One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Jackstar 1960 on October 13, 2016, 07:39:24 PM
-
Batten down the hatches
RFC will announce operating loss
Rumored to be approx $2m
Let's see what creative accounting occurs here
-
Just add it to the other losses.
-
but yeah i wouldnt want to sack hartley or dimwit aye board.
next year will be more
-
Another honourable loss.
-
Was told we will make a modest profit.
-
Another loss by Hardwick!
How many losses are we going allow this guy to have? :banghead
Sack him now!
-
Another loss by Hardwick!
How many losses are we going allow this guy to have? :banghead
Sack him now!
Clearly Balme's fault!!!111111111!!!11eineinuno
-
If this turns out to be the case, it should finish the board.
Their entire mantra was premised upon being a solid financial position despite on field performances being poor.
Complete failure.
-
Sack penny, Benny, Dimma, Betamax
-
Here's an example of poo management across the board.
ME Bank logo still surrounds Punt rd despite pulling their s'ship 6 months ago.
What sort of rabble is this mob?
-
Embarrassing.
75000 members and cannot make a buck
Maybe saints and doggies will throw us some dollars
#equalization.
-
Was told we will make a modest profit.
And you believed them?
This board will be strongly challenged by the Malvern group and if smart enough, will,have out-accounted them in their preparation.
New board needed for the season start to ensure hardwick will be sacked before the halfway mark.
-
hilarious- my word there is some poo that comes out of punt road
-
Was told we will make a modest profit.
And you believed them?
This board will be strongly challenged by the Malvern group and if smart enough, will,have out-accounted them in their preparation.
New board needed for the season start to ensure hardwick will be sacked before the halfway mark.
Yes i do ;)
-
Batten down the hatches
RFC will announce operating loss
Rumored to be approx $2m
Let's see what creative accounting occurs here
This has been in the media for weeks
And your number is wrong. Loss yes that big no but nice try
And please spare me with the creative accounting rubbish. That's typical of people who want to scare monger. Accounts are prepared under law ... nothing creative about it
Ox, re ME bank - sponsorship ended 12 months ago
How we can make a loss, easily
No replacement for ME bank sponsorship
Crowds down on budget
Merch sales down on budget
Event revenues down pn budget
It aint rocket science
-
Batten down the hatches
RFC will announce operating loss
Rumored to be approx $2m
Let's see what creative accounting occurs here
This has been in the media for weeks
Ox, re ME bank - sponsorship ended 12 months ago - EVEN BETTER!!
How we can make a loss, easily
No replacement for ME bank sponsorship - Peggy, Benny, Dimmer
Crowds down on budget - Dimmer
Merch sales down on budget - deluded/creative financial projection
Event revenues down on budget - Peggy Benny
It aint rocket science
You're right, Willy - It ain't.
-
so let me get this right, ME bank is getting free advertisement on one of the busiest roads in Melbourne?
Well done Peggy Sue and Gail you incompetent fools.
-
Batten down the hatches
RFC will announce operating loss
Rumored to be approx $2m
Let's see what creative accounting occurs here
This has been in the media for weeks
And your number is wrong. Loss yes that big no but nice try
And please spare me with the creative accounting rubbish. That's typical of people who want to scare monger. Accounts are prepared under law ... nothing creative about it
Ox, re ME bank - sponsorship ended 12 months ago
How we can make a loss, easily
No replacement for ME bank sponsorship
Crowds down on budget
Merch sales down on budget
Event revenues down pn budget
It aint rocket science
And yet Collingwood will make plenty this year despite a 3rd consecutive finish outside the top 8. I guess that's the equivalent of rocket science
-
so let me get this right, ME bank is getting free advertisement on one of the busiest roads in Melbourne?
Well done Peggy Sue and Gail you incompetent fools.
Yeh.
It's stuffen unheard of.
-
They left it up because "It looks professional".
-
Batten down the hatches
RFC will announce operating loss
Rumored to be approx $2m
Let's see what creative accounting occurs here
This has been in the media for weeks
And your number is wrong. Loss yes that big no but nice try
And please spare me with the creative accounting rubbish. That's typical of people who want to scare monger. Accounts are prepared under law ... nothing creative about it
Ox, re ME bank - sponsorship ended 12 months ago
How we can make a loss, easily
No replacement for ME bank sponsorship
Crowds down on budget
Merch sales down on budget
Event revenues down pn budget
It aint rocket science
I just googled it
Nah no mention in the media WP
Was told there ain't much change out of $2m
-
(https://s12.postimg.org/kydbs5g4t/image.jpg)
For posterity.
-
I just googled it
Nah no mention in the media WP
Was told there ain't much change out of $2m
In the last 3 weeks its been reported in the Age twice
The australian once
And good old Dr Hiscock in his sook piece last week in the HUN said it
The number ive heard is less
And yet Collingwood will make plenty this year despite a 3rd consecutive finish outside the top 8. I guess that's the equivalent of rocket science
Firstly i never said it was acceptable all i said it was easy explained
Now onto the pies. Would think thats pretty obvious as well
Larger sponsorship deals than us (refer thread from weeks ago that had many up in arms)
Greater revenues from coteries
Better revenue deal with the MCG than we have.
More outside revenue streams than us read more pokie revenue
So you are roght it's not rocket science
-
Just wondering if we should start employing rocket scientists?
-
Just wondering if we should start employing rocket scientists?
:lol
I just fond extraordinary that people are apparently so shocked by this news considering our season
-
Not shocked.
