One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Rampstar on October 16, 2014, 02:33:10 PM

Title: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Rampstar on October 16, 2014, 02:33:10 PM
My grade

0/10

Absolutely ZERO, ZILCH, NOTHING!

that's all they deserve

and coming after last years Shaun Hampson fiasco where they deserved to get say

1/10

that makes it 1 out of 20 over 2 years

and that means it was a total and comprehensive failure.

They didn't do any work at all during the last 12 months. ZERO! They will claim they did plenty and they will make up excuses like Trengove failed a medical. Big Deal. Richmonds football staff probably only did about 2% of that, the rest was done by doctors, radiographers etc etc. Its all a load of crap.

2 years running they have failed and that begs the question

What the Fk do we pay them for? Why do members and sponsors put in money? To do what? These people at Richmond aren't good enough. Tiger Fighting Fund - lol. What a joke and the joke is on the members who give there hard earned for people to get big 6 figure salaries to do stuff all.

I wont be a member until these hacks leave the club. If it was good enough for KB its good enough for me. Why should I give these people my hard earned? They don't deserve poo.

 
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Diocletian on October 16, 2014, 02:36:40 PM
n/a
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: (•))(©™ on October 16, 2014, 02:41:13 PM
My grade

0/10

Absolutely ZERO, ZILCH, NOTHING!

that's all they deserve

and coming after last years Shaun Hampson fiasco where they deserved to get say

1/10

that makes it 1 out of 20 over 2 years

and that means it was a total and comprehensive failure.

They didn't do any work at all during the last 12 months. ZERO! They will claim they did plenty and they will make up excuses like Trengove failed a medical. Big Deal. Richmonds football staff probably only did about 2% of that, the rest was done by doctors, radiographers etc etc. Its all a load of crap.

2 years running they have failed and that begs the question

What the Fk do we pay them for? Why do members and sponsors put in money? To do what? These people at Richmond aren't good enough. Tiger Fighting Fund - lol. What a joke and the joke is on the members who give there hard earned for people to get big 6 figure salaries to do stuff all.

I wont be a member until these hacks leave the club. If it was good enough for KB its good enough for me. Why should I give these people my hard earned? They don't deserve poo.

X2

idiot of a club.
Joke of a club.
Total bullshitter of a club.

Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 16, 2014, 02:46:46 PM
0
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: cub on October 16, 2014, 02:47:26 PM
Not too fussed, not much around. Draft is supposed to be pretty deep this year.
Would like to see us chase a gun though!
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 16, 2014, 02:49:36 PM
Not too fussed, not much around. Draft is supposed to be pretty deep this year.
Would like to see us chase a gun though!

Not much around?
 :o
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on October 16, 2014, 02:49:44 PM
10
EFA (Bo impersonator)
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Phil Mrakov on October 16, 2014, 02:51:06 PM
10
EFA (Bo impersonator)
just waiting for his response  :shh
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 16, 2014, 03:00:21 PM
Amazing they didn't trade player/s out for better draft position. More so whe stanley is a pick 20 - Every club has a good young list more or less. We seems to not have a point of difference. going to be hard to be in the flag on the back of picks 50 / 70.  Given the timing of the resigning announcing, I assume Elton dea, Bach , mcdonurs were those put on the table. Not bold or inspiring enough for my liking
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: pmac21 on October 16, 2014, 03:03:46 PM
I'm glad it's all over. Goes for too long and Barrett & Wallace really bug me with their interpretations of lists and trades. 

What happened to the days where you woke up and found out you had a new recruit??
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Tiger Tragic on October 16, 2014, 03:04:42 PM
1/10

lacked imagination.  I give a point for at least not trading for that lemon Trengove and the due diligence done there.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Yeahright on October 16, 2014, 03:17:50 PM
My grade

0/10

and coming after last years Shaun Hampson fiasco where they deserved to get say

1/10

This for me shows the ignorance of some people on this forum when it comes to trades (including free agency). All some people want is for them to do anything even if it is to the detriment of the club and trade for the sake of trading. Yes you must look around and see what's on offer and try and get a deal done (who knows whether Richmond did this) but you don't trade just for the sake of it. At least this year we have our draft picks in tact but last year we made a major stuff up and lost our 2nd round pick AND picked up a dud yet they get a higher rating? Please.

