One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 05:13:21 PM

Title: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 05:13:21 PM
team v port wiill be shown on channel 10 at 5.40pm, 5 changes made
stay tuned

if anyone knows teh team prior just post away
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 05:20:02 PM
my bro just sent me this sms

IN krak, tiv, howat, polo, patto
OUT simmo, bling, meyer, jacko, moore


jack is an emegency incase schulz dosnt pass a fitness test b4 the game
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 05:22:52 PM
if thats the line up , im not happy

looks like tiv got a free ride back in, its not liek he blitzed to earn a spot

meyer is finished, his defensive efforts were pathetic , iirc he played on mackey

moore is a surprise, will leave us short down back, but i guess he is being punished for not using his pace to run the ball out of defence
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: one-eyed on May 10, 2007, 05:26:09 PM
That's the team.

RICHMOND:

In: Krakouer, Tivendale, Howat, Polo, Pattison

Out: Simmonds, Tambling, Meyer, Jackson, Moore


Backs C. Newman L. McGuane J. Bowden

Half-Backs J. Oakley-Nicholls G. Polak A. Raines

Centreline G. Tivendale B. Deledio S. Tuck

Half-Forwards K. Pettifer M. Richardson J. King

Forwards A. Krakouer J. Schulz C. Hughes

Followers A. Pattison K. Johnson N. Foley

Interchange M White D. Polo C. Howat C. Hyde

Emergencies S. Edwards D. Meyer J. Riewoldt


Jack could be a late change for Schulz
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: one-eyed on May 10, 2007, 05:27:43 PM
Port Adelaide - at virtually full strength minus Wilson and Chaplin.

B: Toby Thurstans, Darryl Wakelin, Michael Pettigrew
HB: Matthew Thomas, Chad Cornes, Jacob Surjan
C: Nathan Lonie, Shaun Burgoyne, Domenic Cassisi
HF: Peter Burgoyne, Damon White, David Rodan
F: Brendon Lade, Warren Tredrea, Brett Ebert
R: Dean Brogan, Kane Cornes, Danyle Pearce
Interchange: Greg Bentley, Nathan Krakouer, Josh Mahoney, Daniel Motlop

Emergencies: Travis Boak, Brad Symes, Justin Westhoff

IN: Brogan
OUT: Chaplin (foot)
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 05:31:19 PM
was told jack will definately play, lets wait and see.

maybe terry is giving some players 1 last chance to prove themselves but im guessing meyer will be traded at yrs end, his lack of desire(he wasnt alone though) was disgusting. especially as it was his forst game for a while he should have been pumped and played hard and chased and shoudl have created his luck, but he is to soft to introverted and he may as well pack his bags now
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Ramps on May 10, 2007, 05:47:55 PM
Ports going to flog us by about 80 points with that side.
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 05:48:48 PM
Ports going to flog us by about 80 points with that side.


your being generous
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2007, 05:55:08 PM
In: Krakouer, Tivendale, Howat, Polo, Pattison

Out: Simmonds, Tambling, Meyer, Jackson, Moore
I don't get Meyer getting dropped. He only came in last week and is judged on a single game where 19 of his teammates were useless too and we got pummelled by 26 goals. Hard to impress on a HFF when your team is getting pumped out of the middle  ???.

Jacko and Moore aren't up to it.

Krak and Tivs have only come in to try to stop the bleeding out of the centre if the young blokes fail again. Out of the ins only Polo and perhaps Howat deserve to come in.   
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 05:59:45 PM
In: Krakouer, Tivendale, Howat, Polo, Pattison

Out: Simmonds, Tambling, Meyer, Jackson, Moore
I don't get Meyer getting dropped. He only came in last week and is judged on a single game where 19 of his teammates were useless too and we got pummelled by 26 goals. Hard to impress on a HFF when your team is getting pumped out of the middle  ???.

Jacko and Moore aren't up to it.

