One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: eliminator on August 19, 2013, 06:23:24 PM
-
The third tall forward position in our team is not settled. What are the views of the forum. Should it be between McGuane or Edwards or should they try a different option such as Griffiths. Appears at moment alternating between McGuane and Edwards without great success
-
Flip a 3-sided coin. They're all crap.
-
Appears at moment alternating between McGuane and Edwards without great success
Just biding time till next year when either Bean, Elton or Griff steps up.
-
McGuane
-
Flip a 3-sided coin. They're all crap.
Significantly more crap than mcagune or AEdwards? That should be the question
-
Flip a 3-sided coin. They're all crap.
[claw interpretation]Either one will help us win the premiership, incredible stable of talent we have down there at punt road[/claw interpretation]
-
Play Ben Griffiths!
-
Yep spot on Torch
Good luck turning to Mcguane if Jack goes down again
-
Play Ben Griffiths!
2nd that. Must come in this week
-
Griffiths will just get concussed again when the plane takes off.
-
Would rather take the punt on Elton and try and get him some game time. Would you rather the milk that smells sour or the one you had a gulp of that tasted bad
-
I'd rather a cruiser to be honest brother
-
Develop Ty Vickery properly and then we'd have a tall option forward? or we can try and manufacture our own 'swingman?'
-
I'd rather a cruiser to be honest brother
Don't have to many of them we know how sexual you get after a couple
-
Az has clearly now jumped ahead of Lukey. I gave him B.O.G. today. He needs though to back up that workrate and influence on the match next week before we head into the finals.
-
Unfortunately, Edwards and McGuane may have stalled the development of Griff and Elton. In any case, it's one or the other and my vote is for Edwards. He is just a more natural footballer. In Finals hacks and 'athletes' are found-out whilst pure footballers rise to the top.
-
Az has clearly now jumped ahead of Lukey. I gave him B.O.G. today. He needs though to back up that workrate and influence on the match next week before we head into the finals.
A Edwards has always been better than Lukas IMO. McGaune doesnt have much going for him outside of his defensive pressure.
Edited: :banghead :banghead not funny, you know the rules re posting things that legally can get this site in trouble even in jest and what you posted falls into that category
-
I still would take McGuane for his defensive pressure but Azza did show much more defensively and offensively today than he has wearing our jumper. Was it just because he was taking their second/ third best (18yr old) defender though. I wonder...?
-
Edwards is a flat track bully good against the lower teams but goes missing against quality sides Mcgaune offers more against these sides but is not the long term answer.
-
Lukas IMO.
HSHAHA :lol
Edited see above
-
Edwards looks fitter than McGuane, he is certainly stronger. IMO we should see how Edwards goes against the Dons, if he performs keep him in for the first week of the finals, if not..McGuane.
-
Edwards looks fitter than McGuane, he is certainly stronger. IMO we should see how Edwards goes against the Dons, if he performs keep him in for the first week of the finals, if not..McGuane.
No...just no. If Edwards is fitter & stronger then McG should never play another game for Richmond. We already know Aaron is a superior footballer but if he is fitter and stronger then whoa :shh :shh He's our man as 3rd tall. If not him then definitely not McG. If not Edwards.....Richo for one last game.
-
Edwards looks fitter than McGuane, he is certainly stronger. IMO we should see how Edwards goes against the Dons, if he performs keep him in for the first week of the finals, if not..McGuane.
No...just no. If Edwards is fitter & stronger then McG should never play another game for Richmond. We already know Aaron is a superior footballer but if he is fitter and stronger then whoa :shh :shh He's our man as 3rd tall. If not him then definitely not McG. If not Edwards.....Richo for one last game.
Go and watch the last few replays of McGuane and Edwards comparatively, running out games or chasing....have a look at the difference, also have a look at the one on one's.. ;)
-
WGAF?
-
I would have though a bit hard to guage based on yesterday
Edwards was playing on a skinny kid, was always going to not only look bigger & stronger but actually be bigger and stronger
He will play next week against the "Followers of Ego" who are a bigger, stronger side than the kids that are Giants. Let's see how he goes against them
-
Just saying Coach, if you don't GAF, don't comment then, was just saying that's all.
