One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: WilliamPowell on May 23, 2013, 06:06:54 PM
-
Twitter all a buzz with talk that there will be a Tiger debut this week
No name but everyone is speculating it will be Arnot
-
lonergan
-
lonergan
That appears to be word. We'll find out for sure on Ch 7 after the break.
-
INS: Maric, Newman, Lonergan
OUTS: Stephenson, Nahas, Dea
-
Mcbean
-
Gotta feel for Matt Arnot what does the kid need to do?
No surprises with the outs
ED: I win again ;D
-
Lonergan to chicken win Jobe out of the game
-
Pathetic. Lonergan has done nothing to deserve a game. What happened to rewarding players for playing well ?! Pathetic.
-
agree....surprised lonergan got a call up.....arnot is due
-
Pleased to see Lonergan make his Tiger debut against his old mob. Hope he tears them a new one.
Not pleased to see McGuane retain his spot. Has done nothing for three weeks. To really improve we need to upgrade on battlers like him and Jackson. Elton, A. Edwards or even Stephenson would have been better options IMO.
-
ED: I win again ;D
One mod competition this week ;D.
-
The Round 9 Richmond Team
B: Morris, Rance, Chaplin
HB: Newman, Ellis, Houli
C: Grigg, Cotchin, Jackson
HF: Deledio, S. Edwards, King
F: Vickery, Riewoldt, Martin
R: Maric, Foley, Vlastuin
IC: White, Batchelor, McGuane, Lonergan
Emerg: A. Edwards, Nahas, Dea
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-05-23/exbomber-in-for-dreamtime-with-the-tigers
-
We keep playing one to two talls less than we should. Especially down back we struggle against resting rucks and tall forwards. We were lucky Gawn couldn't kick last Sunday. Won't have the same luxury with Ryder and Bellchambers.
Would have rewarded Arnot as he has had a far better season than Lonergan. I thought you had to earn your senior position?
-
Good team Tiggers.
Get it done boyz
-
Hurley named for the Bombers despite copping concussion last week...
Essendon
B: Jake Carlisle , Dustin Fletcher , Courtenay Dempsey
HB: Dyson Heppell , Cale Hooker , Michael Hibberd
C: Brent Stanton , Jobe Watson , Jake Melksham
HF: Jason Winderlich , Stewart Crameri , Brendon Goddard
F: David Zaharakis , Tom Bellchambers , Michael Hurley
Foll: Patrick Ryder , Heath Hocking , Ben Howlett
I/C: Nick Kommer , Mark Baguley , Leroy Jetta , David Myers
Emg: Jason Ashby , Scott Gumbleton , Elliott Kavanagh
In: Courtenay Dempsey , Leroy Jetta
Out: Jackson Merrett (Omitted), Elliott Kavanagh (Omitted)
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/team/teamannouncement
-
Loners :clapping
-
Had areal funny feeling he would included.
-
Dea unlucky
-
We are supposed to bring in our aboriginal players for dreamtime, essendank did. :shh
...that's right..we don't have any more. :whistle
-
feel for arnot. Deserves a chance
-
Is Lonergan even fit? He's been in and out of rehab all preseason and has only played a couple of games back for Coburg. Arnott unlucky
-
Sheesh Lonergan. Only got the gig because it is his old side.
Will either be a master stroke or a complete flop.
Will be happy for him to have a game like Andrew Browne did in Dreamtime 2011.
-
ED: I win again ;D
One mod competition this week ;D.
That's loser talk OE. Fire the stuff up. :banghead
-
They have a good line-up
-
White, Jackson and Lonergan are all a similar type of player-low skill set, dour. It appears we have gone in with a very defence oriented team.
-
White, Jackson and Lonergan are all a similar type of player-low skill set, dour. It appears we have gone in with a very defence oriented team.
Jackson is a defending (not meaning he plays in defence) tagger, they are not the same.
-
We keep playing one to two talls less than we should. Especially down back we struggle against resting rucks and tall forwards. We were lucky Gawn couldn't kick last Sunday. Won't have the same luxury with Ryder and Bellchambers.
Would have rewarded Arnot as he has had a far better season than Lonergan. I thought you had to earn your senior position?
Spot on Yellow and Black. We should have given McGuane the flick, retained Stephenson, and had the luxury of either he or Maric dropping back on the resting ruckman, while the other goes forward.
-
Wouldn't surprise if there is a late change
McGuane supposedly had a sore knee after last week, perhaps he might not come up and A Edwards will get a go
-
They have a good line-up
But not as good as ours :thumbsup
-
Wouldn't surprise if there is a late change
McGuane supposedly had a sore knee after last week, perhaps he might not come up and A Edwards will get a go
That would be a good change for mine.
-
White, Jackson and Lonergan are all a similar type of player-low skill set, dour. It appears we have gone in with a very defence oriented team.
You have competely misunderstood the post. Are you trying to say that White, Jackson and Lonergan are highly skilled or attacking players? They all tag and are supposed to be known for their defensive qualities.
-
They mentioned on League Teams last night that this is our most experienced team (average 60 games per player) that we have fielded since 2001.
-
White, Jackson and Lonergan are all a similar type of player-low skill set, dour. It appears we have gone in with a very defence oriented team.
You have competely misunderstood the post. Are you trying to say that White, Jackson and Lonergan are highly skilled or attacking players? They all tag and are supposed to be known for their defensive qualities.
I don't necessarily disagree with you (Lonergan had 14 ineffective kicks for Coburg last week from 19 kicks) but in saying that White will be the sub, Jacko the tag on Watson and Lonergan is in to replace Tucky's role given at times last weekend with a Tuck-less midfield we struggled with Melbourne first to the footy and winning the centre clearances. Maric back should hopefully help on that latter front as well as the Big O was soundly beaten in the ruck last week so mids weren't being fed the ball.
-
Ellis out.
-
Ellis out.
Sauce?
-
Ellis out.
Sauce?
No I was asking the question?
Some on some other sites are certain he is out.
-
Use a ? then
-
Azza to play Ellis's role off hb
-
Use a ? then
Grammar nazi in the house
-
Use a ? then
Grammar nazi in the house
Only when it's misleading
-
So ? Big loss if true tonight
-
Use a ? then
Grammar nazi in the house
That word is a no no around these parts missta
-
Use a ? then
Grammar nazi in the house
Rubbish, you made a statement. You either know or you don't.
-
Use a ? then
Grammar nazi in the house
Rubbish, you made a statement. You either know or you don't.
Don't question me.
-
Use a ? then
Grammar nazi in the house
That word is a no no around these parts missta
What ever floats your boat.