One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on August 01, 2006, 02:31:52 AM

Title: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: one-eyed on August 01, 2006, 02:31:52 AM
Who do you guys and gals reckon should come in and go out?

Should Limbach play?
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: letsgetiton! on August 01, 2006, 07:18:49 AM
i will keep my opinion on this thread  to myself because it is obvious my opinion will be wrong and i dont wanna offend all those precious souls on this site
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: wayne on August 01, 2006, 07:51:39 AM
Well, it looks as though we could lose Staff, Simmonds and maybe Raines. Brown is out definitely.

Rodan and Hall should be dropped.

Thats 6 possible changes, no Kellaway still.

Patto, Krak if he's ok, Limbach, Roach, Humm, JON.

Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: julzqld on August 01, 2006, 08:01:24 AM
i will keep my opinion on this thread  to myself because it is obvious my opinion will be wrong and i dont wanna offend all those precious souls on this site
Build a bridge mate.
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: letsgetiton! on August 01, 2006, 09:42:49 AM
str8 to ur place!
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: letsgetiton! on August 01, 2006, 09:49:51 AM
anyway , i know this wont happen, but its best terry forgets the thought of playing finals and thinks whats best to develop these kids 4 the future and get some mileage in their legs

drop for the rest of the season:
tiv, hall, rodan, chaffey, staff(suspended or not cos they may appreal) as they are not part of our future.

bring in : krak if it, patto, JON, mguane, humm,limbach  and give roach a few weks to prove himself


they must play schulz in the back half for the rest of the yr
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: cub on August 01, 2006, 10:16:33 AM
Outside the box here

Play the old hacks see if they can play any good to increase their trade value (if they have any)

Keep the kids at Coburg - For the young kids VFL finals football would be just as good exposure, and with the side full of them they could go all the way and win the Granny.

Would be great for confidence and would keep me entertained in September, which I dont think I will get in the AFL finals.
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: letsgetiton! on August 01, 2006, 10:29:15 AM
not a bad idea at all
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 01, 2006, 10:35:44 AM
bring in : krak if it, patto, JON, mguane, humm,limbach  and give roach a few weks to prove himself

I don't think Limbach is ready for AFL footy - not because I doubt his ability but I worry about his size. He's a great height but he is too light.

Having said that if there was one game you'd look at bringing him in for it would be this against the Doggies (the Dog against the Dogs :P) because size wise the Bullies are not a big bodied team so it could work.

I'd also consider throwing Howat in there as well - might as well play them all before the seasons out
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: letsgetiton! on August 01, 2006, 11:38:44 AM
bring in : krak if it, patto, JON, mguane, humm,limbach  and give roach a few weks to prove himself

I don't think Limbach is ready for AFL footy - not because I doubt his ability but I worry about his size. He's a great height but he is too light.

Having said that if there was one game you'd look at bringing him in for it would be this against the Doggies (the Dog against the Dogs :P) because size wise the Bullies are not a big bodied team so it could work.

I'd also consider throwing Howat in there as well - might as well play them all before the seasons out

howat, why not, i agree,

and also about limbachs size, i know he is light on, but say he plays as a leading fwd, as long as he holds his marks and delivery is good, like u said, v the dogs, his size i feel wont be an issue
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: WilliamPowell on August 01, 2006, 12:05:20 PM
and also about limbachs size, i know he is light on, but say he plays as a leading fwd, as long as he holds his marks and delivery is good, like u said, v the dogs, his size i feel wont be an issue

Yeah that's what I reckon.

Just on his leading - geez I noticed it on Sunday, how quick off the mark the kid is - against the bigger Port Melb bloke it didn't matter about Limbach's size - he was always a least a metre in front  :thumbsup
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on August 01, 2006, 02:57:10 PM

howat, why not, i agree,

and also about limbachs size, i know he is light on, but say he plays as a leading fwd, as long as he holds his marks and delivery is good, like u said, v the dogs, his size i feel wont be an issue

DELIVERY IS GOOD     now thats a good one X :rollin :rollin
Title: Re: Changes this week for the Dogs game?
Post by: mightytiges on August 01, 2006, 04:56:26 PM
Well, it looks as though we could lose Staff, Simmonds and maybe Raines. Brown is out definitely.

Rodan and Hall should be dropped.

Thats 6 possible changes, no Kellaway still.

Patto, Krak if he's ok, Limbach, Roach, Humm, JON.

With the exception of Humm I agree wayne.

Gas (if ok) in for Razor.
Roach in for Rainesy (if suspended).
Patto in for Simmo.
Limbach in for Staff (if suspended).
Krak (if ok) in for Browny.
JON in for Rodan.

So a spine of:

Gas
Schulz
Patto
Richo
Limbach

If the Dogs go with only one tall forward then Joel or Paddy can move to CHB and Patto and Schulz can alternate in the ruck with Richo helping out around the ground forward of centre with ball-ups and throw-ins.
Title: Tigers short on big men - Wallace
Post by: one-eyed on August 01, 2006, 05:28:20 PM
Tigers short on big men
4:40:14 PM Tue 1 August, 2006
Mark Rasmussen
Sportal for afl.com.au

It shapes as an important tribunal hearing with coach Terry Wallace admitting that without Trent Knobel, Simmonds and Stafford, the Tigers' ruck stocks are virtually bare.

"We don't have many options," Wallace said from Punt road on Tuesday.

"We hope Greg Stafford. That's our planning and that's what we're hoping for. If he doesn't (come up) we don't have many alternatives left.

"We've used Adam Pattison before in a similar role and Ray Hall, who can play as mobile ruckman. There's not many options," he said.

Full article at: http://richmondfc.com.au/default.asp?pg=news&spg=display&articleid=285651