One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on July 29, 2013, 07:01:00 PM

Title: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: one-eyed on July 29, 2013, 07:01:00 PM
Lloyd, Healy and Russell discussing us on 3aw tonight:

Lloyd - My problem with Richmond and Collingwood is both their defences are quite poor. Cameron kicked 7 against the Pies while White and Tippett kicked a combined 7 against Rance and Chaplin.

Healy - My view on that is, unlike the Swans' midfielders, Richmond's midfielders don't gut run. They don't gun run to get back and help clog their defence nor do they gut run forward to the goalsquare to lock the ball in.

Lloyd - True but Richards and Grundy still can win one-on-ones in the Swans' backline. You would back them in as defenders over Rance and Chaplin.

Russell - The top 9 are locked in. Out of those you would rule out Richmond, Port and Carlton as having no chance of winning the flag.

Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Yeahright on July 29, 2013, 07:48:51 PM
Agree with all except that flog Lloyd. Everyone in the footy world could see Petterd was on White not Rance
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: bojangles17 on July 29, 2013, 08:31:00 PM
Boy thats funny Lloyd, i thought RFC had third least points kicked against us...umm me finks dat means our defence is damn fine :shh
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Phil Mrakov on July 29, 2013, 08:35:07 PM
Collin wood can't win the flag either. Freo too and Essendon.
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: tony_montana on July 29, 2013, 08:47:10 PM
Agree with all except that flog Lloyd. Everyone in the footy world could see Petterd was on White not Rance

exactly, what a flog
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on July 29, 2013, 08:53:19 PM
Agree with all except that flog Lloyd. Everyone in the footy world could see Petterd was on White not Rance

While he was on white, its not even the point lloyd is just a flog. Rance and Chaplin were both good, it is not their fault our midfield were so poor and the ball came hurtling in the fwd line every few minutes. The backline has been reasonably good this year, the midfield is the problem with cotch down on form (knee injury?) Lids tagged out all the time, tuck long injury, titch has been down. Grigg down hill skiing, well not even  ::)

The part about the gut running fwd and back is sot on, we also crapped ourselves in the 2nd half when the pressure became too much we fumbled the ball on many occasions. Sydneys pressure and even percieved pressure was too much and something needs to be done about the mental fortitude of our pkaying group.

Its one thing to be challenged against teams like port, west coast etc and respond, but its another tonhave the stuffing squeezed out of you by geelongs, sydneys and say stuff you and squeeze back twice as hard

Lloyd mustve been squeezing his balls with his thumbs and become distracted as they were talking  :shh
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on July 29, 2013, 08:54:04 PM
Matthew Lloyd is like the kid screaming for attention in the classroom. If you ignore him he will go away. A flog on the field an even bigger flog off it. Who cares what he says.
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: MADTIGER2010 on July 29, 2013, 09:30:36 PM
Lloyd is wrong. Our midfielders never ran in numbers and didn't work hard enough at stoppages. Sydney did and provided their forwards with a higher quantity and quality of delivery. That's why their forwards got more goals. Not to mention Astbury should have played instead of Petterd
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 29, 2013, 10:02:41 PM
Healy was absolutely spot on. Our lack of gut running killed us Sunday. It stands out like a beacon
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Yeahright on July 29, 2013, 10:24:04 PM
Agree with all except that flog Lloyd. Everyone in the footy world could see Petterd was on White not Rance

While he was on white.

Actually spent most his day on Pyke.
Went through and saw who got how many kicked on them.
Morris 2
Chappy 4.5*
Rance 2*(had to leave man to cover midfield but was his man)
Midfeilder 5 (hard to tell who direct opponent was on replay due to their midfielders looking like they had no opponent :banghead)
Petterd 2**

*'s represent Jesse White goals. Chappy got .5 because I have no clue who was meant to be on Jude Bolten when he kicked the final goal and Chaplin was standing in no mans land with no opponent
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: dwaino on July 29, 2013, 10:51:58 PM
Vlastuin had a couple goes on White. Got some lols when he pushed him under the footy a couple times and burned him off.
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: gerkin greg on July 29, 2013, 11:00:18 PM
Didn't Highpants "write" an "article" during the week where he mentioned the sides that had beaten Sydney in the last 18 months and according to him Richmond weren't one of them  :whistle

Adult nappies for this flog

Aren't his parents first cousins?
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Dubstep Dookie on July 29, 2013, 11:05:48 PM
Lloyd, Healy and Russell discussing us on 3aw tonight:

Lloyd - My problem with Richmond and Collingwood is both their defences are quite poor. Cameron kicked 7 against the Pies while White and Tippett kicked a combined 7 against Rance and Chaplin.

Healy - My view on that is, unlike the Swans' midfielders, Richmond's midfielders don't gut run. They don't gun run to get back and help clog their defence nor do they gut run forward to the goalsquare to lock the ball in.

Lloyd - True but Richards and Grundy still can win one-on-ones in the Swans' backline. You would back them in as defenders over Rance and Chaplin.

