One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: {X} on May 15, 2008, 05:06:30 PM
-
SORRY HAVENT GOT IT YET! :P :lol
but someone will soon, stay tuned!
-
SORRY HAVENT GOT IT YET! :P :lol
but someone will soon, stay tuned!
Well done :clapping
-
your welcome
B: Luke McGuane, Will Thursfield, Jake King
HB: Chris Newman, Graham Polak, Kelvin Moore
C: Matthew Richardson, Shane Tuck, Joel Bowden
HF: Matt White, Jack Riewoldt, Mitch Morton
F: Richard Tambling, Brett Deledio, Nathan Brown
Foll: Troy Simmonds, Kane Johnson, Nathan Foley
I/C: Jordan McMahon, Chris Hyde, Shane Edwards, Adam Pattison
EMG: Jay Schulz, Trent Cotchin, Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls
In: Bowden, Polak
Out: Jackson, Schulz
-
i have a feeling lids will play on the wing and joel at FF
cheers
-
Agree X. No way will Joel be playing on a wing and Lids is wasted at FF.
In: Bowden, Polak
Out: Jackson, Schulz
Terry must have faith in Thursty, Moore and McGuane to do the job on Geelong's 3 tall forward line by dropping Sarge. Perhaps it's a wet weather decision too.
-
l thought Sarge was doing the job in the backline
-
Surely King is in some doubt so maybe he will not play.
-
GEELONG
B: Tom Harley, Matthew Scarlett, Josh Hunt
HB: Darren Milburn, Harry Taylor, Corey Enright
C: Cameron Ling, Joel Selwood, Jimmy Bartel
HF Steve Johnson, Cameron Mooney, Paul Chapman
F: James Kelly, Tom Hawkins, Ryan Gamble
Foll: Mark Blake, Gary Ablett, Joel Corey
I/C: Shane Mumford, Andrew Mackie, Max Rooke, David Wojcinski
EMG: Brent Prismall, Travis Varcoe, Shannon Byrnes
In: G Ablett
Out: Stokes (suspended)
-
I'd have Sarge in long before McGuane at the moment.
-
polak makes the 4th tall in defence
sarge was crap v the saints, he was ok til then, but a spell was needed, problem is , tuck needs a spell too! as does jordy and newman, but they are safe atm for some silly reasons
-
I'd have Sarge in long before McGuane at the moment.
McGuane has been doing his job. Doesn't get a lot of possessions but he's always there with a fist and a bit of pressure. Reckon he'd be a pain in the arse to have as an opponent.
-
With Ottens not playing Geelong don't play all that tall so Polak in makes sense to try and stretch them up forward or give a hand down back if Mooney or Hawkins get going. McGuane, Thursfield and Moore have been doing the job down back and have the height and mobility to cope as good as anyone. I agree with TM that Schulz has been doing ok (when played down back) but just as it was a bit of 'horses for courses' with Polak and St Kilda, I think its the same for the Sarge this time around. And Bowden in the forward line has the potential to muck up the opposition plans and perceptions for us, just as Richo to the wing did a month ago. He has the pace to run with Scarlett and put pressure on his run out of defence - I just hope he has the mindset to do it.
-
well well well surprise blood/y surprise, schulz dropped.
i could be wrong but someone say he didn't lay any tackles against the saints or were they talking bout someone else
bowden has shown form and i think he is more valuable than schulz at this stage
-
Dropping Schulz :banghead
I guess its back to the midget backline now...
-
Well if it peees down like it seems its the right decision Schulz has been the worst performed between him, Moore, Mcguane and Thursty.
If it turns out fine and dry Bowden may find himself on the outer again. :-\
-
your welcome
B: Luke McGuane, Will Thursfield, Jake King
HB: Chris Newman, Graham Polak, Kelvin Moore
C: Matthew Richardson, Shane Tuck, Joel Bowden
HF: Matt White, Jack Riewoldt, Mitch Morton
F: Richard Tambling, Brett Deledio, Nathan Brown
Foll: Troy Simmonds, Kane Johnson, Nathan Foley
I/C: Jordan McMahon, Chris Hyde, Shane Edwards, Adam Pattison
EMG: Jay Schulz, Trent Cotchin, Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls
In: Bowden, Polak
Out: Jackson, Schulz
:cheers
-
well well well surprise blood/y surprise, schulz dropped.
i could be wrong but someone say he didn't lay any tackles against the saints or were they talking bout someone else
Schulz, Newy, Edwards, Morton and Simmo didn't lay a tackle against the Saints. Of the five, Sarge was the only one with less than 10 disposals.
-
well well well surprise blood/y surprise, schulz dropped.
i could be wrong but someone say he didn't lay any tackles against the saints or were they talking bout someone else
Schulz, Newy, Edwards, Morton and Simmo didn't lay a tackle against the Saints. Of the five, Sarge was the only one with less than 10 disposals.
I think Edwards is very lucky to be playing this week. His game last week looked like he needed to go back and regain some confidence in the 2's.
-
well well well surprise blood/y surprise, schulz dropped.
i could be wrong but someone say he didn't lay any tackles against the saints or were they talking bout someone else
Schulz, Newy, Edwards, Morton and Simmo didn't lay a tackle against the Saints. Of the five, Sarge was the only one with less than 10 disposals.
I think Edwards is very lucky to be playing this week. His game last week looked like he needed to go back and regain some confidence in the 2's.
Disagree, love what he does without the ball. Great defensive pressure. :thumbsup
Kicked 2 goals by reading the play.
THere is no way he deserves to be dropped.
-
well well well surprise blood/y surprise, schulz dropped.
i could be wrong but someone say he didn't lay any tackles against the saints or were they talking bout someone else
Schulz, Newy, Edwards, Morton and Simmo didn't lay a tackle against the Saints. Of the five, Sarge was the only one with less than 10 disposals.
I think Edwards is very lucky to be playing this week. His game last week looked like he needed to go back and regain some confidence in the 2's.
Disagree, love what he does without the ball. Great defensive pressure. :thumbsup
Kicked 2 goals by reading the play.
THere is no way he deserves to be dropped.
I also like what he does with the ball, I just don't think he has done nearly enough in his last 2 games to keep a spot. The coaching staff are telling all who will listen that you have to perform to make this side and I reckon Shane would benefit by going back for a couple of weeks to get a dose or 2 of leather poisoning. Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan, I just think he could do with a couple of weeks of being the bully - belting up on the weaker kids.
-
yeah well for years we have played players because of their reputation or games played.
this is the first year i can remember the tigers having some sort of depth in our team.
schulz has not done enough IMO and he along with Petts should be given the door.
We cant keep everyone and some tough decisions need to be made and these 2 should go for some decent healthy mid range picks.
-
yeah well for years we have played players because of their reputation or games played.
this is the first year i can remember the tigers having some sort of depth in our team.
schulz has not done enough IMO and he along with Petts should be given the door.
We cant keep everyone and some tough decisions need to be made and these 2 should go for some decent healthy mid range picks.
Nothing wrong in what you are saying Daniel and there certainly could be a case for both names to be tossed around at draft time but the contradiction is in what you say re: depth. Schulz, Tivendale, Pettifer, Howat, Hyde etc are our depth and just at the moment I don't think this depth is strong enough to trade these types. It will only take an injury or 2 to expose us (the kids) and we will be back where we were last year. In another year or 2, sure, but right now it would be a risk to get rid of them (maybe one but not all).