One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: H Tiger on March 08, 2006, 01:27:20 PM

Title: 16 goals a game
Post by: H Tiger on March 08, 2006, 01:27:20 PM
TW publically declared that was the plan last year.

Is it still the plan?

Or was it just membership advertising?

HT
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: WilliamPowell on March 08, 2006, 03:08:31 PM
TW publically declared that was the plan last year.

Is it still the plan?

Or was it just membership advertising?

HT

Still the plan HT. Definitely still the plan
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: mightytiges on March 08, 2006, 05:32:34 PM
We only achieved 16 goals or more six times last year (won 4 lost 2) and conceded 16 or more goals nine times (1-8). It would still definitely be one of Wallace's key indicators as kicking 16 goals most weeks = finals. We didn't do that last year averaging only about 13 1/2.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: letsgetiton! on March 08, 2006, 07:24:42 PM
should aim for 20, aim high and dont stop till u get there. 2o is a very tall order, but just missing 20, will get u 16-19, usualla win, aiming for 16, and dropping short will get u 12-15, usually a loss.

Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: bluey_21 on March 09, 2006, 09:34:09 PM
should aim for 20, aim high and dont stop till u get there. 2o is a very tall order, but just missing 20, will get u 16-19, usualla win, aiming for 16, and dropping short will get u 12-15, usually a loss.



we need to aim as high as possible
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: mightytiges on April 10, 2006, 04:47:20 AM
Two rounds down and not even close to the 16 goal target. Browny not being 100% and Richo being well held/screwed by gutless umpiring  :scream is hurting our goalscoring ability. We are still getting nowhere near enough goals out of our midfield either.

Is part of Richo's future playing as a loose big man in defence? 
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Mopsy on April 10, 2006, 11:49:33 AM

Is part of Richo's future playing as a loose big man in defence? 
Quote
Yep!!! I have said that all along!! It's no good having someone playing full forward if they can't kick straight
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Tiger Spirit on April 10, 2006, 01:29:28 PM
Is part of Richo's future playing as a loose big man in defence?

Only if we aren’t able to get the ball down to the forwards often enough and the ball spends most of the time in the opposition’s forward half. :P
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Bulluss on April 10, 2006, 01:44:19 PM
We need to get some other people to become multiple goal kickers.

Obviously Browny is stuggling a little to get back up to speed at the moment.

But we really need to get another couple of players who can kick multiple goals on a regular occasion

Maybe Jackson can become one of those players. Limbach is another but appears a way off still.

Hughes may get a game sooner rather than later and i would think he is a better option than Pattison.

Patto is just far too slow for mine. I would rather play Knobel off the becnh than have Patto running around. Knobel also has great size
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: mightytiges on April 10, 2006, 03:43:43 PM
Only if we aren’t able to get the ball down to the forwards often enough and the ball spends most of the time in the opposition’s forward half. :P

That's true TS. We were on the wrong side of the inside 50 count.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: H Tiger on April 10, 2006, 04:53:44 PM

Is part of Richo's future playing as a loose big man in defence? 

Pls god NO!

Richo shouldn't be aloud out of our forward fifty. Do we really want to regularly see him try to take on and beat men in the backline after he has just marked over the top of them? Do we want to see Richo in the open and decide to take a couple of running bounces ala Friday?

We already have two backmen this year who we are seeing struggling with a game requiring quicker legs, thinking and better skills, do we really need one more?
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: the_boy_jake on April 10, 2006, 08:09:13 PM
We need to get some other people to become multiple goal kickers.


I agree. We should be looking at 9-10 individual goalkickers every game. We had 6 against the Saints. It is quite embarassing that Richo is still often the only option. The Cats had 9 individuals, even though Kingsley kicked 8. The Dogs shared their 20 goals between 12 players.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on April 11, 2006, 12:57:04 AM

Is part of Richo's future playing as a loose big man in defence? 

Pls god NO!

Richo shouldn't be aloud out of our forward fifty. Do we really want to regularly see him try to take on and beat men in the backline after he has just marked over the top of them? Do we want to see Richo in the open and decide to take a couple of running bounces ala Friday?

We already have two backmen this year who we are seeing struggling with a game requiring quicker legs, thinking and better skills, do we really need one more?

