One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: WilliamPowell on March 31, 2016, 06:23:29 PM

Title: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 31, 2016, 06:23:29 PM

The Team

B: Astbury, Rance, Grimes
HB: Vlastuin, Houli, B. Ellis
C: Griffiths, C. Ellis, McIntosh
HF: Lambert, Martin, Short
F: Riewoldt, Lloyd, Vickery
R: Hampson, Townsend, Cotchin
IC: Grigg, Menadue, Miles, Hunt
Em: Lennon, A. Moore, Chaplin

In: Grigg, Hunt, Short
Out: Edwards (inj – hand), Rioli (inj – leg), Morris

New: Jayden Short, 20, 177cm, 72kg, from

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-03-31/round-2-team-announcement
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 31, 2016, 06:25:05 PM
Short straight in

Tony Greenberg,
richmondfc.com.au  March 31, 2016 6:25 PM



Jayden Short will make his senior debut on Friday night

Skilful, speedy small forward Jayden Short will make his AFL debut with Richmond in Friday night’s blockbuster against Collingwood at the MCG.

Earlier today, Short was promoted from the Tigers’ rookie list to the senior list, as a replacement for Reece Conca, who has been placed on the Club’s long-term injury list (with hamstring damage).

Short, 177cm and 72kg, was Richmond’s first pick (No. 11 overall) in the rookie draft at the end of 2014.

See how Collingwood will line up in Friday night's match

He showed some impressive signs at VFL level for the Tigers in 2015, predominantly across the forward line, with occasional stints through the midfield.

Full article
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-03-31/round-2-team-announcement
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 31, 2016, 06:28:41 PM
Agree with Morris going out

Though I would have dropped Hampson as well,  played Griffiths as first ruck and bought in Lennon. Mainly because Lennon can play as a lead up target and / or small forward role
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: 🏅Dooks on March 31, 2016, 06:39:09 PM
Bellis and Shampson are a real worry. A real real worry.
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: tony_montana on March 31, 2016, 06:43:32 PM
No Lennon??
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: one-eyed on March 31, 2016, 06:46:00 PM
No Lennon??
Named as an emergency.
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: one-eyed on March 31, 2016, 06:55:02 PM
Collingwood's side for those interested:

FB: Jack Frost, Nathan Brown, Tom Langdon
HB: Jackson Ramsay, Ben Reid, Marley Williams
C: James Aish, Adam Treloar, Levi Greenwood
HF: Jarryd Blair, Darcy Moore, Jordan De Goey
FF: Alex Fasolo, Travis Cloke, Corey Gault
Foll: Brodie Grundy, Scott Pendlebury, Taylor Adams
Int: Brent Macaffer, Jack Crisp, Ben Sinclair, Adam Oxley

Emg: Matthew Goodyear, Alan Toovey, Jeremy Howe

IN: James Aish, Brodie Grundy, Adam Oxley, Ben Reid
OUT: Dane Swan (foot), Jarrod Witts (hand), Steele Sidebottom (suspension), Brayden Maynard (omitted)

NEW: James Aish (20, Brisbane)

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2016-03-31/selection-four-changes-for-friday
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: peggles on March 31, 2016, 06:56:00 PM
probably still a bit underdone.
without the sub, cannot carry those who are not going to run out the game.
probably going to come in after a few more hitouts in the VFL.

then again, he's an emergency
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Penelope on March 31, 2016, 06:59:38 PM
Lennon must have rooted hardwick's missus...and showed him up.

Stuff me, this bloke is his own worst enemy.

loose two agile forwards so they bring in one untried small agile forward, a midfield plodder and total retread
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Diocletian on March 31, 2016, 07:19:51 PM
Did you mean to write retread Al or or were you just avoiding the filter?
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Penelope on March 31, 2016, 07:35:03 PM
it's actually a term I've used for a long time as substitute for a word meaning to hold back (when used as a verb)

in this case it doubly applies to the player in question
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Simonator on March 31, 2016, 07:40:02 PM
Rioli injured ?
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Chuck17 on March 31, 2016, 08:01:33 PM
We will not win games with Hampson in the side

Kiss finals goodbye if he keeps playing

And that is despite him tearing up the training paddock
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Gracie on March 31, 2016, 08:17:35 PM
We will not win games with Hampson in the side

Kiss finals goodbye if he keeps playing

And that is despite him tearing up the training paddock

We have a 100% winning record so far this tear with Hampson in the side.
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: big tone on March 31, 2016, 08:18:09 PM
I'm happy Short is being given an opportunity and good luck to him.. But the other 2 ins are just nothing footballers taking us nowhere....  Dimma at his best at selection once again.

I'd also hope Rioli has a niggle otherwise that decision is just as astounding as playing the other 2 duds.

