One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: Ox on July 15, 2006, 07:06:10 PM
-
Image is too gay i rekkon.
Time to guve them some Punt Road street cred.
They both need to be arrested for assault or posession,
Robinson wouldn't have combed Joels hair with his stops if say,
Joel had been in drug rehab.
-
Lol, them 2 pass it to one another way too much :lol
-
Winning a contested possession here or there would lend them some street cred. Looking for the one-two's, give and recieves, playing wide of their men and racking up useless stats gives them nothing but dream team and homosexual clout.
-
They both need to be arrested for assault or posession,
ROFLAMO@them being arrested for "possession", how fitting woudl that be.
-
Winning a contested possession here or there would lend them some street cred. Looking for the one-two's, give and recieves, playing wide of their men and racking up useless stats gives them nothing but dream team and homosexual clout.
Yeah, for Paddy, and Joel for that matter. Those possesions only count if they have come from an opposition kick and they have diffused a potential goal.
-
They both need to be arrested for assault or posession,
ROFLAMO@them being arrested for "possession", how fitting woudl that be.
Make that over-possession
-
johncock and mcleod always look 4 each other nothing is said about that
worsfold and mckenna did too..............nothing was ever said about that.
if joel and paddy were not brothers there would be no issue.
johnson and smiith at the doggies are the same, nothing ever said.
lets face facts, if u r in defence and have to give the ball off, who do u give it to, the next best available option and player, or someone else 4 the sake of it.
joel and paddy only share the ball the way they do because they are our two best options to run the ball out of defence, and thats why terry has no issue about the whole thing.
it is just another media beat up that would not exist if they were not brothers
-
johncock and mcleod always look 4 each other nothing is said about that
worsfold and mckenna did too..............nothing was ever said about that.
if joel and paddy were not brothers there would be no issue.
johnson and smiith at the doggies are the same, nothing ever said.
lets face facts, if u r in defence and have to give the ball off, who do u give it to, the next best available option and player, or someone else 4 the sake of it.
joel and paddy only share the ball the way they do because they are our two best options to run the ball out of defence, and thats why terry has no issue about the whole thing.
it is just another media beat up that would not exist if they were not brothers
Agreed :thumbsup