Krak and Tivs have only come in to try to stop the bleeding out of the centre if the young blokes fail again. Out of the ins only Polo and perhaps Howat deserve to come in.   

meyer got dropped because he played on our hff, and his opponent who played in teh hbf kicked 4 more goals than he did

krak has been dropped for 2 weeks and played good footy, showed good form and playes well at aami, so i see him as a good inclusion

tiv, was dropped for one week, did nothing and gets recalled, now thats the joke

polo deserved the gig, howat im not convinced, woudl have rathered edwards in
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Ramps on May 10, 2007, 06:03:24 PM
Ports going to flog us by about 80 points with that side.


your being generous

Im hoping for rain ;D
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 06:05:20 PM
Ports going to flog us by about 80 points with that side.


your being generous

Im hoping for rain ;D

any chance of those monsoon type rains that hit perth a couple of weeks ago can stay on top of aami for at least 3 hrs?
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2007, 06:15:34 PM
In: Krakouer, Tivendale, Howat, Polo, Pattison

Out: Simmonds, Tambling, Meyer, Jackson, Moore
I don't get Meyer getting dropped. He only came in last week and is judged on a single game where 19 of his teammates were useless too and we got pummelled by 26 goals. Hard to impress on a HFF when your team is getting pumped out of the middle  ???.

Jacko and Moore aren't up to it.

Krak and Tivs have only come in to try to stop the bleeding out of the centre if the young blokes fail again. Out of the ins only Polo and perhaps Howat deserve to come in.   

meyer got dropped because he played on our hff, and his opponent who played in teh hbf kicked 4 more goals than he did

krak has been dropped for 2 weeks and played good footy, showed good form and playes well at aami, so i see him as a good inclusion

tiv, was dropped for one week, did nothing and gets recalled, now thats the joke

polo deserved the gig, howat im not convinced, woudl have rathered edwards in
Was Meyer on Mackie for the whole game? I would've said he was on the bench most of the time. Anyway my point is he's played one (bad) game. I would've given him one more especially at Footy Park and said Danny do something. There's plenty of others who don't deserve to be in the side and they've had more than one game to show why.

Krak hasn't even played a Coburg seniors game yet. Plays one game in a 3rd tier comp and he's back in because he kicked 3 goals.

Agree on the rest - Polo, Howat and Edwards.
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 06:27:13 PM
In: Krakouer, Tivendale, Howat, Polo, Pattison

Out: Simmonds, Tambling, Meyer, Jackson, Moore
I don't get Meyer getting dropped. He only came in last week and is judged on a single game where 19 of his teammates were useless too and we got pummelled by 26 goals. Hard to impress on a HFF when your team is getting pumped out of the middle  ???.

Jacko and Moore aren't up to it.

Krak and Tivs have only come in to try to stop the bleeding out of the centre if the young blokes fail again. Out of the ins only Polo and perhaps Howat deserve to come in.   

meyer got dropped because he played on our hff, and his opponent who played in teh hbf kicked 4 more goals than he did

krak has been dropped for 2 weeks and played good footy, showed good form and playes well at aami, so i see him as a good inclusion

tiv, was dropped for one week, did nothing and gets recalled, now thats the joke

polo deserved the gig, howat im not convinced, woudl have rathered edwards in
.

Krak hasn't even played a Coburg seniors game yet. Plays one game in a 3rd tier comp and he's back in because he kicked 3 goals.



krak also had about 40 touches, 36 iirc
so what did tiv do to merit selection, he played in the same game as krak and did nothing, 12 possessions iirc

reg if its teh 2nds, 3rds etc, you have to go out and give it ur all, krak did, tiv didnt

and with meyer, i think its more to do with his attitude, lack of desire

we stuffed our picks in 2004, we gave up ottons for , patto and meyer are both jokes

in future we must only recruit interstate players who depsarately want to play for us, none of these homesick  soft introverts like meyer and pretend footy players like patto

we really biggered that up thanx miller!
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Life goes on on May 10, 2007, 06:33:21 PM
Hopefully its the last we will see of Meyer, Jackson and Moore.
If you cant have any impact in team that will win the wooden spoon.
you might as well head down to centrelink come September.
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Ramps on May 10, 2007, 06:35:02 PM
We were always gonna take Meyer, I remember seeing the carnival on TV and Terry Wallace was doing special commentary. You could tell from Ploughs voice that he liked Meyer and we were going to take him if we had the chance.
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Life goes on on May 10, 2007, 06:39:44 PM
Rule no 1 in recruiting.
Dont recruit ANYONE under 6ft unless they have a few ""tricks ""
Ala Davey etc.
Meyer, nah!
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 06:43:03 PM
Hopefully its the last we will see of Meyer, Jackson and Moore.
If you cant have any impact in team that will win the wooden spoon.
you might as well head down to centrelink come September.