And lastly not playing Lennon shows what I have been told by a bloke at the club, that Dimma is not a fan. With as many injuries as we have at the moment it says he doesn't rate Lennon in the top 26/28 players on our list.
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: JP Tiger on March 31, 2016, 08:50:08 PM
I'm disappointed with Rioli going out, but think it is fair enough to be careful with young players with injuries.  A week off wont hurt him that much.  The upside is debuting another youngster!  Go Shorty!   ;D     
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 31, 2016, 09:34:21 PM
Rioli copped a corkie last week

Hasn't come up

Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on March 31, 2016, 10:00:40 PM
I'm happy Short is being given an opportunity and good luck to him.. But the other 2 ins are just nothing footballers taking us nowhere....  Dimma at his best at selection once again.

I'd also hope Rioli has a niggle otherwise that decision is just as astounding as playing the other 2 duds.

And lastly not playing Lennon shows what I have been told by a bloke at the club, that Dimma is not a fan. With as many injuries as we have at the moment it says he doesn't rate Lennon in the top 26/28 players on our list.
Let's face it, it couldn't be that hard to be one of Hardwicks favourites, you don't even have to be good at footy (see Hampsud, Morris etc. ) A blind man and his dog can see that Lennon has some footy tricks but he mustn't be doing what Dumma likes to see during training etc. I suspect he's either lazy or just looks as though he's cruising at half pace. I also suspect his defensive efforts are not up to standards too.   
As far as I could tell Newmans spot was his if he wanted it but if your a decent player but can't get a gig in this squad there's got to be something wrong with attitude.
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: big tone on March 31, 2016, 10:41:27 PM
I'm happy Short is being given an opportunity and good luck to him.. But the other 2 ins are just nothing footballers taking us nowhere....  Dimma at his best at selection once again.

I'd also hope Rioli has a niggle otherwise that decision is just as astounding as playing the other 2 duds.

And lastly not playing Lennon shows what I have been told by a bloke at the club, that Dimma is not a fan. With as many injuries as we have at the moment it says he doesn't rate Lennon in the top 26/28 players on our list.
Let's face it, it couldn't be that hard to be one of Hardwicks favourites, you don't even have to be good at footy (see Hampsud, Morris etc. ) A blind man and his dog can see that Lennon has some footy tricks but he mustn't be doing what Dumma likes to see during training etc. I suspect he's either lazy or just looks as though he's cruising at half pace. I also suspect his defensive efforts are not up to standards too.   
As far as I could tell Newmans spot was his if he wanted it but if your a decent player but can't get a gig in this squad there's got to be something wrong with attitude.
The thing is, if you are not going to play our number 1 draft pick from a couple of years ago, when most, if not all would agree he is good enough to be in the side, especially when we have about 5 or 6 injuries from our side, than trade him when he wants out.
From memory he kicked 4 goals in the twos last week and from all reports played pretty well, and with us struggling to kick a winning score, don't you think he would have been the obvious choice this week?
It's human nature to have favorites and have people you just don't like in life, but you would hope it wouldn't get in the way of a coach picking the best side each week to try and win every game.
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: MintOnLamb on March 31, 2016, 10:45:14 PM
Li am gob smacked and dumbfounded that lennon isnt in.
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on March 31, 2016, 11:23:43 PM
I'm happy Short is being given an opportunity and good luck to him.. But the other 2 ins are just nothing footballers taking us nowhere....  Dimma at his best at selection once again.

I'd also hope Rioli has a niggle otherwise that decision is just as astounding as playing the other 2 duds.

And lastly not playing Lennon shows what I have been told by a bloke at the club, that Dimma is not a fan. With as many injuries as we have at the moment it says he doesn't rate Lennon in the top 26/28 players on our list.
Let's face it, it couldn't be that hard to be one of Hardwicks favourites, you don't even have to be good at footy (see Hampsud, Morris etc. ) A blind man and his dog can see that Lennon has some footy tricks but he mustn't be doing what Dumma likes to see during training etc. I suspect he's either lazy or just looks as though he's cruising at half pace. I also suspect his defensive efforts are not up to standards too.   
As far as I could tell Newmans spot was his if he wanted it but if your a decent player but can't get a gig in this squad there's got to be something wrong with attitude.
The thing is, if you are not going to play our number 1 draft pick from a couple of years ago, when most, if not all would agree he is good enough to be in the side, especially when we have about 5 or 6 injuries from our side, than trade him when he wants out.
From memory he kicked 4 goals in the twos last week and from all reports played pretty well, and with us struggling to kick a winning score, don't you think he would have been the obvious choice this week?
It's human nature to have favorites and have people you just don't like in life, but you would hope it wouldn't get in the way of a coach picking the best side each week to try and win every game.
I agree with everything you've said and for that reason alone the only logical reason I can come up with is attitude. Why else wouldn't he get picked then?
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: Diocletian on March 31, 2016, 11:48:05 PM
Couldn't care less if he's willful as long as he's skillful....
Title: Re: official Tiger team -v- Collingwood Rd 2
Post by: eliminator on April 01, 2016, 06:34:36 AM
Uninspiring selections of Grigg and Hunt. Good luck to Short. Would have brought in Lennon as well.