This year 3/10 due to no stuff ups
Last year 0/10 for a major stuff up
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Dice on October 16, 2014, 03:20:04 PM
Let's hope we start our trade period for 2016 over this summer.
RFC officials need to be heading over to Adelaide in the coming months to get Dangerfield to sign up for 2016.
 If they miss him then they go after the next gun free agent. Then head up to Sydney and get a verbal agreement from one of J.Cameron , Treloar , Hoskin-Elliot or Shiel.
 Get proactive and bloody well get it done !

 That's the only way I'll forgive them for the Hampson stuff up and the inactivity of this year.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Rampstar on October 16, 2014, 03:33:41 PM
My grade

0/10

and coming after last years Shaun Hampson fiasco where they deserved to get say

1/10

This for me shows the ignorance of some people on this forum when it comes to trades (including free agency). All some people want is for them to do anything even if it is to the detriment of the club and trade for the sake of trading. Yes you must look around and see what's on offer and try and get a deal done (who knows whether Richmond did this) but you don't trade just for the sake of it. At least this year we have our draft picks in tact but last year we made a major stuff up and lost our 2nd round pick AND picked up a dud yet they get a higher rating? Please.

This year 3/10 due to no stuff ups
Last year 0/10 for a major stuff up

I gave them 1/10 last year coz they actually tried something, the result was bad but at least they had a go - not much of a go but a go nevertheless.  This year has resulted in nothing. My grading is actually a grading over 2 years = was 1/20 your grading over 2 years was 3/20. Anyway we cut it, the last two years have been nothing short of an abysmal failure.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Yeahright on October 16, 2014, 04:06:23 PM
Yep either way we should be at least trying to do better. Seemed we were never contenders for anyone and if we were mentioned and someone else was, we'd pull out of the race.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: 1965 on October 16, 2014, 04:32:24 PM

10/10

 :cheers
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Chuck17 on October 16, 2014, 04:43:53 PM
Can we have a poll on it

It was an improvement on last year
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Smokey on October 16, 2014, 04:55:20 PM
Whatever score you give them, 2 should be added on for the due diligence of the medical staff in preventing a major catastrophe!!   :bow
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: WilliamPowell on October 16, 2014, 04:57:29 PM
I don't believe we should trade for the sake of saying we made a trade. So that we didn't do anything isn't the end of the world.

I have no issue with them not bringing blokes in.

However, I am disappointed that we appear to have not tried to improve our draft position

I find it disappointing that we again seem to have refused to even consider trading any of our better players. Eg to hear on SEN that Vickery was "off limits" TBBH I found staggering. who many others were there that the same logic was applied?
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 16, 2014, 05:02:48 PM
Grigg
Chaplin
Houli
Conca
Ellis

Etc.

All the untouchables. If hardwick was playing football manager. All his pets would be marked as ' ɪndɪˈspɛnsəb(ə)l/
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: dwaino on October 16, 2014, 05:06:54 PM
10. Don't you worry, Richo and Blair are cool operators. FJ will work his magic  :shh
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: WA Tiger on October 16, 2014, 05:16:56 PM
0
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: JVT on October 16, 2014, 05:32:48 PM
I find it disappointing that we again seem to have refused to even consider trading any of our better players. Eg to hear on SEN that Vickery was "off limits" TBBH I found staggering. who many others were there that the same logic was applied?
:banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Rampstar on October 16, 2014, 06:56:21 PM

10/10

 :cheers

failure and socialists go hand in hand no wonder you gave them full marks  :lol
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: tony_montana on October 16, 2014, 07:30:59 PM
Let's hope we start our trade period for 2016 over this summer.
RFC officials need to be heading over to Adelaide in the coming months to get Dangerfield to sign up for 2016.
 If they miss him then they go after the next gun free agent. Then head up to Sydney and get a verbal agreement from one of J.Cameron , Treloar , Hoskin-Elliot or Shiel.
 Get proactive and bloody well get it done !

