One-Eyed Richmond Forum

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Stalin on August 11, 2016, 01:11:17 PM

Title: MandelaEffect: witch in wizard of oz never said "fly my pretties fly"
Post by: Stalin on August 11, 2016, 01:11:17 PM
Sex and the city originally.

Changed to sex in the city

Now sex and the city again. 
Title: Re: johnny walker or johnnie walker ...
Post by: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 10:43:38 AM
Does no one think it was 'Johnny Walker.' ?

https://www.johnniewalker.com/en-au/
Title: Re: johnny walker or johnnie walker ...
Post by: Damo on August 13, 2016, 05:59:57 PM
Does no one think it was 'Johnny Walker.' ?

https://www.johnniewalker.com/en-au/

Nup

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Walker_(grocer)

Title: Re: I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house ...
Post by: Stalin on August 14, 2016, 09:47:53 AM
Three little pigs changed :

http://www.metrolyrics.com/three-little-pigs-lyrics-green-jelly.html

I'll blow your house down, not in...

Find a book of it and it'll be changed
Title: Re: I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house ...
Post by: 🏅Dooks on August 14, 2016, 12:35:13 PM
Three little pigs changed :

http://www.metrolyrics.com/three-little-pigs-lyrics-green-jelly.html

I'll blow your house down, not in...

Find a book of it and it'll be changed

It was always down
Title: Re: I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house ...
Post by: Stalin on August 14, 2016, 05:45:22 PM
Three little pigs changed :

http://www.metrolyrics.com/three-little-pigs-lyrics-green-jelly.html

I'll blow your house down, not in...

Find a book of it and it'll be changed

It was always down

I reckon all books are now going to say "in" ...
Title: Re: I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house ...
Post by: Damo on August 14, 2016, 05:57:37 PM
http://www.mightybook.com/stuff=Three_Little_Pigs-ftr

House down

Got to love debating the big issues
Title: Re: I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house ...
Post by: Stalin on August 14, 2016, 07:15:48 PM
http://www.mightybook.com/stuff=Three_Little_Pigs-ftr

House down

Got to love debating the big issues

Was it not - Sketchers  ??

https://www.skechers.com/en-us/
Title: Re: I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house ...
Post by: 🏅Dooks on August 14, 2016, 07:17:28 PM
http://www.mightybook.com/stuff=Three_Little_Pigs-ftr

House down

Got to love debating the big issues

Was it not - Sketchers  ??

https://www.skechers.com/en-us/

Yes
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ...
Post by: Stalin on August 14, 2016, 07:23:03 PM
Croc Dundee changed -

"That's not a knife. This is a knife."

Is now.  "That's not a knife. That's a knife."
Title: Re: I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house ...
Post by: Diocletian on August 14, 2016, 07:30:08 PM
Three little pigs changed :

http://www.metrolyrics.com/three-little-pigs-lyrics-green-jelly.html

I'll blow your house down, not in...

Find a book of it and it'll be changed

It was always down

I reckon all books are now going to say "in" ...


This is the only version that matters:

https://vimeo.com/39833006

Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Yeahright on August 14, 2016, 09:23:01 PM
FMD what a thread ::)
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Damo on August 14, 2016, 09:49:40 PM
Was NEVER sketchers
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on August 14, 2016, 10:03:39 PM
Was NEVER sketchers

Yeah it was
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Yeahright on August 14, 2016, 10:05:26 PM
No it wasn't
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on August 15, 2016, 05:49:18 AM
No it wasn't

Incorrect
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Yeahright on August 15, 2016, 06:11:02 PM
Wrong
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 22, 2016, 03:06:35 PM
Bents, what is the hidden, funky meaning behind your perceived observation?
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 22, 2016, 03:11:11 PM
Quantum computing reaching into powerful realms

Glitch in the matrix

CERN changing timelines / dimensions

Time travellers changing history to prevent nuclear war

God playing funny buggers

Seppo goverment project blue beam / earl stages faking 2nd comming / aliens



Who knows...

'Fruit loops'has changed multiple times too

Some car logos like ford 'changing'

Some reckon the human anatomy has changed a fair bit too... Heart was more to the left, and other strange things ...
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 22, 2016, 03:17:11 PM
Right.....or YOU could be wrong.

http://www.skechers.com.au (http://www.skechers.com.au)

Same spelling as always.

Best to identify incorrect research, primarily.
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 22, 2016, 03:20:25 PM
Right.....or YOU could be wrong.

(http://www.skechers.com.au/)

Same spelling as always.

Best to identify incorrect research, primarily.

