One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: TFL on July 02, 2008, 07:38:31 PM

Title: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: TFL on July 02, 2008, 07:38:31 PM
Has anyone heard a rumour that at hald time of the Melbourne game that Jake King grabbed Gary March by the throat and had a crack at him?

It was apparently as a result of Gary having too much to say in the rooms.

I believe that this is on the money.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 02, 2008, 09:01:47 PM
Gary is off jakes christmas card list you might find ;)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Infamy on July 02, 2008, 09:16:09 PM
Yeah right
How's the tin foil hat going?
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 02, 2008, 09:25:38 PM
thanks for the reminder - it's about time to start thinking about Xmas card lists ::)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 02, 2008, 09:36:34 PM
Has anyone heard a rumour that at hald time of the Melbourne game that Jake King grabbed Gary March by the throat and had a crack at him?

It was apparently as a result of Gary having too much to say in the rooms.

I believe that this is on the money.

It actually doesnt surprise me, he was always in the rooms before the game and at half time giving his ""two bobs worth"" , Now what Garys role again, coach or president ? ::)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 03, 2008, 08:15:58 AM
with any luck both gary march and jake king will be gone next year. 1 is a pathetic pres, the other a pathetic player. we can do better without both of them
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 03, 2008, 08:27:01 AM
march has been a good president, for what he has been able to do. money wise we have never been better!!!

However he is as weak as our captain when it comes to dealing with demetriou and his mates.

Does this guy ever speak or what??

Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 03, 2008, 08:31:28 AM
march has been a good president, for what he has been able to do. money wise we have never been better!!!



nothing to do with march, our better financial position is all thanks to wright, not march
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Tigermonk on July 03, 2008, 08:39:00 AM
Has anyone heard a rumour that at hald time of the Melbourne game that Jake King grabbed Gary March by the throat and had a crack at him?

It was apparently as a result of Gary having too much to say in the rooms.

I believe that this is on the money.

where did this rumour come from
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: tiga on July 03, 2008, 09:02:11 AM
Plenty of people in the rooms at half time for this not to have made the papers so I suggest its nothing more than a rumour made by someone with too much time on their hands. If it did occur, two things would have happened. The club would have made a statement that he was dropped for disciplinary reasons (meaning he would have played for Coburg) or nothing would have happened.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Tigermonk on July 03, 2008, 09:35:14 AM
l dont see any truth in this rumour  :sleep
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: tigersalive on July 03, 2008, 10:15:23 AM
Has anyone heard a rumour that at hald time of the Melbourne game that Jake King grabbed Gary March by the throat and had a crack at him?

It was apparently as a result of Gary having too much to say in the rooms.

I believe that this is on the money.

So at half time after our best quarter for the season King decides to grab March by the throat.

Yeah, right.  :sleep  ::)

Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 10:21:29 AM
l dont see any truth in this rumour  :sleep

And even if it was true, some things are best left unsaid sometimes.
No need for this to come out.  I'm sure they can resolve their differences, if differences exist, by themselves and not have us arbitrate  ::)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 01:35:02 PM
l dont see any truth in this rumour  :sleep

And even if it was true, some things are best left unsaid sometimes.
No need for this to come out.  I'm sure they can resolve their differences, if differences exist, by themselves and not have us arbitrate  ::)

Your right Moi.
This wouldnt have come form the President but the player?
Can tell you that ""sources say"" that both parties have put the ::closed door"" sign up. ummmmmmmmmm.
The aribitraters in this instance you might find were the ""leadership group""  Thus Jake missed the following week.
Excuse was given as a hamstring :lol  Quickest Recovery from a hamstring ever :lol


Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: WilliamPowell on July 03, 2008, 01:43:12 PM
nothing to do with march, our better financial position is all thanks to wright, not march

Hmmmm    "ALL"

 :nope :nope dont think so - ALL is sweeping statement

So are you sayig that the board with all their business contacts contribute nothing  :-\ ???





Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Beren on July 03, 2008, 02:11:31 PM
march has been a good president, for what he has been able to do. money wise we have never been better!!!

However he is as weak as our captain when it comes to dealing with demetriou and his mates.

Does this guy ever speak or what??



Umm yes! Have seen him quoted regularly in the press about many matters where we don't see eye to eye with the A.D.

Gary's most recent was an idea for evening up how Clubs are funded with particular reference to stadium deals.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 03, 2008, 03:14:18 PM
nothing to do with march, our better financial position is all thanks to wright, not march

Hmmmm    "ALL"

 :nope :nope dont think so - ALL is sweeping statement

So are you sayig that the board with all their business contacts contribute nothing  :-\ ???







 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 03:18:46 PM
Your right Moi.
This wouldnt have come form the President but the player?
Can tell you that ""sources say"" that both parties have put the ::closed door"" sign up. ummmmmmmmmm.
The aribitraters in this instance you might find were the ""leadership group""  Thus Jake missed the following week.
Excuse was given as a hamstring :lol  Quickest Recovery from a hamstring ever :lol
You should be glad they have mechanisms in place for deaing with situations like this.
Obviously they decided there was some breach, the players dealt with it and we all move on.
Except those who want to bring up on a website  ::)

Old issue now, Jack, ancient history!
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Tigermonk on July 03, 2008, 03:41:06 PM
Jack was not the one who brought it up  ;D it was Tigers for Life  ;D so why you beefing Jack about it
is that the same mechanism that punished Joel as well,  which was hushed up by the leadership group & the club ;D
seems there are some tails being pulled  ;D
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Infamy on July 03, 2008, 04:10:35 PM
Excuse was given as a hamstring :lol  Quickest Recovery from a hamstring ever :lol
They never said it was a tear, just that it was a hamstring injury
Could have just been a strain or tightness, as it did happen at training
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 04:20:58 PM
Jack was not the one who brought it up  ;D it was Tigers for Life  ;D so why you beefing Jack about it
is that the same mechanism that punished Joel as well,  which was hushed up by the leadership group & the club ;D
seems there are some tails being pulled  ;D
Since when did we have to justify why we post lol
You're kidding, right????
But for the sake of your question, I was responding to his post.
All right if I do that?
FFS
 :rollin

Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: TFL on July 03, 2008, 05:41:02 PM
This information was talked about by Tim Watson on SEN the other morning and also from people involved at North Heidelberg.

I find it strange that the President would be making comments on the coaching of the football team and also performance of the players, particularly on game day.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 05:46:56 PM
And it's just rumour, so nothing of substance.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: TFL on July 03, 2008, 05:53:02 PM
You can believe what you like Moi, i believe it to be true.

Other clubs know about this and Carlton, Collingwood and Essendon have already contacted Jake's manager with interest in him for next year. Mail is that March wants him gone at season's end although Terry is supporting Kingy on this one.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 05:57:03 PM
And it's just rumour, so nothing of substance.


Can tell you I have witnessed March being involved( well trying ) in match day situations, not good I wouldnt think
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 05:58:37 PM
You can believe what you like Moi, i believe it to be true.
How else would you have liked the club to have handled the situation?
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 06:10:52 PM
You can believe what you like Moi, i believe it to be true.
How else would you have liked the club to have handled the situation?

Very SIMPLE. Keep imbeciles out of the room at half time and it wouldnt have happened. Presidents of any football clubs shouldnt be involved in football matters.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: TFL on July 03, 2008, 06:12:40 PM
You can believe what you like Moi, i believe it to be true.
How else would you have liked the club to have handled the situation?

Well i would have thought March is out of line.

I have seen Board members/Administration staff try and make suggestions to coaching staff at other football clubs on match day and it isnt taken too well at all.

March has a job and he should stick to that.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 06:14:55 PM
You can believe what you like Moi, i believe it to be true.
How else would you have liked the club to have handled the situation?