 That's the only way I'll forgive them for the Hampson stuff up and the inactivity of this year.

Hawthorn start asking questions 18 months prior to get a feel
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 16, 2014, 07:35:41 PM
stuffen awful. 0.

Where was plan B after Trengove? Were we prepared? If not can we think on the move?

Either recruitment staff lack the skills to mediate and seal a deal or we are so philosophically incompetent that we believe we don't need to address our list weaknesses.

Whilst I'm ranting, it almost looks like Freo, Rich and WC put up the Rance and Conca deals as PR exercises to look like we were involved.

Amateur hour
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: tony_montana on October 16, 2014, 07:36:54 PM
Over to you FJ
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 16, 2014, 07:50:31 PM
Whatever score you give them, 2 should be added on for the due diligence of the medical staff in preventing a major catastrophe!!   :bow

And minus 2 that there was no tangible plan B if the cripple did fail his medical.

Geez Geez. Who have we got working down there?

(http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120329165748/simpsons/images/9/91/So_greasy_face....png)
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Dice on October 16, 2014, 08:03:43 PM
I don't believe we should trade for the sake of saying we made a trade. So that we didn't do anything isn't the end of the world.

I have no issue with them not bringing blokes in.

However, I am disappointed that we appear to have not tried to improve our draft position

I find it disappointing that we again seem to have refused to even consider trading any of our better players. Eg to hear on SEN that Vickery was "off limits" TBBH I found staggering. who many others were there that the same logic was applied?

I'm with you mostly. There wasn't much on offer to get excited about.
I think we should've had some sort of a go at Greenwood and the noises Richardson made about that deal were pretty baffling. ' If he leaves North we'll look at it '.. and.. ' we won't consider Grigg as part of the deal '
I just hope we've already got our FA targets as well as our uncontracted and contracted player targets for 2016 and start our process asap of getting them to the club. Times are a changin'. Get in early and go hard.
 
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Go Richo 12 on October 16, 2014, 08:11:41 PM

10/10

 :cheers

failure and socialists go hand in hand no wonder you gave them full marks  :lol
Socialism works in Cuba.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 16, 2014, 08:29:01 PM
Number of doctors Cuba sending to Africa Ebola 3000
Australia 0
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Diocletian on October 16, 2014, 08:37:34 PM
Save your political crap for the general discussion section.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: bojangles17 on October 16, 2014, 08:46:10 PM
10/10 , of the available garbage on offer , we could have made better use of our delistings as in asking Jacko or o hanlon to reconsider.  We have Fj s team armed to the teeth with draft picks to re stock what's become a veritable warehouse of talent at punt rd  :shh
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Andyy on October 16, 2014, 08:52:30 PM
The only thing stupider than RFC not having a proper crack is the fools saying junk like 'no point tradin just for the sake of trading, need to find good players'.

Open your eyes. There was SERIOUS talent switching clubs this year. Captains, premiership players, all Australians and brownlow medalists FFS.

And we look at blokes like Grigg and say that he's 'off limits'. FMD.

I'd have taken any of Greenwood, Varcoe, Cooney etc over the likes of Grigg or Petterd.

Cooney on one leg is a better player than plenty of our blokes.

If guys like Stanley attract approx pick 20 surely we could stuff off Vickery for something around that mark. Conca too.


Especially after Richardson's mid-season BS comment about how we're going to be aggressive in the trades this year because we need to improve out list. We look like a pack of morons.

God dammit seriously.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: dwaino on October 16, 2014, 09:01:53 PM
10/10 , of the available garbage on offer , we could have made better use of our delistings as in asking Jacko or o hanlon to reconsider.  We have Fj s team armed to the teeth with draft picks to re stock what's become a veritable warehouse of talent at punt rd  :shh

Armed to the teeth like Rambo and going to be smashing those late picks like he hunted fat cops with booby traps. Watch this space  :shh
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on October 16, 2014, 09:28:16 PM
The only thing stupider than RFC not having a proper crack is the fools saying junk like 'no point tradin just for the sake of trading, need to find good players'.

