One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on March 15, 2014, 10:36:47 PM

Title: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: one-eyed on March 15, 2014, 10:36:47 PM
No surprise that the same names will appear in this list :P.

Fire away ...
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 15, 2014, 10:38:36 PM
What's the point

Those that should go won't, those shouldn't probably will

I could list 8 perhaps even 10 I'd send to the VFL but it won't happen
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tony_montana on March 15, 2014, 10:39:43 PM
True that WP! ^^  that's the most disappointing thing of all
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Coach on March 15, 2014, 10:40:45 PM
People may not like Az but he kicked 6 today and always leads up hard at the footy. But the man who is apparently the best KPP of his draft will not make way for him ;D

Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on March 15, 2014, 10:44:38 PM
People may not like Az but he kicked 6 today and always leads up hard at the footy. But the man who is apparently the best KPP of his draft will not make way for him ;D
I'd take anything ahead of Vickery.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: dwaino on March 15, 2014, 10:45:16 PM
People may not like Az but he kicked 6 today and always leads up hard at the footy. But the man who is apparently the best KPP of his draft will not make way for him ;D
I'd take anything ahead of Vickery.

That's what she said  :shh
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on March 15, 2014, 11:21:54 PM
People may not like Az but he kicked 6 today and always leads up hard at the footy. But the man who is apparently the best KPP of his draft will not make way for him ;D
I'd take anything ahead of Vickery.

Id take a wooden martial arts doll. Wheel the son of a bitch onto the ground
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Diocletian on March 15, 2014, 11:23:48 PM
Out - Vickery

In - McBean or Elton or Edwards or Stephenson or stuffing anybody but stuffing Vickery.

Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Simonator on March 15, 2014, 11:29:02 PM
 We need king grimes and jacko asap. Not to mention Maric
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Rampstar on March 15, 2014, 11:32:10 PM
out vickery pettard grigg and all the other bludgers in the team
in - anybody who wants to have a fair dinkum crack
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Golfprotiger on March 15, 2014, 11:53:28 PM
Out - Pettard, Foley, Grigg

In - A. Edwards, Arnot, Jackson
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 16, 2014, 12:45:01 AM
Griff out. You all know it will happen.  ;D

In: Big O. Hard wick is trolling us all.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Francois Jackson on March 16, 2014, 01:00:05 AM
Griff out. You all know it will happen.  ;D

In: Big O. Hard wick is trolling us all.

you didnt like griff tonight?

Thought he played well and why Vickery was left on and griff not was odd.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 16, 2014, 01:06:18 AM
Griff out. You all know it will happen.  ;D

In: Big O. Hard wick is trolling us all.

you didnt like griff tonight?

Thought he played well and why Vickery was left on and griff not was odd.
griff was excellent. But he will likely get dropped. Vickery will play again.  :banghead
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Jackstar is back!!! on March 16, 2014, 07:50:35 AM
Hardwick treats the players like cats
They all have 9 lives
Only change that will be is A.Edwards in .Petterd out
If Hampson has done his groin.Big O in
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Francois Jackson on March 16, 2014, 08:29:26 AM
Griff out. You all know it will happen.  ;D

In: Big O. Hard wick is trolling us all.

you didnt like griff tonight?

Thought he played well and why Vickery was left on and griff not was odd.
griff was excellent. But he will likely get dropped. Vickery will play again.  :banghead

Got it and spot on

I just couldn't understand the logic of Griff getting subbed out and not Vickery

Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Jackstar is back!!! on March 16, 2014, 08:47:32 AM
Vickery washes Hardwicks car each week .end of story
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 16, 2014, 09:54:59 AM
I said there were at least 8 I'd drop and here they are

1. Vickery - shameful performance, gave a 10 minute cameo and that was it. He needs 6 weeks minimum in the VFL to get the message = no more gifts

2. Grigg - 30 possessions that meant squat. Flaps his arms coralling opponents more than the umps do saying play on. He won't tackle, chase or attack a contest so just go

3. Newman- tough call. Yeah probably but was unsighted last night and as a senior player needed to stand up when it mattered. Didn't

4. Ellis - flashed in for part of the 3rd and that was about it

5. Petterd - was shocking. Not that I had any idea what his role was, don't think he did either

6. Chaplin - new member of the leadership group who showed no leadership what so ever.

7. Foley - he isn't a sub. Either play from the start and sub him OUT but not IN or don't play him. Just didn't look fit to me and he looked slow

8. Toss of the coin between Houli who seemed disinterested or Morris who continues to fall over. So I am suggesting for Steve rather than playing VFL he goes shopping for some new boots and he can pick up a pair for Rance while he is at it

INS:
A Edwards (who understands the concept of lead up forward), Arnot, Lloyd, King, big O (who despite his limitation will actually compete for the team), Grimes, Knights, Jackson (if fit)
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 10:22:52 AM
WGAF, really, we won't beat the Blues if we dish that poo up again, doesn't matter who we have in the side.

We'd should of played Foley from the start, Arnott, King, Knights, Big O, stuff it.

Send some of these hero's back to the two's, they are full of there own self importance still.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: froars on March 16, 2014, 10:33:40 AM
Jack for Edwards. Vickery for Edwards, but I'd rather Jack.  He's sooking about external issues STILL and he needs to go back to the seconds to start enjoying footy again.  And so we can start enjoying footy again more is the point trying to accept having this big fat lazy overrated sooking little girl in our side who we rely on so much but delivers stuff all but petulance.  Go Tiges
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: froars on March 16, 2014, 10:35:47 AM
We had our best forward playing in the seconds kicking 6 goals.
LMAO@the incompetence  :rollin
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Muscles on March 16, 2014, 11:46:06 AM
I'm in general agreement with your hit list, WP.   Morris did a shoulder early in the game and could only tackle with one arm and bump one-sided.  You are right though, he just beat Rance in the falling over sweep-stakes.  I don't know what role Chaplin was playing, other than to get where they ball wasn't.  Houli took a bit of a hit in the first quarter and zoned out after that.

