One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on September 08, 2007, 02:12:28 PM

Title: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: one-eyed on September 08, 2007, 02:12:28 PM
Harts is next.

Debuted in 2004 under Spud and played 19 out of 22 games. In 2005 he started the season promisingly before doing his hammy against the Dogs in R3 after 13 disposals in the first quarter and a bit. Harts returned for one game in R14 before playing in the last 5 matches for the year. He played 7 of the first 8 games in 2006 before being dropped to Coburg where he broke his foot against Werribee. Only made one appearance in 2007 against the Hawks in R15 and again broke his foot at Coburg.

http://www.finalsiren.com/PlayerStats.asp?PlayerID=1336&SeasonID=ALL

Any future at Tigerland for Harts?
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: mightytiges on September 08, 2007, 06:36:54 PM
Harts has had back luck with injury but some have to go and  I think Harts will be one of them. There were whispers a few months ago that Sheeds was interested given Harts' dad played for the Bombers but that's gone out the window.
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: retygas on September 08, 2007, 10:37:47 PM
He has to be a keeper. He is one of a very few with enough balls to stand up for himself like the tigers of old. This is what the appeal he has for me. I have seen a few who would rather walk away from a little biffo, but not him. Keep him for the pure guts he shows on the feild. Don't shot him down due to his injuries. Sugar should and has to be on the list before anyone doesn't he, well I think he does. Harts has more guts in his little finger that Sugas has in his body. The last one who showed the same amount of balls was Tim Flemming, and I loved it, when there was a fight there was Tim on the bottom of the pack.
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: Gordon Bennett on September 09, 2007, 10:01:35 AM
He's gone, gone, gone.Not a doubt in my mind. Sorry Brent, that's the way it has to be.
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: tigersalive on September 09, 2007, 10:51:42 PM
Sorry Harts, we cant keep everyone and you're near the bottom of the list, much due to your own bad luck but even late in the season was no good in the seniors.

Delist.
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: cub on September 10, 2007, 11:08:48 AM
Nope
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: wayne on September 10, 2007, 11:11:26 AM
I have seen a few who would rather walk away from a little biffo, but not him. Keep him for the pure guts he shows on the feild. Don't shot him down due to his injuries.

He is a tough nut, but he lacks one important skill, the ability to play AFL football.
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: Fluffy Tiger on September 10, 2007, 02:50:38 PM
bye bye. We need to delist 4 at least and he is in the bottom 4.
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: Darth Tiger on September 10, 2007, 03:33:41 PM
Harts has had his papers stamped if he cant get a game in the Seniors with the Burgers.

Too many similar players without injuries in the RFC squad ahead of Harts (Raines, Jacko, King, Polo etc.)

Hope that he gets another chance at a different club cos he gives his all, but cant see it happening at AFL level for him.
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: Ox on September 10, 2007, 04:16:36 PM
FHO !!!
Title: Re: Yeah or Neah: 33. Brent Hartigan
Post by: one-eyed on October 09, 2007, 02:47:00 PM
Brian Royal's RFC player review

Brent Hartigan

Brent missed the last seven games of the season with a stress fracture in his foot. He played a fair bit of the season with Coburg, but suffered a lot of injuries.

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=52313