I agree totally.  I almost close my eyes when I see him back there.  I f he turns it over there is only 5-10 seconds before they score were as the other end you at least get 20 -30 seconds and a chance to get it back.  I sugest a team rule should be no Richo's in the back half of the ground.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Capt. Revenge on April 11, 2006, 06:16:36 PM
forget 16 goals!.  i'd settle for 16 points if we won!

forget rhetoriric.  applaud endeavour and victory.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: mightytiges on May 02, 2006, 06:13:51 PM
Going by our list of goalkickers this year we still don't get enough goals out of our midfielders and we're still heavily reliant on Richo. We also haven't yet cracked the ton this year and have the second lowest "for" tally. On the positive side Pettifer is continuing on from  last year and Paddy, Simmo and Tivs are chipping in up forward. 

1. Matthew Richardson     12     
2. Kayne Pettifer               7
3. Patrick Bowden             7
4. Troy Simmonds            5
5. Greg Tivendale        4
6. Daniel Jackson              4
7. Chris Hyde               3
8. Greg Stafford                3
9. Shane Tuck                3
10. Andrew Krakouer          2
11. Brett Deledio            2
12. Richard  Tambling     2
13. Kane Johnson           2
14. Nathan Foley            1

15. Nathan Brown            1
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: one-eyed on May 06, 2008, 06:55:43 PM
Bump.

It's taken 3 and a bit years but over the past month we've finally been around or over the promised magical 16 goal mark.

v Fremantle    20.17-137       
v Bulldogs      20.10-130       
v Hawthorn     15.04-94         
v St Kilda        16.11-107       
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Tigermonk on May 06, 2008, 09:35:26 PM
need at least 20 goals per game to even think of winning these days
30 goals when you play Geelong  ;D
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 06, 2008, 10:34:32 PM
We only achieved 16 goals or more six times last year (won 4 lost 2) and conceded 16 or more goals nine times (1-8). It would still definitely be one of Wallace's key indicators as kicking 16 goals most weeks = finals. We didn't do that last year averaging only about 13 1/2.

We achieved 16 gls or more in 3 games last yr.
Melb 18 16 124
Ess   17 17 119
Coll   18 8 116
All wins
although we kicked 100 points in a game against the Saints Freo and Port last yr we kicked 15 goals and lost all 3. We also kicked 15 8 98 against Carltank in Rd 1 also. We need to establish a winning culture with a fast moving skilled brand of footy with very few skill error s and the high scores then will slowly but surely be racked up.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Tigermonk on May 07, 2008, 08:14:10 AM
we need a forward line that can defend & preasure & not let it out so easy after points
We also need a backline who can get the ball out after points quickly by long attacking kicks instead of stuffing around with it
thats where we lose all games & have done for many years but its never corrected
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: one-eyed on May 07, 2008, 04:06:38 PM
We're averaging right on 16 goals according to Hun:

Bulldogs       19.7
Hawthorn      18.3
Geelong        16.9
Richmond     16.0
Collingwood  15.9
Port Adel.     15.3
Carlton         14.9
Adelaide       14.9
Essendon      14.7
Brisbane       14.1
North Melb.   13.7
St Kilda        13.6
Sydney         12.7
Fremantle     12.4
Melbourne     11.0
West Coast    10.6

Also the top 3 and bottom 3 match the current ladder.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Mr Magic on May 07, 2008, 06:59:39 PM
Most pleasing.
If we can keep that up some wins will follow soon enough. 8)
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: one-eyed on July 22, 2008, 05:45:47 PM
It's taken 4 years but we're finally kicking 16 goals or more in the majority of our games and when we've reached the magical 16 goal mark our record this year is 7 wins plus the dogs' draw and the 3-point loss to the Saints.

2004:  0 - Spud's last year
2005:  6 - Plough's first year
2006:  4
2007:  3
2008:  9*  (from 16 games)

It's our most since 1996 which was also 9 times (but from 22 games). You have to go back to the 80's all out attacking footy to better it.