TV was dreadful.  I was stunned when they subbed Griff.  It must have been a pre-arranged plan that took no notice of how Griff/TV/Jack were performing on the night.  Of the tall forwards, Griff was the best by a long way.

Our half forwards did next to nothing - Newy, Petterd, Ellis, Foley were smashed by the Suns going both ways.  Conca looked way short of a gallop.  I cannot recall a single run-down tackle from any of our second-tier mids.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 16, 2014, 11:48:50 AM
I'm in general agreement with your hit list, WP.   Morris did a shoulder early in the game and could only tackle with one arm and bump one-sided.  You are right though, he just beat Rance in the falling over sweep-stakes.  I don't know what role Chaplin was playing, other than to get where they ball wasn't.  Houli took a bit of a hit in the first quarter and zoned out after that.

TV was dreadful.  I was stunned when they subbed Griff.  It must have been a pre-arranged plan that took no notice of how Griff/TV/Jack were performing on the night.  Of the tall forwards, Griff was the best by a long way.

Our half forwards did next to nothing - Newy, Petterd, Ellis, Foley were smashed by the Suns going both ways.  Conca looked way short of a gallop.  I cannot recall a single run-down tackle from any of our second-tier mids.
There was one - Thomas chasing down Ablett - of course he may not be classified as a second tier mid..... :(
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 16, 2014, 12:26:16 PM
WGAF, really, we won't beat the Blues if we dish that poo up again, doesn't matter who we have in the side.

We'd should of played Foley from the start, Arnott, King, Knights, Big O, stuff it.

Send some of these hero's back to the two's, they are full of there own self importance still.

Wtf you said King was underdone and shouldn't be played
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: TigerLand on March 16, 2014, 12:29:38 PM
I said there were at least 8 I'd drop and here they are

1. Vickery - shameful performance, gave a 10 minute cameo and that was it. He needs 6 weeks minimum in the VFL to get the message = no more gifts

2. Grigg - 30 possessions that meant squat. Flaps his arms coralling opponents more than the umps do saying play on. He won't tackle, chase or attack a contest so just go

3. Newman- tough call. Yeah probably but was unsighted last night and as a senior player needed to stand up when it mattered. Didn't

4. Ellis - flashed in for part of the 3rd and that was about it

5. Petterd - was shocking. Not that I had any idea what his role was, don't think he did either

6. Chaplin - new member of the leadership group who showed no leadership what so ever.

7. Foley - he isn't a sub. Either play from the start and sub him OUT but not IN or don't play him. Just didn't look fit to me and he looked slow

8. Toss of the coin between Houli who seemed disinterested or Morris who continues to fall over. So I am suggesting for Steve rather than playing VFL he goes shopping for some new boots and he can pick up a pair for Rance while he is at it

INS:
A Edwards (who understands the concept of lead up forward), Arnot, Lloyd, King, big O (who despite his limitation will actually compete for the team), Grimes, Knights, Jackson (if fit)

Agree with all of this except Chaplin and Ellis need to stay and lift for next week. Petterd.. what a joke
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: TigerLand on March 16, 2014, 12:39:17 PM
B: Morris Rance Grimes
HB: Vlastiun Chaplin Houli
C: Ellis Deledio Conca
HF: Martin Griffiths Edwards
F: A.Edwards Riewoldt King

Foll: Hampson, Cotchin, Thomas

Int: Knights, Arnot, Jackson Sub:Lloyd

If Jackson isn't fit I'd play Miles.

Get fair dinkum please.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 16, 2014, 12:58:13 PM
In McGuane
Out Vickery
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigerfan1961 on March 16, 2014, 01:02:40 PM
I said there were at least 8 I'd drop and here they are

1. Vickery - shameful performance, gave a 10 minute cameo and that was it. He needs 6 weeks minimum in the VFL to get the message = no more gifts

2. Grigg - 30 possessions that meant squat. Flaps his arms coralling opponents more than the umps do saying play on. He won't tackle, chase or attack a contest so just go

3. Newman- tough call. Yeah probably but was unsighted last night and as a senior player needed to stand up when it mattered. Didn't

4. Ellis - flashed in for part of the 3rd and that was about it

5. Petterd - was shocking. Not that I had any idea what his role was, don't think he did either

6. Chaplin - new member of the leadership group who showed no leadership what so ever.

7. Foley - he isn't a sub. Either play from the start and sub him OUT but not IN or don't play him. Just didn't look fit to me and he looked slow

8. Toss of the coin between Houli who seemed disinterested or Morris who continues to fall over. So I am suggesting for Steve rather than playing VFL he goes shopping for some new boots and he can pick up a pair for Rance while he is at it

INS:
A Edwards (who understands the concept of lead up forward), Arnot, Lloyd, King, big O (who despite his limitation will actually compete for the team), Grimes, Knights, Jackson (if fit)
Harsh on Ellis and Chaplin, first bad games for a while IMO.

Others, agree, especially Shaun Grigg. Previously thought he was good for the side with his gut running and ability to find space, but by God, his lack of wanting to contest and tackle and basically do anything of a defensive nature is a joke. MUST be dropped until he learns how to defend and put the body on the line
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: 1980 I Was There on March 16, 2014, 01:16:09 PM
Out: Everyone except for Thomas and Vlastuin

In: Any bastard that can kick the ball instead of hand balling the bloody thing and any bludger that can take a grab and move the frickin thing on fast.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 01:50:33 PM
WGAF, really, we won't beat the Blues if we dish that poo up again, doesn't matter who we have in the side.

We'd should of played Foley from the start, Arnott, King, Knights, Big O, stuff it.

Send some of these hero's back to the two's, they are full of there own self importance still.