agree

We were always gonna take Meyer, I remember seeing the carnival on TV and Terry Wallace was doing special commentary. You could tell from Ploughs voice that he liked Meyer and we were going to take him if we had the chance.

well then terry should quit, he onv knows how to pick duds who dont even want to be with us

i have worked meyer out, he may have talent , but only has desire to play elsewhere, he wants to be in SA, has no desire to bust his pooper for our club, i say dont trade him at yrs end, just delist him, with any luck the kangas or demons or blkues will pick him up, surely that woudl send him into a nervous wreck!
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2007, 06:51:12 PM
krak also had about 40 touches, 36 iirc
so what did tiv do to merit selection, he played in the same game as krak and did nothing, 12 possessions iirc

reg if its teh 2nds, 3rds etc, you have to go out and give it ur all, krak did, tiv didnt

and with meyer, i think its more to do with his attitude, lack of desire

we stuffed our picks in 2004, we gave up ottons for , patto and meyer are both jokes

in future we must only recruit interstate players who depsarately want to play for us, none of these homesick  soft introverts like meyer and pretend footy players like patto

we really biggered that up thanx miller!

I don't think many interstate kids will want to play with us next year either :-\. Danny needs to play in a good side. It's no surprise he looked so much better in Coburg's big wins. You can bag him for it but he's a finisher not a workhorse. I could see one of the SA sides picking him up cheaply if he is delisted. Btw Patto is a Victorian  ;).

As for Krak and Tivs. You shouldn't walk back into AFL level straight from VFL 2's after just one week. Box Hill Hawks 2nds is hardly a test for someone who has/is playing at the highest level. They both should have played for Coburg seniors this week and backed up again to prove they deserve a recall.

Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2007, 06:52:53 PM
Rule no 1 in recruiting.
Dont recruit ANYONE under 6ft unless they have a few ""tricks ""
Ala Davey etc.
Meyer, nah!
Agree with the philosophy but Meyer is 6ft (183cm)  ;)
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Life goes on on May 10, 2007, 06:53:15 PM
krak also had about 40 touches, 36 iirc
so what did tiv do to merit selection, he played in the same game as krak and did nothing, 12 possessions iirc

reg if its teh 2nds, 3rds etc, you have to go out and give it ur all, krak did, tiv didnt

and with meyer, i think its more to do with his attitude, lack of desire

we stuffed our picks in 2004, we gave up ottons for , patto and meyer are both jokes

in future we must only recruit interstate players who depsarately want to play for us, none of these homesick  soft introverts like meyer and pretend footy players like patto

we really biggered that up thanx miller!

I don't think many interstate kids will want to play with us next year either :-\. Danny needs to play in a good side. It's no surprise he looked so much better in Coburg's big wins. You can bag him for it but he's a finisher not a workhorse. I could see one of the SA sides picking him up cheaply if he is delisted. Btw Patto is a Victorian  ;).

As for Krak and Tivs. You shouldn't walk back into AFL level straight from VFL 2's after just one week. Box Hill Hawks 2nds is hardly a test for someone who has/is playing at the highest level. They both should have played for Coburg seniors this week and backed up again to prove they deserve a recall.




Mighty Tiges and William Powell would get a kick at Coburg 2,s
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Life goes on on May 10, 2007, 06:54:34 PM
Rule no 1 in recruiting.
Dont recruit ANYONE under 6ft unless they have a few ""tricks ""
Ala Davey etc.
Meyer, nah!
Agree with the philosophy but Meyer is 6ft (183cm)  ;)

Must of been on the stretch bench over summer, the smallest six footer I have ever seen
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2007, 07:00:28 PM
Mighty Tiges and William Powell would get a kick at Coburg 2,s
Hammy playing up again Jack. I'm sure you would too lol.
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Life goes on on May 10, 2007, 07:09:31 PM
Mate, I would kick 10 standing in the goal square
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Life goes on on May 10, 2007, 07:50:37 PM
By the way, whats Tivendale doing getting a game. ::)
Didnt the used car salesman,sorry Terry Wallace say that he was going to players on form at Tuesdays with Terry?
mail is the Tiv was useless at Coburg, just proves , Terry you are full of dribble, thats reminds me, its about time for a bit of basketball this week isnt it.
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: letsgetiton! on May 10, 2007, 07:53:17 PM
By the way, whats Tivendale doing getting a game. ::)
Didnt the used car salesman,sorry Terry Wallace say that he was going to players on form at Tuesdays with Terry?
mail is the Tiv was useless at Coburg, just proves , Terry you are full of dribble, thats reminds me, its about time for a bit of basketball this week isnt it.


