One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: (•))(©™ on March 18, 2014, 07:05:33 PM

Title: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: (•))(©™ on March 18, 2014, 07:05:33 PM
???????
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: peggles on March 18, 2014, 07:19:10 PM
don't want edwards
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: tony_montana on March 18, 2014, 07:21:12 PM
King should be, Edwards is, who knows with Grimes, might tear his tendon again running laps
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 18, 2014, 08:04:15 PM
All played for the VFL side last week in the praccy game

Would expect them all to play again this week in the VFL praccy game Friday against Footscray
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: the claw on March 18, 2014, 08:16:09 PM
geez aaron edwards was easily our best forward when he came back for the last 3 games of the yr including the e/f. hes kicks 6 in the ressies albeit in a praccie game. ffs hes the only forward who looks likely and people dont want him. id like to know why.

grimes comes in for who. hes not big enough to play kp so hes third tall does he replace rance or chaplin. astbury is actually getting the bigger blokes he cant replace him. he was the best of the three as well against gcs.

king well simply put he cant do worse than newman or petterd. we could do with some forward line pressure. but we need class as well. reckon chappy would be a good option right about now especially with top 4 the aim  :lol.
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: Francois Jackson on March 19, 2014, 08:55:48 PM
geez aaron edwards was easily our best forward when he came back for the last 3 games of the yr including the e/f. hes kicks 6 in the ressies albeit in a praccie game. ffs hes the only forward who looks likely and people dont want him. id like to know why.

grimes comes in for who. hes not big enough to play kp so hes third tall does he replace rance or chaplin. astbury is actually getting the bigger blokes he cant replace him. he was the best of the three as well against gcs.

king well simply put he cant do worse than newman or petterd. we could do with some forward line pressure. but we need class as well. reckon chappy would be a good option right about now especially with top 4 the aim  :lol.

Id rather a edwards on one leg than his other namesake and King can replace newman and petterd. he would do a better job than both of those combined.
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: WA Tiger on March 19, 2014, 09:01:12 PM
I think we the height of Grimes and I would expect him to play. If Edwards kicks another bag it would be hard to leave him out! Regardless if it's a practice match or not.
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: the claw on March 20, 2014, 06:59:10 PM
I think we the height of Grimes and I would expect him to play. If Edwards kicks another bag it would be hard to leave him out! Regardless if it's a practice match or not.
can i ask who grimes replaces.
if we keep rance astbury and chaplin theres a shedload of height grimes wont be needed.
do you think grimes adds enough run polish and ball winning ability to play him as a flanker. i don't.
 with his size which carlton tall do you think he should take. or failing that which small will he play on which is the only option left.
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: big tone on March 20, 2014, 09:34:44 PM
Lately it seems if you play well as a forward, Dimma will try and turn you into something else. Jack, Edwards, Dusty....even A. Edwards was tried as a loose man in defense after playing well as a forward.
FFS Dimma, stop trying to be Alistair Clarkson, you are so far off the mark it's not even funny.
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: Mr Magic on March 20, 2014, 10:35:42 PM
FFS Dimma, stop trying to be Alistair Clarkson, you are so far off the mark it's not even funny.

How many AFL team's have you coached Big Tony?
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: big tone on March 21, 2014, 07:20:45 AM
FFS Dimma, stop trying to be Alistair Clarkson, you are so far off the mark it's not even funny.

How many AFL team's have you coached Big Tony?
None. Why?
Does that mean if you haven't coached at AFL level you cannot have an opinion?
So pretty much 99.9% of the population cannot question what an AFL coach is doing? Let's be honest just because you get a job as a coach in the AFL doesn't mean you can coach.
Mark Neald and Scott Watters say hi!
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: 1965 on March 21, 2014, 07:24:08 AM
FFS Dimma, stop trying to be Alistair Clarkson, you are so far off the mark it's not even funny.

How many AFL team's have you coached Big Tony?
None. Why?
Does that mean if you haven't coached at AFL level you cannot have an opinion?
So pretty much 99.9% of the population cannot question what an AFL coach is doing? Let's be honest just because you get a job as a coach in the AFL doesn't mean you can coach.
Mark Neald and Scott Watters say hi!

and Terry Wallace and Danny Frawley
Title: Re: Grimes, King,Edwards available ??
Post by: big tone on March 21, 2014, 07:32:04 AM
FFS Dimma, stop trying to be Alistair Clarkson, you are so far off the mark it's not even funny.

How many AFL team's have you coached Big Tony?
None. Why?
Does that mean if you haven't coached at AFL level you cannot have an opinion?
So pretty much 99.9% of the population cannot question what an AFL coach is doing? Let's be honest just because you get a job as a coach in the AFL doesn't mean you can coach.
Mark Neald and Scott Watters say hi!

and Terry Wallace and Danny Frawley
Bit rough on TW 1965, could coach but couldn't develop a list  IMO but Danny Frawley spot on! Still dislike him.