Wtf you said King was underdone and shouldn't be played

No I didn't, the club did, after his hit out this weekend he should be right anyway, with Grimes.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: torch on March 16, 2014, 01:54:45 PM
In (Out)

Jackson (Grigg)

A.Edwards (Vickery)

Grimes (Petterd)

Knights (Ellis)

Lloyd (Newman)

Chances of this happening? 0% ...
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: mat073 on March 16, 2014, 03:13:36 PM
Out....players who think they are rock stars because we made the finals once in 13 years.
In ....players who give their all like the new boy from Port.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 16, 2014, 04:59:02 PM
I said there were at least 8 I'd drop and here they are

1. Vickery - shameful performance, gave a 10 minute cameo and that was it. He needs 6 weeks minimum in the VFL to get the message = no more gifts

2. Grigg - 30 possessions that meant squat. Flaps his arms coralling opponents more than the umps do saying play on. He won't tackle, chase or attack a contest so just go

3. Newman- tough call. Yeah probably but was unsighted last night and as a senior player needed to stand up when it mattered. Didn't

4. Ellis - flashed in for part of the 3rd and that was about it

5. Petterd - was shocking. Not that I had any idea what his role was, don't think he did either

6. Chaplin - new member of the leadership group who showed no leadership what so ever.

7. Foley - he isn't a sub. Either play from the start and sub him OUT but not IN or don't play him. Just didn't look fit to me and he looked slow

8. Toss of the coin between Houli who seemed disinterested or Morris who continues to fall over. So I am suggesting for Steve rather than playing VFL he goes shopping for some new boots and he can pick up a pair for Rance while he is at it

INS:
A Edwards (who understands the concept of lead up forward), Arnot, Lloyd, King, big O (who despite his limitation will actually compete for the team), Grimes, Knights, Jackson (if fit)

What did we all make of houlis game?

---

Vickery was awful but I wouldntndrop he for Orren. I would like to see jack/Vickery/Griffiths trio persisted with until Maric is fit.

Grigg is average. I think the opposition like him having the ball...defensively inadequate .

With so many non KPP forwards coming to the club, surely Newman is not undroppable 

Ellis should be retained purely as a high draft pick who we require to make it.

Normal Ricky game. Average.

Chaplin. Slow. Would kill for grimes. Behnd Astbury now IMO.

Rough to judge foley  on a quarter.

Houli. Worrying. Morris. Worrying.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tony_montana on March 16, 2014, 05:13:34 PM
Houli and Morris were fine and far from the problem.

King in for Newman

Vickery out for Azza

Petterd out for Jackson or Knights depending on fitness

Grigg out for Arnot

Give Foley another chance
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Coach on March 16, 2014, 05:14:43 PM
Houli was sliding around in some sort of Alex Rance tribute act.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Diocletian on March 16, 2014, 05:16:59 PM
The Rance Rollerskate & The Houli Hoop....
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 16, 2014, 05:27:10 PM
Houli was sliding around in some sort of Alex Rance tribute act.
:lol
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 16, 2014, 05:59:06 PM
Houli was sliding around in some sort of Alex Rance tribute act.

 :clapping :clapping

 :lol
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Stripes on March 16, 2014, 06:11:26 PM
I think Dimma made a serious error in judgement playing Griffiths, Vickery and Jack in the smaller confines of Metrocon Stadium in humid conditions. I understand he is trying to get them used to structuring up together for the larger grounds but Vickery or Jack should have been omitted for Lloyd or A.Edwards. Dimma dropped the ball here imo
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 16, 2014, 06:15:36 PM
I think Dimma made a serious error in judgement playing Griffiths, Vickery and Jack in the smaller confines of Metrocon Stadium in humid conditions. I understand he is trying to get them used to structuring up together for the larger grounds but Vickery or Jack should have been omitted for Lloyd or A.Edwards. Dimma dropped the ball here imo
When's the last time Dimma dropped Vickery?
I think Noah was rounding up a few animals at the time.....
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 16, 2014, 06:16:52 PM
I think Dimma made a serious error in judgement playing Griffiths, Vickery and Jack in the smaller confines of Metrocon Stadium in humid conditions. I understand he is trying to get them used to structuring up together for the larger grounds but Vickery or Jack should have been omitted for Lloyd or A.Edwards. Dimma dropped the ball here imo
When's the last time Dimma dropped Vickery?
I think Noah was rounding up a few animals at the time.....

Really.

Thought it was closer to when the apple fell from the tree...
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 16, 2014, 06:18:51 PM
I think Dimma made a serious error in judgement playing Griffiths, Vickery and Jack in the smaller confines of Metrocon Stadium in humid conditions. I understand he is trying to get them used to structuring up together for the larger grounds but Vickery or Jack should have been omitted for Lloyd or A.Edwards. Dimma dropped the ball here imo
When's the last time Dimma dropped Vickery?
I think Noah was rounding up a few animals at the time.....

Really.

Thought it was closer to when the apple fell from the tree...
Nah. Googled it. Both wrong.  Apparently God was having a rest on that particular day....
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 16, 2014, 06:20:00 PM
I think Dimma made a serious error in judgement playing Griffiths, Vickery and Jack in the smaller confines of Metrocon Stadium in humid conditions. I understand he is trying to get them used to structuring up together for the larger grounds but Vickery or Jack should have been omitted for Lloyd or A.Edwards. Dimma dropped the ball here imo
When's the last time Dimma dropped Vickery?
I think Noah was rounding up a few animals at the time.....

Really.

Thought it was closer to when the apple fell from the tree...
Nah. Googled it. Both wrong.  Apparently God was having a rest on that particular day....

 :clapping :clapping :thumbsup :bow

 :lol
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: (•))(©™ on March 16, 2014, 06:26:42 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 16, 2014, 06:27:19 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?

Only when injured Ox
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: (•))(©™ on March 16, 2014, 06:36:40 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?

Only when injured Ox

Quite the oddity considering everyone supposedly had to warn their spot....
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 16, 2014, 06:40:26 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?

Only when injured Ox

Quite the oddity considering everyone supposedly had to warn their spot....

