One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on April 02, 2016, 04:16:40 AM

Title: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: one-eyed on April 02, 2016, 04:16:40 AM
They [Richmond] conceded 70 points from turnovers and led for 71 minutes.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/more-news/afl-2016-collingwood-defeats-richmond-by-1-point-at-mcg-in-round-2/news-story/05c63d7e45344ca7a3de2a0030648e58

 :pullhair :rant :help
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: Diocletian on April 02, 2016, 04:22:45 AM
It was the like Hobart 2015 meets Cairns 2012. A true Richmond classic.
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: Stalin on April 02, 2016, 11:03:08 AM
Lennon doesn't turn it over much
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: Beans on April 02, 2016, 11:07:47 AM
Lennon couldn't get a kick in the reserves practice match. Looked disinterested.
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: Stalin on April 02, 2016, 11:16:32 AM
Lennon couldn't get a kick in the reserves practice match. Looked disinterested.

Didn't he kick four goals?
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: Beans on April 02, 2016, 11:20:03 AM
No. That was the week before's practice match. Played down back.
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: (•))(©™ on April 02, 2016, 11:27:31 AM
No. That was the week before's practice match. Played down back.

LMAOOOO
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: TigerMonk on April 02, 2016, 12:54:14 PM
 :rollin
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: Yeahright on April 02, 2016, 12:56:49 PM
No. That was the week before's practice match. Played down back.

Who's bright idea was that
Title: Re: We gave the Pies 70 pts from our turnovers
Post by: Stalin on April 02, 2016, 04:48:01 PM
No. That was the week before's practice match. Played down back.

good

wouldnt want him to kick 5 or 6 goals

you dont learn defense that way