But, It's not about me . If about a large number of people having a COLLECTIVE misremembering about something they thought was a fact. Historically this only happened whn people were in the same town in medieval times an has a bad batch of stuff

People that are generally unrelated in most aspects

For example thousands of people that have not meet each other think jfk assination footage was different to the current

There was no guns in the wizard of oz movie ... Now there is. Many people think it's odd

I only started thinking about it a bit when I read many people claimed a passage in the bible changed, and then changed again quite recently (in te actual books...)
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 22, 2016, 03:25:35 PM
That's nice.
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 22, 2016, 03:28:34 PM
Aye

Quote
There is now a video of the Grassy Knoll shooter


https://youtu.be/IOtZetem1qI?t=28m18s

https://youtu.be/ZQE8Cj_495g

The man whom filmed this was Orville Nix. I have never seen anything about this on any JFK killing documentary. The shooter is clearly visible holding a rifle at JFK. Muzzle flashes can be seen to the shooter's left in the darkness. You can also see silhouettes of men moving right after the headshot.
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 22, 2016, 03:38:42 PM
Lol
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 22, 2016, 06:51:31 PM
Lol

It's a strange world/s:

http://www.jyi.org/issue/ditching-the-indeterminate-cat-griffith-scientists-suggest-testability-of-their-many-interacting-worlds-theory/

http://www.universetoday.com/48619/a-universe-of-10-dimensions/

http://m.phys.org/news/2014-10-interacting-worlds-theory-scientists-interaction.html

http://m.phys.org/news/2015-09-magnetic-wormhole-regions-space.html
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: tony_montana on August 22, 2016, 08:04:31 PM
Right.....or YOU could be wrong.

(http://www.skechers.com.au/)

Same spelling as always.

Best to identify incorrect research, primarily.

But, It's not about me . If about a large number of people having a COLLECTIVE misremembering about something they thought was a fact. Historically this only happened whn people were in the same town in medieval times an has a bad batch of stuff

People that are generally unrelated in most aspects

For example thousands of people that have not meet each other think jfk assination footage was different to the current

There was no guns in the wizard of oz movie ... Now there is. Many people think it's odd

I only started thinking about it a bit when I read many people claimed a passage in the bible changed, and then changed again quite recently (in te actual books...)

or sometimes people just remember wrong, its a big wide world out there with billions of people - perception is a funny thing, read up on it.

Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on August 22, 2016, 08:16:19 PM
Sketchers had a T.

There were only ever 4 people in Kennedys car.

Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: tony_montana on August 22, 2016, 08:17:53 PM
Sketchers had a T.

There were only ever 4 people in Kennedys car.

nah

skechers

6

Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 22, 2016, 08:34:19 PM
Right.....or YOU could be wrong.

(http://www.skechers.com.au/)

Same spelling as always.

Best to identify incorrect research, primarily.

But, It's not about me . If about a large number of people having a COLLECTIVE misremembering about something they thought was a fact. Historically this only happened whn people were in the same town in medieval times an has a bad batch of stuff

People that are generally unrelated in most aspects

For example thousands of people that have not meet each other think jfk assination footage was different to the current

There was no guns in the wizard of oz movie ... Now there is. Many people think it's odd

I only started thinking about it a bit when I read many people claimed a passage in the bible changed, and then changed again quite recently (in te actual books...)

or sometimes people just remember wrong, its a big wide world out there with billions of people - perception is a funny thing, read up on it.

Scarecrow never had a gun in wizard of oz

*in my time line
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 22, 2016, 08:55:19 PM
Sketchers had a T.

There were only ever 4 people in Kennedys car.

nah

skechers

6

What colour were hitlers eyes?

They are now blue ...

http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/rare-color-photo-adolf-hitler-shows-true-eye-color-date-unknown/

Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: 🏅Dooks on August 23, 2016, 01:24:44 PM
Sketchers had a T.

There were only ever 4 people in Kennedys car.

nah

skechers

6

Nope.
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 23, 2016, 01:49:04 PM
So what r u saying, Dooks.
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Yeahright on August 23, 2016, 02:40:09 PM
Sketchers had a T.

There were only ever 4 people in Kennedys car.

nah

skechers

6

What colour were hitlers eyes?

They are now blue ...

http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/rare-color-photo-adolf-hitler-shows-true-eye-color-date-unknown/

They were always blue :lol
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: tony_montana on August 23, 2016, 05:11:16 PM
Sketchers had a T.

There were only ever 4 people in Kennedys car.

nah

skechers

6

Nope.

enlighten us please
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 23, 2016, 05:20:12 PM
He already did
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 23, 2016, 05:56:19 PM
We really need to get rid of hardwick.
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Harry on August 23, 2016, 05:58:42 PM
We really need to get rid of hardwick.