Been a bug bear of one for years, favourites of a coach don't have to earn their spots

Vickery, Grigg, Ellis, Houli to name 4 are clearly Dimma favourites. Throw in Newman too
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 16, 2014, 06:53:24 PM
To put salt on the wound, he also has his whipping boys.
They get dropped with one bad game.......
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: TigerLand on March 16, 2014, 06:53:50 PM
I think Dimma made a serious error in judgement playing Griffiths, Vickery and Jack in the smaller confines of Metrocon Stadium in humid conditions. I understand he is trying to get them used to structuring up together for the larger grounds but Vickery or Jack should have been omitted for Lloyd or A.Edwards. Dimma dropped the ball here imo

Couldn't agree more Stripes.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: TigerLand on March 16, 2014, 06:55:09 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?

Only when injured Ox

Quite the oddity considering everyone supposedly had to warn their spot....

Been a bug bear of one for years, favourites of a coach don't have to earn their spots

Vickery, Grigg, Ellis, Houli to name 4 are clearly Dimma favourites. Throw in Newman too

Houli has been pretty consistent. Ellis was the sub for a month or 2 last year and earnt his spot in the side.

Grigg and Vickery been very very lucky for a long time.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Smokey on March 16, 2014, 07:10:04 PM
Houli was sliding around in some sort of Alex Rance tribute act.

 :lol
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 07:39:20 PM
About ready to watch the Port, Carlscum game now....
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 07:54:02 PM
If we dish that crap up again like last night against the scum they will bury us in the first 15 minutes.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Diocletian on March 16, 2014, 08:09:44 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?

Only when injured Ox

Quite the oddity considering everyone supposedly had to warn their spot....

Been a bug bear of one for years, favourites of a coach don't have to earn their spots

Vickery, Grigg, Ellis, Houli to name 4 are clearly Dimma favourites. Throw in Newman too

Edwards, Jackson before last year...

If we dish that crap up again like last night against the scum they will bury us in the first 15 minutes.

...and then some...
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 08:11:55 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?

Only when injured Ox

Quite the oddity considering everyone supposedly had to warn their spot....

Been a bug bear of one for years, favourites of a coach don't have to earn their spots

Vickery, Grigg, Ellis, Houli to name 4 are clearly Dimma favourites. Throw in Newman too

Jackson before last year....S. Edwards....

If we dish that crap up again like last night against the scum they will bury us in the first 15 minutes.

...and then some...

Yeah, they are playing really well, their pressure is unreal. We need some mongrel about us".we just don't have it. :-\
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 16, 2014, 08:16:06 PM
Is it fair to say he's never been dropped ?

Only when injured Ox

Quite the oddity considering everyone supposedly had to warn their spot....

Been a bug bear of one for years, favourites of a coach don't have to earn their spots

Vickery, Grigg, Ellis, Houli to name 4 are clearly Dimma favourites. Throw in Newman too

Pettard
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: the claw on March 16, 2014, 08:16:23 PM
for all those who want vickery out atm. there is no other option.  thats the scary thing imo. i look at the list and i only see elton and im asking is he ready.
list management hey you could see this sort of scenario coming a mile off.

i dont care what anybody thinks  but you have to play two real good sized kpfs. you then need  athird tall weather that be a ruckman forward, or a pinch hitting forward ruck. we have good tall structure up forward. the club have it right in this regards.the question is are those talls good enough. we went and got hampson to allow vickery to stay at home so we could maintain good structure thru games. the concept or idea is correct.
fail to keep good structure and all that will happen is what talls we do play are up against two or three tall opponents all the time.

 we are a middling team along with 10 other middling teams while appalled at the way we played and performed this week in some ways it is to be expected. we cant throw the structural  baby out with the bath water.

if we drop vickery the option is to play griffiths permanently  forward with riewoldt hampson as the ruck/for and bring in the big o to start in the ruck.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 16, 2014, 08:17:47 PM
Maric mcbean Elton is that not three options

Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 08:17:54 PM
We need to stop stuffing around with Riewoldt, put him at FF and stuffing leave him there!
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 08:19:06 PM
Maric mcbean Elton is that not three options

Watch the Blues game now on, the two later mentioned are not there, the Blues backs would kill them!
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 16, 2014, 08:26:42 PM
Maric mcbean Elton is that not three options

Watch the Blues game now on, the two later mentioned are not there, the Blues backs would kill them!

(http://i.imgur.com/rWu0kFq.jpg)
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 08:39:17 PM
 :lol

The Blues are going to flog the pis s out of us if we don't get our poo together in two weeks...
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 16, 2014, 09:01:14 PM
It's gunna be a slaughter.... Blues by 15 goals
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 09:06:31 PM
It's gunna be a slaughter.... Blues by 15 goals

Probably!
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 09:32:23 PM
Waite will kill Astbury!
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 16, 2014, 09:45:36 PM
Wait will kill Astbury!
I'm calling homicide!
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 09:46:54 PM
Wait will kill Astbury!
I'm calling homicide!

 :lol
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 16, 2014, 10:13:59 PM
Walker just reported for rough conduct?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: bojangles17 on March 16, 2014, 10:18:19 PM
If he hasn't he should be, forearm to the head , late tackle,
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Golfprotiger on March 16, 2014, 10:21:35 PM
Let's hope they don't bring that poo in their last quarter next week....
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: cub on March 17, 2014, 01:16:29 AM
Carlton supporters already bagging me up on the Gold Coast, season defining really
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: torch on March 17, 2014, 07:24:08 PM
Trout saying Vickery could miss 4 weeks???
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: gerkin greg on March 17, 2014, 07:24:37 PM
must have a good heart surgeon
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: wayne on March 17, 2014, 07:42:40 PM
Trout saying Vickery could miss 4 weeks???
Yeah saw that, said whispers were vickery 4 weeks, cotch calf and hampson groin.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on March 17, 2014, 07:44:04 PM
Trout saying Vickery could miss 4 weeks???

