One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Penelope on November 22, 2013, 10:14:51 PM
-
Here's your chance folks.
Think you can do better than the recruiters?
Simply give us one name that was available at the time for each pick.
That is, one name for pick 12, 50 and 56, thread will be bookmarked and we can compare results down the track.
Up for the challenge?
-
Garlett
Mitch thorp
Matt Thomas
-
:lol
thats the spirit.
-
Your challenge, you go first Al.
-
I like the Lennon pick but just to give Albert something to talk about in a year or two from now Ill give him 3 names at each pick:
12: Zac Jones, Blake Acres and Luke Dunstan
50: James Sicily, Mitch Honeychurch and Nick Holman
66: Jon Marsh, Eli Templeton (who wasnt drafted but will probably be rookied) and James Battersby see Templeton.
-
I like the Lennon pick but just to give Albert something to talk about in a year or two from now Ill give him 3 names at each pick:
12: Zac Jones, Blake Acres and Luke Dunstan
50: James Sicily, Mitch Honeychurch and Nick Holman
66: Jon Marsh, Eli Templeton (who wasnt drafted but will probably be rookied) and James Battersby see Templeton.
I think he wants balls out on the table. Anyone can name a bunch of players and claim one turned out good later.
-
From players drafted after each pick:
12 - Acres
50 - Byrne-Jones
66 - Marsh
Sincerely hoping to have egg on my face in a year or two. Much rather Richmond Football club get it right in real life than me being be proven right on an internet messageboard.
-
Zack Jones can suck my balls
-
Zack Jones can suck my balls
Should do well up in Sydney then.
-
Is that where he went?
I'm stoked w Gordo
Swans don't muck around. If bes good enough for them hell r handy
-
Wheres the Crustaceous Claw?
-
Sincerely hoping to have egg on my face in a year or two. Much rather Richmond Football club get it right in real life than me being be proven right on an internet messageboard.
How old are you?
:lol
-
Your challenge, you go first Al.
im not arrogant or narcisstic enough to believe that i have any clue about potential draftees, yet alone more than those paid to do so, nor do i give any pretense to do so.
Just giving an opportunity for those that believe the recruiters are wrong and they know better to put it on the line.
-
I like the Lennon pick but just to give Albert something to talk about in a year or two from now Ill give him 3 names at each pick:
12: Zac Jones, Blake Acres and Luke Dunstan
50: James Sicily, Mitch Honeychurch and Nick Holman
66: Jon Marsh, Eli Templeton (who wasnt drafted but will probably be rookied) and James Battersby see Templeton.
I think he wants balls out on the table. Anyone can name a bunch of players and claim one turned out good later.
Exactly, as that is what often happens.
The recruiters get one pick, so do you.
Nor do you need to pick someone different. if you are happy with one pick they ade, run with that.
-
We all know what is going to happen here
-
I like the Lennon pick but just to give Albert something to talk about in a year or two from now Ill give him 3 names at each pick:
12: Zac Jones, Blake Acres and Luke Dunstan
50: James Sicily, Mitch Honeychurch and Nick Holman
66: Jon Marsh, Eli Templeton (who wasnt drafted but will probably be rookied) and James Battersby see Templeton.
I think he wants balls out on the table. Anyone can name a bunch of players and claim one turned out good later.
Exactly, as that is what often happens.
The recruiters get one pick, so do you.
Nor do you need to pick someone different. if you are happy with one pick they ade, run with that.
I'm happy with Lennon and Lloyd. Would have gone Tambling at 50. :shh
-
I like the Lennon pick but just to give Albert something to talk about in a year or two from now Ill give him 3 names at each pick:
12: Zac Jones, Blake Acres and Luke Dunstan
50: James Sicily, Mitch Honeychurch and Nick Holman
66: Jon Marsh, Eli Templeton (who wasnt drafted but will probably be rookied) and James Battersby see Templeton.
I think he wants balls out on the table. Anyone can name a bunch of players and claim one turned out good later.
Exactly, as that is what often happens.
The recruiters get one pick, so do you.
Nor do you need to pick someone different. if you are happy with one pick they ade, run with that.
I'm happy with Lennon and Lloyd. Would have gone Tambling at 50. :shh
Agree has loads of untapped potential
-
I like the Lennon pick but just to give Albert something to talk about in a year or two from now Ill give him 3 names at each pick:
12: Zac Jones, Blake Acres and Luke Dunstan
50: James Sicily, Mitch Honeychurch and Nick Holman
66: Jon Marsh, Eli Templeton (who wasnt drafted but will probably be rookied) and James Battersby see Templeton.
I think he wants balls out on the table. Anyone can name a bunch of players and claim one turned out good later.
Im not saying that just one of these players will beat our picks, what Im saying is that all 3 in every category could be better than our picks. Is that enough Balls? ;D
-
I like the Lennon pick but just to give Albert something to talk about in a year or two from now Ill give him 3 names at each pick:
12: Zac Jones, Blake Acres and Luke Dunstan
50: James Sicily, Mitch Honeychurch and Nick Holman
66: Jon Marsh, Eli Templeton (who wasnt drafted but will probably be rookied) and James Battersby see Templeton.
I think he wants balls out on the table. Anyone can name a bunch of players and claim one turned out good later.
Im not saying that just one of these players will beat our picks, what Im saying is that all 3 in every category could be better than our picks. Is that enough Balls? ;D
:clapping
-
seriously? a pic of a bloke sitting on two rocks gets snipped?
hardly prudes hey?
LMFAO