One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 05:58:40 AM

Title: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 05:58:40 AM
Port, Geelong. Wce are all making their voice heard

Hello Brendon? Penny?
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 06:02:29 AM
Geelong boss Colin Carter said: “When Paul Little says he has the support of the AFL community, he shouldn’t assume he’s talking about us. “This is going to have a damaging effect on the reputation of the competition and every time the AFL pays a legal bill every one of us is paying one-eighteenth of that amount.”An example of what a proper club would do


Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on June 17, 2014, 06:28:52 AM
We are in no position to be commenting on any club.
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 06:30:57 AM
Rubbish
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on June 17, 2014, 06:35:06 AM
We are in no position to be commenting on any club.

^ this Judge
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 06:49:07 AM
Weak as urrine
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Rampstar on June 17, 2014, 09:23:04 AM
I dont know even one person who doesnt think they are guilty. I hope ASADA and WADA hang the bastards  ;D
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 11:54:13 AM
West Coast chairman Alan Cransberg echoed the private and public thoughts of 10 club bosses contacted on Monday when he said: “I just think it’s a bloody pity that we’re going to have at least another 18 months of this circus. At some stage you’ve got to take your right whack.” AFL club presidents have expressed serious disenchantment with Essendon and its chairman Paul Little, increasingly enraged that Little’s latest round of legal manoeuvring is holding the game to ransom.
Port Adelaide’s David Koch warned the Australian sporting community and the international sporting community were closely watching the AFL’s handling of the drug allegations levelled against Essendon. 
‘‘I want them to see that we are absolutely true to our values and that we are prepared to stand by the values which supposedly define us,’’ Koch said. 
“We cannot fight this on technicalities; we’ve got to fight this on facts. Especially when we pride ourselves on being absolutely relentless in ensuring that our sport is clean. It doesn’t matter who individuals are or their reputations in our code – they have to be dealt with correct




Anything to add brenden?  Woo. Go. Soccer. Roos
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on June 17, 2014, 12:43:19 PM
West Coast chairman Alan Cransberg echoed the private and public thoughts of 10 club bosses contacted on Monday when he said: “I just think it’s a bloody pity that we’re going to have at least another 18 months of this circus. At some stage you’ve got to take your right whack.” AFL club presidents have expressed serious disenchantment with Essendon and its chairman Paul Little, increasingly enraged that Little’s latest round of legal manoeuvring is holding the game to ransom.
Port Adelaide’s David Koch warned the Australian sporting community and the international sporting community were closely watching the AFL’s handling of the drug allegations levelled against Essendon.
‘‘I want them to see that we are absolutely true to our values and that we are prepared to stand by the values which supposedly define us,’’ Koch said.
“We cannot fight this on technicalities; we’ve got to fight this on facts. Especially when we pride ourselves on being absolutely relentless in ensuring that our sport is clean. It doesn’t matter who individuals are or their reputations in our code – they have to be dealt with correct




Anything to add brenden?  Woo. Go. Soccer. Roos
It was a Presidents' meeting Judge, not a CEOs' meeting.
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 01:36:23 PM
Substitute for the female taxan tthen or which ever fool doing this
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Jackstar is back!!! on June 17, 2014, 02:03:42 PM
Port, Geelong. Wce are all making their voice heard

Hello Brendon? Penny?

Who is Peggy ?
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 02:06:20 PM
Yo mumma
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: (•))(©™ on June 17, 2014, 02:22:20 PM
Because that shitman we have as coach is essendon thru and thru
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: WilliamPowell on June 17, 2014, 03:30:26 PM
West Coast chairman Alan Cransberg echoed the private and public thoughts of 10 club bosses contacted on Monday when he said: “I just think it’s a bloody pity that we’re going to have at least another 18 months of this circus. At some stage you’ve got to take your right whack.” AFL club presidents have expressed serious disenchantment with Essendon and its chairman Paul Little, increasingly enraged that Little’s latest round of legal manoeuvring is holding the game to ransom.
Port Adelaide’s David Koch warned the Australian sporting community and the international sporting community were closely watching the AFL’s handling of the drug allegations levelled against Essendon.
‘‘I want them to see that we are absolutely true to our values and that we are prepared to stand by the values which supposedly define us,’’ Koch said.
“We cannot fight this on technicalities; we’ve got to fight this on facts. Especially when we pride ourselves on being absolutely relentless in ensuring that our sport is clean. It doesn’t matter who individuals are or their reputations in our code – they have to be dealt with correct




Anything to add brenden?  Woo. Go. Soccer. Roos
It was a Presidents' meeting Judge, not a CEOs' meeting.

Not quite write YBB - there hasn't been a president's meeting for a few weeks when they finalised the equalisation measures for next year & beyond

For this article Caro contacted all of the clubs, a couple gave on the record comments and some didn't. What's most noticable is that there is no quote for Eddie and he has an opinon on everything  ;D

Think you'lll find that Caro as any good journo would has used the comments that will provoke the most how shall we say angst and discussion and quoted those   ;D

And just on the original question - I would think the RFC has far greater things to worry about than the EFC drugs saga.

