One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Simonator on August 08, 2017, 04:11:54 PM
-
http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2017-08-08/returning-tigers-set-to-provide-a-boost
IF these two are in the finals side I will spew. Especially Hampson.
I liked what conca brought before the injury, but surely he would be so under done.
-
Would think Conca is a long way behind Short, Markov, C Ellis and even Hunt, Batchelor, Menadue and Graham.
Hampson however is only two injuries away - Jack and Nank.
-
Surely this is complete rubbish.conca is stuffn poo and Hampson doesn't deserve poo
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FzOWtnjBj4Q/U07CRKHCPSI/AAAAAAAAAks/cyrNlZbYtyc/s1600/crying+game.jpg)
-
(http://pa1.narvii.com/6447/3d3af39967e640050bf584254ef0f397a9cbb895_hq.gif)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BugSE4FCEAAuYWy.jpg)
-
hahahahahahahaahaha you couldnt make this poo up if you tried.
-
(https://preview.ibb.co/kfA0Wa/image.jpg)
-
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
-
Conca was playing fantastic football before he got injured and settled nicely in our backline and look really good until injury struck again.
-
But that's thw point bro.
His body is fkd and he has never shown enough to justify the persistence shown by the club.
Dckhead rushed him bk for the carlton final and he did a hammy in the first.
Can't handle the pressure of finals with that body.
-
I saw a recent photo of Conca - looked in great nick .
-
Any X-rays ?
-
Was almost worth of being rushed back into the team in '13. Was playing very decent football.
Bring him back through the ressies, if he starts playing above standard football at VFL I'd be happy with a game v Freo to see how he fares.
-
I saw a recent photo of Conca - looked in great nick .
I took this after he left Steven Dank's clinic....
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/dd/46/dd/dd46dda72e4c6a56f4fd1177b0776c3c.jpg)
-
Conca was playing fantastic football before he got injured and settled nicely in our backline and look really good until injury struck again.
I get the feeling your definition of "'fantastic' is a little loose of your own self dignity?
-
Conca should be given time in the VFL to prove his inclusion in the team. If he is having 25+ touches in defence he will come in.
Broad is on noticed clearly.
Pressure for position is good!
-
As much as I don't rate Conca I thought he actually played quite well in the 2015 EF....well at least until that turnover that pretty much cost us the match....... :gotigers
-
As much as I don't rate Conca I thought he actually played quite well in the 2015 EF....well at least until that turnover that pretty much cost us the match....... :gotigers
Yes, that happened right in front of me... :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
-
Conca was playing fantastic football before he got injured and settled nicely in our backline and look really good until injury struck again.
I get the feeling your definition of "'fantastic' is a little loose of your own self dignity?
Maybe open your eyes :banghead he was important in our first 7 or 8 games and playing fantastic footy.
-
Conca was playing fantastic football before he got injured and settled nicely in our backline and look really good until injury struck again.
I get the feeling your definition of "'fantastic' is a little loose of your own self dignity?
Maybe open your eyes :banghead he was important in our first 7 or 8 games and playing fantastic footy.
Fantastic!
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FzOWtnjBj4Q/U07CRKHCPSI/AAAAAAAAAks/cyrNlZbYtyc/s1600/crying+game.jpg)
:lol :rollin
-
Good conca is best 22
We don't get a lot of good conca
Sad thing is this year we were finally getting it
-
Conca was playing fantastic football before he got injured and settled nicely in our backline and look really good until injury struck again.
I get the feeling your definition of "'fantastic' is a little loose of your own self dignity?
Maybe open your eyes :banghead he was important in our first 7 or 8 games and playing fantastic footy.
He played some decent footy in the first 6 rounds with one game being better than decent.
A long long way off being fantastic.
Going into a final id rather have him than Brandy Ellis.
-
Can see them picking Hampson if he gets fit to play ruck allowing Nankervis to play fwd.
-
Conca should be given time in the VFL to prove his inclusion in the team. If he is having 25+ touches in defence he will come in.
Broad is on noticed clearly.
Pressure for position is good!
Sorry, but why is Broad on notice, who gave him this notice and why is it so clear???
:huh :huh :huh
-
Time to ignore form and load up the side with absolute pea hearts and pea brains for our greatest finals capitulation yet.
Hampson, Conca, Morris, Hunt and Griffiths.
-
Time to ignore form and load up the side with absolute pea hearts and pea brains for our greatest finals capitulation yet.
Hampson, Conca, Morris, Hunt and Griffiths.
:thumbsup
-
I saw a recent photo of Conca - looked in great nick .
I took this after he left Steven Dank's clinic....
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/dd/46/dd/dd46dda72e4c6a56f4fd1177b0776c3c.jpg)
Mr. Natural
-
Hopefully they have learnt from the last time they rushed Conca and Griff back into the team for finals and they did bugger all.
Have to entrust in what we have got so far with this season.
-
Conca has definitely lost his spot in the team . He was definitely playing well enough when we were 5-0 . Unfortunately his banged up body couldn't could last 1/4 of a season .