'88 - 9
'86 - 9
'85 - 11
'82 - 15
'81 - 12
'80 - 14

http://stats.rleague.com/afl/teams/richmond/allgames.html
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Tigermonk on July 22, 2008, 06:06:48 PM
still believe we need to kick 18 to 20 goals to win in the modern game MT
can see a improvement  :thumbsup
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: mightytiges on July 22, 2008, 07:11:09 PM
still believe we need to kick 18 to 20 goals to win in the modern game MT
can see a improvement  :thumbsup
Yeah that's true but I'm just regurgitating a Wallace 2004 statement when he was first appointed. We've kicked 20 goals or more 4 times this year for 4 wins.

Just on those stats no wonder a lot of people pine for 80's footy. Mind you the quarters back then were 25 minutes plus time on without the clock stopping at stoppages IIRC. Also just further proof the '82 side was one of the best sides never to win a flag.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on July 22, 2008, 07:18:19 PM
still believe we need to kick 18 to 20 goals to win in the modern game MT
can see a improvement  :thumbsup
Yeah that's true but I'm just regurgitating a Wallace 2004 statement when he was first appointed. We've kicked 20 goals or more 4 times this year for 4 wins.

Just on those stats no wonder a lot of people pine for 80's footy. Mind you the quarters back then were 25 minutes plus time on without the clock stopping at stoppages IIRC. Also just further proof the '82 side was one of the best sides never to win a flag.

Yep MT the 72 one was even better than the 82 side. Kicked 22 goals in the Grannie and still lost. :banghead
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Tigermonk on July 22, 2008, 07:44:33 PM
still believe we need to kick 18 to 20 goals to win in the modern game MT
can see a improvement  :thumbsup
Yeah that's true but I'm just regurgitating a Wallace 2004 statement when he was first appointed. We've kicked 20 goals or more 4 times this year for 4 wins.

Just on those stats no wonder a lot of people pine for 80's footy. Mind you the quarters back then were 25 minutes plus time on without the clock stopping at stoppages IIRC. Also just further proof the '82 side was one of the best sides never to win a flag.

yes amazing what some t@s & pussy can do to a mans mind  ;D that day l remember her like she was running around in my room  :lol
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: one-eyed on July 29, 2008, 03:06:01 PM
Make that 10 times from 17 games. 4th best this year in the AFL.

2004:  0 - Spud's last year
2005:  6 - Plough's first year
2006:  4
2007:  3
2008:  10*  (from 17 games)


The AFL’s complete century scorers’ list for 2008 is:

13 – Geelong, Western Bulldogs
11 – Hawthorn
10 – Richmond
9 – Brisbane, Carlton, Collingwood
8 – Sydney
7 – Essendon, North Melbourne, Port Adelaide
6 – Adelaide, St Kilda
5 – Fremantle
2 – West Coast
1 – Melbourne
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: blaisee on July 29, 2008, 03:16:46 PM
Make that 10 times from 17 games. 4th best this year in the AFL.

2004:  0 - Spud's last year
2005:  6 - Plough's first year
2006:  4
2007:  3
2008:  10*  (from 17 games)


The AFL’s complete century scorers’ list for 2008 is:

13 – Geelong, Western Bulldogs
11 – Hawthorn
10 – Richmond
9 – Brisbane, Carlton, Collingwood
8 – Sydney
7 – Essendon, North Melbourne, Port Adelaide
6 – Adelaide, St Kilda
5 – Fremantle
2 – West Coast
1 – Melbourne



wallet promised us that he wants us to play an attacking brand of football, and there really cannot be any deabte about that at the moment ;)
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Ox on July 29, 2008, 03:29:13 PM
here hear.

Support the tanned one  :thumbsup
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: TFL on July 29, 2008, 03:32:40 PM
Its great to watch when we are attacking and in full flight!!!

Go Tigers
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: tigersalive on July 29, 2008, 03:50:32 PM
Make that 10 times from 17 games. 4th best this year in the AFL.

