One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on February 09, 2016, 10:46:11 AM
-
Channel 7 promo shoot with @DustinMartin4 and @DanielRioli #gotiges 🐯
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CauayePUMAEij3Q.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CauayeVVIAAsq1a.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CauayeUVAAEHhmg.jpg)
https://twitter.com/Richmond_FC
-
Surprised that Martin would want anything to do with Seven these days....
-
Surprised that Martin would want anything to do with Seven these days....
$$$
-
The ball looks like a watermelon in Riolis hands.
-
Racist....
-
That's right.
-
Surprised that Martin would want anything to do with Seven these days....
He's probably been well advised .....
-
Best advice would have been to get a lawyer weeks ago.
-
Best advice would have been to get a lawyer weeks ago.
Life becomes easier when you learn to accept the apology you never got - R. Brault.
-
Surprised that Martin would want anything to do with Seven these days....
He's probably been well advised .....
"Hey Dustin we think it's in your best interests to work with this media organisation that publicly broadcast exaggerated and false allegations against you by one of it's own employees, it's not like they'll be encouraged to ever pull that crap again if there's no real consequences for them this time..."
Yep - sounds like good advice.....
-
Surprised that Martin would want anything to do with Seven these days....
has no choice
Clause in all player contracts; they must be made available to broadcast partners for interviews and these one off promos
-
Pretty sure under the circumstances if he and/or the club wanted to make an issue of it they'd have fairly solid reasons not to deal with them - or should Seven and their employees just be allowed to run around smearing AFL players with baseless allegations and those same players still be expected make themselves available to them just because they happen to hold the broadcast rights?