Dissapointing. Hoping it was the season

#justeffhimorf
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 17, 2014, 07:46:39 PM
Trout saying Vickery could miss 4 weeks???
Was that from broken ribs when the ball bounced off his chest?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: dwaino on March 17, 2014, 07:46:52 PM
If Vickery is lame then he should be put down.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on March 17, 2014, 07:50:24 PM
If Vickery is lame then he should be put down.
:lol
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: the claw on March 17, 2014, 07:58:16 PM
Maric mcbean Elton is that not three options
are you seriously expecting the bean pole that mcbean is to hold down a kp.
maric is a ruckman and is not in contention for vickerys spot.
elton is the only viable/realistic kpf in the wings and like mcbean common sense would be to ask if hes ready for the role. not imo. but hey ready or not perhaps hed give more than vickery has.

 effectively there is no viable replacement for vickery unless,  we play griffiths in the role,   play hampson as a ruck/for and bring in orren  as the starting ruckman.
atm unless players jump out of their skins with improvement the cupboard is bare. i say again we have numbers but we just dont have the quality or development within those numbers.



Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Andyy on March 17, 2014, 08:01:46 PM
Out:
Vickery (if injured)
Hampson (if injured)
Cotchin (if injured)
Petterd
Grigg

In:
Elton
Stephenson
Jackson (if available)
Arnot
Knights
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 17, 2014, 10:50:33 PM
Maric mcbean Elton is that not three options
are you seriously expecting the bean pole that mcbean is to hold down a kp.
maric is a ruckman and is not in contention for vickerys spot.
elton is the only viable/realistic kpf in the wings and like mcbean common sense would be to ask if hes ready for the role. not imo. but hey ready or not perhaps hed give more than vickery has.

 effectively there is no viable replacement for vickery unless,  we play griffiths in the role,   play hampson as a ruck/for and bring in orren  as the starting ruckman.
atm unless players jump out of their skins with improvement the cupboard is bare. i say again we have numbers but we just dont have the quality or development within those numbers.

When Maric fit - could play Ivan fwd - beaner 4th tall

Or play jack + griff only two kPp. And a 200cm flanker

Elton would non worse tyrone last dig

If Hampson is going to be in the 21 - Maric must play forward a lot

Sadly it is unrealistic to expect a 25 year old, 200cm, former top ten draft pick kPp to just be waiting in the twos for jack or Tyrone to have a bad game
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: SCHammo on March 18, 2014, 09:07:09 AM
lets hope there not correct with the injuries... To some degree I thought hampson started to get on top in that last qrt and was hitting to our advantage I think he may be ok....
 if we were to make changes id be starting foley on the ground next week we need some pace as clearly it was shown we lacked it on the weekend....
knights in not sure we get pace from him??? I have a feeling he may bring king in as much as I feel he may struggle this year we certainly lacked some crummers in the forward line on the weekend...
its just a pitty miles wasn't upgraded he would have been handy I reckon...
PAttard may struggle he was very slow.

Walker looks to except the one week which is good for us....
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: the claw on March 18, 2014, 08:51:02 PM
Maric mcbean Elton is that not three options
are you seriously expecting the bean pole that mcbean is to hold down a kp.
maric is a ruckman and is not in contention for vickerys spot.
elton is the only viable/realistic kpf in the wings and like mcbean common sense would be to ask if hes ready for the role. not imo. but hey ready or not perhaps hed give more than vickery has.

 effectively there is no viable replacement for vickery unless,  we play griffiths in the role,   play hampson as a ruck/for and bring in orren  as the starting ruckman.
atm unless players jump out of their skins with improvement the cupboard is bare. i say again we have numbers but we just dont have the quality or development within those numbers.

1/ When Maric fit - could play Ivan fwd - beaner 4th tall. when ivans fit he is by a country mile the best ruckman we have. he will play predominately in the ruck and rightly so wit

2/ Or play jack + griff only two kPp. And a 200cm flanker

3/ Elton would non worse tyrone last dig

4/ If Hampson is going to be in the 21 - Maric must play forward a lot

5/ Sadly it is unrealistic to expect a 25 year old, 200cm, former top ten draft pick kPp to just be waiting in the twos for jack or Tyrone to have a bad game
1/ when ivan is fit he will play ruck. no if or buts about it. when fit hes a country mile in front of any other ruckman we have.
2/ so you play griff and jack as permanent kpfs and mcbean as a flanker  which one goes into the ruck to help ivan or until ivan is fit hampson. so in a way you agree mcbean is not ready to play kpf but are willing to leave us with only one kpf throughout games.
you do realise the whole idea of getting hampson was to address this very issue allowing vickery to play permanently forward so we dont lose structure.
3/ your right elton would be no worse than vickery my granny would be no worse. that doesnt mean hes capable of holding down chf for us.
4/ mate hampson will be in the 21 with or without maric there. hampson will spend significant time forward  when ivan is fit not the other way around. these are  the reasons we got him 1/ not to lose too much in the ruck  when ivan has a rest. 2/ to allow vickery or another tall to play permanently forward to maintain structure throughout a game with jack. these are  the reason why we got hampson.
5/ i have to ask who the hell are you talking about, we dont have a 25yo former top 10 draft pick kpp on the list waiting in the wings for injury. we dont have one kpp who looks remotely like being able to force riewoldt or vickery out as bad as they have been at times yet alone a ready to go 25yr old. ffs lets get him in the team quick smart.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 19, 2014, 01:01:26 PM
How many mins or game perecentage will ivan play forward when fit and Hampson in the 21 ?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: pmac21 on March 19, 2014, 04:28:58 PM
King, A Edwards & Knights should come in for McD, Foley & Petterd
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on March 19, 2014, 07:07:54 PM
King, A Edwards & Knights should come in for McD, Foley & Petterd

Nit that I disagree with the ins, but they're all fwds and your replacing 2 backs and a mid?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: TigerLand on March 19, 2014, 07:30:04 PM
Can anyone confirm Cotchins injury?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Stripes on March 19, 2014, 08:06:24 PM
Can anyone confirm Cotchins injury?

Not on the injury list pope....... :-\
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 19, 2014, 09:07:40 PM
Can anyone confirm Cotchins injury?

What injury?