Can only imagine the outcry if our president or CEO were quoted. We'd have people on here saying they should shut up and be focusing on our club

Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 03:40:47 PM
Because that pooman we have as coach is essendon thru and thru

I heard he wears EFC socks whilst he coachs our games

 :whistle
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Diocletian on June 17, 2014, 04:10:24 PM


For this article Caro contacted all of the clubs, a couple gave on the record comments and some didn't. What's most noticable is that there is no quote for Eddie and he has an opinon on everything  ;D

Think you'lll find that Caro as any good journo would has used the comments that will provoke the most how shall we say angst and discussion and quoted those   ;D



Eddie would never give Caro a quote about anything - hates her guts.
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: TigerMonk on June 17, 2014, 04:54:23 PM
We are in no position to be commenting on any club.

 :clapping what he said
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on June 17, 2014, 04:54:38 PM
We don't honestly comment on our issues or make any comments at all. What could we possibly say about the EFC drugs saga?
Who cares we don't need to comment. Let's worry about ourselves foremost.

Because that pooman we have as coach is essendon thru and thru

I heard he wears EFC socks whilst he coachs our games

 :whistle

If he does he needs to be hung, drawn, quartered and for good measure eighth, sixteenth and thirty seconded. :help
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 17, 2014, 06:01:02 PM
Edit: warning - poor formatting

We don't honestly comment on our issues or make any comments at all. What could we possibly say about the EFC drugs saga

You could take my boy O'Keefe path

Quote
SYDNEY star Ryan O'Keefe says Jobe Watson can't complain if he is stripped of his Brownlow Medal for drug cheating.

The Norm Smith medallist admitted he was "shocked" by Watson's revelation this week that he was injected with banned peptide AOD9604.

As debate raged over whether Watson should be allowed to keep footy's biggest individual prize, O'Keefe said the Essendon midfielder shouldn't have any recourse if he is found guilty.

"I think it comes down to, if you take a banned substance then expect the full wrath of the authority," O'Keefe said.

"I don't think you can complain if it comes your way." [\quote]


Or



Here are three examples from recent times

1.

Geelong boss Colin Carter said: “When Paul Little says he has the support of the AFL community, he shouldn’t assume he’s talking about us. “This is going to have a damaging effect on the reputation of the competition and every time the AFL pays a legal bill every one of us is paying one-eighteenth of that amount.”


2.

West Coast chairman Alan Cransberg echoed the private and public thoughts of 10 club bosses contacted on Monday when he said: “I just think it’s a bloody pity that we’re going to have at least another 18 months of this circus. At some stage you’ve got to take your right whack.” AFL club presidents have expressed serious disenchantment with Essendon and its chairman Paul Little, increasingly enraged that Little’s latest round of legal manoeuvring is holding the game to ransom.

3.

Port Adelaide’s David Koch warned the Australian sporting community and the international sporting community were closely watching the AFL’s handling of the drug allegations levelled against Essendon.
‘‘I want them to see that we are absolutely true to our values and that we are prepared to stand by the values which supposedly define us,’’ Koch said.
“We cannot fight this on technicalities; we’ve got to fight this on facts. Especially when we pride ourselves on being absolutely relentless in ensuring that our sport is clean. It doesn’t matter who individuals are or their reputations in our code – they have to be dealt with correctly.”

Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: bojangles17 on June 17, 2014, 06:56:18 PM
Why would we be commenting , it's no more relevant to us than the Rolfe Harris case , we have bigger fish to fry  :shh
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Chuck17 on June 18, 2014, 11:19:21 AM
We let our game day play be all the commentary we need to make
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: tiga on June 18, 2014, 12:38:22 PM
Agreed Chuck.  :thumbsup Not our Circus, not our Monkeys.
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Mr Magic on June 18, 2014, 02:07:24 PM
Why would we be commenting , it's no more relevant to us than the Rolfe Harris case , we have bigger fish to fry  :shh

Certainly do.
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: bojangles17 on June 18, 2014, 06:48:59 PM
Because that pooman we have as coach is essendon thru and thru
PA I think matey , ess gave him the. BULLeT :shh
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 18, 2014, 06:54:44 PM
Couldn't fit him salary cap
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Judge Roughneck on June 20, 2014, 10:05:33 AM
Carlton

''My view is that if it drags on to the point that it affects the brand of the AFL then we are all damaged,'' LoGiudice said. ''Has it gone on too long? Anything that affects the AFL brand is the time when we have an issue. I don't know what their legal strategy is and I don't know what their legal advice is but it becomes an issue when it affects the other clubs.''

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/carlton-voices-concerns-over-essendon-saga-20140619-zsfhk.html#ixzz8cIb8fCcY


Richmond

Plop plop plop
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: Chuck17 on June 20, 2014, 03:20:54 PM
LMAO on Carlton taking the moral high ground after their tanking and Judd incidents

They would be best served to go the plop plop plop route
Title: Re: why is Richmond not.commenting on efc drug cheating?
Post by: The Big Richo on June 20, 2014, 09:54:53 PM
Why would we be commenting , it's no more relevant to us than the Rolfe Harris case , we have bigger fish to fry  :shh

What are your thoughts on Rolf, Jangsy?