More revelling in their imminent demise.
-
Just wondering if we should start employing rocket scientists?
:lol
I just fond extraordinary that people are apparently so shocked by this news considering our season
Ooh please.. the shock isn't the loss as that was guaranteed with this cow in charge. It's the figure of 2 mil, which I doubt is accurate IMO.
Without knowing what bombers loss was of years gone by I find it hard to believe we are at that level.
My guess is a half a mil loss
-
Sack the bums
-
Sack the bums
Gee I thought you might be sleeping in, it's taken a while this morning... ;D
-
Another honourable loss.
:snidegrin
-
Is it too late to bring back hiscock.
Benny Fail and Peggy O'No are out of their depths and people and the media that defend them have little idea. Without the supporters reaching into their pockets this board has done nothing.
-
I just googled it
Nah no mention in the media WP
Was told there ain't much change out of $2m
In the last 3 weeks its been reported in the Age twice
The australian once
And good old Dr Hiscock in his sook piece last week in the HUN said it
The number ive heard is less
And yet Collingwood will make plenty this year despite a 3rd consecutive finish outside the top 8. I guess that's the equivalent of rocket science
Firstly i never said it was acceptable all i said it was easy explained
Now onto the pies. Would think thats pretty obvious as well
Larger sponsorship deals than us (refer thread from weeks ago that had many up in arms)
Greater revenues from coteries
Better revenue deal with the MCG than we have.
More outside revenue streams than us read more pokie revenue
So you are roght it's not rocket science
So, whose accountable for finding alternative revenue?
If we assume that supporters are largely accountable for membership revenue - what impact does anyone at Richmond have for everything else?
At its most basic level, to have a worse deal than Collingwood on the stadium deal is ridiculous - our attendances are at least on a par with theirs over the last 4 years.
Again, it begs the question - what is their long term vision in this area and what exactly are they accountable to deliver to the members.
And finally, what is worse, a current board that has no idea what it is doing and is both unaccountable and complacent or a potential board that has no idea what it's doing but actually gives a poo?
-
What I'd like to know is, how can replacing O'neal, Gale and Hardwick put us in any worse a position?
Anyone??
Seems they've got the majority believing otherwise.
-
What I'd like to know is, how can replacing O'neal, Gale and Hardwick put us in any worse a position?
Anyone??
Seems they've got the majority believing otherwise.
Oh no Ox, we can't have that. We'd have chaos, with people rioting and looting and burning down punt road. We need stability.
-
We sound like a very fragile organisation.
Regardless of our year on field, we had over 70,000 members. That will go down in 2017 as some people have had enough of the clubs incompetence.
Why do we except a board that cannot keep up with the Coolingwoods of this world?? It's not that we are just a little off the pace, it's seems miles off.
So with our side failing this year combined with us losing money, why isn't their more change at the club?
We sign the same players, sign the same coach and the board basically stays the same.
Madness!!
-
Would also need to know costs incurred for the set up of the new fitness club venture down in Beaconsfield
-
Batten down the hatches
RFC will announce operating loss
Rumored to be approx $2m
Let's see what creative accounting occurs here
$2 million? how
-
Would also need to know costs incurred for the set up of the new fitness club venture down in Beaconsfield
A high margin business not
-
This is poohouse
-
So we are giving free advertising to ME Bank? That's nice of us.
-
We're a community-minded club.... :gotigers
-
Is it too late to bring back hiscock.
Benny Fail and Peggy O'No are out of their depths and people and the media that defend them have little idea. Without the supporters reaching into their pockets this board has done nothing.
Whosecock?
-
We're a community-minded club.... :gotigers
Yes we support banks for free :facepalm
-
We're a community-minded club.... :gotigers
Yes we support banks for free :facepalm
But we look professional.
-
And stable.
-
No. we LOOK like a stable.
-
No. we LOOK like a stable.
RFC. Perceptions not premierships TM
-
Hardwick met his KPI's & got a raise?
-
Hardwick met his KPI's & got a raise?
Yes has developed the best list since he has been at the club
-
The best list since the worst list since Fitzroy..... :clapping
-
So we are giving free advertising to ME Bank? That's nice of us.
Left it up in the hope they'll come back to us.
-
Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.
Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.
-
Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.
Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.
Rumours of 2m loss
800k negative doesn't look so bad?
-
Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.
Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.
Rumours of 2m loss
800k negative doesn't look so bad?
800k?....it was 80k
-
Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.
Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.
Rumours of 2m loss
800k negative doesn't look so bad?
its an $80,000 loss not $800,000 :P ::)
huge difference don't you think
-
all things considered that is an acceptable result
BLK going under - $300k
No PRO Naming sponsor - $500 k ??
poor on field attendance - $100k a game ? 1.1m
-
Would have made over $200k profit if it wasn't for $300k writedowns of bad debts.
-
all things considered that is an acceptable result
BLK going under - $300k
No PRO Naming sponsor - $500 k ??
poor on field attendance - $100k a game ? 1.1m
BLK who are in receivership not closed would not have any impact on this year's result. The events have happened today, that is only advised ASICS today so cannot be in our 2016 result as it has happened after clubs find year end
The $300k sponsorship bad debt would be Metro Solar and someone else
Naming rights to PRO would be over a million. For memory with ME Bank it was around the $1mil to $1.5mil a year
Match date revenues I agree would be around $1 million-plus to $1.5 mil and that's conservative
Dont think it is acceptable to make a loss but certainly could have been alot of worse