This is perhaps the only thing that's certain in this universe
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 23, 2016, 06:03:29 PM
 :shh
Title: Re: Sketchers spelling changed ... Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 23, 2016, 06:06:06 PM
Sketchers had a T.

There were only ever 4 people in Kennedys car.

nah

skechers

6

What colour were hitlers eyes?

They are now blue ...

http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/rare-color-photo-adolf-hitler-shows-true-eye-color-date-unknown/

They were always blue :lol

Maybe in your timeline...

Do you not remember jokes about nazi leadership looking non-ayrian ?

Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 23, 2016, 06:14:22 PM
Sex in the city

Not sex and the city

Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 23, 2016, 06:25:58 PM
fruit loops

Not froot loops FFs
Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 23, 2016, 06:42:06 PM
fruit loops

Not froot loops FFs

Yes, you are
Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 23, 2016, 06:46:32 PM
fruit loops

Not froot loops FFs

Yes, you are

Open minded old bean.   — 'Believe only half of what you see and nothing that you hear.'

Apparently fruit loops (froot loops) and kit-kat (kitkat) change back and forth every now and then 

Keep an eye out
Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 23, 2016, 06:58:25 PM
Enjoy
Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: Yeahright on August 24, 2016, 01:04:37 PM
And Richmonds logo used to look like this... Something fishys going on guys

(http://www.vectorportal.com/img_novi/richmondtigers_3448.jpg)
Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: Harry on August 24, 2016, 01:31:13 PM
Always thought it was johnny with a Y

Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 24, 2016, 06:56:31 PM
You're right Bents.

I was sure it was Sarah Connor but now it's Sara Connor.  :scream
Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 24, 2016, 08:57:49 PM
Didn't it used to be Jeopardise but now its jeopardize ?

That's weird.
Title: Re: SkeTchers, jfk car, hitlers eyes, JohhnY walker, Something funky going down?
Post by: Stalin on August 26, 2016, 02:22:59 AM
Sex in the city

Not sex and the city

I wrote this the opposite was way.

Sex and the city changed back again ...

 :(

Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Harry on August 26, 2016, 08:58:39 AM
WTF is going on?
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Stalin on August 26, 2016, 11:24:23 AM
This is the first one I've seen change 100%
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 26, 2016, 11:50:14 AM
lol used to be lol
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Stalin on August 26, 2016, 11:57:38 AM
lol used to be lol

Only two days ago if you google 'sex AND the city'

 it autocorrected to 'in', and every thing had 'in' pictures and websites.

It's now and, again
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 26, 2016, 12:01:10 PM
Google bots
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Stalin on August 26, 2016, 12:04:10 PM
If only I still had my sex and/in the city poster to Cheak something more physical

Can you get out your DVDs

How can google bots change pictures with words written In them?
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Yeahright on August 26, 2016, 12:35:44 PM
It has always been sex AND the city. You've just got a perverted mind and thought you stumbled across something great on late night television only to be left disappointed
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Stalin on August 26, 2016, 12:37:29 PM
It has always been sex AND the city. You've just got a perverted mind and thought you stumbled across something great on late night television only to be left disappointed

As of like three day ago , it was IN

It was was originally AND, as it's changed back to that now

Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Yeahright on August 26, 2016, 12:47:12 PM
So it changed for a total of three days? :lol
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Stalin on August 26, 2016, 12:59:02 PM
So it changed for a total of three days? :lol

I only found out about the mandela effect thing recently.

I only found out about the sex AND the city, changing a few days ago...  So I search websites and pictures and everything was sex IN the city.

I don't know how long it had been that way ...

I know it's changed back to sex and city in last day or two
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: tony_montana on August 26, 2016, 07:16:12 PM
lol used to be lol

I thought it was LOL?

I swear ive also seen lolz and lulz :o
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Stalin on August 26, 2016, 07:24:59 PM
 * It was AND to my mind originally.
 * Last week it was IN - I looked it up on images and sites ... Everything said "in" in both words an pictures
 * It's now AND again  :huh

I am pretty sure my post in this thread changed too - unless the mods are playing a evil trick on me. However I sent someone a txt (on topic) only a couple day ago and that's the same ...


I am gaining nothing by making this up ... Apart from lookin like a loonie prat. It's not about me - many people are noticing this specific change/s, and others.

Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Diocletian on August 26, 2016, 10:30:35 PM
"lol" used to mean "lots of love".....probably been a few awkwardly signed sympathy cards in recent years as a result....
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: (•))(©™ on August 26, 2016, 11:49:49 PM
I'm sure this is only an issue with bored muthfuckers that have otherwise never watched the crap program.