All I have noticed in the past he can hold himself better one on one, not just in yesterdays game but the ones he has played in previously and he runs games out better where McGuane looks spent.
-
Unfortunately, Edwards and McGuane may have stalled the development of Griff and Elton.
I don't think they have. If you're struggling at VFL level, you'll have no hope at senior level.
Riewoldt was kicking plenty of goals and performing well in the VFL before he got a call up. McBean is also doing well and probably would have played yesterday if he was fit.
Elton and Griffiths haven't shown much at all so far.
-
Just saying Coach, if you don't GAF, don't comment then, was just saying that's all.
All I have noticed in the past he can hold himself better one on one, not just in yesterdays game but the ones he has played in previously and he runs games out better where McGuane looks spent.
Please don't tell me how to post, guy.
-
Just saying Coach, if you don't GAF, don't comment then, was just saying that's all.
All I have noticed in the past he can hold himself better one on one, not just in yesterdays game but the ones he has played in previously and he runs games out better where McGuane looks spent.
Please don't tell me how to post, guy.
Was not telling you how to post, was suggesting you don't bother posting.. :wallywink
-
if you don't GAF, don't comment then
Suggesting? I think not papa
-
if you don't GAF, don't comment then
Suggesting? I think not papa
Oh get over it, what are you two? :help
-
if you don't GAF, don't comment then
Suggesting? I think not papa
Oh get over it, what are you two? :help
Get over what? You told me not to comment on something in a frighteningly aggressive manner. I responded, nicely requesting that you don't tell me how to post (this is a forum, guy). You responded by telling me you only suggested that I don't comment...which was wrong. Will you admit it or will you threaten me?
Forget it. I am reporting you to OE/WP. I won't put up with this anymore :banghead
-
if you don't GAF, don't comment then
Suggesting? I think not papa
Oh get over it, what are you two? :help
Get over what? You told me not to comment on something in a frighteningly aggressive manner. I responded, nicely requesting that you don't tell me how to post (this is a forum, guy). You responded by telling me you only suggested that I don't comment...which was wrong. Will you admit it or will you threaten me?
Forget it. I am reporting you to OE/WP. I won't put up with this anymore :banghead
Drugs must be rife were you live.. :lol
-
if you don't GAF, don't comment then
Suggesting? I think not papa
Oh get over it, what are you two? :help
Get over what? You told me not to comment on something in a frighteningly aggressive manner. I responded, nicely requesting that you don't tell me how to post (this is a forum, guy). You responded by telling me you only suggested that I don't comment...which was wrong. Will you admit it or will you threaten me?
Forget it. I am reporting you to OE/WP. I won't put up with this anymore :banghead
Drugs must be rife were you live.. :lol
Not really but I still get my hands on them.
-
if you don't GAF, don't comment then
Suggesting? I think not papa
Oh get over it, what are you two? :help
Get over what? You told me not to comment on something in a frighteningly aggressive manner. I responded, nicely requesting that you don't tell me how to post (this is a forum, guy). You responded by telling me you only suggested that I don't comment...which was wrong. Will you admit it or will you threaten me?
Forget it. I am reporting you to OE/WP. I won't put up with this anymore :banghead
Drugs must be rife were you live.. :lol
Not really but I still get my hands on them.
A lot!!!!!
-
Yeah. As a cop I pride myself on my ability
-
Yeah. As a cop I pride myself on my ability
God, please no, that's explains so much!!! :police: :outtahere
-
ACAB :police:
-
Yeah. As a cop I pride myself on my ability
God, please no, that's explains so much!!! :police: :outtahere
:lol
-
Had to lol at Coach's "frighteningly aggressive manner" :thumbsup
-
you didn't have to
baaaa
-
I would have though a bit hard to guage based on yesterday
Edwards was playing on a skinny kid, was always going to not only look bigger & stronger but actually be bigger and stronger
He will play next week against the "Followers of Ego" who are a bigger, stronger side than the kids that are Giants. Let's see how he goes against them
Fair comment although Edwards did work hard yesterday. Kicking is his strong point. Edwards is a better kick than McGuane but McGuane is a better mark than Edwards. Position still very much up for grabs.
