One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on March 28, 2019, 10:33:30 PM
-
High push with the forearm on Elliot. Elliot got up straight away.
Is Grimesy in trouble?
-
The way the umpires treated us tonight he’ll get a week for sure ::)
-
If Mumford got off, so should Grimes... :shh
-
1 week according to a fan page on FB
-
Confirmed on AFL website.
This reminds of that Melbourne loss a few years back.
-
(https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/696c38fd-6037-42cd-8fdc-e37ca7977508.png)
-
Can Grimes say he was concussed that's why he got him high?
:shh 2 weeks cox 1 for grimes 1 for delayed effects resulting in Elliot getting hit :lol
-
Grimes not challenging his one week suspension.
https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-04-01/cox-off-to-tribunal-to-stuff
-
He's not challenging? Claw was right....coward :shh
-
Thats soft
-
It's soft by the club not to challenge.
-
It's soft by the club not to challenge.
I agree. Mumford got off for worse!
-
We never challenge these, clubs getting soft. Letting injured players fly oversees during game week. Good cause I get it. These things will start coming to a head if we start losing.
-
Big Cox-Ucker got off.....#onlyblack&whitelivesmatter :shh
-
I'm sure if they thought it was rubbish they would have challenged.
Can't believe the comments in here, it's a week ban ffs.
:rollin
-
Big Cox should have gotten off- that was nothing IMO.
Grimes’ wasn’t much worse in terms of force, but it didn’t look all that good.
Fair result IMO.
-
Rightly or wrongly, by the letter of the law Cox shouldn't have gotten off had he been a Richmond player he wouldn't have....:shh
-
I dont like the rules they have in place nowadays as to me they are trying to take all the physicality out of the game.
With that said I dont think they could ever change what Cox did down to reckless. He looked at grimes as he was doing it, no way that wasn't intentional