exactly what i said b4

fingers crossed by yrs end we start fresh, wipe teh slate clean for the 100th time and get the right ppl at the club, i personally now have realised terry isnt the right man to help rebuild us, imho, he only wanted to coach us to be with browny, since browny went down, terry lost his hunger and focus
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Hellenic Tiger on May 10, 2007, 08:17:24 PM
Not only that Terry has been trying to model a team circa on the 1997-98 Bulldogs team that was skillful and full of run with a lack of talls key positions call it what you like. That was his mistake then.
He obviously has not learnt as he has been recruiting midfielders to the club and no emphasis on key positions. I think its yes its one thing to get killed out of the middle on game day and get flogged but with no key possie players eg chb chf you will get flogged by even more. Its time we got some. Good key position Talls will win you a flag West Coast of course being the exception.
Syd -Hall Barry Goodes
Port Lade Tredrea Cornes
Brisbane Lynch Michael Brown
just to name a few in recent years.
No Gaspar No Kellaway soon to be no Richo also we will have a side no taller than 6 ft 2.
Right now I can't see the light no one fills me confidence down there lads.
From car Salesman Terry down. Only three that can hold their head up Foley, Cleve and Richo and the Pres Gary March.
Car salesman Terry is full of it looking at his ins selections for this week. Are those selections meant to stem the bleeding from the wounds that were opened on Sunday night? :help :help
 :banghead :banghead
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Life goes on on May 10, 2007, 08:52:13 PM
Not only that Terry has been trying to model a team circa on the 1997-98 Bulldogs team that was skillful and full of run with a lack of talls key positions call it what you like. That was his mistake then.
He obviously has not learnt as he has been recruiting midfielders to the club and no emphasis on key positions. I think its yes its one thing to get killed out of the middle on game day and get flogged but with no key possie players eg chb chf you will get flogged by even more. Its time we got some. Good key position Talls will win you a flag West Coast of course being the exception.
Syd -Hall Barry Goodes
Port Lade Tredrea Cornes
Brisbane Lynch Michael Brown
just to name a few in recent years.
No Gaspar No Kellaway soon to be no Richo also we will have a side no taller than 6 ft 2.
Right now I can't see the light no one fills me confidence down there lads.
From car Salesman Terry down. Only three that can hold their head up Foley, Cleve and Richo and the Pres Gary March.
Car salesman Terry is full of it looking at his ins selections for this week. Are those selections meant to stem the bleeding from the wounds that were opened on Sunday night? :help :help
 :banghead :banghead

Great post!
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 10, 2007, 08:59:08 PM
I don't get Meyer getting dropped. He only came in last week and is judged on a single game where 19 of his teammates were useless too and we got pummelled by 26 goals. Hard to impress on a HFF when your team is getting pumped out of the middle  ???.


IMHO I reckon there was one moment last week that probably cost Danny his spot this week and that was in the 3rd quarter and the ball is rolling towards him and he just stood there, did nothing :o

I cannot remember who the other tiger guy was chasing the Geelong bloke but it was a 1 on 2 situation and Danny did nothing- I nearly jumped from the 2nd level of the Dome to throttel him.

I know we were 100 points behind but in those situations you've got to show something and he didn't - just stood there. For mine it was the worst effort of the night and in a 157 point thrashing that is saying something.

Was actually was going to post about earlier in the week but couldn't be bothered  ;D
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: WilliamPowell on May 10, 2007, 09:01:52 PM
Mighty Tiges and William Powell would get a kick at Coburg 2,s
Hammy playing up again Jack. I'm sure you would too lol.