Open your eyes. There was SERIOUS talent switching clubs this year. Captains, premiership players, all Australians and brownlow medalists FFS.

And we look at blokes like Grigg and say that he's 'off limits'. FMD.

I'd have taken any of Greenwood, Varcoe, Cooney etc over the likes of Grigg or Petterd.

Cooney on one leg is a better player than plenty of our blokes.

If guys like Stanley attract approx pick 20 surely we could stuff off Vickery for something around that mark. Conca too.


Especially after Richardson's mid-season BS comment about how we're going to be aggressive in the trades this year because we need to improve out list. We look like a pack of morons.

God dammit seriously.
On the surface you are right.  Information from a reasonable source, however, is that what the club is saying publically is very different to what actually occurred during discussions.
I'll just leave it at that.......
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 16, 2014, 09:37:25 PM
10/10 , of the available garbage on offer , we could have made better use of our delistings as in asking Jacko or o hanlon to reconsider.  We have Fj s team armed to the teeth with draft picks to re stock what's become a veritable warehouse of talent at punt rd  :shh

Agreed. I hear picks 128 and 146 are now Ebola free and their lack limbs is no shortage for their determination.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Judge Roughneck on October 16, 2014, 09:38:36 PM
Pakistani refugee pick 168.

International class b
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: camboon on October 16, 2014, 09:42:54 PM
Very good as they see this draft as a good one and were carful not to waste our picks or pay overs , if there was something there that was too good to pass on they would have gone for it.

What's with Adelaide, wasting top picks on players that probably would have been delisted - stupid. 
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: the claw on October 16, 2014, 09:43:57 PM
lol 25 30 players changed hands and numerous picks and not one of em are good enough for us.

me i would have gone hard at hallahan ffs 47 and 49 cheap as chips., garlett 61 and 79 virtually nothing, and frawley f/a free to a good home. .would add james gwilt also free to a good home. giles for pick 53  or luke lowden  cheney a better propisuion than most of our hacks in defense.

it was a lost opportunity to find mature players add real depth and stay in the nd.

ah locked and loaded and those cherrys are as ripe as they will get. lol.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: bojangles17 on October 16, 2014, 09:48:32 PM
Hallihan,  :lol we've got arnot in the ressies that can't crack our dream team midfield sonny Jim , some reference checks would underline he s a heck of a lot better performed at senior level that most if the second rate bums that switched clubs for no 7 picks et al :shh
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: The Big Richo on October 16, 2014, 09:53:46 PM
Has to be 0/10 or n/a cause we did nothing.

Dan Richardson has to go. Biggest handbrake the club has had since Craig Cameron.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Golfprotiger on October 16, 2014, 10:03:34 PM
I thought from all reports we were going to be a player over the time, disappointed that nothing happened. Better mean something then.......  :whistle
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 16, 2014, 10:19:58 PM
Pakistani refugee pick 168.

International class b

Will be cleared through customs along with picks 204, 258 and 320 following louse spray via aisle sweepings from Air Karachi staff
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: (•))(©™ on October 16, 2014, 10:37:31 PM
I really hope we pick up some kids; whom can flounder in the two's for 6 years,
Unless of course dimmer is forced to play one of them thru a plethora of injuries to senior listed
champions.

Go you good things !

New RFC Mantra - 8 is great but 9 is fine!!
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: big tone on October 16, 2014, 10:53:40 PM
Club is run by a bunch of sissies.
To scared to make a mistake...
To scared to sack a coach...
To scared to move on an under preforming recruiting manager....
To scared to spend some money.....our money!
To scared to to have a go....
To scared to make a change...
Always drafting the safe kid...
Gutless weak and insipid....

Blind Freddy can see our list needs help, and pick 12 and the rest of our picks are not nearly enough to catch the top sides..

30 odd years of the same old crap.

Hats off to the Dogs, at least they are putting their balls on the line, even if it doesn't work with Boyd, I'd be proud of my club for talking a educated rick. Good luck to them.

Anyone that is happy with the way this club is run is a deadbeat!

