One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on October 02, 2014, 12:08:34 PM

Title: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: one-eyed on October 02, 2014, 12:08:34 PM
Richmond's Dan Richardson chats with NAB Trade Radio's Nathan Brown and Cam Luke.

AUDIO: https://soundcloud.com/nabtraderadio/dan-richardson-on-nab-trade-radio
Title: Re: Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: WA Tiger on October 02, 2014, 12:13:35 PM
What did he say?? probably the usual blurb..
Title: Re: Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 02, 2014, 12:18:45 PM
Nothing interview. Don't bother listening. Why does he even give an interview if he's just going to say we aren't going to be active at all in FA/Trade period
Title: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: one-eyed on October 02, 2014, 01:05:43 PM
Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood, Ty Vickery to stay

Michael Whiting 
afl.com.au
October 2, 2014 12:01 PM



DON'T expect any Tigers to be put on the trade table, with Richmond football manager Dan Richardson saying his players were all happy at Punt Road.

And despite having some interest in North Melbourne midfielder Levi Greenwood, Richardson said he expected the Kangaroo to extend his contract and remain a part of Brad Scott's team.

Speaking on NAB AFL Trade Radio, Richardson said the Tigers would be looking to add midfield depth over the coming months, but would be unlikely to give up players of their own.

"We don't see any indication from any of our players – including (captain) Trent (Cotchin) – that they're interested in playing anywhere else but here, and hopefully be a part of some success we hope to have," Richardson said.

He was quick to dispel any notion Richmond might trade maligned stuff Ty Vickery, saying he was a required player.

Richardson said his non-selection in the final rounds after returning from suspension was solely based on not wanting to upset team chemistry when they were in such good form.

"Tall key-position players that can play in the ruck are players that a lot of clubs are after," he said.

"He was a little disappointed after missing out on selection late in the year when he came back from suspension … but that's not to say from a long-term perspective we don't see him being a real important player for our footy club."

Richardson said the Tigers had all but given up any hope of getting Greenwood, and would not be sacrificing either Reece Conca or Shaun Grigg to do so.

"At this stage it doesn’t seem to make any sense to us that he (Greenwood) would want to leave North Melbourne," he said.

"They're in the process of negotiation and at this stage we haven't received any indication from Levi's management or the Kangaroos that they want to let him go. I'm sure that's where it'll end up."

Richardson also quashed speculation the Tigers had made a play for Sydney Swan Dan Hannebery.

He said Hannebery, contracted until the end of 2016, would be a welcome addition to any midfield, but was unlikely to move.

"Having just lost a Grand Final, I'd be astounded if any Swans players weren't working hard to rectify that. I'd be astounded if any of their players were to move on."

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-10-02/richmond-eyes-greenwood-but-vickery-to-stay
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: yellowandback on October 02, 2014, 01:14:23 PM
Did they ask him what had changed from the middle of the season when he stated we were going to bring forward our play for free agents?
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: tiga on October 02, 2014, 01:43:08 PM
Required player is indian for player on contract with no currency.
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: WA Tiger on October 02, 2014, 01:59:04 PM
Did they ask him why the stuff he bothered with the interview??

Typical weak as pee no answers non involvement crap that we have become accostmed to at this club....

They honestly must thinsk we are so close to a premiership its not funny... :huh
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: one-eyed on October 02, 2014, 02:20:42 PM
Grigg not up for trade either.

We have no interest in either Jeff Garlett or Mitch Robinson.



Richmond confirms interest in North Melbourne midfielder Levi Greenwood

Herald-Sun
October 02, 2014


RICHMOND will swoop on North Melbourne hard man Levi Greenwood if he is unable to agree to terms at the Kangaroos.

The Herald Sun revealed on Tuesday Greenwood was unsigned for next season despite an expected top-three finish in tomorrow night’s best and fairest.

The Roos remain confident a deal for Greenwood is imminent, but will likely have to increase their offer to the onballer on the back of his career-best season.