-
I would have though a bit hard to guage based on yesterday
Edwards was playing on a skinny kid, was always going to not only look bigger & stronger but actually be bigger and stronger
He will play next week against the "Followers of Ego" who are a bigger, stronger side than the kids that are Giants. Let's see how he goes against them
Fair comment although Edwards did work hard yesterday. Kicking is his strong point. Edwards is a better kick than McGuane but McGuane is a better mark than Edwards. Position still very much up for grabs.
Absolutely agree regarding Edwards' kicking. Not only a relaible shot for goal but his field kicking is excellent too
-
I would have though a bit hard to guage based on yesterday
Edwards was playing on a skinny kid, was always going to not only look bigger & stronger but actually be bigger and stronger
He will play next week against the "Followers of Ego" who are a bigger, stronger side than the kids that are Giants. Let's see how he goes against them
Fair comment although Edwards did work hard yesterday. Kicking is his strong point. Edwards is a better kick than McGuane but McGuane is a better mark than Edwards. Position still very much up for grabs.
Absolutely agree regarding Edwards' kicking. Not only a relaible shot for goal but his field kicking is excellent too
Actually I have noticed that too, the main thing I have noticed as well and this was with Richo back in the day, while some forwards goal kicking is not that good their field kicking is very good. Not that that is the case with Edwards, just saying.
-
I would have though a bit hard to guage based on yesterday
Edwards was playing on a skinny kid, was always going to not only look bigger & stronger but actually be bigger and stronger
He will play next week against the "Followers of Ego" who are a bigger, stronger side than the kids that are Giants. Let's see how he goes against them
Fair comment although Edwards did work hard yesterday. Kicking is his strong point. Edwards is a better kick than McGuane but McGuane is a better mark than Edwards. Position still very much up for grabs.
Absolutely agree regarding Edwards' kicking. Not only a relaible shot for goal but his field kicking is excellent too
Actually I have noticed that too, the main thing I have noticed as well and this was with Richo back in the day, while some forwards goal kicking is not that good their field kicking is very good. Not that that is the case with Edwards, just saying.
Keep the slanderous comments out please
-
you didn't have to
baaaa
Oi I tried to keep it in but I couldn't. So yes I had to >:(
-
that's what she said
-
“We’ve been really pleased with what Aaron’s brought to the table, but also Luke McGuane at stages,” Hardwick said.
“Probably, where we’re at, at the moment, Luke is a bit unfortunate to be out of the side.
“But between the both of those guys, we’ve got the output of one player.
“It’s a little bit unfortunate, because one of those guys is going to miss out.
“But we’re really pleased with what those two have brought to the table.”
Read more and the full article at: http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-09-04/forward-boost-for-tigers
-
In b4 Azza kicks 0 goals Sunday
-
Azza hasn't played against the cheats since coming to the RFC. Could be a wildcard ;)
-
Edwards will dominate IMO, at least 3-4. Vicks and Jack quiet, 1-2 each.
-
Azza is a better mark then McGuane IMO, and I think he uses the ball better too. McGuane is better at defensive acts.
If Jamison goes to Riewoldt, does that mean Bootsma goes to Azza? He will kick 15. :rollin
-
Azza is a better mark then McGuane IMO, and I think he uses the ball better too. McGuane is better at defensive acts.
If Jamison goes to Riewoldt, does that mean Bootsma goes to Azza? He will kick 15. :rollin
maybe waite
then bootsma to vickery?
-
that's what she said
no she didn't. >:(
-
Someone knock out Waite and Mitch Robinson
Scum bags
-
Azza is a better mark then McGuane IMO, and I think he uses the ball better too. McGuane is better at defensive acts.
If Jamison goes to Riewoldt, does that mean Bootsma goes to Azza? He will kick 15. :rollin
maybe waite
then bootsma to vickery?
Bootsma wont play
They wont bring him back in for this game