The sore calf?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: the claw on March 19, 2014, 09:42:59 PM
How many mins or game perecentage will ivan play forward when fit and Hampson in the 21 ?
how the hell do i know.
if i took a guess id say a fit maric would spend 60% ruck. 20% forward 20% bench
hampson would go 40% ruck 40% forwrd 20% bench. it aint hard to do. maintain a decent ruck presence maintain the third tall forward while giving both a decent break thru out.
i ask again you do understand the reasons behind why we got hampson. you do have an understanding of exactly what ivan brings to the table as a ruckman. if you asked me  id say not.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: eliminator on March 20, 2014, 06:53:40 AM
Would bring in Jackson, King and Edwards at the expense of Petterd, Newman and Vickery. Would bring in Biscuit at expense of Foley.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: the claw on March 20, 2014, 11:12:56 AM
it wont happen but id be happy with as many as 6 changes and send a early message to the lot of em.
stephenson > vickery. o to the ruck, griffiths to vickerys spot and hampson spends more time forward as the ruck/for.
gordon > grigg. big body flexable and will tackle and run and hopefully use the ball better. can go forward as well.
jackson > mcdonough. jackos a mid replacing a def/mid whos not quite there yet.
king > newman. sad but true but king offers more as a forward than newman. thing is ball use and foot skills are an issue with us and newman is one of the better users of the ball and jakes not.
knights > petterd its a no brainer. can go thru the middle as well and is smart and uses well. all the things petterd isnt.
a edwards > s edwards. a medium forward for a non performing sml forward. aaron is the form forward on our list.

the crazy thing is i think there will only be changes made because of injury. if they all come up no changes.

Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Simonator on March 22, 2014, 09:03:58 AM
I wanna see knights come in, sounds like he had a good game. If RFC selection panel had any guts they would drop newman, played horribly. Let him go get some form in the 2's.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Gigantor on March 22, 2014, 09:44:34 AM
I reckon some of you guys are way too harsh calling for heads after just one game..lets give it a few more then we can storm the bastille.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 22, 2014, 09:57:25 AM
I wanna see knights come in, sounds like he had a good game. If RFC selection panel had any guts they would drop newman, played horribly. Let him go get some form in the 2's.

 :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: (•))(©™ on March 22, 2014, 10:07:53 AM
I wanna see knights come in, sounds like he had a good game. If RFC selection panel had any guts they would drop newman, played horribly. Let him go get some form in the 2's.
I can't remember Newmans last standout game.

He's a hack
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 22, 2014, 11:59:36 AM
FFS something has to happen
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: torch on March 22, 2014, 03:34:32 PM
I think if we see Grigg and Vickery's surname in the out's list we all would be happy with that!  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: (•))(©™ on March 22, 2014, 03:40:15 PM
Primarily we need to see names of blokes who will do a consistently better job.

I believe #vickisue is front runner for this years , "Least consistent" award.

Say it slowly ....least con-sis-tent!

Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 22, 2014, 03:52:22 PM
I reckon some of you guys are way too harsh calling for heads after just one game..lets give it a few more then we can storm the bastille.

But maybe it isn't just about one game?

Some of the names are those who been dishing up the same old same old for an extended period of time but keep getting picked because the coaches love 'em for reasons lots of us just don't get

I think if we see Grigg and Vickery's surname in the out's list we all would be happy with that!  :thumbsup

Agree

But won't happen  :-\
Title: Richmond must decide whether to rush back B&F winner Daniel Jackson (H-Sun)
Post by: one-eyed on March 23, 2014, 10:01:52 PM
Richmond must decide whether to rush back best-and-fairest winner Daniel Jackson

    Jon Ralph
    Herald Sun
    March 23, 2014 7:22PM


RICHMOND must decide this week whether to rush back reigning Jack Dyer Medallist Daniel Jackson against Carlton after just one pre-season hit-out.

Jackson won 13 possessions in three quarters on Friday night in the club’s VFL game after returning from groin and hamstring soreness.

But he would need to play off a six-day break, a tough ask given a pre-season held back by persistent soft-tissue concerns.

Midfielder Nathan Foley could muster only a dozen possessions as he strives to play against the Blues after being a controversial omission from the finals defeat last year.

The Tigers led by 33 points early in the third term before being run down through the heroics of Chris Judd, Nick Duigan, Bryce Gibbs and Marc Murphy.

The Tigers and Blues will this year be unable to call on a number of reinforcements as they strive to avoid a 0-2 start to the season.

Small forward Chris Knights was excellent at VFL level with 24 touches, and could be considered after a number of games back from what Damien Hardwick has described as a “car crash” of a knee injury.

The Blues will also have to dig themselves out of their Round 1 hole without former captain Judd, who lit up the MCG in the third-quarter of last year’s blockbuster final.

He is considered likely to play in Round 3 but isn’t yet ready after achilles surgery.

Likewise, Andrew Carrazzo (calf) and ex-Brisbane recruit Sam Docherty (knee) are another week away.

The Blues will need to replace defender Andrew Walker, suspended for slinging Port Adelaide’s Angus Monfries into the Etihad Stadium fence.

Blues football manager Andrew Mackay said last week Judd was still a week away, but Dennis Armfield (knee) could face a fitness test.

“He’s (Judd’s) running now and will be training late this week or early next week, so we’re confident he will be ready for the match against Essendon.”

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/afl/richmond-must-decide-whether-to-rush-back-bestandfairest-winner-daniel-jackson/story-fni5f9jc-1226862631439
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on March 23, 2014, 10:19:37 PM
I would not risk/rush jacko back this week we wil need him fit.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 23, 2014, 10:36:19 PM
Would be a panic move.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Diocletian on March 23, 2014, 11:31:38 PM
Would be a panic move.

So a Richmond move then?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Andyy on March 24, 2014, 01:46:44 AM
Just let Thomas do the hard stuff. No point rushing him back, he's had no run-time basically. Will do more harm than good.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Chuck17 on March 24, 2014, 11:03:29 AM
Just let Thomas do the hard stuff. No point rushing him back, he's had no run-time basically. Will do more harm than good.