As far as I'm concerned - Hammer will be doing well to replace even Soldo . Any suggestion of his return to the senior side is "fake news" in my opinion. Won't happen .
-
If you understood Conca's injury you would not have described it as you have.
His linfrac injury was a result of being stepped on by Selwood an injury that any other player would have succumbed to in the same situation.
Both Atsbury and Conca have had bad runs with unusual injuries but as with Atsbury when he gets his body right he is an asset.
-
Take as long as you need, Shaun.
-
If you understood Conca's injury you would not have described it as you have.
His linfrac injury was a result of being stepped on by Selwood an injury that any other player would have succumbed to in the same situation.
If you understood injuries full stop you would know that you can't possibly come up with that assumption.
-
If you understood Conca's injury you would not have described it as you have.
His linfrac injury was a result of being stepped on by Selwood an injury that any other player would have succumbed to in the same situation.
Both Atsbury and Conca have had bad runs with unusual injuries but as with Atsbury when he gets his body right he is an asset.
Are you a doctor or do you have any medical or para-medical qualifications with regards to such injuries?
-
Lol.
-
If you understood Conca's injury you would not have described it as you have.
His linfrac injury was a result of being stepped on by Selwood an injury that any other player would have succumbed to in the same situation.
Both Atsbury and Conca have had bad runs with unusual injuries but as with Atsbury when he gets his body right he is an asset.
Are you a doctor or do you have any medical or para-medical qualifications with regards to such injuries?
Good call Dooks, we already have two doctors on here and don't need a third
-
I did some CPR training when I was an apprentice.
-
If you understood Conca's injury you would not have described it as you have.
His linfrac injury was a result of being stepped on by Selwood an injury that any other player would have succumbed to in the same situation.
Both Atsbury and Conca have had bad runs with unusual injuries but as with Atsbury when he gets his body right he is an asset.
Are you a doctor or do you have any medical or para-medical qualifications with regards to such injuries?
Good call Dooks, we already have two doctors on here and don't need a third
We could have a third and then have a bona fide conference for tax deduction purposes! :lol
-
I did some CPR training when I was an apprentice.
That will do, don't be afraid to throw a medical opinion around
-
I did some CPR training when I was an apprentice.
That will do, don't be afraid to throw a medical opinion around
Except you should call it a Lisfranc injury, not a linfranc injury because the latter does not exist.... :lol
-
If fit and well with a game or two in the seconds to get the feel back he should definitely walk straight back in. I'd dump Corey to make space.
-
I did some CPR training when I was an apprentice.
That will do, don't be afraid to throw a medical opinion around
I think from memory that it was me who nailed the original diagnosis on Conca. So, with all due respect, I pretty much deserve this status as well
-
The more the merrier! :cheers
-
Geez Geez we will end up with more Doctors than experts on here soon
-
Geez Geez we will end up with more Doctors than experts on here soon
Wow, wow, wow, let's not trivialise the profession lads :thumbsdown
-
(https://pics.me.me/me-as-a-doctor-it-hurts-when-i-do-this-17977704.png)
-
(https://68.media.tumblr.com/e04654acf2a361a57f892f9009b37bae/tumblr_oknzwp0L051s1bdg8o1_500.jpg)
-
Lol!!!
Considering putting a stent in her left radial artery would do absolutely nothing for an occlusion to the external iliac artery because the former is in your forearm and the latter is in your pelvis, I think Matt form the vascular lab needs to find a new job! :lol
-
(http://www.kampkrusty.altervista.org/img/Seasons/S04E11_30.png)
-
For what its worth, Ive done my Duke of Edinburgh. I also dance a mean Pride of Erin.
-
Geez Geez we will end up with more Doctors than experts on here soon
I think that has already happened.
:thumbsup
-
Lol!!!
Considering putting a stent in her left radial artery would do absolutely nothing for an occlusion to the external iliac artery because the former is in your forearm and the latter is in your pelvis, I think Matt form the vascular lab needs to find a new job! :lol
Matt never specified where the stent was put :shh
-
Richmond has reinstated Shaun Hampson to the senior list from the long-term injury list.
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/895543019557969920
-
Yes! Halfstep's secret finals weapon! :clapping
-
Richmond has reinstated Shaun Hampson to the senior list from the long-term injury list.
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/895543019557969920
Accountant's advice?
-
Self implosion imminent
-
It's like a disaster unfolding in front of your eyes where you can't do anything about it but you know how it will hurt you..... :banghead
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
-
I hate myself
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
Yes.
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
It's a good point.
Soldo is doing the bare minimum playing at this level and a fit Hampson is a better player at this stage.
I wouldn't play either if it were up to me but it gives Nank a chop out and a chance to play forward.
He is a pretty decent option as a forward with his mobility. He is not just your mark, kick big man.
-
Well stuff me I have heard it all now
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
It's a good point.
Soldo is doing the bare minimum playing at this level and a fit Hampson is a better player at this stage.
I wouldn't play either if it were up to me but it gives Nank a chop out and a chance to play forward.
He is a pretty decent option as a forward with his mobility. He is not just your mark, kick big man.