Very SIMPLE. Keep imbeciles out of the room at half time and it wouldnt have happened. Presidents of any football clubs shouldnt be involved in football matters.
We don't know what happened - it's just rumour Jack.
I realise you want to make a federal case due to your hate for the club, but there's nothing to it, because no-one's come out and acknowledged it.  Don't you think Caro or Sheahan would be onto it if there was a story?  Of course they would.
Have they though?  No.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 06:16:09 PM
You can believe what you like Moi, i believe it to be true.
How else would you have liked the club to have handled the situation?

Well i would have thought March is out of line.

I have seen Board members/Administration staff try and make suggestions to coaching staff at other football clubs on match day and it isnt taken too well at all.

March has a job and he should stick to that.
As I said, just rumour, so flogging a dead horse wouldn't you think  :gotigers
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 06:17:14 PM
You can believe what you like Moi, i believe it to be true.
How else would you have liked the club to have handled the situation?

Very SIMPLE. Keep imbeciles out of the room at half time and it wouldnt have happened. Presidents of any football clubs shouldnt be involved in football matters.
We don't know what happened - it's just rumour Jack.
I realise you want to make a federal case due to your hate for the club, but there's nothing to it, because no-one's come out and acknowledged it.  Don't you think Caro or Sheahan would be onto it if there was a story?  Of course they would.
Have they though?  No.


Can tell you that they all ran for cover during the week when the press got word.  The press were on to it.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 06:19:25 PM
Hey Moi, its no rumour either.
Alex McDonald who is Jakes manager went into damage control this week, ;)
Jake wasnt allowed to speak to the press either, funny about that
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 06:23:45 PM
Hey Moi, its no rumour either.
Alex McDonald who is Jakes manager went into damage control this week, ;)
Jake wasnt allowed to speak to the press either, funny about that
That wouldn't stop the press, Jack
How naive  ::)
And even if it's true, the club handled it perfectly IMO.
So what's your beef?
According to you Wallace needs all the help he can get, so any intervention from March you'd reckond would be good wouldn't it  :lol
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 06:30:08 PM
Hey Moi, its no rumour either.
Alex McDonald who is Jakes manager went into damage control this week, ;)
Jake wasnt allowed to speak to the press either, funny about that
That wouldn't stop the press, Jack
How naive  ::)
And even if it's true, the club handled it perfectly IMO.
So what's your beef?
According to you Wallace needs all the help he can get, so any intervention from March you'd reckond would be good wouldn't it  :lol


You would have to be joking. Having March talk to players about footy matters , what next, thats why the RFC  are a JOKE.
You will probably suggest that we have all your new found friend on the board have a helping hand as well :banghead :banghead

IF Wallet had ANY balls, he would tell March and others not to advise players at all, I find it unbelievable that March is even allowed in the rooms at half time
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 06:31:23 PM
Jake was approached , a no comment was his words
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 03, 2008, 06:31:30 PM
Hey Moi, its no rumour either.
Alex McDonald who is Jakes manager went into damage control this week, ;)
Jake wasnt allowed to speak to the press either, funny about that

lets hope then his hammy ;) injury puts him on the long term injury list and we promote collard!

moi, leave sexy jack alone!  you really have a dig at him on here, did he reject you once apon a time?

alot of tension on this forum, i think people on here should get out more

tigermonk! your tops ;)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 06:40:20 PM
moi, leave sexy jack alone!  you really have a dig at him on here, did he reject you once apon a time?
:rollin
Jack's quite capable of responding doesn't need your sympathy
And we don't need the other kind of comments - well, most of us are mature enough not to stoop to that old boring routine  :lol
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 03, 2008, 06:41:29 PM
ouch

there is a cat in the house
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: cub on July 03, 2008, 06:45:19 PM
rofllolslagginoffwhocaresiwanttowin  :rollin :gotigers
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: mightytiges on July 03, 2008, 06:46:52 PM
Excuse was given as a hamstring :lol  Quickest Recovery from a hamstring ever :lol
Did Jake build a time machine too Jack as he did his hammy before the Melbourne game  ;). The Carlton game was his first game back since the Adelaide game. A 3 week gap. Pretty standard for a hammy wouldn't you think. He also had a bandage around his thigh in the rehab group at training in that time.

