One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Razorblade on August 30, 2005, 03:46:53 PM
-
http://www.footywire.com/fw/web/ft_player_compare?tid1=15&pid1=1400&tid2=19&pid2=109
Disposals Per Game
Tuck: 23.6
Judd: 21.6
Marks Per Game
Tuck: 4.8
Judd: 3.3
Goals Per Game
Tuck: 0.4
Judd: 0.7
Tackles Per Game
Tuck: 3.2
Judd: 3.3
While mucking around on this site i compared these two players stats.............freaky!
-
It'd be interesting to see the comparitive stats on hard ball gets also, I bet Tuck beats him in that area too.
Probably the area where Judd would stand out is effective possessions %.
-
just gotta have a dig at some of my mates on here
LMAORRF @ All of you who couldn't see Tuck had something special
:rollin :rollin phukken :rollin
I didn't watch much Westco games so i dont really know how Judd went comparitively
but this Tuck bloke is ours.
:cheers
-
Could Tucky win the Brownlow :o
They'd have to brillant odds wouldn't they
-
Might have to get on mate. :shh
-
It'd be interesting to see the comparitive stats on hard ball gets also, I bet Tuck beats him in that area too.
Probably the area where Judd would stand out is effective possessions %.
Judd vs Tuck comparison from the pro-stats site:
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=116&pid1=2002147&tid2=112&pid2=20158
Judd is number 1 in the AFL at winning contested footy at 90. Tuck is 2nd with 89 (Cogs is 4th)
Error/Disp: Judd 2.4/21.8 = 11.0% ; Tuck 2.9/23.9 = 12.1%
Tuck at $81 for the brownlow at sportsbet. Browny early on and Richo later on will take votes off him IMO.
-
Thanks MT.
I was surprised Judd was No.1
Like Ox I haven't seen much of the WCE this year, I thought Tuck's error rate would be much higher than Judd's, but there's actually not much in it.
You're right Razor, those stats are eerily similar!
-
SEN were commenting on the similarities Lids has with Judd in terms running and bouncing the footy and David Schwarz brought up about Tuck also being Judd-like. Reckons Tucky has deceptive pace. He must have read this thread ;).