One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on February 14, 2008, 04:05:26 PM

Title: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: one-eyed on February 14, 2008, 04:05:26 PM
Glenn Lovett from Champion Data/AFL prospectus was just on SEN talking about our strengths and weaknesses:

* We averaged 13 goals per game last year (10th best)

* Our forward line is surprisingly equal 1st. When you take into account depth we have the potential for our forward line to score heavily with Richo, Browny, Petts, Lids, Polak, Morton, Jack, Schulz, etc. We were 4th in marks inside 50.

* The problem is Richmond's midfield which is the major worry and it's starving the forward line as we had the least inside 50s. The problem is depth in midfield. Average quality rating (that is with no injures) we are rated last with only Foley and Tuck and no depth. They can't classify Cogs as the game has changed in the last 18 months and they don't know how he'll go.

* Foley - No 1 in AFL in contested possies, centre clearances and bounces.

* Not many contested possies in our games thanks to our turnovers. Numbers behind the ball, run it up, turn it over and then the opposition hits us on the counter.

* We have a lot of above averager players but we also have the equal most below average. Not much in between. Need those classed as below average to step up.

* Prediction for 2008: 8-9 wins.

Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: bluey_21 on February 14, 2008, 06:58:44 PM
Glenn Lovett from Champion Data/AFL prospectus was just on SEN talking about our strengths and weaknesses:

* We averaged 13 goals per game last year (10th best)

* Our forward line is surprisingly equal 1st. When you take into account depth we have the potential for our forward line to score heavily with Richo, Browny, Petts, Lids, Polak, Morton, Jack, Schulz, etc. We were 4th in marks inside 50.

* The problem is Richmond's midfield which is the major worry and it's starving the forward line as we had the least inside 50s. The problem is depth in midfield. Average quality rating (that is with no injures) we are rated last with only Foley and Tuck and no depth. They can't classify Cogs as the game has changed in the last 18 months and they don't know how he'll go.

* Foley - No 1 in AFL in contested possies, centre clearances and bounces.

* Not many contested possies in our games thanks to our turnovers. Numbers behind the ball, run it up, turn it over and then the opposition hits us on the counter.

* We have a lot of above averager players but we also have the equal most below average. Not much in between. Need those classed as below average to step up.

* Prediction for 2008: 8-9 wins.



about right IMO
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: richmondrules on February 14, 2008, 07:55:40 PM
Those stats show we are getting it right in some areas which is encouraging but it is pretty obvious where the work need to be done. Seems we are either really good or completely hopeless. If we can get the completely hopeless to average then we will no longer be easy beats. If we can get the completely hopeless to good then we may even be successful.
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: rogerd3 on February 14, 2008, 09:03:11 PM
the engine room aint got no engine or only running on 4 cylinders at best.
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: Jacosh on February 15, 2008, 02:45:38 AM
Trying to explain engine room (mid field) to a european mate learning the game i used the following analogy.

Geelong were as of the end of last season a smooth running Porsche or Ferrari. all parts working in sync and tight producing maximum performance and results.

Adelaide/ST Kilda. more like a XR8/HSV, Solid performance with a decent heart but not quite up to matching the Porsche or Ferrari.

Richmond. Well what can i say? A 1970's Ford Escort with a million K's on the clock. Still chugging along but in need of some serious work to it.

Poor guy didnt know if he should laugh cry or get me commited.
Sounds like a Richmond supporter to me.
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: mightytiges on February 15, 2008, 05:24:15 AM
lol

Last year we were more like an East German Trabant. Would fall apart and pack it in before we even got going  :P.

Seriously though last year we were smashed in the hitouts and even though Foley did well reading the opposition ruckman we were always giving the opposition first use of the footy more often than not out of the centre. That meant, as the guy from Champion Data said, us playing more players behind the ball and limiting our attacking options.

Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: tiga on February 15, 2008, 08:39:31 AM
lol

Last year we were more like an East German Trabant. Would fall apart and pack it in before we even got going  :P
:rollin :rollin :lol

Another car that comes to mind MT, a Lada Samara!!  :lol IIRC they had a rope for a fan belt.  :help
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: bluey_21 on February 15, 2008, 09:01:32 AM
i would have thought last year we were more like any f1 car Mark Webber drives. Can't go the distance  :P :rollin
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: Smokey on February 15, 2008, 09:10:56 AM
I liken us more to the new prototype Ferrari engine; sounds good on the dyno but as yet untested on the track.  When the bodyshop guys have finished with their new shell design and both parts come together, then lookout.  Will require a bit of testing and tuning as with all new models but worth the wait!
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: bluey_21 on February 15, 2008, 09:49:46 AM
lol, reminds me of an episode of family guy where Peter was going to but a car that looked good but only had a picture of an engine under the hood  :lol
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: mightytiges on February 15, 2008, 01:50:05 PM
That's cruel bluey but funny  ;) ;D.

Another car that comes to mind MT, a Lada Samara!!  :lol IIRC they had a rope for a fan belt.  :help
:rollin  :ROTFL

From wikipedia: One notorious feature of early Samaras was the 'disco-lights' problem caused by poor electricals. The Samara driver had to be aware that when the brakes were applied, it was quite likely that the hazard and reversing lights would come on and not the brake lights.

 :rollin

Another car we were like was that 3-wheeler in Mr Bean episodes. Any applied pressure and we'd roll over lol.
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: Ramps on February 15, 2008, 01:56:27 PM
Richmond 2008= Maurice Marina or however they spell it.
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: tiga on February 15, 2008, 02:54:19 PM

Another car we were like was that 3-wheeler in Mr Bean episodes. Any applied pressure and we'd roll over lol.

MT that reminds me of a funny quote from "The Young Ones"

Jerzy Balovski to Mike: "Telly you wot, I'll do ya par-ex on a Reliant"

Mike: "A Reliant?? They're are three wheeler aren't they??"

Jerzy: "Yeah...usually!!"  :rollin
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: mightytiges on February 15, 2008, 03:19:39 PM
MT that reminds me of a funny quote from "The Young Ones"

Jerzy Balovski to Mike: "Telly you wot, I'll do ya par-ex on a Reliant"

Mike: "A Reliant?? They're are three wheeler aren't they??"

Jerzy: "Yeah...usually!!"  :rollin
  :lol
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: bluey_21 on February 15, 2008, 07:36:54 PM
Another car we were like was that 3-wheeler in Mr Bean episodes. Any applied pressure and we'd roll over lol.

 :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL
Title: Re: Our Strengths and Weaknesses on SEN
Post by: Tigermonk on February 16, 2008, 12:12:38 AM
is this thread headed correct

since when did we ever have any strengths last year we got the spoon  :rollin