2004:  0 - Spud's last year
2005:  6 - Plough's first year
2006:  4
2007:  3
2008:  10*  (from 17 games)


The AFL’s complete century scorers’ list for 2008 is:

13 – Geelong, Western Bulldogs
11 – Hawthorn
10 – Richmond
9 – Brisbane, Carlton, Collingwood
8 – Sydney
7 – Essendon, North Melbourne, Port Adelaide
6 – Adelaide, St Kilda
5 – Fremantle
2 – West Coast
1 – Melbourne


Excellent, right behind the top 3 teams in the competition.  :thumbsup  :clapping

Now all we need is for our inexperienced, young defence to further mature, which will come, to stop the leakage at that end and we're on the right track.  :cheers
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Infamy on July 29, 2008, 05:29:02 PM
I think the defence is doing a pretty good job under immense pressure.
It's the midfield that needs to give them a hand stopping the quick entry that's impossible to beat as a defender
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Tigermonk on July 29, 2008, 08:38:16 PM
as l said before our team needs to score 18-20 goals min to win games, 16 goals just aint enough in modern day football
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: tigersalive on July 29, 2008, 10:22:14 PM
I think the defence is doing a pretty good job under immense pressure.
It's the midfield that needs to give them a hand stopping the quick entry that's impossible to beat as a defender

I do agree for a young backline they're doing a terrific job for where they are in their development.

We do need a bit more defensive intensity from the mids but I see that rising as well.  :thumbsup

They'll get there, but with such a young backline they're going to make mistakes, just as long as they all learn from it.  :thumbsup
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: mightytiges on July 30, 2008, 01:37:47 AM
I think the defence is doing a pretty good job under immense pressure.
It's the midfield that needs to give them a hand stopping the quick entry that's impossible to beat as a defender
Agree infamy. It's when we've been smashed out of the centre or turnover the footy something chronically through dumb play that we leak like a seive. Did it again against Brisbane in the first 15 minutes of the 3rd quarter, and the Bombers, and the Dees, and Adelaide, and Geelong  :P. The problem in those bad quarters occurs at the centre bounces and in the midfield. Hopefully with more maturity and more depth in the next few years as others come through like Connors we can get a more even and consistent effort out of our midfield.     
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: mightytiges on September 03, 2008, 10:02:08 PM
We ended up with 12 times reaching 16 goals this year and when we scored 100 points or more this year we had a 11-1-1 record. 5th highest scoring team too. Need to work on our defensive efforts all over the park though. Every time we kept the opposition to below 100 we won but we only did that 8 times.
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Infamy on September 03, 2008, 10:12:47 PM
I don't remember us getting taken apart by a tall forward all year though

With a stronger midfield we will reduce the goals kicked by opposition midfielders
Plus we need a small defender who can stop us getting cut up by the goal sneaks
Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: cub on September 03, 2008, 10:32:41 PM
as l said before our team needs to score 18-20 goals min to win games, 16 goals just aint enough in modern day football

This years top 4 Average goals per game

Geelong 17.8
Hawks 16.1
Bulldogs 16.9
Saints 14.0

Tigers 15.0

Yep right again Mr expert

Thinking Infamy is a bit closer the mark.

Cogs to come back and Cothin with a preseason should help in the middle department.
Small defender would be good too, rodents like Milne allways have a field day on us ....

Title: Re: 16 goals a game
Post by: Judge Roughneck on September 03, 2008, 10:51:21 PM

Re: 16 goals a game
« Reply #14 on: May 02, 2006, 06:13:51 pm »

Going by our list of goalkickers this year we still don't get enough goals out of our midfielders and we're still heavily reliant on Richo. We also haven't yet cracked the ton this year and have the second lowest "for" tally. On the positive side Pettifer is continuing on from  last year and Paddy, Simmo and Tivs are chipping in up forward. 

1. Matthew Richardson     12     
2. Kayne Pettifer               7
3. Patrick Bowden             7
4. Troy Simmonds            5
5. Greg Tivendale        4
6. Daniel Jackson              4
7. Chris Hyde               3
8. Greg Stafford                3
9. Shane Tuck                3
10. Andrew Krakouer          2
11. Brett Deledio            2
12. Richard  Tambling     2
13. Kane Johnson           2
14. Nathan Foley            1
15. Nathan Brown            1

Its good than in 2 years our forward line now does not have Richo. IMO he needs to play the rest of his carrer in is floating wing role and allow the forward line to develop. He is still prone to kicking bags of goals when playing in midfield and resting stuff.

We kicked some large scores this year, and fond some new goal kickers.

Without a star young forward we are going to have to kick goals from blokes like: Brown, Reiwoldt, Morton, Connors. And goal kicking midfeilders: Deledio, Cotchin, Tambling, Edwards, Whte etc.

Collard isabit of a wildcard.