So if the rumour was true it would have had to have been between an injured player in a suit and a Prez in a suit in an incident that had nothing to do with the actual team playing on the back of a 8.7 quarter. Very strange!  
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 06:48:13 PM
Excuse was given as a hamstring :lol  Quickest Recovery from a hamstring ever :lol
Did Jake build a time machine too Jack as he did his hammy before the Melbourne game  ;). The Carlton game was his first game back since the Adelaide game. A 3 week gap. Pretty standard for a hammy wouldn't you think. He also had a bandage around his thigh in the rehab group at training in that time.

So if the rumour was true it would have had to have been between an injured player in a suit and a Prez in a suit in an incident that had nothing to do with the actual team playing on the back of a 8.7 quarter. Very strange!  

Touche methinks  :thumbsup  :rollin
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: TFL on July 03, 2008, 07:02:29 PM
I never said Jake was playing in the game.

Facts are that Jake grabbed March by the throat and held him agains the wall.

Jake told him to keep his nose out of it with a few expletives thrown in there also.

He also told March that next time he wouldnt threaten him he would belt him.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 03, 2008, 07:04:32 PM
I never said Jake was playing in the game.

Facts are that Jake grabbed March by the throat and held him agains the wall.

Jake told him to keep his nose out of it with a few expletives thrown in there also.

He also told March that next time he wouldnt threaten him he would belt him.

i think jake would win the fight

but imo, both should be kicked out of the club
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 07:06:27 PM
I never said Jake was playing in the game.

Facts are that Jake grabbed March by the throat and held him agains the wall.

Jake told him to keep his nose out of it with a few expletives thrown in there also.

He also told March that next time he wouldnt threaten him he would belt him.

Touche methinks
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 07:08:21 PM
Gary March = fighting machine. :lol :lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 07:09:55 PM
Excuse was given as a hamstring :lol  Quickest Recovery from a hamstring ever :lol
Did Jake build a time machine too Jack as he did his hammy before the Melbourne game  ;). The Carlton game was his first game back since the Adelaide game. A 3 week gap. Pretty standard for a hammy wouldn't you think. He also had a bandage around his thigh in the rehab group at training in that time.

So if the rumour was true it would have had to have been between an injured player in a suit and a Prez in a suit in an incident that had nothing to do with the actual team playing on the back of a 8.7 quarter. Very strange!  


MT , how many players were in rehab last tuesday week and played on saturday ? I actually watch training too you know. ::)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 07:10:10 PM
I never said Jake was playing in the game.

Facts are that Jake grabbed March by the throat and held him agains the wall.

Jake told him to keep his nose out of it with a few expletives thrown in there also.

He also told March that next time he wouldnt threaten him he would belt him.
Facts are they now  :lol  And why would the media keep quiet about something like this if true lol
Jake got what he deserved whether he threatened the bootstudder or the president.

You're trying to beat something up that nobody GAF about  :rollin
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 07:12:03 PM
well you do, you keep replying to this thread :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
I think its comedy RFC style at its best, nothing surprises me at punt road anymore :lol
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Moi on July 03, 2008, 07:13:33 PM
well you do, you keep replying to this thread :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
I think its comedy RFC style at its best, nothing surprises me at punt road anymore :lol
I'm replying cos I luv annoying you two  ;D
I do it pretty good I reckon  :lol
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: cub on July 03, 2008, 07:15:50 PM
And someone here would take over the chief clown position if they could  :rollin rofllmao@howmuch u ppl seem to h8 tiges - in make believe land  ??? :cheers :help :santa :birthday :gotigers
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: cub on July 03, 2008, 07:19:56 PM
u know if it is all true, my feeling and I think those of most would be the president stays the f out of the game time part of footy - I could go on but would just be speculating on the merits of this thread.

