlisle (Ankle), Brendan Lee
New: Nicholas O'Brien (North Ballarat Rebels)
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/team%20announcement/tabid/16481/default.aspx
-
Glad to see Batchelor back. Glad they included Astbury. If they were going to drop Ellis I would have done it earlier can't see the point now.
-
Good to see Astbury back
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Much like your posting ;D
I will cut you some slack this week, it's always a tough week for you when the two sides that sacked your behind go up against each other ;D
Comedian
Past your bed time
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Much like your posting ;D
I will cut you some slack this week, it's always a tough week for you when the two sides that sacked your behind go up against each other ;D
Comedian
Past your bed time
What happened to your much-loved ignore button?
-
Get it done, Tiges :clapping
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
harsh and over exagerated timeline there. :lol
-
Ellis ommitted
Only 10 weeks to late
He's been terrible. Worst player in the side by far. ::)
Maybe Miller should have got a send off game.
-
Play Astbury forward! The number 12 doesn't belong in the backline.!
That has some merit there Johnny. :thumbsup
Unlike you who played mostly in the backline.
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Yes Jack, but Miller should play because he can kick all of 37 metres now. :help
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Yes Jack, but Miller should play because he can kick all of 37 metres now. :help
That's with the wind and one bounce.
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Yes Jack, but Miller should play because he can kick all of 37 metres now. :help
That's with the wind and one bounce.
and a 50 metre penalty :lol :rollin :lol
-
In: Astbury, Batchelor, Dea
Out: King (inj.), Griffiths (inj.), Ellis (omitted)
Thats actually a pretty imposing side just quietly :shh
-
In: Astbury, Batchelor, Dea
Out: King (inj.), Griffiths (inj.), Ellis (omitted)
Thats actually a pretty imposing side just quietly :shh
Whoaaaaaaa! Get it done Bo Jo :shh
-
Congrats to Astbury - great effort to come back from that knew injury, it was a shocker
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Yes Jack, but Miller should play because he can kick all of 37 metres now. :help
That's with the wind and one bounce.
and a 50 metre penalty :lol :rollin :lol
Is he multi talented as well as giving a handpass out the back he can also give a kick out the back.
More strings to his bow than I gave him credit for.
-
Play Astbury forward! The number 12 doesn't belong in the backline.!
That has some merit there Johnny. :thumbsup
Unlike you who played mostly in the backline.
:)
-
I actually think we might get pipped in this one
-
We should get this one. Good to see astbury back. He'll go forward I think. Post will have a good test against gumbleton and rance is a good match for Hurley I think. Batch can take crameri. Will be nice to have 3 talls up forward for the first time this season maybe
-
We should get this one. Good to see astbury back. He'll go forward I think. Post will have a good test against gumbleton and rance is a good match for Hurley I think. Batch can take crameri. Will be nice to have 3 talls up forward for the first time this season maybe
We did at the start and it worked horribly
-
Astbury and Batch back.
2 quality players.
-
I'm personally happy with the in's, people can finally stop asking Bojangles where Dea is
-
Agree with Smasha. Astbury and Batch both good at intercept marks. Agree Rance should go on Hurley. Agree Batch should go on Crameri.
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Totally agree and I would think that is why he was dropped, perhaps if the experts watched him, actually watched him, they would notice that he either misses his target more often then not and he pops the ball up rather than stab passing it to leading players. His kicking style has the ball in the air for a very long time meaning by the time it gets to the intended target, the player is swamped by opposition players.
Good move, he must improve his kicking.
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Totally agree and I would think that is why he was dropped, perhaps if the experts watched him, actually watched him, they would notice that he either misses his target more often then not and he pops the ball up rather than stab passing it to leading players. His kicking style has the ball in the air for a very long time meaning by the time it gets to the intended target, the player is swamped by opposition players.
Good move, he must improve his kicking.
if we're dropping guys because of there kicking then how the hell are Tuck, Jackson, Edwards and Grigg getting a game :huh :huh :huh
No excuses remember ;)
-
Bury those pricks!
Will it rain tonight?
-
Bury those pricks!
Will it rain tonight?
Nah bro
-
Bury those pricks!
Will it rain tonight?
Nah bro
rubbish Bruzzz
-
Got Cotch for most possies in my multi. In the Doggies game I went with Lids and he cost me 1000 bucks.. He will probably get most tonight.
Go Cotch
-
Got Cotch for most possies in my multi. In the Doggies game I went with Lids and he cost me 1000 bucks.. He will probably get most tonight.
Go Cotch
Deledio and Tuck equal 1st with 33 possessions. Ouch!
-
his kicking has been ordinary to say the least
Totally agree and I would think that is why he was dropped, perhaps if the experts watched him, actually watched him, they would notice that he either misses his target more often then not and he pops the ball up rather than stab passing it to leading players. His kicking style has the ball in the air for a very long time meaning by the time it gets to the intended target, the player is swamped by opposition players.
Good move, he must improve his kicking.
if we're dropping guys because of there kicking then how the hell are Tuck, Jackson, Edwards and Grigg getting a game :huh :huh :huh
No excuses remember ;)
Exactly, while I appreciate Tucks work and believe Edwards and Grigg do an OK job the reality is they are crap kicks for AFL level
-
Grigg is definitely not a crap kick.
-
Grigg is definitely not a crap kick.
Neither is Ellis if you get my drift ;)