He can do more harm than good when he is fit as well
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: gerkin greg on March 24, 2014, 12:23:54 PM
Knights has to play

Class above 90% of the list
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Dice on March 24, 2014, 01:33:17 PM
Knights has to play

Class above 90% of the list

Agree. We've gotta find some goals from somewhere. Especially since we've decided the best place to play the best full forward in the AFL is on a wing  :banghead
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Coach on March 24, 2014, 03:14:00 PM
Roughead plays on a wing for us?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Stripes on March 24, 2014, 03:15:25 PM
Roughead plays on a wing for us?

No Cloke
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Coach on March 24, 2014, 03:21:03 PM
Roughead plays on a wing for us?

No Cloke

Cloke plays on a wing for us?
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 24, 2014, 03:44:18 PM
Knights has to play

Class above 90% of the list
Could use some class off half back. Get it done Dimma.  :clapping
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: gerkin greg on March 24, 2014, 03:48:56 PM
Knights has to play

Class above 90% of the list
Could use some class off half back. Get it done Dimma.  :clapping

HF
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 24, 2014, 04:12:42 PM
Knights has to play

Class above 90% of the list
Could use some class off half back. Get it done Dimma.  :clapping

HF
Half back is the new half forward.  ;D
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: dwaino on March 24, 2014, 04:29:26 PM
Knights has to play

Class above 90% of the list
Could use some class off half back. Get it done Dimma.  :clapping

HF

Tigs was getting inb4 Hardwick changes Knights' position  :shh
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Diocletian on March 24, 2014, 04:31:13 PM
Out: Choking after half-time

In: Maintaining lead right to fulltime
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Dice on March 24, 2014, 04:37:23 PM
Tigs was getting inb4 Hardwick changes Knights' position  :shh

 :clapping
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Dice on March 24, 2014, 04:42:30 PM
Roughead plays on a wing for us?

Point taken , but you must admit Jack is the best full forward we've had since ' Barge' Taylor
 ;D
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Coach on March 24, 2014, 06:08:30 PM
Gotta love Barge Taylor ;D
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Golfprotiger on March 24, 2014, 08:34:39 PM
Out: Choking after half-time

In: Maintaining lead right to fulltime

X2  :clapping
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: one-eyed on March 24, 2014, 10:07:00 PM
Richmond won't panic as it seeks its first win of season

   Emma Quayle
     The Age
    March 23, 2014


Richmond's disappointment at its opening round loss is unlikely to spark any panic at the selection table before Thursday night's match against Carlton.

While Daniel Jackson is available for selection having overcome the hamstring injury that cut short his pre-season, the Tigers will resist tipping too many players out of the side beaten by Gold Coast on March 15.

Carlton will be unable to slot Chris Judd and Andrew Carrazzo into its side, with both midfielders at least one more week away from resuming, but must find at least one new player to replace the suspended Andrew Walker.

The Blues' selection decisions are unlikely to be driven by any injury concerns. The team has not reported any problems since its 33-point loss to Port Adelaide in round one.

Richmond football manager Dan Richardson said Jackson had played about three quarters of Friday's match, after he was injured late in the Tigers' pre-season.

The short turnaround may also count against the 27-year-old, with the club not wanting to rush him back into the senior side before he is fully prepared.

"He played on Friday in the VFL and he'll be better for the run," Richardson said. "Whether he did enough to be up for selection for Thursday I'm not quite sure. That's something that will be discussed later in the week.

"He hadn't played at all, so he needed to get a run in. We'll see what happens during the week but, at this stage, I'd say he would be unlikely to come straight back in.

"We've got a few back in the VFL now which is good, but there's no panic. I wouldn't think we'd be making too many changes this week."

Jackson, the Tigers' primary midfield shutdown player, lined up alongside first-round draftee Ben Lennon, utility Chris Knights and onballer Nathan Foley in the VFL game against Footscray.

Ruckman Ivan Maric is not expected to be playing for at least another few weeks although Jake King, left out of the round one side because he had not been able to get sufficient work in, is fit and under consideration for a return to the forward line.

Lennon, Richmond's first choice at No.12 in last year's draft, played his first game after being sent for minor knee surgery in February, with Knights continuing his journey back from the horrendous knee injury that cut short his first season at Richmond last year.

Walker accepted a one-match ban for rough conduct following the Blues' loss to Port Adelaide, with Kane Lucas, Sam Rowe and young midfielders Patrick Cripps, Dylan Buckley and Nick Holman likely to be considered for a call-up.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/richmond-wont-panic-as-it-seeks-its-first-win-of-season-20140323-hvlx6.html#ixzz2wsRvNW5g
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Willy on March 24, 2014, 10:21:48 PM
Want Knights and King in.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Darth Tiger on March 25, 2014, 12:44:00 AM
Roughead plays on a wing for us?

No Cloke

Cloke plays on a wing for us?

Yep its 1974 in the Punt Road Hot Tub machine.  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WA Tiger on March 25, 2014, 07:59:13 AM
Maybe Knights in for Newman and King for Foley, even Arnot for Foley...
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: greyhound bob on March 25, 2014, 08:34:09 AM
KNIGHTS
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tony_montana on March 25, 2014, 10:11:55 AM
Maybe Knights in for Newman and King for Foley, even Arnot for Foley...

Unfortunately we all know Newman will never ever be dropped. He's an untouchable
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 25, 2014, 10:16:01 AM
Maybe Knights in for Newman and King for Foley, even Arnot for Foley...

Unfortunately we all know Newman will never ever be dropped. He's an untouchable

 :yep :yep

So true
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Phil Mrakov on March 25, 2014, 10:38:49 AM
Maybe Knights in for Newman and King for Foley, even Arnot for Foley...