If we were sucessful everyone could have thier 2 bobs - BUT WE AREN'T - faark I H8 this ship
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: mightytiges on July 03, 2008, 08:10:52 PM
Excuse was given as a hamstring :lol  Quickest Recovery from a hamstring ever :lol
Did Jake build a time machine too Jack as he did his hammy before the Melbourne game  ;). The Carlton game was his first game back since the Adelaide game. A 3 week gap. Pretty standard for a hammy wouldn't you think. He also had a bandage around his thigh in the rehab group at training in that time.

So if the rumour was true it would have had to have been between an injured player in a suit and a Prez in a suit in an incident that had nothing to do with the actual team playing on the back of a 8.7 quarter. Very strange!  


MT , how many players were in rehab last tuesday week and played on saturday ? I actually watch training too you know. ::)
So where did you sit at training last tuesday week? You would've liked the questions we asked Miller lol.

You're surely not saying Kingy wore a bandage around his thigh for the best part of 3 weeks and remained in rehab just to kill a story :rollin. Kingy shouldn't have played. He wasn't match-fit and should have comeback via Coburg. Most of those that were in rehab and played shouldn't have. If there wasn't the break they probably wouldn't have  ::).

TFL I'm not having a go at you. Just saying Kingy did his hammy before the Melbourne game unlike what was suggested. As you know Kingy and Schulz didn't train at Coburg even though they were named to play for the Burgers. They obviously knew Thursty wasn't playing and King was in even though they still named Thursty in the side ::).
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: 2JD on July 03, 2008, 08:38:23 PM
u know if it is all true, my feeling and I think those of most would be the president stays the f out of the game time part of footy - I could go on but would just be speculating on the merits of this thread.
While I too think the president should keep his nose out of footy business, who the hell does Jake King think he is threatening anyone like that? Maybe he should keep his aggro for the field and let the people who should be dealing with the pres work things out.
At the risk of offending 'sexy Jack'  :lol Gary March being a fighting machine is neither here nor there, he shouldnt need to be at his own club
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 08:39:46 PM
MT, the geniuses at punt road, named Schulz and and emerg although he was ruled out for the weekend, now thats smart.
As for Miller, you should of asked him what he was going to do for employment in 2009 ::)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 08:41:21 PM
u know if it is all true, my feeling and I think those of most would be the president stays the f out of the game time part of footy - I could go on but would just be speculating on the merits of this thread.
While I too think the president should keep his nose out of footy business, who the hell does Jake King think he is threatening anyone like that? Maybe he should keep his aggro for the field and let the people who should be dealing with the pres work things out.
At the risk of offending 'sexy Jack'  :lol Gary March being a fighting machine is neither here nor there, he shouldnt need to be at his own club


I was joking, Gary March couldnt punch a hole in a wet paper bag :lol
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: 2JD on July 03, 2008, 08:57:27 PM
u know if it is all true, my feeling and I think those of most would be the president stays the f out of the game time part of footy - I could go on but would just be speculating on the merits of this thread.
While I too think the president should keep his nose out of footy business, who the hell does Jake King think he is threatening anyone like that? Maybe he should keep his aggro for the field and let the people who should be dealing with the pres work things out.
At the risk of offending 'sexy Jack'  :lol Gary March being a fighting machine is neither here nor there, he shouldnt need to be at his own club


I was joking, Gary March couldnt punch a hole in a wet paper bag :lol
I know young Jack, i was saying he shouldnt need to  :)
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Ramps on July 03, 2008, 09:05:28 PM
farcical thread imho lol @ 3 clubs chasing King lol.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 09:17:11 PM
farcical thread imho lol @ 3 clubs chasing King lol.

