One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on October 23, 2015, 06:54:57 PM
-
AFL.com.au's preliminary 2016 free agency list:
Richmond
Shane Edwards
Ty Vickery
If both continue to improve then Shane Edwards and Ty Vickery's phones will be ringing.
Adelaide
Scott Thompson
Nathan van Berlo
Brisbane Lions
Daniel Merrett
Daniel Rich
Carlton
Kade Simpson
Collingwood
Nathan Brown
Brent Macaffer
Steele Sidebottom
Dane Swan
Alan Toovey
Essendon
Heath Hocking
Cale Hooker
David Myers
Brent Stanton
Fremantle
Zac Clarke
Chris Mayne
Clancee Pearce
Aaron Sandilands
Geelong
Jimmy Bartel
Corey Enright
Tom Lonergan
Hawthorn
Luke Hodge
Sam Mitchell
Melbourne
Jack Grimes
Neville Jetta
Jake Spencer
Jack Watts
North Melbourne
Todd Goldstein
Brent Harvey
Drew Petrie
Lindsay Thomas
Daniel Wells
Port Adelaide
Paul Stewart
St Kilda
Sean Dempster
Sam Fisher
Jarryn Geary
Nick Riewoldt
Sydney Swans
Kieren Jack
Ted Richards
Nick Smith
West Coast
Mitch Brown
Sam Butler
Chris Masten
Matt Priddis
Will Schofield
Western Bulldogs
Matthew Boyd
Will Minson
Dale Morris
Robert Murphy
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-10-23/pie-and-roo-stars-headline-2016-free-agent-list
-
Zac Clarke or Todd Goldstein please.
-
Meh....they have their moments but wouldn't shed a single tear over losing either one of Vickery or Edwards.......
-
Sidebottom, Hooker, Goldstein, Jack, Brown, Schofield
Two A-grade mids, the best ruck in the AFL, and 3 reputable KPD's. Hooker was AA 40-squad not long ago IIRC.
-
Hooker would be handy
-
Not getting any HRT?
-
Honestly all of those six are worthy targets. Should be in their ears already, offering them some of our 'war chest'.
Goldstein would have to be priority, followed by Hooker and Sidebottom.
-
We are getting nobody.
They'll spruike FTF again and tell us our war chest is now the size of a shipping container and we'll end up with Minson from the Dogs and it will be shown as something extraordinary because we are just an ordinary club.
We are not elite.
We are not very good either.
At least we are not sus standard or pathetic.
We are just ordinary. Vanilla.
-
We are getting nobody.
They'll spruike FTF again and tell us our war chest is now the size of a shipping container and we'll end up with Minson from the Dogs and it will be shown as something extraordinary because we are just an ordinary club.
We are not elite.
We are not very good either.
At least we are not sus standard or pathetic.
We are just ordinary. Vanilla.
Wow, aren't you a ray of sunshine...
But TBH you're probably right. We'll look at who's being delisted by teams finishing 5th-12th and pick up a fringe player lmao
-
Meh....they have their moments but wouldn't shed a single tear over losing either one of Vickery or Edwards.......
edwards would be a significant lose
-
Yeh. Titch is grouse.
-
yeah....nah....
-
Not getting any HRT?
:lol :lol
-
Well I cant see either Vicks or Edwards going anywhere.
Out of the lot from other clubs, we wont get any, also no big fish there that wont stay at their own clubs..
Rich may go to GWS.. :thumbsup
-
Not getting any HRT?
:lol :lol
;D
-
Sidearse and Goldstein please.
Convince Goldy norf are old and on decline. Pinch Sidearse as payback for Treloar
-
Would be disappointed losing Vickery or Edwards. I think they're both very important to our structures. Good ordinary players are what you win flags with.
Collingwood may be under a lot of salary cap pressure next year, Sidebottom could be a realistic option.
Goldstein would be great, won't be going anywhere unless we (or someone) offers him huge overs. I have thought anything less than $1 mill per season wouldn't be sneezed at.
-
Aren't pies sniffing around Vickery?
-
What are the chances the SA clubs will be all over Edwards like a cheap suit?
-
MMMMMMM good I'd say. He'd be a handy player for either Port or Adelaide. what compo would we get? 6 first rounders
-
Aren't pies sniffing around Vickery?
Was the rumour a bit back
-
Edwards is not a free agent. RFC gave him a 3 year contract. Are they stuffin serious :banghead
-
It's a smart move. Best to be able to trade a bloke and get something for him than to lose him to free agency.
-
It's a smart move. Best to be able to trade a bloke and get something for him than to lose him to free agency.
:thumbsup
-
A bloke who signs 3 year contract is not interested in being traded.
-
A bloke who signs 3 year contract is not interested in being traded.
Very true - unless his name is McCarthy and plays for GWS. :whistle
-
when did Cam sign his? ;D but fair point ;D
-
A bloke who signs 3 year contract is not interested in being traded.
You're right but it gives an insight to those who complain about by why we, and other clubs, sign up guys to avoid free agency.