One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on December 02, 2016, 11:00:17 PM
-
This year's crop of 🐯 draftees #gotiges
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyocQMvUUAAS9wo.jpg)
https://twitter.com/Richmond_FC/status/804488048926785537
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
Yep, new sponsor is Puma. ;D
-
Mate is one a giant or two midgets
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
Yep, new sponsor is Puma. ;D
And had it confirmed (finally after asking 3 times) that Decor are no longer a sponsor either
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
Yep, new sponsor is Puma. ;D
And had it confirmed (finally after asking 3 times) that Decor are no longer a sponsor either
Out of interest, who were the bad debt sponsors referred to in the media a couple of months ago. Also mentioned in the Annual Report.
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
Yep, new sponsor is Puma. ;D
And had it confirmed (finally after asking 3 times) that Decor are no longer a sponsor either
Out of interest, who were the bad debt sponsors referred to in the media a couple of months ago. Also mentioned in the Annual Report.
Metro Solar & BLK I reckon
-
Thanks Taz
-
Poofs
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
Yep, new sponsor is Puma. ;D
And had it confirmed (finally after asking 3 times) that Decor are no longer a sponsor either
Out of interest, who were the bad debt sponsors referred to in the media a couple of months ago. Also mentioned in the Annual Report.
Metro Solar & BLK I reckon
Metro Solar, definitely been reported
But I am not so sure the other is BLK. Only because BLK only went into administration in mid Nov, they only reported to ASICS at the time. Clubs financial year finishes 31 October. Not sure how they could allow for a bad debt in last fin year unless they were aware of BLK issues before ASICS. Which raise more questions ....
But have asked 3 times for an answer on that and nil response on that too. Will get answer, AGM have their advantages
-
I hate how you have to ask. The lack of open and honest reporting from thus board is worrying.
-
I hate how you have to ask. The lack of open and honest reporting from thus board is worrying.
In this case I don't blame the board I blame the entire club
Just another example of the disconnect between members & club
Driven by the PR division of the club under the stewardship for the CEO who in 2016 seemed to be obsessed with treating us like morons and thinking lets only spin things positively
-
Driven by the PR division of the club under the stewardship for the CEO who in 2016 seemed to be obsessed with treating us like morons and thinking lets only spin things positively
Think it worked for a large portion of supporters
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
Yep, new sponsor is Puma. ;D
And had it confirmed (finally after asking 3 times) that Decor are no longer a sponsor either
Thank goodness for that. Being asked not to contain(er) my excitement every home game was embarrassing...
-
....and none of them will ever play a game in that kit....
Yep, new sponsor is Puma. ;D
And had it confirmed (finally after asking 3 times) that Decor are no longer a sponsor either
Thank goodness for that. Being asked not to contain(er) my excitement every home game was embarrassing...
While that promo wasn't great
Decor was an outstanding partner. Extremely easy to deal with from what I've heard and were always giving extras for raffles etc
Really disappointed to see them go.