I am embarrassed for the RFC and I'm embarrassed to be a supporter.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: 🏅Dooks on October 16, 2014, 10:59:15 PM
I really hope we pick up some kids; whom can flounder in the two's for 6 years,
Unless of course dimmer is forced to play one of them thru a plethora of injuries to senior listed
champions.

Go you good things !

New RFC Mantra - 8 is great but 9 is fine!!

Eight is great but nine is fine
The 2nds pee away contract time
Just ask Elton he's the man
2 year deal for his tan
0 games in a year
Members take it up the rear
Why stop there on the burst.
What's becoming of the firsts?
How's abouts Newman and ability
How's about Griggs and agility
Here comes Dimmas favourite sons
Here comes Balwyns next year guns.










Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: one-eyed on October 16, 2014, 11:00:04 PM
TRADE EXPERTS PETER RYAN AND NICK BOWEN MARK YOUR CLUB:

Adelaide: Picked up a couple of Hawks and reshuffled their draft picks. Score: D

Brisbane Lions: Picked up two jets, but no live draft picks until the fourth round. Score: A

Carlton: Lost veteran key forward, but traded in a couple of young key talls. Score: B-

Collingwood: Heavily involved - lost a-grader, improved draft position. Score: B-

Essendon: Got another ruck to replace Ryder, plus a first rounder and a Brownlow medallist. Score: B-

Fremantle: No action from the Dockers. Score: C

Geelong: Christensen and Varcoe out the door, got talls to help Tomahawk. Score: C

Gold Coast: Picked up two hard bodies to assist their young list and kept their early picks. Score: B+

Greater Western Sydney: Got busy - lost some youngsters, gained some elite talent and more top picks. Score: C

Hawthorn: Shored up their defence and picked about a young mid, got Crows' second round pick. Score: A

Melbourne: Massive compo for Frawley and snared a speedy goalsneak on the cheap. Score: B

North Melbourne: Gained a couple of free agents, but lost a solid citizen. Score: B-

Port Adelaide: Got their man and Matthew Lobbe finally gets some help. Score: B+

Richmond: Medical scared them away from the former Dees skipper. Score: C

St Kilda: Kept pick No.1 and now has three picks in the top 22. Score: B

Sydney Swans: Ridiculous AFL decision killed their chance of any action. Score: N/A

West Coast: No action from the Eagles. Score: C

Western Bulldogs: Finally got a decent forward, but lost their skipper. Score: B

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-10-16/trade-period-who-cleaned-up-who-lost-out-
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: the claw on October 16, 2014, 11:13:48 PM
so how did we do compared to sides below us. how about melborne a side that pulled our pants down
were very active, the way i read it their outs were
frawley, clarke, 23, 61, 79.
it leaves them with
nd 2, 3, 40, 41, 53, 59, plus they added lumumba, garlett, and frost. this compares to us.

nd 12, 31 , 49, 67, 85 with no new additions to alleviate needs.
i would not be surprised to see em pull our pants down again and possibly go past us. id be drooling over the prospect of picks 2 and 3 and a fit jesse hogan.

how about collingwood. they made the best out of a bad situation
outs were beams, lumumba.
it left em with
nd 5, 9, 28, 46, 64.  plus greenwood, varcoe, crisp.

thats just two clubs around us. some  people arent going to say we did okay surely. theres two clubs there who if they use the nd well will gain an inordinate amount compared to us.
but hey we are locked and loaded and dont need to improve our list they are cherry ripe.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: the claw on October 16, 2014, 11:17:53 PM
Club is run by a bunch of sissies.
To scared to make a mistake...
To scared to sack a coach...
To scared to move on an under preforming recruiting manager....
To scared to spend some money.....our money!
To scared to to have a go....
To scared to make a change...
Always drafting the safe kid...
Gutless weak and insipid....

Blind Freddy can see our list needs help, and pick 12 and the rest of our picks are not nearly enough to catch the top sides..

30 odd years of the same old crap.

Hats off to the Dogs, at least they are putting their balls on the line, even if it doesn't work with Boyd, I'd be proud of my club for talking a educated rick. Good luck to them.