Back's gone again Jack  :rollin

Though the physio said it wasn't too bad today ;D

mail is the Tiv was useless at Coburg,

Saw the first half and he certainly wasn't useless ;)
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: Moi on May 10, 2007, 09:15:20 PM
Thought Kingsley might have got a gig after 8 goals.
Not sure now why they got him
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2007, 09:29:38 PM
Not only that Terry has been trying to model a team circa on the 1997-98 Bulldogs team that was skillful and full of run with a lack of talls key positions call it what you like. That was his mistake then.
He obviously has not learnt as he has been recruiting midfielders to the club and no emphasis on key positions. I think its yes its one thing to get killed out of the middle on game day and get flogged but with no key possie players eg chb chf you will get flogged by even more. Its time we got some. Good key position Talls will win you a flag West Coast of course being the exception.
Syd -Hall Barry Goodes
Port Lade Tredrea Cornes
Brisbane Lynch Michael Brown
just to name a few in recent years.
No Gaspar No Kellaway soon to be no Richo also we will have a side no taller than 6 ft 2.
Right now I can't see the light no one fills me confidence down there lads.
From car Salesman Terry down. Only three that can hold their head up Foley, Cleve and Richo and the Pres Gary March.
Car salesman Terry is full of it looking at his ins selections for this week. Are those selections meant to stem the bleeding from the wounds that were opened on Sunday night? :help :help
 :banghead :banghead
Our KPPs haven't been the main issue for us though not counting the ruck.  They haven't kicked straight but when we actually get it inside forward 50 they have been getting their hands on it. Polak has been good and McGuane has shown signs at FB. The problem is we don't get it inside forward 50 enough even in our 5 close losses. The finger for that should be pointed at our smalls. Our midfield is crap. We have the worst midfield depth in the comp. You're meant to have 10-12 midfielders. We have Foley who is a genuine ballwinner plus a few ring-ins. Tuck and Sugar are too slow and the rest are outside receivers. We have no natural ballwinners with size, footy smarts, pace and skill.  
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: DallasCrane on May 10, 2007, 09:41:57 PM

I cannot remember who the other tiger guy was chasing the Geelong bloke but it was a 1 on 2 situation and Danny did nothing- I nearly jumped from the 2nd level of the Dome to throttel him.

I think it was Pettifer, and that effort by Danny Meyer was appalling, I officially gave up on him after seeing that (I am sure he is shattered)
 
Thought Kingsley might have got a gig after 8 goals.
Not sure now why they got him

Yes Moi I agree. If he is right to go, play him, what's the use of having overpaid reserves players. Perhaps TW is scared of the backlash if we get flogged again, worried the journo's might use the recruiting angle 'recycled hack instead of youth' articles (again)! 
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: DallasCrane on May 10, 2007, 09:48:12 PM
Our midfield is crap.

I thought I told you to stop being so cryptic in your posts MT.


We have the worst midfield depth in the comp. You're meant to have 10-12 midfielders. We have Foley who is a genuine ballwinner plus a few ring-ins. Tuck and Sugar are too slow and the rest are outside receivers. We have no natural ballwinners with size, footy smarts, pace and skill.   

You can analyse footy as much as you like, spend hours writing scouting reports, listen to SEN 24 hours a day, people even write PhD's on footy these days, however those two lines by MT sum up exactly what our problem is. Yes we still need to be looking at kpp and drafting a young ruckman but you've got to get the bloody thing first.
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 10, 2007, 10:36:13 PM
Our midfield is crap.

I thought I told you to stop being so cryptic in your posts MT.
lol

Can't Ruddy Attain Possession  :whistle
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: DallasCrane on May 10, 2007, 11:10:44 PM
Can't Ruddy Attain Possession  :whistle

 :rollin   :bow very nice mt

I've always thought our midfield Couldn't Run And Pass as well as the rest of the teams in the comp. 
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: mightytiges on May 11, 2007, 06:27:53 PM
I've always thought our midfield Couldn't Run And Pass as well as the rest of the teams in the comp. 
;D
Title: Re: team v port adelaide
Post by: tiga on May 11, 2007, 11:46:22 PM
I agree with MT's comment earlier, Meyer is a finisher and has kicked some freakish goals but he appears to have neither ticker, nor motivation.

Give him the ball in the clear tucked tight in the forward pocket either side and he's a certainty to convert.

See if he can win his own contested posession tight in the forward pocket either side and then convert..........No chance as he won't win the ball.  :sleep

Title: Schulz passed his fitness test
Post by: one-eyed on May 12, 2007, 02:53:02 AM
Richmond arrived in Adelaide last night with 23 players.

Untried draftee Jack Riewoldt was the travelling emergency to cover for forward Jay Schultz, who appeared to pass a fitness test on his corked thigh while training at AAMI Stadium.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,21715762%255E19742,00.html