Russell - .................I can count to potato

EFA
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: dwaino on July 29, 2013, 11:07:12 PM
Didn't Highpants "write" an "article" during the week where he mentioned the sides that had beaten Sydney in the last 18 months and according to him Richmond weren't one of them  :whistle

Adult nappies for this flog

Aren't his parents first cousins?

You are correct. He did in fact draw an article with a crayon between his teeth.
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Dice on July 30, 2013, 09:26:50 AM
Russell - The top 9 are locked in. Out of those you would rule out Richmond, Port and Carlton as having no chance of winning the flag.

What is it with these deluded turds ?  Even if Essendon don't get stripped of their points they can't win the flag coz they're no good.
 Watson on SEN this morning saying no team should take any notice of of how they go against GWS or GC. If you want to measure how good you are you need to look at a game like Richmond v Sydney. Richmond have now found out where they are at.
 Well Timmay , don't worry about our team ,  we played away against the reigning premier on a ground not fit for AFL football....and we were in the game until the last ten minutes of the 3rd. I'd say a better example of where a team is at would be to look at your drugged up team's performance against Hawthorn at your home ground in neutral conditions. Your mob was effin flogged ! 
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 30, 2013, 09:39:10 AM
Hahaha dice

Love the angst you show against those pigs

I concur. Funny I rarely hear Timmy bag his own club but always happy to pot shot others

Just another dillusional bomber that will soon realise what it's like to bent over

Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: wayne on July 30, 2013, 10:17:32 AM
Didn't Highpants "write" an "article" during the week where he mentioned the sides that had beaten Sydney in the last 18 months and according to him Richmond weren't one of them  :whistle

Adult nappies for this flog

Aren't his parents first cousins?

I saw highpants on The Sunday Footy show.

They were interviewing Sheedy and he was asked whether he would have traded Lloyd for Judd. Sheedy said 'Why wouldn't you, Lloyd has retired and Judd is still playing'. They cut to highpants and you could almost see tears welling in his eyes. Highpants then said 'but Sheeds, what about the fabric of the club..'. Sheedy later said he was joking around and wanted to see Lloyds reaction.  :lol
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: gerkin greg on July 30, 2013, 11:22:07 AM
 :lol sheeds master troll
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: tigs2011 on July 30, 2013, 11:43:29 AM
Didn't Highpants "write" an "article" during the week where he mentioned the sides that had beaten Sydney in the last 18 months and according to him Richmond weren't one of them  :whistle

Adult nappies for this flog

Aren't his parents first cousins?
he sooked it on twitter when someone had a go at him. Saying he was talking about round 10 onwards so get your facts right. Oh dribble lloydy round 10 was barely 14 months ago.
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: smasha on July 30, 2013, 12:28:41 PM
Russell - The top 9 are locked in. Out of those you would rule out Richmond, Port and Carlton as having no chance of winning the flag.

What is it with these deluded turds ?  Even if Essendon don't get stripped of their points they can't win the flag coz they're no good.
 Watson on SEN this morning saying no team should take any notice of of how they go against GWS or GC. If you want to measure how good you are you need to look at a game like Richmond v Sydney. Richmond have now found out where they are at.
 Well Timmay , don't worry about our team ,  we played away against the reigning premier on a ground not fit for AFL football....and we were in the game until the last ten minutes of the 3rd. I'd say a better example of where a team is at would be to look at your drugged up team's performance against Hawthorn at your home ground in neutral conditions. Your mob was effin flogged !

 :clapping

Swans played at their fortress.
Bombers played at their home ground.
Essendon easy game against GWS to prepare before Hawks game.
Tigers tough defensive game before Sydney game.

Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: tigs2011 on July 30, 2013, 01:53:18 PM
Didn't Highpants "write" an "article" during the week where he mentioned the sides that had beaten Sydney in the last 18 months and according to him Richmond weren't one of them  :whistle

Adult nappies for this flog

Aren't his parents first cousins?

I saw highpants on The Sunday Footy show.

They were interviewing Sheedy and he was asked whether he would have traded Lloyd for Judd. Sheedy said 'Why wouldn't you, Lloyd has retired and Judd is still playing'. They cut to highpants and you could almost see tears welling in his eyes. Highpants then said 'but Sheeds, what about the fabric of the club..'. Sheedy later said he was joking around and wanted to see Lloyds reaction.  :lol
Sheeds meant it. Not trolling at all. My source confirms Lloyd is still confused what happened.  :shh
Title: Re: Richmond discussion on 3aw tonight
Post by: Dice on July 30, 2013, 03:05:41 PM
Sheeds meant it. Not trolling at all. My source confirms Lloyd is still confused what happened.  :shh

Damn straight he meant it ! It's not the first time he's said it either. Reckon I've heard him run that story at least three times. 100% serious every time.
I'm just rapt it was Knighter who sent Lloyd into retirement....and he hasn't stopped crying since  :lol