Anyone that is happy with the way this club is run is a deadbeat!

I am embarrassed for the RFC and I'm embarrassed to be a supporter.
will this change at the first hint of a winning streak. just asking because thats what happens around here. lots of chicken littles who lac the power of their convictions.

anyway  clearly we are locked and loaded and cherry freakin ripe so lets all thank the gods for our deliverance eh.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Willy on October 16, 2014, 11:22:51 PM
I'm pretty disappointed TBH.
Just needed to be more creative.
Are Dan Richo and the boys worth what we're paying them? I'm not sold.

Not very inspiring for next year really.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: DCrane on October 16, 2014, 11:24:03 PM
Good post Andyy. There was some pretty good talent on offer this year but as always there was a lot of chaff too.
Agree with WP, very disappointed that we couldn't upgrade at least our second round pick. We needed another in the top 20 and when you look at the last trade it is actually possible to move on list cloggers, even if only for a small upgrade.
Look at Hawthorn who have embraced free agency, and look at the results.
2 years of free agency and what do we get, Shane Spudson, far can pathetic Richmond.
This 2 years of ball scratching in trade week better be leading to something big next year and I mean Paddy Dangerfield+1 big otherwise the recruiters and a few others have to go.
At least the club didn't throw players names around unneccesarily, I suppose I'll give them that, but under this system there are ways to upgrade without even doing that, but we have chosen not to go down that path either, this needs to change.
1/10   

Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: the claw on October 16, 2014, 11:42:10 PM

Are Dan Richo and the boys worth what we're paying them? I'm not sold.

Not very inspiring for next year really.
you have their records mapped out in front of you and you still have to ask that. cmon willy you know the answer already you knew the answer last yr and more likely yrs before that.
hartley, jackson, richardson their records speak for themselves.

ffs benny gale spoke about the advent of f/a and other things yrs before it happened and yet again  we get left behind when a major change to the way things are done happens.

it all starts with the list manager followed closely by the recruiters. our trouble is if they cant or wont see the problems then they cant very well do something about them.
the rfc cycle of mediocrity continues. yet the nuffies will hang their hats on making finals.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Willy on October 16, 2014, 11:47:23 PM

Are Dan Richo and the boys worth what we're paying them? I'm not sold.

Not very inspiring for next year really.
you have their records mapped out in front of you and you still have to ask that. cmon willy you know the answer already you knew the answer last yr and more likely yrs before that.
hartley, jackson, richardson their records speak for themselves.

ffs benny gale spoke about the advent of f/a and other things yrs before it happened and yet again  we get left behind when a major change to the way things are done happens.

it all starts with the list manager followed closely by the recruiters. our trouble is if they cant or wont see the problems then they cant very well do something about them.
the rfc cycle of mediocrity continues. yet the nuffies will hang their hats on making finals.

yes, I don't have a terrific amount of faith in our recruiters/list managers. I hope there will be change at the end of next year if we don't win a final, as they must shoulder some of the blame.

Mate, I don't think anyone is satisfied with two elimination losses. Not even the most supportive fans.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: (•))(©™ on October 17, 2014, 12:31:50 AM
Club is run by a bunch of sissies.
To scared to make a mistake...
To scared to sack a coach...
To scared to move on an under preforming recruiting manager....
To scared to spend some money.....our money!
To scared to to have a go....
To scared to make a change...
Always drafting the safe kid...
Gutless weak and insipid....

Blind Freddy can see our list needs help, and pick 12 and the rest of our picks are not nearly enough to catch the top sides..

30 odd years of the same old crap.

Hats off to the Dogs, at least they are putting their balls on the line, even if it doesn't work with Boyd, I'd be proud of my club for talking a educated rick. Good luck to them.

Anyone that is happy with the way this club is run is a deadbeat!

I am embarrassed for the RFC and I'm embarrassed to be a supporter.


This !
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: (•))(©™ on October 17, 2014, 12:33:03 AM
I really hope we pick up some kids; whom can flounder in the two's for 6 years,
Unless of course dimmer is forced to play one of them thru a plethora of injuries to senior listed
champions.