I heard there were 2 clubs, Carlton and Essendon :shh
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: rogerd3 on July 03, 2008, 11:26:46 PM
farcical thread imho lol @ 3 clubs chasing King lol.

I heard there were 2 clubs, Carlton and Essendon :shh

just upgrade to a better model, that has his witts about him in a pressure situation, something Jake lacks.
all sausage no sizzle wont bring us want we want, dont you think.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 03, 2008, 11:42:00 PM
another Tim Flemming
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Infamy on July 04, 2008, 01:03:04 AM
another Tim Flemming
Absolute garbage, Tim Fleming was a complete dud, shocking disposal, not fast, just hard at it
King has shown more in one season than Fleming did in his career
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Fishfinger on July 04, 2008, 09:53:40 AM

As for Miller, you should of asked him what he was going to do for employment in 2009 ::)
Is he planning on leaving?
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Ramps on July 04, 2008, 10:01:46 AM
I dont think Jake King is a long term answer for us, thats why I find it hard to believe that 2 or 3 clubs would be interested in him.

On the other hand, I know that Carlton and Essendon continue to be interested in Chris Newman.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Infamy on July 04, 2008, 03:04:24 PM
I dont think Jake King is a long term answer for us, thats why I find it hard to believe that 2 or 3 clubs would be interested in him.
I find it amazing that for so long one of the main things we've lacked from the side is a bit of mongrel, now we've got some in King and people want to get rid of him.
I think he's great and hope we hang on to him, we have plenty of medium sized defenders and none to take the smalls, we need a bloke like King, he is super quick, takes the game on, tough as nails, definitely a long term spot for him if he wants it. He may not have Luke Hodge like disposal, but it's not terrible, he makes the odd mistake but he's young and new to the elite level so he can still learn.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Tigermonk on July 04, 2008, 03:21:32 PM
Jake King aint young  :lol
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Francois Jackson on July 04, 2008, 03:28:24 PM
i cant believe when poo hits the fan u turn to jakey king of all people.

how about looking at our captain FFS.

the joke starts with him..
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 04, 2008, 05:06:43 PM

As for Miller, you should of asked him what he was going to do for employment in 2009 ::)
Is he planning on leaving?

Its called Lemon and Sarse,
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 04, 2008, 05:12:43 PM
jakey "try hard" king will not be at richmond next year  :shh

he is just an angry version of rodan
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: TFL on July 04, 2008, 05:24:03 PM
Nice try X  :shh  :rollin
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Fishfinger on July 04, 2008, 08:49:08 PM

As for Miller, you should of asked him what he was going to do for employment in 2009 ::)
Is he planning on leaving?

Its called Lemon and Sbehind,
I've got no info one way or the other but I reckon he'll be Director of Football at Richmond Football Club in 2009.
Should we bookmark it?
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: shannon on July 04, 2008, 08:59:59 PM
Nice try X  :shh  :rollin

you seriously have issues
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: jackstar on July 04, 2008, 09:05:03 PM

As for Miller, you should of asked him what he was going to do for employment in 2009 ::)
Is he planning on leaving?

Its called Lemon and Sbehind,
I've got no info one way or the other but I reckon he'll be Director of Football at Richmond Football Club in 2009.
Should we bookmark it?


YEP< BOOKMARK IT, he will be shown the door.
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: Infamy on July 04, 2008, 10:27:01 PM
Jake King aint young  :lol
Well 23-24 is hardly old, he's also inexperienced in AFL term so needs at least another season to adjust to the level around the 50 game mark
Title: Re: Was Jake King really injured?
Post by: 2JD on July 05, 2008, 05:13:19 PM
Jake King aint young  :lol
Well 23-24 is hardly old, he's also inexperienced in AFL term so needs at least another season to adjust to the level around the 50 game mark
Im with you infamy, we finally get a little bit of mongrel and people want him out, I'd much rather Jake King who tries hard and makes mistakes than Captain Kane who should be well past making mistakes. I see absolutely nothing wrong with an angry Rodan :gotigers