Unfortunately we all know Newman will never ever be dropped. He's an untouchable

At what point do we start to ignore that he was our club's captain and recognise that he's a crap footballer at present.... ? and we have Nathan Gordon who is probably already a better option rotting away in the 2's 
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: gerkin greg on March 25, 2014, 10:55:30 AM
Gotta love Barge Taylor ;D

BARGE! :clapping
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: 1965 on March 25, 2014, 11:23:49 AM

When are the changes for Thursday announced?

 :cheers
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 25, 2014, 11:25:25 AM
Teams announced Wednesday
Title: In the mix: round two (afl site)
Post by: one-eyed on March 25, 2014, 03:50:33 PM
In the mix: round two

Nathan Schmook   
afl.com.au
March 25, 2014 12:40 PM


RICHMOND
Club champion Daniel Jackson was eased back from a hamstring injury with the Tigers' VFL team on Saturday, playing three quarters of a practice match against Footscray. The strong-bodied midfielder will have five days to recover for Thursday night's blockbuster against Carlton but appears set to return. Pushing strong cases for inclusion were half-forward Chris Knights (24 possessions), who regularly drifted into defence, and midfielder Anthony Miles (20 possessions and six clearances). Prized draftee Ben Lennon has recovered from a knee injury and played a half but is unlikely to feature in senior calculations yet.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-03-25/in-the-mix-round-two
Title: Re: In the mix: round two (afl site)
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 25, 2014, 04:09:33 PM
In the mix: round two

Nathan Schmook   
afl.com.au
March 25, 2014 12:40 PM


RICHMOND
Club champion Daniel Jackson was eased back from a hamstring injury with the Tigers' VFL team on Saturday, playing three quarters of a practice match against Footscray. The strong-bodied midfielder will have five days to recover for Thursday night's blockbuster against Carlton but appears set to return. Pushing strong cases for inclusion were half-forward Chris Knights (24 possessions), who regularly drifted into defence, and midfielder Anthony Miles (20 possessions and six clearances). Prized draftee Ben Lennon has recovered from a knee injury and played a half but is unlikely to feature in senior calculations yet.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-03-25/in-the-mix-round-two

Great reporting there by Nathan Schmuk oops I mean Schmook  ::)

Miles is a rookie and isn't elevated so therefore cannot be considered for selection  ::)
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: one-eyed on March 25, 2014, 04:15:04 PM
Who’s hurt? Who’s on the cusp? We look ahead to Round 2 in this week’s Barometer

Herald-Sun
March 25, 2014


RICHMOND

ON THE BLOCK: There were no shortage of players who didn’t live up to expectations in Round 1 but Matt McDonough seems the likely omission if Damien Hardwick wants to make a change. Nathan Foley is also on the brink — he started as the sub against Gold Coast and played in the VFL on Friday. The rest are on notice to turn their form around.

ON THE CUSP: The big question this week is do the Tigers rush back Daniel Jackson? The Jack Dyer Medallist played his first minutes of the year in a VFL practice match on Friday after being hampered by groin and hamstring soreness and picked up 13 disposals in three quarters. His leadership is vital but he might be too underdone, especially coming off a six-day break. The other hot topic at selection will be the misfiring forward line and the possible need to add a mid-size or crumbing forward to the mix. Aaron Edwards, Chris Knights and Jake King are all options.

AL PATON’S FORECAST: Knights might get the nod to return for his first game since his “car crash” knee injury last season after a couple of impressive VFL performances, but Jackson may have to wait another week. We’ve heard plenty about last year’s finals disaster (expect to hear more before Thursday) and the fact Carlton has won 11 of the past 12 clashes between these sides. More remarkable is that in three head-to-head match-ups last season the Tigers opened up a lead of four goals or more only to be mown down. Let’s see how much Richmond has grown; 0-2 isn’t a good place to be.

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/whos-hurt-whos-on-the-cusp-we-look-ahead-to-round-2-in-this-weeks-barometer/story-fndv7pj3-1226863188624?from=trendinglinks
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 25, 2014, 06:50:00 PM
I swear Hardeick wrote that article. "Matt McDonough is a second round selection. Ffs why didn't you tell me. He's cut"

Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: gerkin greg on March 25, 2014, 07:00:26 PM
Although I wasn't able to cut everyone I wanted to, I have cut a lot of you. Wendell is cut. Rudy is cut. Janey, you're gone. Steven, I like your hustle. That's why it was so hard to cut you.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: tigs2011 on March 25, 2014, 07:06:57 PM
Although I wasn't able to cut everyone I wanted to, I have cut a lot of you. Wendell is cut. Rudy is cut. Janey, you're gone. Steven, I like your hustle. That's why it was so hard to cut you.
:lol it's a real shame Steven was drafted early 2nd round and not first. Could have even been saved if he'd played like poo for another club first.  :shh
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: the claw on March 25, 2014, 08:26:23 PM
would like to see 4 changes. see i can be optimistic.
a edwards for petterd.
knights for mcdonough
gordon for grigg or houli cant have both sheepdogs.
jackson for newman or s edwards.
very lucky ellis.

would have loved to see vickery get a bullet  put up him and play elton,   but its not practicle atm such a shame there are no real options with the talls.another howler from vickery and maybe we just bite the bullet and change things around a bit.
Title: Re: Changes for the Carlton game?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on March 29, 2014, 05:29:56 PM
How many mins or game perecentage will ivan play forward when fit and Hampson in the 21 ?
how the hell do i know.
if i took a guess id say a fit maric would spend 60% ruck. 20% forward 20% bench
hampson would go 40% ruck 40% forwrd 20% bench. it aint hard to do. maintain a decent ruck presence maintain the third tall forward while giving both a decent break thru out.
i ask again you do understand the reasons behind why we got hampson. you do have an understanding of exactly what ivan brings to the table as a ruckman. if you asked me  id say not.

So we play two ruckman + Tyrone/jack/griff

That is very tall. Playing the above five limits our run. Ideally Hampson would be dropped?

I would say Hampson is primarily a back up ruckman playing in the twos in an ideal world. This would mean we have young kPp players Plus extra speed / midfield roations. That said I am not against two ruckman set up but unsure