Go you good things !

New RFC Mantra - 8 is great but 9 is fine!!

Eight is great but nine is fine
The 2nds pee away contract time
Just ask Elton he's the man
2 year deal for his tan
0 games in a year
Members take it up the rear
Why stop there on the burst.
What's becoming of the firsts?
How's abouts Newman and ability
How's about Griggs and agility
Here comes Dimmas favourite sons
Here comes Balwyns next year guns.

Very good, Dookenbaum ;D
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Yeahright on October 17, 2014, 01:10:36 AM

Where was plan B after Trengove?



Plan B was Trengove
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: dwaino on October 17, 2014, 07:30:57 AM
(http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj489/dwwaino/baby.gif)
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: eliminator on October 17, 2014, 07:32:32 AM
Will reserve my judgement until after national draft. Only positive so far did not trade away a pick for a dud like last year
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Hard Roar Tiger on October 17, 2014, 08:05:46 AM
Not a bad effort Ramos, reckon you can get this thread to 10 pages with the right amount of inciting
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: WA Tiger on October 17, 2014, 08:38:59 AM
(http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj489/dwwaino/baby.gif)

 :sleep
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: MintOnLamb on October 17, 2014, 08:46:52 AM
(http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj489/dwwaino/baby.gif)

 :sleep
Exactly

Interesting to note that Ports 1st pick in the National Draft is 57 then 75.
They have their team, got Ryder and are very set.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Chuck17 on October 17, 2014, 09:14:38 AM
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-trade-2014-report-card-who-were-the-winners-and-losers-in-the-trade-and-free-agency-period/story-fn69a32t-1227092874309

RICHMOND — PASS

IN: Nil

OUT: Nil

DRAFT PICKS: 12, 33, 52, 70, 88, 106, 124

VERDICT: Well done to the medical staff who kiboshed a Titanic of a trade when they turned down Jack Trengove after a scan on his foot. Informed judges believe they offered pick 12 for David Armitage, and sniffed around Adelaide’s Scott Thompson. Club denies both. Now look to the draft to find a pacy midfielder and potentially a clever small forward. Could they have done more to get another hard inside mid? Look at their rivals — Hawthorn and Port all got appreciably better, so they need to extract significant outside from the likes of Conca, Vlastuin, Lennon, Vickery, Griffiths and Co.

5/10 its official you numpties
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on October 17, 2014, 09:50:55 AM
5/10 to be adjusted in a year or two.

If they can bring in some real talent it could be 10/10, if they bomb out in the ND it could be a big fat zero.

Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Rampstar on October 17, 2014, 09:51:09 AM
Not a bad effort Ramos, reckon you can get this thread to 10 pages with the right amount of inciting

If you had any brains you would be filthy wif da club.  :o
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: dwaino on October 17, 2014, 10:15:10 AM
(http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj489/dwwaino/baby.gif)
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Rampstar on October 17, 2014, 10:18:29 AM
 :veryhappy
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: one-eyed on October 17, 2014, 12:12:48 PM
RICHMOND

What they got: Nil

What they lost: Nil

Draft selections: 12, 33, 52, 70, 88, 106, 124

Bottom line: For all the talk about not being seduced by the amazing end to the season, they are yet to make any significant changes to the list. Only time will tell what the inactivity means for next year and beyond.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-trade-and-free-agency-2014-a-clubbyclub-guide-20141016-1171cu.html
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: one-eyed on October 17, 2014, 12:30:57 PM
Stick to the footy topics and discussion ppl.
Title: Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
Post by: Francois Jackson on October 17, 2014, 05:59:05 PM
i rate this draft a 9/10, equal to the size of feces that came of my date this morning.

As frustrating as it is was i couldnt give a stuff now. Season is over lads.

The only news i want to hear now, aside from FJ getting the sack, is the signatures of cotch, dusty and rance before round 1 next year. if we hit round 1 and some arent signed odds are one will whip out the party line "im not in a rush to sign until the end of the year"

Dan Richardson you are a hack but sign these guys up before xmas and you would have at least done something right.

Lose one and we are stuffed.