Maybe Hampson was better at his peak fitness but his mobility and fitness would have to be at Ann time low right now, if he plays in a final you know we have not learnt a single thing. I'd rather Elton, Griffiths, soldo or even no 2nd ruck at all
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
you dont think one is a has been pathetic excuse for a footballer and the other is a developing ruckman who needs game time?
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
It's a good point.
Soldo is doing the bare minimum playing at this level and a fit Hampson is a better player at this stage.
I wouldn't play either if it were up to me but it gives Nank a chop out and a chance to play forward.
He is a pretty decent option as a forward with his mobility. He is not just your mark, kick big man.
Maybe Hampson was better at his peak fitness but his mobility and fitness would have to be at Ann time low right now, if he plays in a final you know we have not learnt a single thing. I'd rather Elton, Griffiths, soldo or even no 2nd ruck at all
Exactly
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
you dont think one is a has been pathetic excuse for a footballer and the other is a developing ruckman who needs game time?
You would think it is stuffing obvious wouldn't you
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
you dont think one is a has been pathetic excuse for a footballer and the other is a developing ruckman who needs game time?
Finally some sense :clapping
-
Will Conca and Hammer be able to play in the VFL final series ??
-
Will Conca and Hammer be able to play in the VFL final series ??
I believe so, Mat. Both will have played at least a game this year at either AFL or VFL level by finals time and both haven't played AFL since July 1.
20. Participation in VFL Finals
(a) A Player who has not played in at least one AFL, VFL Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Match in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in the Senior Grade Finals Series.
(b) Subject to Rule 20(c) below, a Player who has played in an AFL Home and Away Match after 1 July in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in VFL Senior Grade or Development League Finals Series Matches unless that Player has played in a combined total of at least six (6) Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Matches in the same season.
(c) A Player who has not played in at least two (2) Development League Home and Away Matches in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in a Development League Finals Series Match unless, immediately prior to selection:
(i) the Player has missed at least ten (10) consecutive VFL Home and Away Matches through injury; and
(ii) the Player’s Club remains active in the VFL Senior Grade Finals Series.
(d) A Player who has played in more than eight (8 ) VFL Senior Grade Home and Away Matches will be ineligible to play in Development League Final Series Matches unless that Player has played in at least six (6) Development League Home and Away Matches.
(e) Despite any other provision of this Rule 20, but subject to Rule 20(f), where a Club has both its AFL and VFL Senior Teams engaged on the same weekend, any Player may be selected to play in the VFL Senior Team so long as that Player has played in at least one AFL or VFL Senior Grade Home and Away Match or Development League Home and Away Match in that relevant season.
(f) When an AFL Club is eliminated from the AFL Final Series on the same weekend as the VFL Grand Final, the selection of players in the VFL Senior Grade team shall be unrestricted, provided the player has participated in at least one (AFL or VFL) Senior Grade or AFL Victoria Development League match in the relevant season.
(g) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, where a Club does not field a Development League Team, an AFL listed Player must:
(i) qualify under Regulation 20(b); and
(ii) have played no more than 12 AFL Home and Away Matches,
to be eligible to play in VFL Finals Series Matches.
(h) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, in circumstances where:
(i) an AFL Club is participating in the AFL Finals Series, but is not required to play on a particular weekend (by virtue of winning its AFL Qualifying Final and earning a one-week break before its AFL Preliminary Final); and
(ii) the AFL Club’s VFL team is playing on that weekend,
any AFL listed player who did not play in the AFL Qualifying Final will be eligible to play in the Club’s VFL team in the week in which the AFL Club has a one-week break.
(I) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, in circumstances where:
(i) an AFL Club is participating in the AFL Finals Series, but is not playing on the weekend of the AFL bye weekend after the final round of the AFL home and away season; and
(ii) the AFL Club’s VFL team is playing on that weekend,
any AFL listed player who did not play in the AFL Club’s AFL team in the final round of the AFL home and away season will be eligible to play in the Club’s VFL team in the AFL bye round after the final round of the AFL home and away season.
(j) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, the CEO of AFL Victoria (or nominee) may deem any Player eligible to play in any VFL Finals Series Match.
http://websites.sportstg.com/assoc_page.cgi?c=1-118-0-0-0&sID=277333
-
I'd rather bring back Maric than Hamspud...
-
I'd rather bring back Maric than Hamspud...
:clapping :clapping
:bow :bow
:thumbsup :thumbsup
-
I'd rather bring back Maric than Hamspud...
Honestly don't know why they haven't been playing Maric instead of Soldo...
-
Let's be honest, would he be worse than Soldo ATM?
you dont think one is a has been pathetic excuse for a footballer and the other is a developing ruckman who needs game time?
Mate, I'm just mentally preparing for the inevitable. What you say is logical (and yes the thought crossed my mind) but I need to prepare.
-
Hahahah now it makes sense.
The only question remains is which week it happens in
I'm tipping week 1 of finals, but it could be against the saints
Either way it's going to be the hammer show ladies and gents
-
I'd rather bring back Maric than Hamspud...
I'd rather dig up Roy Wright than play either of them