One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on January 25, 2007, 04:14:07 PM

Title: How wrong can you be
Post by: one-eyed on January 25, 2007, 04:14:07 PM
The 16 Least Physically Intimidating Players In The AFL
aflinsider.net
January 24th 2007 20:49

Some of these players are stars, some of them are not, but they all have in common the lack of a physical presence on the field. Some are just naturally small, others are too placid, some need to train hard and eat their vitamins, but none of them will be worrying people in a darkened alley or on the AFL playing field.

Richmond:
Nathan Foley  ???
If he was nicknamed Mick Foley instead of Axel Foley it might be different. But maybe Kingsley will become the player here instead.

http://www.aflinsider.net/the-16-least-physically-intimidating-players-in-the-afl/

He may be short but Foles has no fear.
(http://cache.gettyimages.com/xc/73040676.jpg?v=1&c=MS_GINS&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF193CC300C081D9F47000541F093FE2FB018E884322CF39532F0)
Title: Re: How wrong can you be
Post by: julzqld on January 25, 2007, 04:28:26 PM
Note that Ottens is runner-up to Steven King for Geelong :lol
Title: Re: How wrong can you be
Post by: Moi on January 25, 2007, 04:57:35 PM
The 16 Least Physically Intimidating Players In The AFL
aflinsider.net
January 24th 2007 20:49

Some of these players are stars, some of them are not, but they all have in common the lack of a physical presence on the field. Some are just naturally small, others are too placid, some need to train hard and eat their vitamins, but none of them will be worrying people in a darkened alley or on the AFL playing field.

Richmond:
Nathan Foley  ???
If he was nicknamed Mick Foley instead of Axel Foley it might be different. But maybe Kingsley will become the player here instead.

http://www.aflinsider.net/the-16-least-physically-intimidating-players-in-the-afl/

He may be short but Foles has no fear.
(http://cache.gettyimages.com/xc/73040676.jpg?v=1&c=MS_GINS&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF193CC300C081D9F47000541F093FE2FB018E884322CF39532F0)
Does the poo for brains who wrote this article actually have a name, or just anonymous?
He/she's lucky I'm not there at the moment lol