Richmond head of football Dan Richardson said the Tigers were interested in Greenwood if he decided to leave Arden St.

“He’s the type of player certainly that there is some interest from us in, but look, at this stage, I think at the moment it doesn’t seem to make any sense to us that he would want to leave North Melbourne,” Richardson said on AFL trade radio.

“At this stage we haven’t received any indication from Levi’s management or the Kangaroos that they want to let him go.

“I’m sure that’s where he will end up, most of the time it does.

“Certainly he’s a player that we have got some interest in. He’s good friends with Aaron Edwards, who ironically we’ve delisted.

“So we’ve got some understanding of where Levi’s at, but until anything falls out with the Kangaroos I think that’s probably where that will end up.”

Richardson ruled out trading for Carlton pair Mitch Robinson and Jeff Garlett, while contracted Tigers Shaun Grigg and Tyrone Vickery would not be offered up.

http://www.news.com.au/sport/breaking-news/richmond-confirms-interest-in-north-melbourne-midfielder-levi-greenwood/story-fnect155-1227077521172
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: tiga on October 02, 2014, 02:29:26 PM
All I can say is Grigg must have photos......
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Yeahright on October 02, 2014, 02:52:32 PM
You'd be a fool not to offer up Shaun Grigg if it was going to get you Greenwood  :lol. Better player plus we offload a soft outside player who we started playing inside for a genuine inside mid
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 02, 2014, 03:27:55 PM
Why would we not be interested in Gartlett? Is it because he's an aborriginee
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Chuck17 on October 02, 2014, 03:28:49 PM
Why would we not be interested in Gartlett? Is it because he's an aborriginee

Is there such thing as an aboriginal muslim?
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Penelope on October 02, 2014, 03:34:55 PM
maybe coz he's a stuff up that struggled on the field when eddie left and he copped all the attention?
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 02, 2014, 03:35:07 PM
Why would we not be interested in Gartlett? Is it because he's an aborriginee

Is there such thing as an aboriginal muslim?
Yeah, Mundine is one
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: mightytiges on October 02, 2014, 03:39:16 PM
maybe coz he's a stuff up that struggled on the field when eddie left and he copped all the attention?
Yep, this.

It would go against the 'good-character' rhetoric continually coming out of the club, if they suddenly recruited a player that had been in trouble for off-field issues/matters at his former club.
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Chuck17 on October 02, 2014, 03:44:41 PM
Why would we not be interested in Gartlett? Is it because he's an aborriginee

Is there such thing as an aboriginal muslim?
Yeah, Mundine is one

Thats right he is to, I often think of him as god though and not as  a normal human being
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Penelope on October 02, 2014, 03:46:40 PM
partly right there chucky
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: bojangles17 on October 02, 2014, 05:44:04 PM
Dan richardson aced it .....again ,  :thumbsup...absolute pro at this time of year  :shh
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 02, 2014, 05:48:00 PM
Dan richardson aced it .....again ,  :thumbsup...absolute pro at this time of year  :shh
really what did he do.
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: bojangles17 on October 02, 2014, 06:31:22 PM
Gave them nothing when we are up to our eyeballs in negotiation  :shh
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 02, 2014, 06:35:23 PM
Gave them nothing when we are up to our eyeballs in negotiation  :shh
Rubbish
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: WA Tiger on October 02, 2014, 07:38:15 PM
Gave them nothing when we are up to our eyeballs in negotiation  :shh
Rubbish

x 2. Same people on this forum being sucked in to the same crap as last trade period..
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: rogerd3 on October 02, 2014, 10:30:12 PM
Dan richardson aced it .....again ,  :thumbsup...absolute pro at this time of year  :shh

I'll raise one of these  :shh :shh
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: one-eyed on October 02, 2014, 11:08:52 PM
A bit more from Dan Richardson:

* Really want to improve our midfield depth. We feel this draft has a lot of depth in that area. We'll also be proactive in looking at players from other clubs but that will depend on what happens during the trade period.

