One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: 🏅Dooks on May 21, 2016, 10:23:55 AM

Title: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on May 21, 2016, 10:23:55 AM
Pros - he wouldnt cost us picks
Cons - he is Travis Cloke.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on May 21, 2016, 10:59:31 AM
Cons: Julie Cloke
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on May 21, 2016, 11:06:19 AM
We need a new whipping boy to take over from Vickery.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Stalin on May 21, 2016, 12:26:47 PM
Pro:  he is not troy Chaplin
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: TigerMonk on May 21, 2016, 12:28:27 PM
Got a pairs of the best hands in the league.  Very strong. Very Mobile.  :sarcasm Could lose you a Grand Final  ;D After seeing him miss a goal inside the 10 metre square just the other week.  :razz
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: mat073 on May 21, 2016, 01:46:53 PM
Don't want Cloke .

Play Chol or Mcbean FFS.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: mat073 on May 21, 2016, 02:05:26 PM
While we're at it ....dont want that frizzy haired girl Mayne either  !!!!! !
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: dwaino on May 21, 2016, 02:57:24 PM
Part of me says yeah because it would structure our forward line well. Other part of me says hell no because it clearly doesn't work for Collingwood and the bloke is captain potato. 
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Heart of Darkness on May 21, 2016, 03:01:47 PM
Part of me says yeah because it would structure our forward line well. Other part of me says hell no because it clearly doesn't work for Collingwood and the bloke is captain potato.

I'd rather him than Vickery. Think structurally/ game plan wise he (when up and about) is exactly what our forward line is missing.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on May 21, 2016, 03:31:24 PM
NO!

The Cloke family can get stuffed! The old man deserted us for the filth and when the boys had a choice to make they chose the filth again.

Get lost! 
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Penelope on May 21, 2016, 04:42:52 PM
 :lol
Its a bit late for that.
you do know that David came back and finished his career at richmond?
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on May 21, 2016, 05:48:41 PM
NO!

The Cloke family can get stuffed! The old man deserted us for the filth and when the boys had a choice to make they chose the filth again.

Get lost!

x2
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Willy on May 21, 2016, 05:49:42 PM
If we did get him I'd play him at CHB.

It's really just his goal kicking that is killing him as a player. His field kicking is fine and he has a decent tank.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Stalin on May 21, 2016, 06:23:33 PM
If we did get him I'd play him at CHB.

It's really just his goal kicking that is killing him as a player. His field kicking is fine and he has a decent tank.

Pro:  he is not troy Chaplin
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Yeahright on May 21, 2016, 06:35:49 PM
Effin lol. Can only guess who picked yes
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: TigerMonk on May 21, 2016, 07:42:29 PM
NO!

The Cloke family can get stuffed! The old man deserted us for the filth and when the boys had a choice to make they chose the filth again.

Get lost!

X3
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: tdy on May 21, 2016, 07:46:28 PM
He's past it. Collywobble will try to offload him at the end of the year but there will be no takers not even Fred.  He's cooked.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Tigeritis™©® on May 22, 2016, 03:09:57 AM
:lol
Its a bit late for that.
you do know that David came back and finished his career at richmond?
Wasn't happy about it then either. Rang the club and told them to tell the bum picker to pee off back to Victoria park.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: mat073 on May 22, 2016, 09:23:11 AM
David Cloke kicked 8 goals in his final game for Richmond . Wonderful stirring win against Carlton too.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 22, 2016, 09:41:41 AM
Nope,

Next

Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: big tone on May 22, 2016, 10:37:06 AM
No more duds from other clubs especially when they cannot even get a game.
Surely we have learned our lesson.
Hurley please.
I don't even really care about getting Prestia.

Trade the likes of Vickery, BEllis, Griff and Astbury for picks and draft some decent young talent. Preferably big bodied kids.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Go Richo 12 on May 22, 2016, 10:40:15 AM
Leave him for North to pursue.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: camboon on May 22, 2016, 10:58:32 AM
Not even if you got him for nothing, he is contracted for another year and Collingwood will get overs for him, and a stupid club will get him
I believe he's got nothing left
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: YellowandBlackBlood on May 22, 2016, 11:00:17 AM
Leave him for North to pursue.
Too young for Norf! :shh
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Andyy on May 22, 2016, 11:26:04 AM
If we don't land a player like Jenkins I would be open to getting Cloke for a couple of years, provided we land a solid ruck, KPD and a mid or two as well. If we don't land some more players to build the list then there's no point getting Cloke.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: (•))(©™ on May 22, 2016, 11:26:46 AM
Him and Yarran will be a amazing
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: eliminator on May 22, 2016, 11:52:36 AM
No. Not player that we need.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 22, 2016, 12:25:24 PM
LMFAO at the know it all's criticising North and their recruiting.. :lol :lol :lol

Where are they on the ladder compared to us again and how many games have they won compared to us and how have they followed up on their form from last year compared to us... :help



Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Yeahright on May 22, 2016, 03:59:42 PM
Don't think anyone criticised their recruiting, more alluded to their love of chasing older players which is well established.
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: (•))(©™ on May 22, 2016, 04:12:20 PM
What happened to the other two Cloke duds?
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Stalin on May 22, 2016, 04:15:37 PM
Bollocks if Norf get swallow of gc
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: WA Tiger on May 22, 2016, 04:55:57 PM
Don't think anyone criticised their recruiting, more alluded to their love of chasing older players which is well established.

WTF and that's not recruiting... :huh :huh :huh
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: TigerMonk on May 22, 2016, 04:56:30 PM
Bollocks if Norf get swallow of gc

l bet they will get him
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Yeahright on May 22, 2016, 04:58:51 PM
Don't think anyone criticised their recruiting, more alluded to their love of chasing older players which is well established.

WTF and that's not recruiting... :huh :huh :huh

Criticism and commenting on something are two different things. Although I know everything in your emo mind is shyte so the only thing you ever do is criticise
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on May 22, 2016, 07:56:04 PM
Stay on topic pls otherwise ill consider bans
Title: Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
Post by: Yeahright on May 23, 2016, 02:09:32 AM
Sorry WilliamDooks