No hard corers would be tripping on this.
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Diocletian on August 27, 2016, 12:00:27 AM
Who was your favourite? Horse Face, The Old Blonde Hag from Mannequin, The Ugly Ginger Dyke or the non-descript Brunette who looked a lot hotter than she actually was because she was always seen with them?
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Yeahright on August 28, 2016, 10:00:11 AM
Who was your favourite? Horse Face, The Old Blonde Hag from Mannequin, The Ugly Ginger Dyke or the non-descript Brunette who looked a lot hotter than she actually was because she was always seen with them?

I feel like Dio just confirmed he's a fan
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Diocletian on August 28, 2016, 02:31:58 PM
No but I was married to one....
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Stalin on August 28, 2016, 02:35:43 PM
non-descript Brunette who looked a lot hotter than she actually was because she was always seen with them for me She was well fit
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: Diocletian on August 28, 2016, 02:51:24 PM
"Well fit" eh?

Still fantasising that you grew up in a council estate in London rather than a middle class suburb of Melbourne I see...
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: Sex AND the city has changed back to and, not in... Wtf ???
Post by: 🏅Dooks on August 28, 2016, 03:00:25 PM
Who was your favourite? Horse Face, The Old Blonde Hag from Mannequin, The Ugly Ginger Dyke or the non-descript Brunette who looked a lot hotter than she actually was because she was always seen with them?

Crιdit where its due. I could always rely on all 4 when in need of a fast de-chub. Especially pee eyes

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/12/03/article-0-09CAD3A0000005DC-903_224x366.jpg)

And

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/29/21/2CE8DE3F00000578-0-image-m-61_1443556963846.jpg)
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: non-religious changes.
Post by: Stalin on August 28, 2016, 08:52:43 PM
Quote

Neil deGrasse Tyson Wrong? Our location in the Milky Way Galaxy (Sagittarius Arm or Orion Spur)?

Ive seen a thread similar to this before but nothing with too much evidence to back some of the "misremembering".

Ok, so Ive been watching Neil Tyson videos on youtube for quite a few years now, and ive watched all his episodes of Startalk. The guys awesome... and I have personally always thought we were in the Sagittarius Arm because ive heard Neil Tyson say it before. It took me a while to find where he says it in one of his videos... But i finally found it. On Startalk episode 4 at 37:55 (on Netflix) Neil Tyson says "From Manhattan NYC, North America..." and continues all the way to the... "Sagittarius Arm". Now as "history" says we are in the "Orion Spur"... ALWAYS have been, either in the "Orion Arm" or the "Orion Spur." And the distance between the two (Sagittarius Arm and Orion Spur) is at least 1,000+ light years away from each other minimum. (Im no astronomer so this is my personal estimation by just given the fact that the Orion Arm is 10,000 light years long and by looking at the "Milky Way Galaxy Map") Thats way too far to just be wrong... Now how does Neil Tyson "misremember" where we are in the Milky Way? Hes one of the top Astrophysicists in the world. Of course, he could be... and i guess just IS apparently wrong. But thats surprising to me that he would not know where we are in the Milky Way. Does anyone else remember ever learning this same thing from another source? Or do you remember the Earth always being in the Orion Spur?

Heres a link to Startalk episode 4 (start at 37:45) https://youtu.be/zNSSY0n36Jw

?? Edit: Here is a possible Carl Sagan video also saying we are in the Sagittarius Arm. (I say possible because i dont know what Carls voice sounds like, but the video is labeled Carl Sagan. It almost sounds like a "robot- voice". Im on my phone right now with no headphones and my speaker is horrible... sorry in advance if im wrong)

Carl Sagan Link: (start at 1:00)

https://dotsub.com/view/9063c8e8-e2f7-43b1-bae9-a43bbb204890
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: non-religious changes.
Post by: Stalin on August 31, 2016, 01:54:58 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Smoky_Mountains


SmokEy
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: non-religious changes.
Post by: Stalin on September 03, 2016, 08:25:42 AM
http://www.ezilon.com/maps/images/northamerica/Canada-map.gif (http://www.ezilon.com/maps/images/northamerica/Canada-map.gif)

Hudson Bay wasn't that big ...
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: non-religious changes. Hudson Bay Canada now huge
Post by: Stalin on September 04, 2016, 10:20:09 PM
Canon now has a weird bit on the c changed

Not just the logo, the cameras too
Title: Re: MandelaEffect: non-religious changes. Hudson Bay Canada now huge
Post by: Stalin on September 13, 2016, 06:23:23 PM
Lucy, you got some 'splaining to do" never happened in this timeline. Not once did he say it.