* Midfield bull and outside speed are the types we need.

* Vickery is definitely a required player. A key position player who can play in the ruck. Clubs want these types and we're fortunate to have a couple of them. We're keen to hold onto Ty.

* Dusty - we'll work through a new contract in the appropriate time. He's had a very good year. Haven't put much thought into it. Got 12 months to sort that out.

* Small forwards - it's an area we're keen to develop (i.e. develop our young players such as Gordon, Lloyd & McDonough). More likely an area we'll look into in the draft. Don't have interest in Garlett or Saad. Discussed them but Jeff's off-field issues were a concern and we decided not to go down that path.

* Be outstanded if Hannebery wanted to leave Sydney or the Swans wanted to let him go.

* Rucks - Browny said you've only got Hampson to back up Ivan. Dan replied we've also got Vickery, Griffiths and McBean (in the VFL) who can play in the ruck. Browny said they are more forwards. Dan said they are forward/rucks and are still capable of playing in the ruck.

* Hampson - We still need to work with Shaun and develop him further as a footballer. Earlier in the year he was able to get his hands to the footy in the ruck but didn't do enough around the ground. We need to continue to support him and develop him in 2015.

* If Greenwood becomes available, would Conca or Grigg be put on the trade table? Dan replied "No".

https://soundcloud.com/nabtraderadio/dan-richardson-on-nab-trade-radio
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: tony_montana on October 02, 2014, 11:12:31 PM
hmmm, I've heard from some that this draft is lighter on for midfield talent than usual, but Dan says otherwise, any junior/draft watchers care to share their thoughts?
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: Diocletian on October 02, 2014, 11:21:42 PM
hmmm, I've heard from some that this draft is lighter on for midfield talent than usual, but Dan says otherwise, any junior/draft watchers care to share their thoughts?

From what I can gather it's around the average but the consensus seems to be that it's likely there'll be a better chance of picking up good mids later than usual due to the supposedly higher number of tall talent pushing them down the order.
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: tony_montana on October 02, 2014, 11:29:33 PM
ta man
Title: Re: Richmond eyes Levi Greenwood; Vickery to stay / Dan Richardson on Trade Radio
Post by: the claw on October 02, 2014, 11:40:47 PM
A bit more from Dan Richardson:

* Really want to improve our midfield depth. We feel this draft has a lot of depth in that area. We'll also be proactive in looking at players from other clubs but that will depend on what happens during the trade period.

* Midfield bull and outside speed are the types we need.

* Vickery is definitely a required player. A key position player who can play in the ruck. Clubs want these types and we're fortunate to have a couple of them. We're keen to hold onto Ty.

* Dusty - we'll work through a new contract in the appropriate time. He's had a very good year. Haven't put much thought into it. Got 12 months to sort that out.

* Small forwards - it's an area we're keen to develop (i.e. develop our young players such as Gordon, Lloyd & McDonough). More likely an area we'll look into in the draft. Don't have interest in Garlett or Saad. Discussed them but Jeff's off-field issues were a concern and we decided not to go down that path.

* Be outstanded if Hannebery wanted to leave Sydney or the Swans wanted to let him go.

* Rucks - Browny said you've only got Hampson to back up Ivan. Dan replied we've also got Vickery, Griffiths and McBean (in the VFL) who can play in the ruck. Browny said they are more forwards. Dan said they are forward/rucks and are still capable of playing in the ruck.

* Hampson - We still need to work with Shaun and develop him further as a footballer. Earlier in the year he was able to get his hands to the footy in the ruck but didn't do enough around the ground. We need to continue to support him and develop him in 2015.

* If Greenwood becomes available, would Conca or Grigg be put on the trade table? Dan replied "No".

https://soundcloud.com/nabtraderadio/dan-richardson-on-nab-trade-radio
this bloke is just full of crap. only conclusion is he is paying lip service to the masses or has no freakin idea,,