One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Rampstar on November 14, 2013, 08:37:23 PM
-
Anyone reckon we should consider taking say Travis Tuck at 50 and Todd Banfield with our last pick. Banfield just got delisted by Lions and they will try and rookie him. Considering we lost White I think Banfield with our last pick may not be a bad option. He knows how to kick a goal. Travis Tuck can come in and play the role his brother did, the hard in and under player. At late picks I think we should consider.
-
No to Tuck on the primary list, Rookie yes. Banfield is defiantly worth the risk at 60. I'm not sure what's behind Brisbane cutting him?
-
Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS
-
Wouldn't get in a poo fight with other clubs trying to win Banfield, but wouldn't mind him for chips. More warm bodies to compete for the 21-25 spots the better imo.
-
Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS
disagree and think that bringing him in as the last player on the list is a risk worth taking. we aint gonna get nobody anyway at pick 68 anyway.
-
Ive got a doozy in mind :shh
-
Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS
disagree and think that bringing him in as the last player on the list is a risk worth taking. we aint gonna get nobody anyway at pick 68 anyway.
Yeah but getting Banfield and Tuck would make certainties of it. ;D
-
If you could get 5 to 8 games a season from both then its been a win.
-
Nahas >>> Banfield
you're taking the list backwards Terry
-
Nahas >>> Banfield
you're taking the list backwards Terry
dont call me Terry just call me the List Manager ;D
-
Banfield would be a good get. Late pick or psd. Has excitement factor but can be sloppy or lazy. A new club could change him
-
Nahas >>> Banfield
you're taking the list backwards Terry
dont call me Terry just call me the List Manager ;D
:lol
-
Would take Kane Lambert over both of these.
-
Ive got a doozy in mind :shh
Well spill the beans Tone!